Moderators: peeker643, swerb, yogi
by FUDU » Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:50 pm
by swerb » Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:52 pm
by skatingtripods » Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:34 pm
Swerb wrote:Dude is amazing. We're witnessing the most dominant individual talent in sports history, at the pinnacle of his prime.
by pup » Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:10 pm
by DarNoor » Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:55 am
Skating Tripods wrote:Swerb wrote:Dude is amazing. We're witnessing the most dominant individual talent in sports history, at the pinnacle of his prime.I could make a compelling argument for Lance Armstrong here.
by davemanddd » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:43 am
by pup » Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:23 pm
davemanddd wrote:this is what seperates tiger from lebron james. lebron misses potential game-winning shots, like against washington just last week, while tiger sinks them like he's got ice water in his veins. if lebron wants to win the mvp this year, he can start by making a couple of game-winning shots at the buzzer.
by FUDU » Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:48 pm
No way. Armstrong dominated ONE race. That is it. Tiger wins all over the world, against all types of competetion. It doesn't matter who the competetion is, he wins. It doesn't matter what course he plays, he wins. Armstrong isn't even in the same galaxy as Tiger.
by DarNoor » Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:54 pm
by FUDU » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:51 pm
by leadpipe » Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:20 pm
by Brendan » Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:39 pm
by Lubber » Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:42 pm
Brendan wrote:He's the greatest golfer of all time. That's as far as I'm willing to go. His sport is decidedly less athletic, and physically demanding than football, baseball, basketball, hockey, soccer, volleyball, tennis, etc. My 82 year old great-uncle is a better golfer than I am, but NOT a better athlete. Don't get me wrong - I LOVE to play golf. But to call Tiger a better overall athlete that LeBron, Josh Cribbs, Grady, etc. is a bit skewed.
Return to The 19th Hole
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests