Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by dazindiansfanuk » Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:40 pm
by 1Perry » Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:38 pm
by RedDawg53 » Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:39 pm
by 1Perry » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:02 pm
by Prosecutor » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:03 pm
by jerryroche » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:08 pm
by leadpipe » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:12 pm
by Bigfist » Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:45 pm
by Am I Here Again? » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:32 am
Bigfist wrote: Like it or not, I think we see Shelly, Matt, and Hannahan the rest of the season.

by justmebd » Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:18 am
Bigfist wrote:I wonder if we will see any late season call ups? My reasoning is that the team is going nowhere, and each guy who plays on the major league team for a month will get 80 thousand. Can't see Dolan laying out cash like that. Like it or not, I think we see Shelly, Matt, and Hannahan the rest of the season.
to the Dolans
by jb » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:45 am
justmebd wrote:This also is why you probably won't see Manny Acta fired.
by 1Perry » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:55 am
jb wrote:justmebd wrote:This also is why you probably won't see Manny Acta fired.
Give me one valid reason Manny Acta should lose his job.
by skatingtripods » Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:08 pm
Bigfist wrote:I wonder if we will see any late season call ups? My reasoning is that the team is going nowhere, and each guy who plays on the major league team for a month will get 80 thousand. Can't see Dolan laying out cash like that. Like it or not, I think we see Shelly, Matt, and Hannahan the rest of the season.
by Bigfist » Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:26 pm
by skatingtripods » Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:30 pm
Bigfist wrote:We'll see. I think if the FO had any intention in having Fedroff, Canzler, or Goedert audition, they would have done so by now.
by pup » Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:30 am
jb wrote:justmebd wrote:This also is why you probably won't see Manny Acta fired.
Give me one valid reason Manny Acta should lose his job.
by skatingtripods » Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:49 am
pup wrote:jb wrote:justmebd wrote:This also is why you probably won't see Manny Acta fired.
Give me one valid reason Manny Acta should lose his job.
1 2007 38 Washington Nationals NL 162 73 89 .451 4
2 2008 39 Washington Nationals NL 161 59 102 .366 5
3 2009 40 Washington Nationals NL 87 26 61 .299 5
4 2010 41 Cleveland Indians AL 162 69 93 .426 4
5 2011 42 Cleveland Indians AL 162 80 82 .494 2
6 2012 43 Cleveland Indians AL 129 55 74 .426 4
Washington Nationals 3 years 410 158 252 .385 4.7
Cleveland Indians 3 years 453 204 249 .450 3.3
6 years 863 362 501 .419 4.0
by Am I Here Again? » Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:12 am
skatingtripods wrote:Anyone with half a brain knows that he had no fucking talent in Washington and has no fucking pitching here.
He might get fired, but, it ain't his fault.
by pup » Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:22 pm
Am I Here Again? wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Anyone with half a brain knows that he had no fucking talent in Washington and has no fucking pitching here.
He might get fired, but, it ain't his fault.
^This^
I've said elsewhere neither Al Lopez nor Grover could have dragged this team up to a .500 season. Can't make lobster salad when you're given chum fish.
by skatingtripods » Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:30 pm
pup wrote:Is this roster 4-25 bad? There is no excuse or defense for this month of August. He might not be a bad manager, but he sure as hell isn't a good one.
by pup » Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:10 pm
skatingtripods wrote:pup wrote:Is this roster 4-25 bad? There is no excuse or defense for this month of August. He might not be a bad manager, but he sure as hell isn't a good one.
The pitching is. They're on pace to be the only team since 1899 without a starting pitcher that is above being a replacement-level player (nobody with a positive WAR).
Can't blame Acta that the starters put them in a hole damn near every game.
by skatingtripods » Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:32 pm
pup wrote:So, what you are saying is the "building around strong pitching" has failed?
by rigs » Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:08 pm
by skatingtripods » Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:29 pm
rigs wrote:People that want Manny Acta to stick around need to give a reason why. Why should he stay? The team has totally quit on him. They are playing at a 120 loss pace since the all-star break. What manager would ever survive this? Not even Brad Mills, on a team that was EXPECTED to lose 100+ games, survived it.
No crap the team stinks. What manager lost 100 games with a good team?
by TouchEmAllTime » Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:43 pm
by rigs » Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:01 pm
skatingtripods wrote:rigs wrote:People that want Manny Acta to stick around need to give a reason why. Why should he stay? The team has totally quit on him. They are playing at a 120 loss pace since the all-star break. What manager would ever survive this? Not even Brad Mills, on a team that was EXPECTED to lose 100+ games, survived it.
No crap the team stinks. What manager lost 100 games with a good team?
I don't think Acta keeps his job, but for the sake of devil's advocate, I'll play your game.
A team of replacement level players is projected by Baseball-Reference to finish 51-111. In Acta's five full years as manager, he has had teams that were 17, 10.4, 21.5, 22.6, and this season's team is 11.3 wins above replacement players.
That means Acta should have records of 68-94, 61-101, 73-89, 74-88, and this season should end 62-100. That's a combined 338-472. So far, Acta is 336-441 with 32 games to go. So, he has overachieved as a manager with a total lack of talent on his ballclubs.
He's a very progressive manager with statistics. If he had the necessary tools for the job, I believe he would be able to use them effectively. He studies sabermetric stats and matchups. That should mesh well with most front offices in the league.
I don't think this year's team has quit on him, per se, they've quit on themselves. It shouldn't be the manager's job to play cheerleader and get everybody all riled up. It's a team devoid of on-field leaders and with only a couple of energy guys (Kipnis may be the only one).
Acta had two really strong first halves with teams that were severely flawed. There's something to be said for that, especially last year's team that dealt with a lot of injuries throughout the year.
Acta's not the problem. The team is.
None of this will be enough to keep his job, and, frankly, I don't think he wants to keep this job and endure a 100-loss season next year.
I can't say for certain how Acta is with the players. There has been regression with several guys, and I'm not entirely sure how much of that is on Acta. I don't know what his day-to-day dealings are with players, or if he delegates that to his coaching staff.
Like Lead Pipe likes to point out, I don't know how much a manager truly matters. I can take it or leave it with Acta for next season. I don't think it matters either way.
by swerb » Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:24 pm
by 1Perry » Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:36 pm
by Bigfist » Thu Aug 30, 2012 5:33 pm
by Dnthateonthepronk » Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:20 pm
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], gbot and 5 guests