Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by British_Pharaoh » Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:51 pm

by peeker643 » Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:25 pm
skatingtripods wrote:British_Pharaoh wrote:I'm thinking Swisher ain't going to be sitting in the home dugout at Progressive Field if the rumoured 4 year $50m offer is to be believed.
I'm betting it's higher than that. I personally think the Indians went closer to 4/56 and are hoping their rumored offer stays on the low end and maybe lets them sneak in with the highest or second-highest bid.
by motherscratcher » Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:32 pm
skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:I agree with Kluwe, McCarthy and Calcaterra.
And the 'ballpark is empty' line is excellent.
Hope someone left a light on downtown when he came in last night or at least spray-painted "We Love You, Nick!!" on one of the boarded up buildings.
Calcaterra's from New Albany. He's a Tribe fan, at least as far as I can tell from his Twitter picture in which he's wearing a block C cap.
We have good restaurants and good hospitals. Beyond that, Cleveland a near impossible sell to a FA who has 4-5 interested parties.
Maybe they had lunch while watching reruns of Reba featuring Swisher's wife Joanna Garcia.
by motherscratcher » Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:33 pm
British_Pharaoh wrote:Jon Heyman of CBSSports.com has the M's out of the Swisher game. The FA is not visiting Seattle this week and it seems like the M's don't wish to give up the number 12 pick (which they would lose if they signed Swisher)
per Rotoworld
by skatingtripods » Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:40 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Wait, how does that work? Will the Tribe be giving up a pick if they sign him?
by skatingtripods » Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:48 pm
peeker643 wrote:Not to belabor the point or roll on with the negativity, but if the Indians offer me 4/56 and the Rangers or some other contender offer me 4/48, I'm not playing in Cleveland for the next 2-4 years.
by Govbarney » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:00 pm
skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Not to belabor the point or roll on with the negativity, but if the Indians offer me 4/56 and the Rangers or some other contender offer me 4/48, I'm not playing in Cleveland for the next 2-4 years.
Probably the case, especially since the Rangers missed on Hamilton. That's the worst-case scenario for us, Hamilton not going back to Texas. I don't think any of the other potential destinations are as attractive as Texas.
I don't think he's really interested in Boston or Baltimore. Philadelphia could be in play, but he's never been in the NL.
Personally, I think he winds up in Texas, but we'll have the highest offer.
by gotribe31 » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:10 pm
motherscratcher wrote:British_Pharaoh wrote:Jon Heyman of CBSSports.com has the M's out of the Swisher game. The FA is not visiting Seattle this week and it seems like the M's don't wish to give up the number 12 pick (which they would lose if they signed Swisher)
per Rotoworld
Wait, how does that work? Will the Tribe be giving up a pick if they sign him?

by motherscratcher » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:25 pm
skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Not to belabor the point or roll on with the negativity, but if the Indians offer me 4/56 and the Rangers or some other contender offer me 4/48, I'm not playing in Cleveland for the next 2-4 years.
Probably the case, especially since the Rangers missed on Hamilton. That's the worst-case scenario for us, Hamilton not going back to Texas. I don't think any of the other potential destinations are as attractive as Texas.
I don't think he's really interested in Boston or Baltimore. Philadelphia could be in play, but he's never been in the NL.
Personally, I think he winds up in Texas, but we'll have the highest offer.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:29 pm
motherscratcher wrote:skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Not to belabor the point or roll on with the negativity, but if the Indians offer me 4/56 and the Rangers or some other contender offer me 4/48, I'm not playing in Cleveland for the next 2-4 years.
Probably the case, especially since the Rangers missed on Hamilton. That's the worst-case scenario for us, Hamilton not going back to Texas. I don't think any of the other potential destinations are as attractive as Texas.
I don't think he's really interested in Boston or Baltimore. Philadelphia could be in play, but he's never been in the NL.
Personally, I think he winds up in Texas, but we'll have the highest offer.
It's certainly possible. How big is their scoreboard?
by Dnthateonthepronk » Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:05 am
by peeker643 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:45 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:motherscratcher wrote:skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Not to belabor the point or roll on with the negativity, but if the Indians offer me 4/56 and the Rangers or some other contender offer me 4/48, I'm not playing in Cleveland for the next 2-4 years.
Probably the case, especially since the Rangers missed on Hamilton. That's the worst-case scenario for us, Hamilton not going back to Texas. I don't think any of the other potential destinations are as attractive as Texas.
I don't think he's really interested in Boston or Baltimore. Philadelphia could be in play, but he's never been in the NL.
Personally, I think he winds up in Texas, but we'll have the highest offer.
It's certainly possible. How big is their scoreboard?
It's not a matter of where he grips it, it's about weight ratio. There's no way a 5 ounce bird can carry a 1 pound coconut.
by Pressrunnr » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:10 pm
by Dnthateonthepronk » Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:00 pm
couldnt even get it out
by skatingtripods » Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:15 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:reports say Angels seeking an Inngins eater for Morales.... What about Ubal![]()
couldnt even get it out
by British_Pharaoh » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:21 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:14 am
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:motherscratcher wrote:skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Not to belabor the point or roll on with the negativity, but if the Indians offer me 4/56 and the Rangers or some other contender offer me 4/48, I'm not playing in Cleveland for the next 2-4 years.
Probably the case, especially since the Rangers missed on Hamilton. That's the worst-case scenario for us, Hamilton not going back to Texas. I don't think any of the other potential destinations are as attractive as Texas.
I don't think he's really interested in Boston or Baltimore. Philadelphia could be in play, but he's never been in the NL.
Personally, I think he winds up in Texas, but we'll have the highest offer.
It's certainly possible. How big is their scoreboard?
It's not a matter of where he grips it, it's about weight ratio. There's no way a 5 ounce bird can carry a 1 pound coconut.
African or European?
by YahooFanChicago » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:28 am
by British_Pharaoh » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:07 am

by noles1 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:53 am

by Govbarney » Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:25 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:motherscratcher wrote:skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Not to belabor the point or roll on with the negativity, but if the Indians offer me 4/56 and the Rangers or some other contender offer me 4/48, I'm not playing in Cleveland for the next 2-4 years.
Probably the case, especially since the Rangers missed on Hamilton. That's the worst-case scenario for us, Hamilton not going back to Texas. I don't think any of the other potential destinations are as attractive as Texas.
I don't think he's really interested in Boston or Baltimore. Philadelphia could be in play, but he's never been in the NL.
Personally, I think he winds up in Texas, but we'll have the highest offer.
It's certainly possible. How big is their scoreboard?
It's not a matter of where he grips it, it's about weight ratio. There's no way a 5 ounce bird can carry a 1 pound coconut.
African or European?
African swallows are non migratory.
by WiscTribeFan » Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:53 am
noles1 wrote:Edwin Jackson has went to the Cubs. Ink nearly dry.
by motherscratcher » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:25 pm
The most formidable cheekbones in the AL Central.
by skatingtripods » Thu Dec 20, 2012 1:28 pm
by British_Pharaoh » Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:07 pm

by leadpipe » Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:20 pm
by googleeph2 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:37 pm
leadpipe wrote:Not really sure what all the fuss is about
by skatingtripods » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:29 am
leadpipe wrote:Guy looks like he's on the decline on both sides if you ask me.
And I agree with Tripods - For the most part Marcum has been pretty good - when he pitches. In that price range I'm not sure you could do much better.
by leadpipe » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:36 am
skatingtripods wrote:leadpipe wrote:Guy looks like he's on the decline on both sides if you ask me.
In what way? Higher ISO power than 2011, was lower than 2009 and 2010, though. Second highest swinging strike rate of his career could indicate a slowdown of bat speed, though that appears to be negated by the highest line drive percentage of his career. Fielding metrics on par with his career averages. Seemed to be a pretty standard season in WAR and was one of his better baserunning seasons in his career.
Did you watch a lot of Swisher with the Yankees?And I agree with Tripods - For the most part Marcum has been pretty good - when he pitches. In that price range I'm not sure you could do much better.
Might be the first time you've agreed with me on a baseball personnel decision.
by skatingtripods » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:50 am
leadpipe wrote:A better indicator of possibly some slowing bat speed is how he looked against good pitching. Not all that suprised he struggled in the playoffs, cause generally you see good pitching.
Point is, I don't think he's a great gamble, cause I don't think the payoff is all that great at this point should you hit the jackpot.
by leadpipe » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:59 am
skatingtripods wrote:leadpipe wrote:A better indicator of possibly some slowing bat speed is how he looked against good pitching. Not all that suprised he struggled in the playoffs, cause generally you see good pitching.
.169/.283/.305/.589 slash in the playoffs. Wasn't a new trend this year. But, certainly, something to be concerned about if you're counting on him to be a playoff contributor sometime during that contract.Point is, I don't think he's a great gamble, cause I don't think the payoff is all that great at this point should you hit the jackpot.
Fair, but, what's the other option? Michael Bourn? Cody Ross?
I realize that asking for contention 2013 is not easy to do, but it's not like the Indians will have their hat in the ring very often for a quality corner OF bat. There are some promising 2014 FAs, but not guys I see us really contending for in an open market.
by motherscratcher » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:41 pm
leadpipe wrote:Bottom line is, signing a guy like Nick Swisher in 2012 does little but perhaps improve the product on the field to make it somewhat more tolerable and placate the fan base a bit. It doesn't do anything for the real future of the team. And all this is fine as long as you don't pay a premium to do it.
by skatingtripods » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:53 pm
motherscratcher wrote:leadpipe wrote:Bottom line is, signing a guy like Nick Swisher in 2012 does little but perhaps improve the product on the field to make it somewhat more tolerable and placate the fan base a bit. It doesn't do anything for the real future of the team. And all this is fine as long as you don't pay a premium to do it.
Agree with this completely. Even if contention is unrealistic in the immediate future, tolerability is a worthwhile endeavor.
So, the question becomes, what is a premium for Nick Swisher?
by British_Pharaoh » Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:21 pm

by Adverb Harry » Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:02 pm
by skatingtripods » Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:29 pm
by skatingtripods » Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:25 pm
by WiscTribeFan » Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:43 am
skatingtripods wrote:Not saying that this has any bearing on the situation, but Swisher's agent, Dan Lozano, is reportedly a gigantic piece of shit: http://deadspin.com/5861982/dan-lozano- ... e-mountain (FWIW, he didn't dispute any of these claims; he just chalked them up to "jealousy" on the part of the person who sent this information to the media)
I imagine he's trying to play the Tribe like a cheap fiddle for more money and it's not working out the way that he and Swisher planned it. The delay, more than anything, probably has to do with Swisher's agent. He can't deal with the fact that the market's not there for Swisher.
Also the guy who got the Pujols monster deal, the enormous Votto extension, and several other notorious deals.
by British_Pharaoh » Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:03 am

by peeker643 » Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:23 am
British_Pharaoh wrote:We should withdraw our offer to Swisher if he doesn't sign before next weekend. He clearly doesn't want to play in Cleveland and is waiting for another team to come along with an offer and rescue him. I don't want a player on this team who does not want to be here.
by Adverb Harry » Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:02 pm
British_Pharaoh wrote:We should withdraw our offer to Swisher if he doesn't sign before next weekend. He clearly doesn't want to play in Cleveland and is waiting for another team to come along with an offer and rescue him. I don't want a player on this team who does not want to be here.
by bookelly » Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:05 pm
by British_Pharaoh » Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:57 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:British_Pharaoh wrote:We should withdraw our offer to Swisher if he doesn't sign before next weekend. He clearly doesn't want to play in Cleveland and is waiting for another team to come along with an offer and rescue him. I don't want a player on this team who does not want to be here.
So you're suggesting we disband the team?

by skatingtripods » Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:00 pm
by British_Pharaoh » Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:30 pm

by bookelly » Sat Dec 22, 2012 5:11 pm
by skatingtripods » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:02 pm
by Adverb Harry » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:00 pm
skatingtripods wrote:If Sands figures it out at the ML level, it's a decent haul for the Pirates. This is mostly a lot of rambling, but it may give us some kind of indication what the Chris Perez market might look like, if the Indians are still looking to move him to fill a hole.
by skatingtripods » Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:01 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:They should be. We've got plenty of bullpen depth now, he could bring us back a potentially valuable piece, and the savings on his contract could go toward a guy like Lohse or Marcum.
What's the market on him, though? Detroit needs a closer, but I doubt the Indians would trade him within our division, particularly if they seem to think they can go for it this year. Boston's obviously out now, too. Who else could be a fit for us?
by googleeph2 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:07 pm
Adverb Harry wrote: Who else could be a fit for us?
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: gbot, TouchEmAllTime and 2 guests