Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by Lubber » Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:12 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:22 pm

by leadpipe » Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:25 pm
by FUDU » Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:35 pm
by noles1 » Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:39 pm
FUDU wrote:Yeah at some point the remaining clock management and obtaining the lead need to become a more clear cut focus. Especially when you KNOW you are using 4 downs. Obviously it it more difficult when you need a TD to take the lead, but still you cannot leave teams enough time to for the opponent to gain 30+ yards anymore to take a desperation kick or throw anymore.

by FUDU » Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:45 pm
by FUDU » Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:10 pm
by FUDU » Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:21 pm
OldDawg wrote:I am sick of Ray Lewis hamming up, over-dramatizing and writing his own farewell song. I don't mean how he's playing. Its everything else. Playing it all up. The ultimate punk of a human being. He is begging us to adore and idolize him. On the ground, crying after the game. Give me a break.
by Lubber » Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:31 pm
FUDU wrote:OldDawg wrote:I am sick of Ray Lewis hamming up, over-dramatizing and writing his own farewell song. I don't mean how he's playing. Its everything else. Playing it all up. The ultimate punk of a human being. He is begging us to adore and idolize him. On the ground, crying after the game. Give me a break.
I just watched the on field post game interview with Lewis, talk about wanting to puke.
He over dramatizes everything. The fact that man even speaks the name of God in the context he does is a disgrace.
Bunch of pussies in the media that bow to that clown.
by FUDU » Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:34 pm
by Triple-S » Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:38 pm
FUDU wrote:OldDawg wrote:I am sick of Ray Lewis hamming up, over-dramatizing and writing his own farewell song. I don't mean how he's playing. Its everything else. Playing it all up. The ultimate punk of a human being. He is begging us to adore and idolize him. On the ground, crying after the game. Give me a break.
I just watched the on field post game interview with Lewis, talk about wanting to puke.
He over dramatizes everything. The fact that man even speaks the name of God in the context he does is a disgrace.
Bunch of pussies in the media that bow to that clown.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Lubber » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:00 am
Triple-S wrote:FUDU wrote:OldDawg wrote:I am sick of Ray Lewis hamming up, over-dramatizing and writing his own farewell song. I don't mean how he's playing. Its everything else. Playing it all up. The ultimate punk of a human being. He is begging us to adore and idolize him. On the ground, crying after the game. Give me a break.
I just watched the on field post game interview with Lewis, talk about wanting to puke.
He over dramatizes everything. The fact that man even speaks the name of God in the context he does is a disgrace.
Bunch of pussies in the media that bow to that clown.
ESPN having a few analysts and anchors go on about how "inspiring" he is this post season.
In what regard? This isn't like the guy is say, Jesse Owens in the 1930's who pretty much fundamentally changed sports as we know it, or a Chuck Pagano who came back to the sidelines after dealing with Leukemia
No, this is Ray Lewis, the same obnoxious middle linebacker that we all know and loathe here in Cleveland, who literally got away with murder, and then hides behind God in order to try to make us all forget about what happened that night in 2000.
It comes off as arrogant as well to insist that God had a hand in having his football team win. This isn't like the man was healed of some life threatening disease, survived a war or was struggling to find food to feed his family, and himself. No, it was a FOOTBALL GAME. Mind you, one that he's paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS to play. THAT, is something you should be thanking God about Ray. Not winning a dumbass football game, the mere fact that you have a warm place to sleep at night, get to play a game you love, and oh yeah, literally get a 2nd chance after being involved in a MURDER.
He's just not a sympathetic figure to me.
by e0y2e3 » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:01 am

by Lubber » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:02 am
by neoleo » Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:50 am

by Hikohadon » Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:37 am
neoleo wrote:I stopped watching all ESPN programming except for games about a year ago, and it has improved my quality of life and my enjoyment of watching sports. Those stupid points that they belittle all week long - like Ray Ray's inspirational story, Tebow, Linsanity, etc. - I only here mentions of during the game now. I honestly wouldn't have known about the over dramatic Ray Ray God speech if it weren't for this board.
by Larvell Blanks » Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:19 pm
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:30 pm
Triple-S wrote:FUDU wrote:I just watched the on field post game interview with Lewis, talk about wanting to puke.He over dramatizes everything. The fact that man even speaks the name of God in the context he does is a disgrace.
It comes off as arrogant as well to insist that God had a hand in having his football team win. This isn't like the man was healed of some life threatening disease, survived a war or was struggling to find food to feed his family, and himself. No, it was a FOOTBALL GAME. Mind you, one that he's paid MILLIONS OF DOLLARS to play. THAT, is something you should be thanking God about Ray. Not winning a dumbass football game, the mere fact that you have a warm place to sleep at night, get to play a game you love, and oh yeah, literally get a 2nd chance after being involved in a MURDER.

by Hikohadon » Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:00 pm
Larvell Blanks wrote:<--------- thankful for NBA, MLB, NFL networks so he doesn't have to suffer through as much fluff if I only had ESPN as the go to
by neoleo » Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:38 pm
Hikohadon wrote:I wish there were a viable threat to their monopoly to force them to improve the quality of their programming, but maybe I just need to stop with the Big Sports Media altogether.

by Lubber » Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:04 pm
by FUDU » Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:23 pm
by Hikohadon » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:38 pm
by Lubber » Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:44 pm
Hikohadon wrote:I wish Wes Welker could catch. Nice drop on 3rd down there to allow the Raisins to hang around.
People forget that his lasting championship legacy is dropping the ball that would've sealed the game in last year's SB.
by Lubber » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:37 pm
FUDU wrote:44-20 NE
by Big Money Player » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:54 pm
Lubber wrote:FUDU wrote:44-20 NE
Defense shuts down Brady.
Flacco, 3 down, 1 to go. This will be the toughest test coming up. I have San Fran winning 24-21.
by justmebd » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:13 am
by leadpipe » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:40 am
justmebd wrote:Clearly Tom Brady is suffering from diminished skills and should be cut immediately. There is no excuse for that kind of play on a Bill Belichick team.
On a more serious note, the years of consistently trading down out of the first round now are catching up with Belichick. You can't keep a quality team year-after-year on the blind arrogance you can develop every third-, fourth- and fifth-round pick you pick up on concession, look at the Browns.
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:59 am
by FUDU » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:06 am
by Lubber » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:39 am
FUDU wrote:Billy Boy got too cute today. He went away from the fast paced approach that got them their success this season, there wasn't a better day than today to continue that approach.
They done fucked up.
Meanwhile we're gonna hear a bunch of shit about how special Joe Fucko is and even more about the minister or murdervational speakers Ray Lewis.
by bac5665 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:44 am
by leadpipe » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:00 am
bac5665 wrote:Guys, a mediocre QB is going to win a Superbowl. That is very good for the NFL. Flacco will likely never be in the same class as Brady, Mannings, etc., and I don't care how good Caeppernick will be in a few years, he's mediocre this year. One way or another, a non-elite QB will take home the title this year, and that's really interesting.
by Triple-S » Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:11 am
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by justmebd » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:36 am
leadpipe wrote:justmebd wrote:Clearly Tom Brady is suffering from diminished skills and should be cut immediately. There is no excuse for that kind of play on a Bill Belichick team.
On a more serious note, the years of consistently trading down out of the first round now are catching up with Belichick. You can't keep a quality team year-after-year on the blind arrogance you can develop every third-, fourth- and fifth-round pick you pick up on concession, look at the Browns.
Dude, they've kept a quality team for a dozen years. The guys been to the Bowl damn near half his years there, with other times losing in the round he lost today. A dropped pass and a helmet catch away from being the best ever.
They probably should keep doing just what they are doing.
Remember about 6 years ago when they traded Seymour to the Raiders to start their "rebuild."
, Mangini did the ol' multiple trade down, and it's pretty much agreed the 2009 draft set the team back another two years. Think how much better this defense would be had he drafted Clay Matthews instead of trading down a bunch of time for low-round draft picks who no longer are on this team and instead took Alex Mack with the first pick, who still would have been on the board in the 2nd round because no one else was drafting a center that year that high in the draft.
by leadpipe » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:59 am
justmebd wrote:leadpipe wrote:justmebd wrote:Clearly Tom Brady is suffering from diminished skills and should be cut immediately. There is no excuse for that kind of play on a Bill Belichick team.
On a more serious note, the years of consistently trading down out of the first round now are catching up with Belichick. You can't keep a quality team year-after-year on the blind arrogance you can develop every third-, fourth- and fifth-round pick you pick up on concession, look at the Browns.
Dude, they've kept a quality team for a dozen years. The guys been to the Bowl damn near half his years there, with other times losing in the round he lost today. A dropped pass and a helmet catch away from being the best ever.
They probably should keep doing just what they are doing.
Remember about 6 years ago when they traded Seymour to the Raiders to start their "rebuild."
Agreed, the Patriots have kept a quality team, but I'm not the only who thinks it's strange they haven't won another Super Bowl in the last eight or nine years.
The lack of depth on their defense was crystal clear last night, and Brady was plagued by a lot of drops in the first quarter. I'm not directly comparing the Patriots to the Browns, but the correlation of not properly utilizing your top-round draft picks is a valid criticism.
To, Mangini did the ol' multiple trade down, and it's pretty much agreed the 2009 draft set the team back another two years. Think how much better this defense would be had he drafted Clay Matthews instead of trading down a bunch of time for low-round draft picks who no longer are on this team and instead took Alex Mack with the first pick, who still would have been on the board in the 2nd round because no one else was drafting a center that year that high in the draft.
And before anyone tries to debate my Alex Mack theory, I have a 2,000-word rebuttal somewhere on the Internet.
by justmebd » Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:06 am
leadpipe wrote:justmebd wrote:leadpipe wrote:justmebd wrote:Clearly Tom Brady is suffering from diminished skills and should be cut immediately. There is no excuse for that kind of play on a Bill Belichick team.
On a more serious note, the years of consistently trading down out of the first round now are catching up with Belichick. You can't keep a quality team year-after-year on the blind arrogance you can develop every third-, fourth- and fifth-round pick you pick up on concession, look at the Browns.
Dude, they've kept a quality team for a dozen years. The guys been to the Bowl damn near half his years there, with other times losing in the round he lost today. A dropped pass and a helmet catch away from being the best ever.
They probably should keep doing just what they are doing.
Remember about 6 years ago when they traded Seymour to the Raiders to start their "rebuild."
Agreed, the Patriots have kept a quality team, but I'm not the only who thinks it's strange they haven't won another Super Bowl in the last eight or nine years.
The lack of depth on their defense was crystal clear last night, and Brady was plagued by a lot of drops in the first quarter. I'm not directly comparing the Patriots to the Browns, but the correlation of not properly utilizing your top-round draft picks is a valid criticism.
To, Mangini did the ol' multiple trade down, and it's pretty much agreed the 2009 draft set the team back another two years. Think how much better this defense would be had he drafted Clay Matthews instead of trading down a bunch of time for low-round draft picks who no longer are on this team and instead took Alex Mack with the first pick, who still would have been on the board in the 2nd round because no one else was drafting a center that year that high in the draft.
And before anyone tries to debate my Alex Mack theory, I have a 2,000-word rebuttal somewhere on the Internet.
This is beyond silly.
The Patriots are in need of specifics.
The Browns, especially then, were in need of everything.
If there was a player available the Pats thought key, I'd assume they take him in lieu of dealing the pick. If they feel there is more value in the selections, that's what they do.
See my comments in the Lombardi thread. Belichik figured this out years ago - that is, it ain't close to an exact science. Belichik has whiffed bad in the draft. Him fleecing others has allowed him to whiff more often.
And the Patriots not winning it all in recent years is the same as those shouting "He's done nothing since spy gate!!!!! (Besides go 17-1 the next year)
Again, in a single elimination playoffs, to finish with the run they've had.....let me know the next team that does this.
In a league that practically mandates no dynasties, by the way.
And Clay Matthews is playing the result.
by justmebd » Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:14 am
by leadpipe » Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:46 am
justmebd wrote:Just re-read the whole thing, and now I think I see where we're diverging.
You cite the Patriots 17-1 record and their consistent playoff appearances, but note they don't consistently win the big sausage.
I think what a lot of people are forgetting when overdoing it on the Belichick praise is the AFC East.
How many division titles has Belichick won because the AFC East has consistently sucked for about a decade? The Undefeated regular season aside, I don't believe the Patriots record outside of their division hasn't been statistically anomolous. I'd have to go back and check the records year-by-year to be sure, but there it is.
Their record in the playoffs since Spygate is common knowledge.
Belichick is a great coach, no argument. But you can only coach up so many guys to a certain point before you realize 90 percent of the fifth-round draft picks taken are fifth-round draft picks for a reason.
And yes, the Browns did need every position, but passing up Clay Matthews -- TWICE -- was just fucking stupid. This is not a debatable point to me.
by justmebd » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:39 am
leadpipe wrote:justmebd wrote:Just re-read the whole thing, and now I think I see where we're diverging.
You cite the Patriots 17-1 record and their consistent playoff appearances, but note they don't consistently win the big sausage.
I think what a lot of people are forgetting when overdoing it on the Belichick praise is the AFC East.
How many division titles has Belichick won because the AFC East has consistently sucked for about a decade? The Undefeated regular season aside, I don't believe the Patriots record outside of their division hasn't been statistically anomolous. I'd have to go back and check the records year-by-year to be sure, but there it is.
Their record in the playoffs since Spygate is common knowledge.
Belichick is a great coach, no argument. But you can only coach up so many guys to a certain point before you realize 90 percent of the fifth-round draft picks taken are fifth-round draft picks for a reason.
And yes, the Browns did need every position, but passing up Clay Matthews -- TWICE -- was just fucking stupid. This is not a debatable point to me.
Ca-Rist.
They run a team out there capable of winning the Super Bowl every damn year.
Again, ring me when you see another.
You can question the process all you like but, again, THEY RUN A TEAM OUT THERE THAT CAN WIN A SUPERBOWL EVERY YEAR.
Are you insinuating Belichik would rather have a group of 4th round rummies than legitimate stars. Cause if you are, shake yourself and read the sentence again.
And again, their record since spygate and "winning the sausage." So, for example, we'll give them credit for a Super Bowl win on the backs of the tuck rule and some best kicking ever - yet when they are victim to about 25 balls thrown up for grabs - including the biggest one sticking to a helmet, well, then they are "losers."
And yeah, 14....15....16 wins will prety much win you any division.
Really, now the Pats are winning cause of an easy division....
What's next?
Lastly, not debating the clay Mathews thing now. Just that as many people were going apeshit they passed on Mark Sanchez - if not more. So again, as I stated, and the only thing I stated concerning the matter is....playing the result.
Any other NFL team or fan ripping on how the Pats approach things....you've got 31 better targets.
Hope they get an easy schedule draw next year or they're F'd.
Either that or they'll hang 13 or 14 no matter who's hurt or what the hell else goes on.
by Nicastro13 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:50 am
by pod2dawg » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:55 am
bac5665 wrote:Guys, a mediocre QB is going to win a Superbowl. That is very good for the NFL. Flacco will likely never be in the same class as Brady, Mannings, etc., and I don't care how good Caeppernick will be in a few years, he's mediocre this year. One way or another, a non-elite QB will take home the title this year, and that's really interesting.
by Nicastro13 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:00 pm
pod2dawg wrote:bac5665 wrote:Guys, a mediocre QB is going to win a Superbowl. That is very good for the NFL. Flacco will likely never be in the same class as Brady, Mannings, etc., and I don't care how good Caeppernick will be in a few years, he's mediocre this year. One way or another, a non-elite QB will take home the title this year, and that's really interesting.
I really don't have a dog in this but according to Bradshaw, coz I am too lazy to check & he gets paid:
1. Flacco has won more games than any QB since 2008.
2. Above said has won more playoff games than any other QB since 2008.
3. Above said has the highest completion % of all QB's with passes over 25 yds and "0" interceptions since 2008.
That sounds pretty good. I would take Flacco , Caeppernick, or even Kaepernick in 2 sec. and send Weeds/McCoy to where they belong .......Ariz/Jax/ or Buffalo.
by FUDU » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:11 pm
pod2dawg wrote:bac5665 wrote:Guys, a mediocre QB is going to win a Superbowl. That is very good for the NFL. Flacco will likely never be in the same class as Brady, Mannings, etc., and I don't care how good Caeppernick will be in a few years, he's mediocre this year. One way or another, a non-elite QB will take home the title this year, and that's really interesting.
I really don't have a dog in this but according to Bradshaw, coz I am too lazy to check & he gets paid:
1. Flacco has won more games than any QB since 2008.
2. Above said has won more playoff games than any other QB since 2008.
3. Above said has the highest completion % of all QB's with passes over 25 yds and "0" interceptions since 2008.
That sounds pretty good. I would take Flacco , Caeppernick, or even Kaepernick in 2 sec. and send Weeds/McCoy to where they belong .......Ariz/Jax/ or Buffalo.
by pod2dawg » Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:53 pm
by pup » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:11 pm
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:21 pm

by pod2dawg » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:06 pm
pup wrote:Flacco is also the same guy that goes home last week short of the greatest secondary disaster in the history of the league. But I guess we should give him credit for throwing that ball that faked like it was falling out of the sky before giving itself that second boost to get it to his spot.

by Hikohadon » Mon Jan 21, 2013 2:20 pm
bac5665 wrote:Guys, a mediocre QB is going to win a Superbowl. That is very good for the NFL. Flacco will likely never be in the same class as Brady, Mannings, etc., and I don't care how good Caeppernick will be in a few years, he's mediocre this year. One way or another, a non-elite QB will take home the title this year, and that's really interesting.
by TouchEmAllTime » Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:16 pm
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests
