Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by swerb » Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:36 pm
by skatingtripods » Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:53 pm
by Dnthateonthepronk » Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:53 pm

by WiscTribeFan » Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:26 pm
by pup » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:53 am
by bac5665 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:07 am
by skatingtripods » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:32 am
bac5665 wrote:I like this move if this was last year. Doesn't bother me this year, but I wonder what the point is.
by Kingpin74 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:54 am
by peeker643 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:44 pm
by scott » Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:54 pm
peeker643 wrote:Wow.
I see nothing in terms of a plan here. Nothing.
by bac5665 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:08 pm
peeker643 wrote:Wow.
I see nothing in terms of a plan here. Nothing. I see no point in this deal either other than you gotta put someone out there every day and Reynolds will at least say 'yes' to taking the money.
Good for him. Good for people who get to see one of his 12-15 HRs at home.
And at $6m that's only costing $26k per...K
by skatingtripods » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:14 pm
peeker643 wrote:Wow.
I see nothing in terms of a plan here. Nothing. I see no point in this deal either other than you gotta put someone out there every day and Reynolds will at least say 'yes' to taking the money.
Good for him. Good for people who get to see one of his 12-15 HRs at home.
And at $6m that's only costing $26k per...K
by peeker643 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:14 pm
bac5665 wrote:peeker643 wrote:Wow.
I see nothing in terms of a plan here. Nothing. I see no point in this deal either other than you gotta put someone out there every day and Reynolds will at least say 'yes' to taking the money.
Good for him. Good for people who get to see one of his 12-15 HRs at home.
And at $6m that's only costing $26k per...K
And hence why I don't care. This move is a pr move, and little more.
by bac5665 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:25 pm
peeker643 wrote:bac5665 wrote:peeker643 wrote:Wow.
I see nothing in terms of a plan here. Nothing. I see no point in this deal either other than you gotta put someone out there every day and Reynolds will at least say 'yes' to taking the money.
Good for him. Good for people who get to see one of his 12-15 HRs at home.
And at $6m that's only costing $26k per...K
And hence why I don't care. This move is a pr move, and little more.
Runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs. Can't wait til Reynolds doesn't put the ball in play. We get ALL over guys for those kinds of things. Wondering if we'll be fine with it then.
by skatingtripods » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:31 pm
peeker643 wrote:Runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs. Can't wait til Reynolds doesn't put the ball in play. We get ALL over guys for those kinds of things. Wondering if we'll be fine with it then.
by peeker643 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:54 pm
bac5665 wrote:peeker643 wrote:bac5665 wrote:peeker643 wrote:Wow.
I see nothing in terms of a plan here. Nothing. I see no point in this deal either other than you gotta put someone out there every day and Reynolds will at least say 'yes' to taking the money.
Good for him. Good for people who get to see one of his 12-15 HRs at home.
And at $6m that's only costing $26k per...K
And hence why I don't care. This move is a pr move, and little more.
Runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs. Can't wait til Reynolds doesn't put the ball in play. We get ALL over guys for those kinds of things. Wondering if we'll be fine with it then.
Probably not. Honestly, it probably depends, in mind mind at least, how Santana is doing. If he has finally learned that at bats can end in singles, or even ground outs, as opposed to walks, Ks or HRs, than I have less problem with Reynalds having that disease. I just don't want two of them. One is fine, if he hits HRs.
by peeker643 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:04 pm
skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs. Can't wait til Reynolds doesn't put the ball in play. We get ALL over guys for those kinds of things. Wondering if we'll be fine with it then.
Actually has a career slash of .284/.364/.554/.918 with 25 sac flies in 206 PA in that situation. 55 K. Which is a K 26.6% of the time. Which is 6% less than his career K% rate.
by skatingtripods » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:10 pm
peeker643 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs. Can't wait til Reynolds doesn't put the ball in play. We get ALL over guys for those kinds of things. Wondering if we'll be fine with it then.
Actually has a career slash of .284/.364/.554/.918 with 25 sac flies in 206 PA in that situation. 55 K. Which is a K 26.6% of the time. Which is 6% less than his career K% rate.
Check out Casey Kotchman's splits in the same (and eerily similar) situation.
.370/.418/.481 .899 w/22sac flies in 213 ABs and 15Ks. 135RBI to Reynolds' 111.
by peeker643 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:17 pm
skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:Runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs. Can't wait til Reynolds doesn't put the ball in play. We get ALL over guys for those kinds of things. Wondering if we'll be fine with it then.
Actually has a career slash of .284/.364/.554/.918 with 25 sac flies in 206 PA in that situation. 55 K. Which is a K 26.6% of the time. Which is 6% less than his career K% rate.
Check out Casey Kotchman's splits in the same (and eerily similar) situation.
.370/.418/.481 .899 w/22sac flies in 213 ABs and 15Ks. 135RBI to Reynolds' 111.
Impressive. Was he the first one you looked to cherry pick that stat from or did you have to cross names off the list before you got to him?
Kotchman stayed somewhat true to those numbers this year. .303/.333/.333/.667, just minus the power in 36 PA. Only struck out once.
If Reynolds is part of a bigger offseason plan, like I believe he is, then I really like the move. If it's a stand-alone move, then it makes no sense and can be judged accordingly.
He's better than what we have been trotting out there. There's no way you can deny that.
by bac5665 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:26 pm
peeker643 wrote:bac5665 wrote:peeker643 wrote:bac5665 wrote:peeker643 wrote:Wow.
I see nothing in terms of a plan here. Nothing. I see no point in this deal either other than you gotta put someone out there every day and Reynolds will at least say 'yes' to taking the money.
Good for him. Good for people who get to see one of his 12-15 HRs at home.
And at $6m that's only costing $26k per...K
And hence why I don't care. This move is a pr move, and little more.
Runner on 3rd and less than 2 outs. Can't wait til Reynolds doesn't put the ball in play. We get ALL over guys for those kinds of things. Wondering if we'll be fine with it then.
Probably not. Honestly, it probably depends, in mind mind at least, how Santana is doing. If he has finally learned that at bats can end in singles, or even ground outs, as opposed to walks, Ks or HRs, than I have less problem with Reynalds having that disease. I just don't want two of them. One is fine, if he hits HRs.
But we hold Santana to those standards. And rightfully so. Even though he's a younger player than Reynolds. Just like we should hold any player to those standards.
by Erie Warrior » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:33 pm
skatingtripods wrote:This signing, and the interest in Victorino, Youk, Swisher, etc., indicate to me that there's a plan. These aren't moves that you make without having a bigger picture. They have clearly targeted the two biggest lineup weaknesses, 1B and LF, and are being proactive about them.


by pup » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:35 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:36 pm
peeker643 wrote:I don't do much research or like looking at numbers. He's the guy Reynolds replaces so that's who I looked at.
And I'm not sure how big a difference a guy like Reynolds makes, to tell the truth. He's double the money, less accomplished with the glove (though not a hack by any means) and as a stand alone move doesn't excite me in the least.
It's not that the move makes zero sense to me, I guess I understand the concept. I just don't think it makes it much difference. If you go by those precious numbers, he's a one game upgrade in WAR over Kotchman. For $3million more than Kotchman last season.
by pod2dawg » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:44 pm
by Kingpin74 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:48 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:02 pm

by Kingpin74 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:07 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Ah yes, bitching before knowing anything.....
This FO will NEVER win with the fans here, ever.
by peeker643 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:11 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Ah yes, bitching before knowing anything.....
This FO will NEVER win with the fans here, ever.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:13 pm

by motherscratcher » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:18 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Ah yes, bitching before knowing anything.....
This FO will NEVER win with the fans here, ever.
by peeker643 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:18 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:No, but bitching about this specific off-season is a bit ridiculous. You will likely have the fact to back your angst, but can we at least wait until they all present themselves? Two years ago everyone swore up and down the Indians would never trade major prospects at the dead-line, they did (no matter how unfortunate it turned out).
by skatingtripods » Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:32 pm
Kingpin74 wrote:Mark Reynolds is perfectly fine as a player but I'd rather spend cash on overslotting draft picks or putting it in the coffers when we actually have a shot at winning something.
by pup » Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:47 pm
by motherscratcher » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:00 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:19 pm
by leadpipe » Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:44 pm
by Erie Warrior » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:11 pm
leadpipe wrote: cause that line-up will be mediocre. Run of the mill. Just cause it won't blow like the pitching, doesn't mean it will be good.


by 1Perry » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:30 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:46 pm
by pod2dawg » Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:25 pm
Kingpin74 wrote:We can't find a young guy to play freaking first base that at least has some chance to be here long term?
by British_Pharaoh » Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:30 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Like this move a lot. I can deal with 200 K's if he walks 75 times and hits 30 HR. Pretty decent 1B. Right handed bat with .857 career OPS against LHP. Can play 3B against tough LHP to give Chisenhall a day off. Very low risk with one-year deal. I said I preferred him to Youkilis and I'm going to stand by that.

by TribeinLA » Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:11 pm
by dazindiansfanuk » Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:31 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:40 pm
dazindiansfanuk wrote:Russ Canzler DFA'd to make room for Reynolds on the roster whose signing is now official.
by skatingtripods » Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:52 pm
by NH Tribe Fan » Tue Dec 18, 2012 7:02 pm
dazindiansfanuk wrote:Russ Canzler DFA'd to make room for Reynolds on the roster whose signing is now official.
by skatingtripods » Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:05 pm
NH Tribe Fan wrote:dazindiansfanuk wrote:Russ Canzler DFA'd to make room for Reynolds on the roster whose signing is now official.
I would have dropped
Huff
Carrera
Tomlin
ahead of Canzler.
by leadpipe » Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:18 pm
skatingtripods wrote:NH Tribe Fan wrote:dazindiansfanuk wrote:Russ Canzler DFA'd to make room for Reynolds on the roster whose signing is now official.
I would have dropped
Huff
Carrera
Tomlin
ahead of Canzler.
You're going to drop one of two starting pitchers or an adequate fourth outfielder with speed before a guy who will be 27 next April and start the season in AAA?
by skatingtripods » Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:12 pm
leadpipe wrote:More to the point, if anyone of these four guys fell off the face of the earth, outside of close friends and family, who the well would know?
by Rat_Tail » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:43 pm
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests