Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by cozmeesah » Wed Sep 05, 2012 6:05 pm
by skatingtripods » Wed Sep 05, 2012 6:36 pm
by FUDU » Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:19 pm
by leadpipe » Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:28 pm
skatingtripods wrote:It's another case where what he says isn't wrong, but he's not in a position to say it. He's right that you can't miss. He's right that Illitch spends money. He's right that Willingham would look good in this lineup. You just don't say anything about the team that signs your paycheck.
Front office is going to try like hell to trade him to Houston.
Too bad the Marlins just paid a ton of money to Heath Bell. Chris could be miserable back in his home city with a team that blows.
Also, for coz's game, I'm going with December 6.
by dazindiansfanuk » Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:35 pm
by Adverb Harry » Wed Sep 05, 2012 7:55 pm
by Prosecutor » Wed Sep 05, 2012 8:27 pm
“You can’t miss,” Perez said. “You have to be right. That’s why I say it’s not just ownership. They don’t make the trades. It’s the GMs. It goes hand in hand. The GMs can only spend the money the owners give them, but they pick who they spend it on or who they don’t. They pick. The owners don’t pick.
“Josh Willingham would look great in this lineup. They didn’t want to (pony) up for that last year. … That’s the decision they make, and this is the bed we’re laying in.”
by Am I Here Again? » Wed Sep 05, 2012 8:49 pm
skatingtripods wrote:It's another case where what he says isn't wrong, but he's not in a position to say it....
by leadpipe » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:00 pm
Prosecutor wrote:“You can’t miss,” Perez said. “You have to be right. That’s why I say it’s not just ownership. They don’t make the trades. It’s the GMs. It goes hand in hand. The GMs can only spend the money the owners give them, but they pick who they spend it on or who they don’t. They pick. The owners don’t pick.
“Josh Willingham would look great in this lineup. They didn’t want to (pony) up for that last year. … That’s the decision they make, and this is the bed we’re laying in.”
He didn't say anything that everybody doesn't already know.
I don't care what he says as long as he's locking down wins. We have too few good players to trade them just because they're outspoken.
I'm in favor of trading him simply because we have Pestano and Allen to work the 8th and 9th. If Perez could bring in an upgrade at one of the everyday positions it would be a good move. It doesn't help much to have three great relievers but nobody who can get the team a lead.
by Adverb Harry » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:28 pm
leadpipe wrote:
So, to summarize, we should clearly not trade him, but we should trade him.
Sounds like a plan.
by peeker643 » Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:54 pm
by motherscratcher » Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:15 pm
peeker643 wrote:He's an attention-seeking piece of shit, douchebag.
And Lead is right, it doesn't matter if he's right. Defending him is defending stupidity.
1. Anyone who gives a fuck and isn't brain dead already knows it is what it is. He's not enlightening anyone who pays attention. The Dolan's don't spend, Ilitch does and Willingham woulda looked good here.
Fucking astounding!!! What a goddamn genius.
2. Those that don't pay attention and don't give a fuck don't give a fuck and ain't paying to that cock-smoking fuck wad.
3. Two months ago he was telling us we were the assholes for not supporting a winner. Where's our winner to support today. Was it Dolan's sheer fucking genius that had them in 1st place back then? Is it not a bit the players' fault that they blow rat cock today?
Fuck Chris Perez. I hope his wife is a genius so that the new baby has a chance to at least aspire to be just run of the mill stupid and therefore brighter than her old man.
by motherscratcher » Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:21 pm
by Govbarney » Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:24 pm
by Prosecutor » Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:42 am
So, to summarize, we should clearly not trade him, but we should trade him.
by Spin » Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:49 am
by Larvell Blanks » Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:19 am
by WiscTribeFan » Thu Sep 06, 2012 10:54 am
by Adverb Harry » Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:23 pm
by googleeph2 » Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:58 pm
by skatingtripods » Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:27 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:My only question is this...with all the controversies he's been involved with this year, does that hurt his trade value? Would other GMs want a possible distraction like him added to their team? If the Indians indeed decide they HAVE to trade him, will they be forced to settle for less just because his rep hurts his value? He's one of our very few tradeable assets that we need to rebuild...it would suck (and be just our luck) to get a less-than-ideal return on him.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:40 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:Nice rant. If he would have said for Dolan to get the dick out of his mouth, as he told that fan in Oakland, it would have been epic.
by cozmeesah » Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:10 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Im more concerned with Antonetti saying he strongly disagrees. I really hope he doesnt truly believe that.
by leadpipe » Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:35 pm
Prosecutor wrote:So, to summarize, we should clearly not trade him, but we should trade him.
No, Meat, I said we should not trade him just because he's outspoken, but we should trade him because he's got value and he can be replaced internally, like Mother said.
That being said, as long as he's an employee of the team he should refrain from criticizing ownership and management. You don't always have to voice your frustration.
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:49 pm
leadpipe wrote:Prosecutor wrote:So, to summarize, we should clearly not trade him, but we should trade him.
No, Meat, I said we should not trade him just because he's outspoken, but we should trade him because he's got value and he can be replaced internally, like Mother said.
That being said, as long as he's an employee of the team he should refrain from criticizing ownership and management. You don't always have to voice your frustration.
So, to update the summary, we should clearly not trade him, but we should trade him.

by Dnthateonthepronk » Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:43 pm
cozmeesah wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Im more concerned with Antonetti saying he strongly disagrees. I really hope he doesnt truly believe that.
Well, what was he going to publicly say? No way they'd ever say "Sure, he's right, we suck. We all deserve to lose our jobs." Besides, in agreeing publicly he'd also be talking shit publicly about his boss(es).
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:40 pm
by idoctribefan » Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:23 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:I know he would never say that publicly. He had to say what he said, I'm saying I hope he doesnt actually believe what he said.

Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 2 guests
