Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by Gradysmanldy » Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:27 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:44 pm
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:45 pm

by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:49 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:Holmgren is out, per ESPN. Haslam does not waste time.
by mattvan1 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:56 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:02 pm
mattvan1 wrote:As long as Banner sticks to the business/contract/cap side of the org I am cautiously ambivilent.
But if the guy wanders over toward the pro player personnel side then this might make us all long for the days of Pete Garcia.
by Gradysmanldy » Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:30 pm
by FUDU » Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:53 pm
by mattvan1 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:00 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:
Nevermind, it appears Banner is taking the reigns immediately. Mike will just be around to facilitate a smooth turnover....
by Larvell Blanks » Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:11 pm
FUDU wrote:At least Mike can hit up Brasa a few more times before he leaves town.
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:59 pm
by andrew6586 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:03 pm
Larvell Blanks wrote:FUDU wrote:At least Mike can hit up Brasa a few more times before he leaves town.
Doesn't Mike have to at least BE in town?
by Gradysmanldy » Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:05 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:55 pm
by justmebd » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:43 pm
Hikohadon wrote:I don't know if they're headed in the right direction or not yet. Maybe we'll know better by the end of the season.
Just the feel of another (what is apparently inevitable) blow-up is getting old.
If this guy is in it for... probably the rest of my life... I'll let his actions help me decide whether or not I feel like buying in.
by swerb » Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:55 pm
by motherscratcher » Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:07 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:25 pm
swerb wrote:It can't be any worse. Even under a worst case scenario, Haslam is a huge upgrade over Lerner.
by municipalmutt » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:29 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:37 pm
municipalmutt wrote:Do we know for sure that Banner will be in the front office? I heard some rumblings that he might only be offered minority ownership.
by googleeph2 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:44 pm
Hikohadon wrote:swerb wrote:It can't be any worse. Even under a worst case scenario, Haslam is a huge upgrade over Lerner.
Sounds like what everyone said when they finally benched DA for Quinn.
Which is certainly not any kind of support for Lerner, who was unbelievably clueless. Just that I ain't gettin excited about ANYONE anymore until they show they deserve it.
by bookelly » Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:59 pm
by googleeph2 » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:06 pm
by leadpipe » Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:50 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:08 pm
leadpipe wrote:If it is a TOTAL rebuild, and I believe it will be, let's remember, the 45 previous rebuilds aren't the new regime's fault.
Frankly, with a new head coach, and front office, what are the odds that many of their thoughts are going to mesh with this regimes 1985 thinking. And if they mesh, well, they are in deep shit anyway.
I'd be more than happy if someone came in here and said, "What the fuck with the 29 year old immobile rookie and the Christmas gift to the Vikings for a fucking running back?" What game are we tryin' to play here?
Keep the guys worth a damn, and start over. I don't like it, but I don't see a rise without it.
Holmgren fleeced Lerner. Period. If you've got a vested owner you got a chance. Without a vested owner you have none. Clearly.
Maybe Haslam will F this up. Maybe he won't. This is still light years ahead of "I don't care."
by leadpipe » Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:22 pm
Hikohadon wrote:leadpipe wrote:If it is a TOTAL rebuild, and I believe it will be, let's remember, the 45 previous rebuilds aren't the new regime's fault.
Frankly, with a new head coach, and front office, what are the odds that many of their thoughts are going to mesh with this regimes 1985 thinking. And if they mesh, well, they are in deep shit anyway.
I'd be more than happy if someone came in here and said, "What the fuck with the 29 year old immobile rookie and the Christmas gift to the Vikings for a fucking running back?" What game are we tryin' to play here?
Keep the guys worth a damn, and start over. I don't like it, but I don't see a rise without it.
Holmgren fleeced Lerner. Period. If you've got a vested owner you got a chance. Without a vested owner you have none. Clearly.
Maybe Haslam will F this up. Maybe he won't. This is still light years ahead of "I don't care."
Can the GM, the coach, and the rookie first rounders.
Sounds awesome.
I AM too tired of this to care.
Wake me up when they're in the playoffs sometime around 2020.
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:28 pm
leadpipe wrote:What the hell do you think is gonna happen?
First two are already circling the drain.
The alternative is keeping this train rolling and hitting the playoffs sometime around never.
by leadpipe » Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:35 pm
Hikohadon wrote:leadpipe wrote:What the hell do you think is gonna happen?
First two are already circling the drain.
The alternative is keeping this train rolling and hitting the playoffs sometime around never.
As if I can trust that Haslam won't keep flushing and flushing like Jammies did.
We'll see. But if someone comes in here and judges that they need to completely reboot the whole damn thing - not just talking Shurmy and Heckert - then I have no more faith in him than I did in Randy.
We get a more visible, more personable dumbass.
by Hikohadon » Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:41 pm
leadpipe wrote:Jammies did nothing - aside from fall for the first person to walk thru the door, cause he had no interest or time for any process.
That's the whole point. No matter what Haslam does, total reboot. Partway reboot.....at least it will be SOMETHING. And again, you're left with two outcomes, he'll either be right. Or he'll be wrong. One of those is very much better than "I don't care" and the other is no worse.
by mattvan1 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:19 am
by justmebd » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:41 am
by leadpipe » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:47 am
Hikohadon wrote:leadpipe wrote:Jammies did nothing - aside from fall for the first person to walk thru the door, cause he had no interest or time for any process.
That's the whole point. No matter what Haslam does, total reboot. Partway reboot.....at least it will be SOMETHING. And again, you're left with two outcomes, he'll either be right. Or he'll be wrong. One of those is very much better than "I don't care" and the other is no worse.
I actually disagree with that wholeheartedly because a dumbass owner that doesn't care might blind squirrel/nut himself into hiring someone that is competent, since he won't do anything himself.
A dumbass owner that cares - that insists on being involved and making big decisions - well, there's no cure for that.
We better hope Haslam is good because if he's the owner equivalent of - say - Phil Savage, there ain't nobody gonna fire his ass after 4 years of failure.
There's a reason that the Cowboys will never again do shit under Jerry Jones, and it ain't Jason Garrett.
Nothing more destructive than a stupid owner who "cares".
by Hikohadon » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:03 am
mattvan1 wrote:"Football reports to Joe" is a sentence that makes me really really nervous.
EOD, I'm with Hiko. Too tired to care one way or the other. I have a friend of Russian descent; the guy is full of great sayings, all deeply rooted in the inherent despair of his culture. There are two that come to mind in the Browns current situation.
Once we were in the middle of some type of effed up project; things were going to shit all around. I looked at him and complained "What else could possibly go wrong?" His deadpanned reply - "Don't worry, many things."
But my favorite, which should be the rallying cry for all Browns fans, is allegedly taken from WWII and the siege of Stalingrad.
"they fuck us, but we grow stronger"
by Hikohadon » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:08 am
leadpipe wrote:Hikohadon wrote:leadpipe wrote:Jammies did nothing - aside from fall for the first person to walk thru the door, cause he had no interest or time for any process.
That's the whole point. No matter what Haslam does, total reboot. Partway reboot.....at least it will be SOMETHING. And again, you're left with two outcomes, he'll either be right. Or he'll be wrong. One of those is very much better than "I don't care" and the other is no worse.
I actually disagree with that wholeheartedly because a dumbass owner that doesn't care might blind squirrel/nut himself into hiring someone that is competent, since he won't do anything himself.
A dumbass owner that cares - that insists on being involved and making big decisions - well, there's no cure for that.
We better hope Haslam is good because if he's the owner equivalent of - say - Phil Savage, there ain't nobody gonna fire his ass after 4 years of failure.
There's a reason that the Cowboys will never again do shit under Jerry Jones, and it ain't Jason Garrett.
Nothing more destructive than a stupid owner who "cares".
Jerry Jones, if you took away the SB's he stumbles upon, still won as much as Randy Lerner.
Nothing more destructive than a stupid owner that cares? All a matter of degree in how you like your losses.
My point is the chance that he isn't stupid exists. With a guy that couldn't give a shit, it doesn't.
by scott » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:53 am
by Hikohadon » Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:04 am
scott wrote:Mostly with Hiko on this one.
Feel like I should be ecstatic that the guy who never wanted to own the team is out. It is probably a good thing. I just don't feel like I have the energy to sit through another 5 year plan.
Of course I will. What's the alternative?

by mattvan1 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:05 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:54 pm
mattvan1 wrote:According to wiki, Foreshadowing is a literary device in which an author indistinctly suggests certain plot developments that will come later in the story.
And I am afraid the following foreshadows impending doom
Asked if Banner would be involved with football decisions, Haslam said "it depends on how deep you go. But, yeah, Joe's the CEO of the organization, and generally that means you're going to be involved in all phases of the organization."
by FUDU » Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:20 pm
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:23 pm
by mattvan1 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:23 pm
peeker643 wrote:mattvan1 wrote:According to wiki, Foreshadowing is a literary device in which an author indistinctly suggests certain plot developments that will come later in the story.
And I am afraid the following foreshadows impending doom
Asked if Banner would be involved with football decisions, Haslam said "it depends on how deep you go. But, yeah, Joe's the CEO of the organization, and generally that means you're going to be involved in all phases of the organization."
Like the CEO of Progressive is involved in Commercial Claims? I mean, I suppose it's all relative, but Progressive's CEO is Progressive's CEO and his reach into claims is hiring the very best Claims people to run his operation. So yeah, he's involved in the Claims operation, but he's not sitting next to me looking at the latest settlement demand.
I would assume, the Browns having just sold for >$1billion, that this is a business. And the CEO should be involved in all phases of the organization. But that doesn't mean he orders the soap in the shower, calls plays or necessarily hires and fires coaches and others. But he should have input on how all of that will affect the business, no?
by DeanSheen » Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:00 pm
I have a friend of Russian descent; the guy is full of great sayings, all deeply rooted in the inherent despair of his culture. There are two that come to mind in the Browns current situation.
Once we were in the middle of some type of effed up project; things were going to shit all around. I looked at him and complained "What else could possibly go wrong?" His deadpanned reply - "Don't worry, many things."
But my favorite, which should be the rallying cry for all Browns fans, is allegedly taken from WWII and the siege of Stalingrad.
"they fuck us, but we grow stronger"
by peeker643 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:28 pm
by Hikohadon » Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:43 pm
peeker643 wrote:The equipment manager or assistant equipment manager order the shampoo Donny. No idea how good either of them are.
And Matt, Banner allegedly has the chops to run a football franchise too, judging by what I'm reading. I don't know how it will all work out, but I'm saying that being the CEO of any big organization would seemingly require you to effectively delegate and hire experienced people. Yep, we've seen this go wrong many times here. But that doesn't mean there aren't folks out there with the knowledge and ability to actually do it right.
If we got that we're better off than we were yesterday. If not, well, not sure how much worse than 1-5 and headed to 2-3 wins it can get. If Banner and Haslam are working out UDFAs and sitting in on film sessions we're as fucked today as we were yesterday.

by mattvan1 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:53 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:The equipment manager or assistant equipment manager order the shampoo Donny. No idea how good either of them are.
And Matt, Banner allegedly has the chops to run a football franchise too, judging by what I'm reading. I don't know how it will all work out, but I'm saying that being the CEO of any big organization would seemingly require you to effectively delegate and hire experienced people. Yep, we've seen this go wrong many times here. But that doesn't mean there aren't folks out there with the knowledge and ability to actually do it right.
If we got that we're better off than we were yesterday. If not, well, not sure how much worse than 1-5 and headed to 2-3 wins it can get. If Banner and Haslam are working out UDFAs and sitting in on film sessions we're as fucked today as we were yesterday.
Agree with this.
So I'm going to assume that we're just as fucked today as we were yesterday and then wait for Haslam and Banner to prove me wrong. THEN I'll get excited.
Maybe I just want to be more proactive with my disdain this time so I can be more in lockstep with you people. Hate 'em BEFORE they have a chance to do anything so that I can say "I told you so" later.

by Hikohadon » Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:02 pm
mattvan1 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:So I'm going to assume that we're just as fucked today as we were yesterday and then wait for Haslam and Banner to prove me wrong. THEN I'll get excited.
Maybe I just want to be more proactive with my disdain this time so I can be more in lockstep with you people. Hate 'em BEFORE they have a chance to do anything so that I can say "I told you so" later.
LOL. I am having a distinct sense of déjà vu.
And BTW, not once have I ever written "I told you so" regarding SHUR.
But baby Jesus in a manger I often lie awake at night thinking about it.
by justmebd » Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:27 pm
by Hikohadon » Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:37 pm
justmebd wrote:Some thoughts to ponder.
The biggest difference between the upcoming reboot and the last several come down to ownership: Randy Lerner no longer is making any decisions of any kind.
This is a good thing. I got tired of hearing what a "nice guy" he is when that didn't mean shit to winning or losing games.
Bottom line is Lerner kept hitting the reset button in the desperate hope that, sooner or later, he'd be able to get past the Gorgon on Level Two in Castlevania.
Lerner's FO choices:
Savage/Crennel: Two men going in two different directions, none of them forward. Crennel proved why he had been a career assistant.
Eric Mangini: Fancied constantly shooting himself in the foot while imagining himself as the "next Bill Belichick" was the way to win games. Passed off his failures as "part of the process."
Holmgren/Heckert/SHUR: Holmgren had no idea what his job actually was, somehow made things worse. Made most of his hires based on Bob Lamonte's recommendations, because your agent always has your best interests in mind. I like Heckert. SHUR has spent way too much time looking clueless for me to feel he'll ever "grow" into his role as a head coach. I feel the same way about SHUR as I did about Brian Daboll -- Cut your losses and move on fer christ sake!!
Now that Haslem is here, and he's already spent more time with the team and the fans in two months than Lerner did in 10 years, I feel this time could be different. Cautiously optimistic is where I'm at.
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:56 pm
So I'm going to assume that we're just as fucked today as we were yesterday and then wait for Haslam and Banner to prove me wrong

by Gradysmanldy » Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:33 am
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Madre Hill, Superstar and 2 guests
