Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:31 am
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:45 am
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:49 am
by LarsHancock » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:01 am

by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:14 am
by motherscratcher » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:42 am
by FUDU » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:45 am
motherscratcher wrote:34-13?! Dafuq happened?
I can't believe we lost to that craptastic Philly team.
by fairvis » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:15 am
by motherscratcher » Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:59 am

by justmebd » Fri Dec 14, 2012 9:44 am
motherscratcher wrote:
He said we wouldn't get get it. He said we wouldn't get the treasure we seek on account of our obstacles.
by peeker643 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:49 am





by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:27 pm
This isn't about how there's no chance in hell the Browns go 3-0 in the last 3.
It's about which teams need to lose in order for that purple unicorn to fly.
by peeker643 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:17 pm
Hikohadon wrote:For Peek, who is either reading impaired or can't resist his impulses:This isn't about how there's no chance in hell the Browns go 3-0 in the last 3.
It's about which teams need to lose in order for that purple unicorn to fly.
We've been perfectly aware of the Browns related obstacles and if we would somehow forget we've got you to remind us every day.
by bac5665 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:52 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:22 pm
bac5665 wrote:And Peek, Weeds is will not be the reason we lose. Not to any of the teams left on our schedule. Shurmur, yeah, probably. But Weeds will play safe and not make any game losing mistakes.
by googleeph2 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:25 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:30 pm
googleeph2 wrote:What is ridiculously funny about having fun following sports, again?
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:34 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:For Peek, who is either reading impaired or can't resist his impulses:This isn't about how there's no chance in hell the Browns go 3-0 in the last 3.
It's about which teams need to lose in order for that purple unicorn to fly.
We've been perfectly aware of the Browns related obstacles and if we would somehow forget we've got you to remind us every day.
Funny none the less.
Seriously, I laughed out loud when I saw the thread initially. Wondered Sunday if the talk radio mentality would reach the boards.
It did. It's very Kylie & Booms and Bull & Fox.
by motherscratcher » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:38 pm

by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:40 pm
peeker643 wrote:googleeph2 wrote:What is ridiculously funny about having fun following sports, again?
Following sports has always been fun for me or I wouldn't spend nearly the time I spend doing it or involving myself in it.
That said, I'm not of the need to delude myself into examining Browns playoff chances to get that enjoyment.![]()
It's ridiculous and therefore I'm stating that it's ridiculous.

by FUDU » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:42 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:For Peek, who is either reading impaired or can't resist his impulses:This isn't about how there's no chance in hell the Browns go 3-0 in the last 3.
It's about which teams need to lose in order for that purple unicorn to fly.
We've been perfectly aware of the Browns related obstacles and if we would somehow forget we've got you to remind us every day.
Funny none the less.
Seriously, I laughed out loud when I saw the thread initially. Wondered Sunday if the talk radio mentality would reach the boards.
It did. It's very Kylie & Booms and Bull & Fox.
by peeker643 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:54 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:googleeph2 wrote:What is ridiculously funny about having fun following sports, again?
Following sports has always been fun for me or I wouldn't spend nearly the time I spend doing it or involving myself in it.
That said, I'm not of the need to delude myself into examining Browns playoff chances to get that enjoyment.![]()
It's ridiculous and therefore I'm stating that it's ridiculous.
I couldn't figure out how to make it green and give it a Santa hat.

by peeker643 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:24 pm
by pup » Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:48 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:29 pm
pup wrote:For the record, we all agreed a few weeks ago, Peeks is Booms. Which automatically makes Hiko Kylie.
by pup » Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:38 am
peeker643 wrote:pup wrote:For the record, we all agreed a few weeks ago, Peeks is Booms. Which automatically makes Hiko Kylie.
I did not and do not agree with this.
At all.
by Hikohadon » Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:23 pm
by Hikohadon » Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:33 pm
by peeker643 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:58 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Gotta defend my boy Peeks here.
Booms is a complete idiot that should be neutered immediately so he can't reproduce.
Peeks shares some of his bad qualities, but he's not nearly as over-the-top. He'll just call you a homer for predicting 6 wins or come to your party uninvited and shit in your 7 layer dip because HE doesn't like guacamole and therefore NO ONE should eat it.
But not every word that comes out of his mouth is TOTALLY retarded, and his voice doesn't sound like someone's shoving a bowling pin up his ass.
by British_Pharaoh » Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:02 am

by That_Guy™ » Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:53 am


by Hikohadon » Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:29 pm

by jfiling » Sun Dec 16, 2012 4:49 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Lovely, now we can win 4 in a row without ever having played a real team.
It's all coming together...
by pup » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:00 am

by LarsHancock » Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:11 am
pup wrote:

by bac5665 » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:52 pm
bac5665 wrote:And Peek, Weeds is will not be the reason we lose. Not to any of the teams left on our schedule. Shurmur, yeah, probably. But Weeds will play safe and not make any game losing mistakes.

by Hikohadon » Sun Dec 23, 2012 5:52 pm
by Hikohadon » Sun Dec 23, 2012 6:16 pm
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: gbot and 2 guests
