Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by peeker643 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:32 pm
by swerb » Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:50 pm
peeker643 wrote:Even if you didn't have a replacement captain aboard the ship when the other captain mistakenly lights himself on fire 6 times and dies on the last one, someone should be able to safely keep it afloat.
How do you keep someone in charge who completely and consistently keeps fucking up the simplest responsibilities of his job?
by municipalmutt » Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:30 am
by pup » Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:33 am
by swerb » Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:28 am

by Hikohadon » Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:39 am
swerb wrote:peeker643 wrote:Even if you didn't have a replacement captain aboard the ship when the other captain mistakenly lights himself on fire 6 times and dies on the last one, someone should be able to safely keep it afloat.
How do you keep someone in charge who completely and consistently keeps fucking up the simplest responsibilities of his job?
If we're going to turn this thread to talk about the election Tuesday, we have to move it to No Holds Barred.
by Gradysmanldy » Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:45 am
pup wrote:Nothing says well coached team like:
False start
False start
Timeout to avoid delay of game
1 yard run on 1st and 20
by pup » Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:25 pm
by comish » Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:16 pm
by Triple-S » Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:59 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by OldDawg » Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:26 pm
pup wrote:There is a long list of WTF, before you even get to going for it on 4th down on your own 30 with 4 minutes left. I guess he showed all of us idiots for complaining about him punting on 4th and inches against Indy.
Still have a job?

by Larvell Blanks » Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:27 pm
Triple-S wrote:Well this is the perfect time to get rid of him and, considering the bye-week.
by LakeErieWarriors » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:35 am
by Hikohadon » Tue Nov 06, 2012 2:54 pm
by General » Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:06 pm

by peeker643 » Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:19 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Brian, liked your Fire Shurmur article today, especially agree with this passage:
I honestly can’t tell if Weeden simply blows or if it’s a combination of him struggling in an offense that’s doing nothing for him. And Haslam needs to know pretty damn soon about Mr. Weeden.
Probably argument #1 to can him.
by General » Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:27 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Brian, liked your Fire Shurmur article today, especially agree with this passage:
I honestly can’t tell if Weeden simply blows or if it’s a combination of him struggling in an offense that’s doing nothing for him. And Haslam needs to know pretty damn soon about Mr. Weeden.
Probably argument #1 to can him.
Thank you. At least you saw it for the Browns message and aren't sending me hate-tweets or emails about teaching my 11 yr old daughter how to maim and draw blood.

by Hikohadon » Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:41 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Brian, liked your Fire Shurmur article today, especially agree with this passage:
I honestly can’t tell if Weeden simply blows or if it’s a combination of him struggling in an offense that’s doing nothing for him. And Haslam needs to know pretty damn soon about Mr. Weeden.
Probably argument #1 to can him.
Thank you. At least you saw it for the Browns message and aren't sending me hate-tweets or emails about teaching my 11 yr old daughter how to maim and draw blood.
by municipalmutt » Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:44 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Brian, liked your Fire Shurmur article today, especially agree with this passage:
I honestly can’t tell if Weeden simply blows or if it’s a combination of him struggling in an offense that’s doing nothing for him. And Haslam needs to know pretty damn soon about Mr. Weeden.
Probably argument #1 to can him.
by leadpipe » Tue Nov 06, 2012 8:03 pm
municipalmutt wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Brian, liked your Fire Shurmur article today, especially agree with this passage:
I honestly can’t tell if Weeden simply blows or if it’s a combination of him struggling in an offense that’s doing nothing for him. And Haslam needs to know pretty damn soon about Mr. Weeden.
Probably argument #1 to can him.
Argument #2 can be made that he doesn't know what he has in Trich either. I know he's had a couple decent runs but they are not utilizing his potential either. Running up the gut with 8 in the box is not a recipe for success unless you are doing it against us.
Here's a simplistic idea SHUR: maybe try THROWING when in a power formation and RUNNING from a spread formation once in a while. You know, like the other 31 teams do. It might just benefit both rookies.
by pod2dawg » Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:58 pm
by justmebd » Tue Nov 06, 2012 11:18 pm
pod2dawg wrote:^^^^^^ That. Like my Brother ( real coach) says, " You have no f%^^&&ing idea what you got up there, they are trying implement an offense that has been figured out for a decade. More tape than Ron Jeremy. IF you wanted to run something like that these days you would need superior talent & very dynamic play calling.
Shurmur does nothing to make the D think. They will kill Richardson, and Weeden has not been given one schematic advantage of which to work. It be like being the little kid walking to school with one arm tied behind your back and your Mom calling the neighborhood bullies & letting them know when to expect you and what pocket your lunch money is in."
by bookelly » Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:34 am

by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:37 pm
bookelly wrote:From Josh Cribbs:
"I think the fact we haven't been winning [leads to] constant turnover," Cribbs said. ". . . Guys who have been here long, myself and Phil [Dawson], you see that. Different guys come here, you can't get tight-knit. It's hard to have a type of consistency with anything when you have so much change. So hopefully somebody comes and just makes it constant so we can get something started."
That my friends, is the writing on the wall right there. Everyone knows it, everyone wants it. Hell, I bet even SHUR at this point wants to be fired.
Halsem - pull the trigger.
by TouchEmAllTime » Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:46 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:bookelly wrote:From Josh Cribbs:
"I think the fact we haven't been winning [leads to] constant turnover," Cribbs said. ". . . Guys who have been here long, myself and Phil [Dawson], you see that. Different guys come here, you can't get tight-knit. It's hard to have a type of consistency with anything when you have so much change. So hopefully somebody comes and just makes it constant so we can get something started."
That my friends, is the writing on the wall right there. Everyone knows it, everyone wants it. Hell, I bet even SHUR at this point wants to be fired.
Halsem - pull the trigger.
To be fair, Josh Cribbs shouldn't even be on the team. The fact that Shurmer keeps running him out there for kickoffs, that he returns to the 15-yard line from 8-yards deep, is borderline criminal.
by Gradysmanldy » Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:03 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:bookelly wrote:From Josh Cribbs:
"I think the fact we haven't been winning [leads to] constant turnover," Cribbs said. ". . . Guys who have been here long, myself and Phil [Dawson], you see that. Different guys come here, you can't get tight-knit. It's hard to have a type of consistency with anything when you have so much change. So hopefully somebody comes and just makes it constant so we can get something started."
That my friends, is the writing on the wall right there. Everyone knows it, everyone wants it. Hell, I bet even SHUR at this point wants to be fired.
Halsem - pull the trigger.
To be fair, Josh Cribbs shouldn't even be on the team. The fact that Shurmer keeps running him out there for kickoffs, that he returns to the 15-yard line from 8-yards deep, is borderline criminal.
by bookelly » Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:47 pm
by justmebd » Sat Nov 24, 2012 9:49 am
by TouchEmAllTime » Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:18 pm
by BruceK » Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:44 pm

by bookelly » Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:45 pm
by Big Money Player » Sun Nov 25, 2012 9:46 pm
by FUDU » Sun Nov 25, 2012 10:45 pm
bookelly wrote:Loved this: 2:30 to go, up by six. Run the ball 3 times up the middle for 3 yards. Fumble on the 3rd try but get a break because the rules are whacked. Punt. Play prevent defense.
Genius. Pure Genius.
/I know they won...but winning by 6 with the other team turning the ball over 8 times is not a win, that's getting laid by a 800 pound granny.
by swerb » Mon Nov 26, 2012 9:31 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:30 am
by andrew6586 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:36 am
by mattvan1 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:14 am
andrew6586 wrote:I'll give Shurmer credit for this: his players play hard for him and there is something in that. We've seen this team quit on Mangini and Romeo in the past at this point in the season and Shurmer still has the locker room on his side.
by neoleo » Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:39 am
mattvan1 wrote:andrew6586 wrote:I'll give Shurmer credit for this: his players play hard for him and there is something in that. We've seen this team quit on Mangini and Romeo in the past at this point in the season and Shurmer still has the locker room on his side.
Not to get nit-picky, but that's not entirely true, especially in the case of Mangini (other than his season/career ending game against the Steelers). Browns were competitive through game 15 that year.

by Govbarney » Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:44 am
andrew6586 wrote:I'll give Shurmer credit for this: his players play hard for him and there is something in that. We've seen this team quit on Mangini and Romeo in the past at this point in the season and Shurmer still has the locker room on his side. I still want a new coach at the end of the season but it should be noted that he hasn't lost the players. It may not matter though. Haslam didn't invest ONE BILLION DOLLARS of his own money to let some clown he doesn't trust lead his team.
by Larvell Blanks » Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:56 am
by andrew6586 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:49 am
by Hikohadon » Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:03 pm
by bookelly » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:41 pm
Hikohadon wrote:I think it's a good sign that the team still plays hard and is motivated and is in every game.
I also think that Shurmur has amply displayed that his limitations as a play caller and play designer necessitate his removal.
by Hikohadon » Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:34 am
bookelly wrote:Hikohadon wrote:I think it's a good sign that the team still plays hard and is motivated and is in every game.
I also think that Shurmur has amply displayed that his limitations as a play caller and play designer necessitate his removal.
What if they keep winning? *shudder.
/I guess that Banner could always fall back to the "new owner - new Prez -we're going in different direction even though SHUR was showing progress" line of bullshit.
by bookelly » Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:11 am
Hikohadon wrote:bookelly wrote:Hikohadon wrote:I think it's a good sign that the team still plays hard and is motivated and is in every game.
I also think that Shurmur has amply displayed that his limitations as a play caller and play designer necessitate his removal.
What if they keep winning? *shudder.
/I guess that Banner could always fall back to the "new owner - new Prez -we're going in different direction even though SHUR was showing progress" line of bullshit.
I don't think it's a hard sell. You just say "Remember what happened the last time a new regime kept a suckass coach jsu because he won some games at the end of a suckass season."

by bookelly » Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:54 am
by Govbarney » Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:46 am
by andrew6586 » Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:47 pm
by Larvell Blanks » Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:53 am
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
