e0y2e3 wrote:<-- still doesn't understand why Norv Turner is OC when the stated desire to to run the new age spread and read option.
Hm. Did Shanahan run any spread and read options before RGIII came to town?
Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:18 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:<-- still doesn't understand why Norv Turner is OC when the stated desire to to run the new age spread and read option.

by e0y2e3 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:25 pm

by peeker643 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:48 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 1:51 pm
peeker643 wrote:1. They gave HC 4-year deal

by Madre Hill, Superstar » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:06 pm
A report that talks broke down between the Browns and head coach candidate Ken Whisenhunt on Thursday because the front office wanted input on staff issues is "totally false," a league source told The Plain Dealer today.

by peeker643 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:07 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:peeker643 wrote:1. They gave HC 4-year deal
This meaning anything is funny..... you know better.
And I get the Vertical Passing Game crapola, I really do. I just don't understand WHY NORV TURNER IS THE GAWD DAMN NEW OC WHEN BANNER IS RUNNING AROUND TALKING ABOUT MODERNIZING THE OFFENSE!!!!#%!
Either Banner is telling different stories out of both sides of his mouth or he's a fucking imbecile.
Norv actually makes sense for the current personel and I get it. If they do something like sign Vick Norv makes -1,000 sense and all of this shiny new toy shit means the Browns should theoretically do something like sign Vick.
by peeker643 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:09 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Probably because, as it turns out, LaCanfora doesn't have the same sources as MKC:
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2013/01/report_that_browns_talks_broke.htmlA report that talks broke down between the Browns and head coach candidate Ken Whisenhunt on Thursday because the front office wanted input on staff issues is "totally false," a league source told The Plain Dealer today.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:14 pm

by Govbarney » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:39 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:FWIW: Rivals reported that the key breakdown in Chip's negotiations was about control issues as well.
by peeker643 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:44 pm
Govbarney wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:FWIW: Rivals reported that the key breakdown in Chip's negotiations was about control issues as well.
I see nothing wrong with the Browns wanting to prevent Chip (or anyone for that matter) from having carte blanche control. For better or for worse Haslem the man who paid $1 Billion Dollars for this train wreck, hand picked Banner to right the ship, and not to start pissing contest's with some power hungry prima-dona coach or GM.
We will never know what really happened behind closed doors , but I imagine there was a line in the sand that Banner/Haslem was not willing to cross under any circumstances. Or at least I hope that's the case.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:53 pm

by peeker643 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:54 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:The point isn't what's right or wrong, it's that Banner is Holgren, just skinner and more Golumy.
by jerryroche » Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:19 pm
by Govbarney » Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:34 pm
peeker643 wrote:Govbarney wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:FWIW: Rivals reported that the key breakdown in Chip's negotiations was about control issues as well.
I see nothing wrong with the Browns wanting to prevent Chip (or anyone for that matter) from having carte blanche control. For better or for worse Haslem the man who paid $1 Billion Dollars for this train wreck, hand picked Banner to right the ship, and not to start pissing contest's with some power hungry prima-dona coach or GM.
We will never know what really happened behind closed doors , but I imagine there was a line in the sand that Banner/Haslem was not willing to cross under any circumstances. Or at least I hope that's the case.
More importantly, I did not see a single deer (not one except for the one the car ahead of me hit 300 yards from my driveway at 515am Tuesday morning) over the course of muzzle loading season. And Saturday and Sunday I froze my balls off all day.
by peeker643 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:36 pm
jerryroche wrote:I would bet that 90% of the people who post here have at some time worked for the kind of CEO that Banner appears to be. A guy who's always right, who's never wrong, and when he is wrong, he will never admit to it. Those kind of guys are either hugely successful—or they spend their whole career jumping from one CEO job to another. If such is the case with Banner, I hope he's here for the next two decades. But we'll know one way or another within two or three years.
by peeker643 » Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:41 pm
Govbarney wrote:You hear the rumor ODNR is going to allow rifle and breach loaders next year?
by jerryroche » Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:47 pm
peeker643 wrote:Still early I guess. But initial indications don't appear favorable.
by Govbarney » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:25 pm
peeker643 wrote:OTGovbarney wrote:You hear the rumor ODNR is going to allow rifle and breach loaders next year?
Have not heard that. Rifles? Restrictions on that?
Hell, some of these muzzle loaders are damn near breech loaded anyway with the way they break down and the primers being dropped in. Not mine. I have a plain old Knight in-line that requires me using a cap tool to put the thing on.
Sorry about the gut shot. Sucks for you and for the doe. I did it with a 10-point last season. That felt even worse.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests