Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by skatingtripods » Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:09 pm
by Adverb Harry » Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:38 pm
by gotribe31 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:09 pm

by bookelly » Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:17 pm
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:24 am
by pup » Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:50 am
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:35 am
pup wrote:Problem is, has to be for Miller since he is the most MLB ready. Hard to sell a trade for he future before end of ST after this off season.
One of the pitchers and Taveras? Now I am interested.
by pup » Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:03 am
skatingtripods wrote:pup wrote:Problem is, has to be for Miller since he is the most MLB ready. Hard to sell a trade for he future before end of ST after this off season.
Rosenthal was dominant as a reliever in 2012. Not sure if it'll translate to being a starter, but he's certainly MLB-ready.
That's why in my article, I suggested that the Indians trade Cabrera with a bullpen arm to make sure STL is willing to give up Rosenthal as one of the pieces.
A base of a deal with one of the two is fine with me. Add a little more to package if Rosenthal.One of the pitchers and Taveras? Now I am interested.
Taveras would be an incredible pick up, but he's probably the only untouchable STL prospect.
Two of the pitchers plus something else also works. Three pitchers and I'm ecstatic.
by gotribe31 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:30 am

by leadpipe » Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:56 am
bookelly wrote:With the re-emergence of Kasmir, I don't think we really need to look for SP just yet.
by WiscTribeFan » Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:01 am
bookelly wrote:With the re-emergence of Kasmir, I don't think we really need to look for SP just yet.
by WiscTribeFan » Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:34 pm
by pup » Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:57 pm
gotribe31 wrote:They're not trading Taveras. Let alone Taveras + something else.
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:01 pm
by pup » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:04 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I'd happily trade Cabrera for pitching. Shame that the Cardinals don't appear interested and want to go with Pete Kozma or some other schlub. Whatever.
Pup, why wouldn't you do it? It's no different than Choo for Bauer. 1 year for 6 years. If the Indians got any of STL's top pitching talent, it'd be 2 years of Cabrera for 6 years of Shelby Miller/5 of Trevor Rosenthal/6 of whoever else.
It's a moot point, I'm just curious.
by peeker643 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:12 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I'd happily trade Cabrera for pitching. Shame that the Cardinals don't appear interested and want to go with Pete Kozma or some other schlub. Whatever.
Pup, why wouldn't you do it? It's no different than Choo for Bauer. 1 year for 6 years. If the Indians got any of STL's top pitching talent, it'd be 2 years of Cabrera for 6 years of Shelby Miller/5 of Trevor Rosenthal/6 of whoever else.
It's a moot point, I'm just curious.
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:13 pm
pup wrote:1. Bauer for Choo was before going nuts with Swisher and Bourn. You have a fan base interested for this first time in a while. To revert back to trading away good players for prospects will turn some off.
2. Asdrubal >> Choo, IMO
I think we fleeced Zona/Cinci in that deal. I do not think anything short of fleecing St. Louis is worth the negative impact to the fan base.
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:23 pm
peeker643 wrote:Assuming you're okay going with Aviles in a year where you believe the Indians can potentially challenge for a playoff spot, why wouldn't the Cardinals consider doing the same thing with another Aviles-like SS as opposed to dealing big time prospects for Asdrubal Cabrera?
by peeker643 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:30 pm
skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Assuming you're okay going with Aviles in a year where you believe the Indians can potentially challenge for a playoff spot, why wouldn't the Cardinals consider doing the same thing with another Aviles-like SS as opposed to dealing big time prospects for Asdrubal Cabrera?
I could write a lengthy blurb about the Cabrera to Aviles gap and how much it would cost us. Yes, I think it would make an impact this season and it's a definite downgrade. Which I'd live with at the expense of getting some starting pitching.
Because they'd have Cabrera for next year too? They were making a play for Cabrera at the Winter Meetings. Andrus as well. Clearly, they think SS is an organizational need, even before the Furcal injury. If they were so inclined, I think they could sign Cabrera to an extension and he'd be cheaper than Andrus.
If they can find an Aviles-type guy, who plays above average defense and can hit a little, then, that's the route they'll go. Don't let Kozma's small sample size in MLB last year fool you, he had a .236/.308/.344/.652 slash in over 2700 plate appearances in the minors.
I understand why STL wouldn't do it. Frankly, they're not as good as Cincinnati and I don't know if they can beat the Braves or Giants/Dodgers for a wild card spot. They're better off keeping the arms and retooling the rotation.
But that should never stop the Indians from asking and finding out if they'll overpay.
by gotribe31 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:37 pm
pup wrote:skatingtripods wrote:I'd happily trade Cabrera for pitching. Shame that the Cardinals don't appear interested and want to go with Pete Kozma or some other schlub. Whatever.
Pup, why wouldn't you do it? It's no different than Choo for Bauer. 1 year for 6 years. If the Indians got any of STL's top pitching talent, it'd be 2 years of Cabrera for 6 years of Shelby Miller/5 of Trevor Rosenthal/6 of whoever else.
It's a moot point, I'm just curious.
1. Bauer for Choo was before going nuts with Swisher and Bourn. You have a fan base interested for this first time in a while. To revert back to trading away good players for prospects will turn some off.
2. Asdrubal >> Choo, IMO
I think we fleeced Zona/Cinci in that deal. I do not think anything short of fleecing St. Louis is worth the negative impact to the fan base.

by pup » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:50 pm
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:00 pm
pup wrote:Adam - Why do you have to go the bandwagon fan route? It really cheapens an otherwise very strong position and post. Fans should not be required to follow shit. They may decide to, but you are not a bandwagon fan for getting sick of the same old crap year after year...then responding positively when the team does the work required to reengage the fans.
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:06 pm
peeker643 wrote:I doubt it has stopped the Indians from asking. But I believe the Cardinals are likely more comfortable for now in keeping that pitching and bridging the SS gap. I'd not be comfortable with Kozma either if I was them, but there are players out there with lower acquisition costs than Cabrera's, in all likelihood.
The Tribe should knock on the door and make their pitch. I just would expect the Cardinals to close the door on them rather quickly.
by motherscratcher » Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:52 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:16 pm
motherscratcher wrote:I'm with Pup in that I'd be willing to move Asdrubal only if we get a knockout offer. Other than that I think you roll with the team on the field. But I think Tripod's point is that the Cards may be ripe for fleecing right now.
Bottom line is, while dropping Cabrera to Aviles is a definite and obvious downgrade, I have trouble believing that it would be the difference between World Series Champs and Also Rans when considering the rotation we will enter the season with. Cabrera has a value, and if StL is willing to overpay, then y have to do it. Despite the exiting and welcome spending spree that we just went on, we still aren't the Yankees and continually being on the right side of deals, ala TB, has the best chance to bear fruit.
Also, I highly recommend that when reading the name Furcal, you pronounce it in your head as if it rhymes with Urkel. You won't regret it. Very enjoyable.
Raphael Furkel
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:18 pm
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:40 pm
peeker643 wrote:If the Cardinals want to do that, fine. Take all you can get. But to think they will? Not sure why they'd even entertain the thought.
by motherscratcher » Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:07 pm
yourself donkey dicknose.
by 1Perry » Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:08 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:09 pm
motherscratcher wrote:donkey dicknose.

by motherscratcher » Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:01 pm
by peeker643 » Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:00 am
motherscratcher wrote:Searching for a goofy insult that first thin that popped into my head for some reason was donkey dick. But that's not really an insult is it? So I just added nose onto the end and called it a day.
)
by Dnthateonthepronk » Sat Mar 09, 2013 2:34 pm
by dazindiansfanuk » Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:33 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:I think they want to upgrade Furcal but dont want to pay the price to do it. It could be possible that they are willing to pay a high price but are just playing chicken and waiting to see if a teams blinks.
Either way Im not sure Asdrubal would end up in St Louis anyways. Because If I was actually going to give up a package of Miller/and or Taveras and Wacha which is what we or the front office would want for dealing Cabrera, Im calling Colorado and making a deal for Tulo not Cabrera. If im giving up that much Im getting the best player I can. Im pretty sure Colorado would have to at least listen to a deal like that on Tulo just like we would on Cabrera.
by motherscratcher » Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:45 pm
by statmasta » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:05 pm
by motherscratcher » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:10 pm
statmasta wrote:Regardless of whether or not it makes baseball sense, you just can't do it. Not with this fanbase. Not with the goodwill this FO has built this off-season. To trade Cabrera now would kill all of that.
Play out the season with Cabrera this year. With him being in better shape and having a better lineup around him, he should be able to produce all year long and hopefully avoid the second half slump. If that does happen, his value will be higher. Trade him then, after this season. Plus, Lindor/Paulino will be one year closer to the bigs, too. That's one less season we have to deal with some scrub like Aviles starting everyday. It works all the way around.
by statmasta » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:40 pm
motherscratcher wrote:statmasta wrote:Regardless of whether or not it makes baseball sense, you just can't do it. Not with this fanbase. Not with the goodwill this FO has built this off-season. To trade Cabrera now would kill all of that.
Play out the season with Cabrera this year. With him being in better shape and having a better lineup around him, he should be able to produce all year long and hopefully avoid the second half slump. If that does happen, his value will be higher. Trade him then, after this season. Plus, Lindor/Paulino will be one year closer to the bigs, too. That's one less season we have to deal with some scrub like Aviles starting everyday. It works all the way around.
Honest to God who gives a shit what the fanbase thinks? Just win. If it makes sense to make a trade then do it. If you are worried what Chuck Fucking Booms and the assholes who call his show think then I don't want you anywhere near the front office or making decisions.
by motherscratcher » Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:57 pm
statmasta wrote:motherscratcher wrote:statmasta wrote:Regardless of whether or not it makes baseball sense, you just can't do it. Not with this fanbase. Not with the goodwill this FO has built this off-season. To trade Cabrera now would kill all of that.
Play out the season with Cabrera this year. With him being in better shape and having a better lineup around him, he should be able to produce all year long and hopefully avoid the second half slump. If that does happen, his value will be higher. Trade him then, after this season. Plus, Lindor/Paulino will be one year closer to the bigs, too. That's one less season we have to deal with some scrub like Aviles starting everyday. It works all the way around.
Honest to God who gives a shit what the fanbase thinks? Just win. If it makes sense to make a trade then do it. If you are worried what Chuck Fucking Booms and the assholes who call his show think then I don't want you anywhere near the front office or making decisions.
Ownership cares. Happy fans = ticket sales
And trading Cabrera wouldn't help them win this year. And that's what ownership wants right now, to win this year....or at least they want to win enough to sell plenty of tickets. Obviously nobody expects a championship, but they don't want the stadium empty anymore.
They won't trade Cabrera.
by statmasta » Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:11 pm
motherscratcher wrote:statmasta wrote:motherscratcher wrote:statmasta wrote:Regardless of whether or not it makes baseball sense, you just can't do it. Not with this fanbase. Not with the goodwill this FO has built this off-season. To trade Cabrera now would kill all of that.
Play out the season with Cabrera this year. With him being in better shape and having a better lineup around him, he should be able to produce all year long and hopefully avoid the second half slump. If that does happen, his value will be higher. Trade him then, after this season. Plus, Lindor/Paulino will be one year closer to the bigs, too. That's one less season we have to deal with some scrub like Aviles starting everyday. It works all the way around.
Honest to God who gives a shit what the fanbase thinks? Just win. If it makes sense to make a trade then do it. If you are worried what Chuck Fucking Booms and the assholes who call his show think then I don't want you anywhere near the front office or making decisions.
Ownership cares. Happy fans = ticket sales
And trading Cabrera wouldn't help them win this year. And that's what ownership wants right now, to win this year....or at least they want to win enough to sell plenty of tickets. Obviously nobody expects a championship, but they don't want the stadium empty anymore.
They won't trade Cabrera.
What the FO will do and what they should do are different arguments. It's easy to say that they won't trade Cabrera. That's a pretty likely conclusion in any scenario. The odds that he will be dealt is very small in any circumstance. But to say that he won't be dealt because Antonetti is afraid of the fans reaction is ridiculous.
Just as it's ridiculous to suggest that all of the good will this FO has garnered this offseason will evaporate immediately if Cabrera was shipped in a great deal. It won't. Not if they win. And if they don't, then it won't matter anyway.
But, what I was reacting to mostly was the statement "Regardless of whether or not it makes baseball sense, you just can't do it." That is the same as saying "The Indians shouldn't do something that makes them better because the they are afraid some fans will be mad." This front office has never given any indication they give a single solitary crap what the fans think is the right move baseball wise. Nor should they.
And if they do I want a new front office.
by peeker643 » Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:34 pm
by statmasta » Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:53 pm
peeker643 wrote:People here value Cabrera beyond what he's actually worth. That doesn't surprise me at all except for the fact they watch him every year and watch him get fat, complacent and lazy pretty much the middle of July every year.
He's a good ball player. He's not a premier player offensively or defensively. If you think he's more than that then there ain't much more of a conversation to have.
Again, you see it every year. Check with the numbers guys if ya don't trust the eyes.
by skatingtripods » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:58 pm
peeker643 wrote:People here value Cabrera beyond what he's actually worth. That doesn't surprise me at all except for the fact they watch him every year and watch him get fat, complacent and lazy pretty much the middle of July every year.
He's a good ball player. He's not a premier player offensively or defensively. If you think he's more than that then there ain't much more of a conversation to have.
Again, you see it every year. Check with the numbers guys if ya don't trust the eyes.
by leadpipe » Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:52 pm
by bookelly » Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:11 am
leadpipe wrote:Happy fans don't equal ticket sales nearly as much as winning does.
And I would add - exactly what fan base are you risking pissing off? Cause the select few that showed up to games last year always show up to the games.
The bandwagonners that you draw from winning wouldn't know Asbrubal Cabrera (Let alone the guys they get in trade) if he came up and puched them in the zipper.
Jeezus, how many poeple outside of close family and friends are gonna say, "If ACab is not on the team, no way in holy hell I suppost those bastards..."
An organization that makes on the field baseball decisions catering to fans is a bad organization.
by motherscratcher » Sun Mar 10, 2013 10:53 am
by leadpipe » Sun Mar 10, 2013 1:17 pm
bookelly wrote:leadpipe wrote:Happy fans don't equal ticket sales nearly as much as winning does.
And I would add - exactly what fan base are you risking pissing off? Cause the select few that showed up to games last year always show up to the games.
The bandwagonners that you draw from winning wouldn't know Asbrubal Cabrera (Let alone the guys they get in trade) if he came up and puched them in the zipper.
Jeezus, how many poeple outside of close family and friends are gonna say, "If ACab is not on the team, no way in holy hell I suppost those bastards..."
An organization that makes on the field baseball decisions catering to fans is a bad organization.
That's like saying a politician that makes decisions based on his electorate is a bad politician. Every pro sports organization has to take into account the reaction of it's fan base. They are after all in business to sell tickets. To endager the goodwill built-up this offseason by trading Droobs would certainly be a PR blow.
And would instantly kill any sort of chemistry this team has been building this ST.
by statmasta » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:25 pm
motherscratcher wrote:They are not politicians Boo.
If the Tribe trades Asdrubal and wins, people will come.
If the Tribe keeps Asdrubal and they lose, people will stay home.
Chemistry comes from winning.
by statmasta » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:26 pm
leadpipe wrote:bookelly wrote:leadpipe wrote:Happy fans don't equal ticket sales nearly as much as winning does.
And I would add - exactly what fan base are you risking pissing off? Cause the select few that showed up to games last year always show up to the games.
The bandwagonners that you draw from winning wouldn't know Asbrubal Cabrera (Let alone the guys they get in trade) if he came up and puched them in the zipper.
Jeezus, how many poeple outside of close family and friends are gonna say, "If ACab is not on the team, no way in holy hell I suppost those bastards..."
An organization that makes on the field baseball decisions catering to fans is a bad organization.
That's like saying a politician that makes decisions based on his electorate is a bad politician. Every pro sports organization has to take into account the reaction of it's fan base. They are after all in business to sell tickets. To endager the goodwill built-up this offseason by trading Droobs would certainly be a PR blow.
And would instantly kill any sort of chemistry this team has been building this ST.
This is really, really simple.
With very few exceptions, if you win, you draw. If you lose, you don't.
They trade Asdrubal, and are in the pennant race late, they'll draw. If they stink, they could damn near have September be "Hand Job Month" and they'd struggle to draw a crowd. Adrubal or no Addrubal.
Christ, it's like Asdrubal is to Cleveland what Cal Ripken was to Baltimore.
by statmasta » Sun Mar 10, 2013 2:30 pm
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: andrew6586, bookelly, British_Pharaoh, Dnthateonthepronk, gameface and 2 guests