Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by Hikohadon » Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:51 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:13 pm
by motherscratcher » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:23 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:35 pm

by peeker643 » Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:48 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Anytime you can draft a guy with 4.5 a half career sacks....
by leadpipe » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:27 am
by bookelly » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:58 am
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:10 am
bookelly wrote:There needs to be some metric where guys who do mock drafts get graded not only on the accuracy of their drafts, but the actual effectiveness of their high ranked players over the years.
Because otherwise; it's just fools who strut and fret themselves upon the stage, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
by bookelly » Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:49 am
Hikohadon wrote:bookelly wrote:There needs to be some metric where guys who do mock drafts get graded not only on the accuracy of their drafts, but the actual effectiveness of their high ranked players over the years.
Because otherwise; it's just fools who strut and fret themselves upon the stage, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Can these guys not predict who the teams will pick without agreeing with said picks? If you look at some of their boards/player rankings, they are much different than where they predict the players to be taken.
For instance, I don't think anyone has Geno Smith as the best player available in the draft, but no one would be shocked to see KC take him anyway. If Al Davis were still alive, they'd have some physical phreak that can't play a lick of football going to him, and they'd probably be right.
I think they should be graded on the accuracy of their predictions, sure. But I don't think they should be responsible for the outcome of the players unless they were mocking how THEY would pick if they were each of the teams.
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:07 am
Hikohadon wrote:For instance, I don't think anyone has Geno Smith as the best player available in the draft, but no one would be shocked to see KC take him anyway.

by scott » Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:37 am
by scott » Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:39 am
bookelly wrote:Hikohadon wrote:bookelly wrote:There needs to be some metric where guys who do mock drafts get graded not only on the accuracy of their drafts, but the actual effectiveness of their high ranked players over the years.
Because otherwise; it's just fools who strut and fret themselves upon the stage, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Can these guys not predict who the teams will pick without agreeing with said picks? If you look at some of their boards/player rankings, they are much different than where they predict the players to be taken.
For instance, I don't think anyone has Geno Smith as the best player available in the draft, but no one would be shocked to see KC take him anyway. If Al Davis were still alive, they'd have some physical phreak that can't play a lick of football going to him, and they'd probably be right.
I think they should be graded on the accuracy of their predictions, sure. But I don't think they should be responsible for the outcome of the players unless they were mocking how THEY would pick if they were each of the teams.
Fair enough. I just hope for a more perfect world where decisions and judgement are dictated by a compu
*ERROR CODE 243*
by Gradysmanldy » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:31 pm
by Prosecutor » Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:48 pm
bookelly wrote:There needs to be some metric where guys who do mock drafts get graded...
Because otherwise; it's just fools who strut and fret themselves upon the stage, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:41 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Hikohadon wrote:For instance, I don't think anyone has Geno Smith as the best player available in the draft, but no one would be shocked to see KC take him anyway.
I would. First pick of the new Reid era, I'm not entirely sure he'll want to attach his wagon to a question mark like Geno.
Now Oakland and Philadelphia on the other hand...

by peeker643 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:57 pm
Prosecutor wrote:bookelly wrote:There needs to be some metric where guys who do mock drafts get graded...
Because otherwise; it's just fools who strut and fret themselves upon the stage, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Being a strutting fool upon the stage is not a bad gig - those guys get paid pretty well just for having an opinion.
Actually, they do provide a service. Since I am not able to watch hundreds of college football games, it helps to have people with NFL contacts who can at least provide a list of the draftable players and a semi-accurate ranking of where they probably will go. It at least gives us some names to research and discuss if you're into that.
For example, I'm not a BYU fan and never heard of Ziggy Ansah. He sounds like Jason Pierre-Paul when he came out; an athletic freak who was considered a boom/bust prospect IIRC. With Horton's love for "big guys who can run" he might just be lobbying feverishly for him, 4.5 career sacks notwithstanding.
by Prosecutor » Fri Feb 08, 2013 5:09 pm
by Nicastro13 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:03 pm
by pup » Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:09 pm
One NFL personnel evaluator characterized BYU DE Ziggy Ansah as a "one-year wonder" and a "tweener."
"If a guy has length, some twitch and a motor, people think it’s Jason Pierre-Paul," the scout told Pro Football Weekly. "He ain’t. Otherwise, they wouldn’t align him inside so much. He’s a one-year wonder and a tweener. ... Put on the bowl game. He was getting pushed down the field and a ball was thrown at his chest and he intercepts it. He fell into it — he didn’t create it. That’s how he produced this year." Ansah is perhaps this year's most polarizing draft-eligible prospect.
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:42 pm
Nicastro13 wrote:Kiper has us taking Werner FSU and McShay has Mingo LSU
I'm personally hoping we go OLB in free agency and Millner Falls to us
by Prosecutor » Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:02 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Nicastro13 wrote:Kiper has us taking Werner FSU and McShay has Mingo LSU
I'm personally hoping we go OLB in free agency and Millner Falls to us
Are there any OLB's worth having in FA? I haven't checked yet.
by Gradysmanldy » Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:03 pm
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:43 pm
Rush Linebackers
Paul Kruger
Anthony Spencer
Connor Barwin
Shaun Phillips
Victor Butler
Antwan Barnes
Bryan Thomas
Quentin Groves
Erik Walden
Shawne Merriman
Travis LaBoy
Chris Wilson
Jamaal Westerman
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 08, 2013 9:42 pm
pup wrote:One NFL personnel evaluator characterized BYU DE Ziggy Ansah as a "one-year wonder" and a "tweener."
"If a guy has length, some twitch and a motor, people think it’s Jason Pierre-Paul," the scout told Pro Football Weekly. "He ain’t. Otherwise, they wouldn’t align him inside so much. He’s a one-year wonder and a tweener. ... Put on the bowl game. He was getting pushed down the field and a ball was thrown at his chest and he intercepts it. He fell into it — he didn’t create it. That’s how he produced this year." Ansah is perhaps this year's most polarizing draft-eligible prospect.
by pup » Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:01 pm

by pod2dawg » Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:51 pm
by FUDU » Sun Feb 10, 2013 7:59 pm
leadpipe wrote:Geno Smith projected #1?
Any of these guys watch football?
by leadpipe » Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:15 am
FUDU wrote:leadpipe wrote:Geno Smith projected #1?
Any of these guys watch football?
But somebody needs to have dibs on the next RG3, even though RG3 really hasn't become RG3 just yet.
by justmebd » Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:35 am
leadpipe wrote:FUDU wrote:leadpipe wrote:Geno Smith projected #1?
Any of these guys watch football?
But somebody needs to have dibs on the next RG3, even though RG3 really hasn't become RG3 just yet.
Except that Geno Smith reminds nobody of RG3.
He's more Weeden than RG3.
Seriously.
by Hikohadon » Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:27 am
FUDU wrote:leadpipe wrote:Geno Smith projected #1?
Any of these guys watch football?
But somebody needs to have dibs on the next RG3, even though RG3 really hasn't become RG3 just yet.
by Hikohadon » Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:28 am
justmebd wrote:leadpipe wrote:FUDU wrote:leadpipe wrote:Geno Smith projected #1?
Any of these guys watch football?
But somebody needs to have dibs on the next RG3, even though RG3 really hasn't become RG3 just yet.
Except that Geno Smith reminds nobody of RG3.
He's more Weeden than RG3.
Seriously.
How dare you insult Mike Holmgren's favorite QB on these very boards!!! Look at those stats . . . . no wait, look at that poise . . . no wait . . . Look at the . . . uhhh . . . Hey!! Look, A Squirrel!!!
by Gradysmanldy » Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:53 am
Hikohadon wrote:justmebd wrote:leadpipe wrote:FUDU wrote:leadpipe wrote:Geno Smith projected #1?
Any of these guys watch football?
But somebody needs to have dibs on the next RG3, even though RG3 really hasn't become RG3 just yet.
Except that Geno Smith reminds nobody of RG3.
He's more Weeden than RG3.
Seriously.
How dare you insult Mike Holmgren's favorite QB on these very boards!!! Look at those stats . . . . no wait, look at that poise . . . no wait . . . Look at the . . . uhhh . . . Hey!! Look, A Squirrel!!!
That wasn't an insult, rather a statement that Geno isn't that mobile.
by Hikohadon » Mon Feb 11, 2013 12:07 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Feb 11, 2013 12:49 pm

by motherscratcher » Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:00 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Almost as hysterical as all the dufus' on here the see a black QB and compare him to RG3...
by e0y2e3 » Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:24 pm

by HoodooMan » Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:44 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I just want to know who stole Geno's extra calf muscle....
by Hikohadon » Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:20 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:27 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Finally watched some Ansah video today. Enticing, I can see why some would be willing to take the chance. Could be a real playmaker... if he can be taught to get off blocks better. Otherwise he'll get eaten alive in the NFL where he can power rush linemen into the backfield.
Because he has such limited football experience, there's certainly a chance that he could be taught that. But I don't know if a team like the Browns can afford such a boom-or-bust prospect at 6.
by jb » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:47 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Finally watched some Ansah video today. Enticing, I can see why some would be willing to take the chance. Could be a real playmaker... if he can be taught to get off blocks better. Otherwise he'll get eaten alive in the NFL where he can power rush linemen into the backfield.
Because he has such limited football experience, there's certainly a chance that he could be taught that. But I don't know if a team like the Browns can afford such a boom-or-bust prospect at 6.
Exactly right. He's a freak. But at #6?.... ehhh....not sure I have the stomach for that risk there...
Reading more about him, interesting story, apparently a bright kid and also apparently extremely receptive to coaching and working. So if he busts, he busts working hard at it. Which will still be no consolation if he busts working hard at it in an orange helmet.
by peeker643 » Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:57 am
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:42 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:26 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Here are who some mocks have the Browns taking:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nfl/news/20130124/2013-nfl-mock-draft-1/
1. KC - Luke Joeckel
2. JAX - Bjoern Werner
3. OAK - Damontre Moore
4. PHI - Geno Smith
5. DET - Jarvis Jones
6. CLE - Dee Milliner - CB - Alabama
The ex-Crimson Tide product is the cleanest cornerback on the board, with a physical style of play and the ability to both tackle and pitch in on run defense. The idea of teaming Milliner with Cleveland's other first-round cornerback, the gifted Joe Haden, is an early draft scenario that's already quite popular in northeast Ohio.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/mock
Rob Rang
1. KC - Geno Smith
2. JAX - Damontre Moore
3. OAK - Bjoern Werner
4. PHI - Luke Joeckel
5. DET - Barkevious Mingo
6. CLE - Jarvis Jones - OLB - Georgia
Dane Brugler
1. KC - Geno Smith
2. JAX - Bjoern Werner
3. OAK - Star Lotulelei
4. PHI - Luke Joeckel
5. DET - Damontre Moore
6. CLE - Dee Milliner - CB - Alabama
http://walterfootball.com/draft2013.php
1. KC - Geno Smith
2. JAX - Star Lotelelei
3. OAK - Damontre Moore
4. PHI - Luke Joeckel
5. DET - Bjoern Werner
6. CLE - Ezekiel Ansah - DE/OLB - BYU
The Browns have to find a franchise quarterback to compete for the AFC North. There are none worth taking here, however - I could be wrong, but I think I remember hearing Michael Lombardi say there was no quarterback worth taking early this year - but that's OK because they need to improve their pass rush as well. Jabaal Sheard led the team in sacks with only seven. Juqua Parker-Thomas was next with six, and he'll be a 35-year-old free agent this offseason.
It was very close for me between Ezekiel Ansah and Barkevious Mingo, but I thought about it and the former makes more sense from a scheme perspective. Lombardi learned from Bill Parcells and Bill Belichick, who both prefer larger rush linebackers. Ansah (274 pounds) dwarfs Mingo (240). He was also more productive this past season and possesses more upside, so why not Ansah?
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2013/mock-drafts/gil-brandt/155116
1. KC - Luke Joeckel
2. JAX - Bjoern Werner
3. OAK - Geno Smith
4. PHI - Chance Warmack
5. DET - Dee Milliner
6. CLE - Damontre Moore - DE - Texas A&M
The Browns need a pass rusher, so they go with the best one left on the board in Moore, who offers a ton of upside.
http://www.fftoolbox.com/nfl_draft/2013/2013-nfl-mock-draft.cfm?writer=37
1. KC - Geno Smith
2. JAX - Star Lotulelei
3. OAK - Bjoern Werner
4. PHI - Luke Joeckel
5. DET - Damontre Moore
6. CLE - Dion Jordan - DE - Oregon
The pass rush could use a play maker (middle of the pack with 38 sacks in 2012). Jabaal Sheard led the team in sacks with only seven. Bolstering the interior of the offensive line is also an area need to address in order to build their offense around Trent Richardson.
http://www.fftoolbox.com/nfl_draft/2013/2013-nfl-mock-draft.cfm?writer=10
1. KC - Luke Joeckel
2. JAX - Bjoern Werner
3. OAK - Star Lotulelei
4. PHI - Dee Milliner
5. DET - Damontre Moore
6. CLE - Jarvis Jones - OLB - Georgia
I didn't add ESPN's because fuck ESPN.
by jb » Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:06 pm
by Hikohadon » Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:20 pm
by danwismar » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:05 pm
by jb » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:22 pm
danwismar wrote:"Run the ball...stop the run" is dead.
Three things you need above all else:
1) The passer
2) the guys who protect the passer
3) the guys who rush the passer
As far as I can see, the Browns have #2 decently covered.
There doesn't appear to be an immediate solution to #1 available with the 6th pick.
So if they take anyone other than at least a partial solution to #3 in the first round, they're idiots. (and I know they need a solid corner and a solid safety REAL bad, but I don't see a #6-worthy pick there, so I'll stick with the statement)
I realize I haven't said anything here that isn't blindingly obvious...but isn't that what we do here?
BTW, I have every expectation that they'll fuck it up.
by danwismar » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:49 pm
by pod2dawg » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:55 pm
jb wrote:
I am not very impressed by the pass rusher crop other than J Jones in a scheme, so there is no need to reach on one of these project guys or a Borg Warner to be your Chris Long.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
