by Govbarney » Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:46 am
That game was farther apart then the score indicated , I counted at least 2 balls that bounced off the bar in the 1st half, one of which defied the law of physics not going in. Then once the US scored Klinsmann conceded Offense and got ultra German conservative. Gutsy move considering the Jamaican speed, but then again the majority of the US stars had already played a game that week over seas so I understand Klinsmann trying to conserve some energy, I am sure that Dempsey especially really appreciated that.
Crew Stadium has the best case for becoming USA soccer's Home Field, in the same way Azteca is Mexico's Home Field. 50% of the United States population lives within a 500 mile radius of Columbus (60% if you go out to 600miles). It has the history of being the first soccer only stadium in the country, Its big enough at 22000 seats where you always have crazy sellouts for every game regardless of whether its a WCQ, or just a Friendly, but not so big where you have vast areas of empty seats, and Columbus has a good size Hispanic soccer crazy fan base, but not so big that the US fans are out numbered 3-1 when playing Mexico in California or Texas.
I understand US Soccer needs to spread the wealth, but I think at the very least all of our games against Mexico should be played in Columbus. The embarrassment in Pasadena is the best case for why.
"I don't think they're building chemical weapons in Berea. But they might be. I can't say for sure."
Chuck Klosterman