Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by mattvan1 » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:08 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:21 pm
by StewieG » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:47 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:49 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:12 pm
by Hikohadon » Sun Aug 26, 2012 6:00 pm
by justmebd » Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:39 pm
Hikohadon wrote:JoJo Dickson, your UPS truck is calling.
by motherscratcher » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:16 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:34 pm

by motherscratcher » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:36 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:It's Fed Ex Kinko's now you dumbfucks.
by FUDU » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:40 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:11 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:38 pm
Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:Why the hell would anyone ever go to Kinkos in the first place?

by e0y2e3 » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:51 pm

by Hikohadon » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:55 am

by Love child of shawn kemp » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:12 am
by peeker643 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:18 am
e0y2e3 wrote:On the rare occasion I need to print something and can't wait to do it at work I use the shit out of Fedex Kinko's.... dumbfucks.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:44 am

by LarsHancock » Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:39 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:The rate of return on a home printer when you don't have kids is like negative infinity.

by e0y2e3 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:41 pm
LarsHancock wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:The rate of return on a home printer when you don't have kids is like negative infinity.
An all-in-one fax-copy-print-scan is like $60. Hell, most computer manufacturers will throw it in for free just so you buy the ink later on. I know my kids do a shit ton of faxing which pays for the machine (sarcasm), but even for you, how is that not a good investment?

by LarsHancock » Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:03 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:LarsHancock wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:The rate of return on a home printer when you don't have kids is like negative infinity.
An all-in-one fax-copy-print-scan is like $60. Hell, most computer manufacturers will throw it in for free just so you buy the ink later on. I know my kids do a shit ton of faxing which pays for the machine (sarcasm), but even for you, how is that not a good investment?
I only buy Apple.
And fuck the space the thing takes up for the 2x a year I'd use it.


by e0y2e3 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:10 pm

by FUDU » Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:41 am
e0y2e3 wrote:LarsHancock wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:The rate of return on a home printer when you don't have kids is like negative infinity.
An all-in-one fax-copy-print-scan is like $60. Hell, most computer manufacturers will throw it in for free just so you buy the ink later on. I know my kids do a shit ton of faxing which pays for the machine (sarcasm), but even for you, how is that not a good investment?
I only buy Apple.
And fuck the space the thing takes up for the 2x a year I'd use it.
by motherscratcher » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:18 am
FUDU wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:LarsHancock wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:The rate of return on a home printer when you don't have kids is like negative infinity.
An all-in-one fax-copy-print-scan is like $60. Hell, most computer manufacturers will throw it in for free just so you buy the ink later on. I know my kids do a shit ton of faxing which pays for the machine (sarcasm), but even for you, how is that not a good investment?
I only buy Apple.
And fuck the space the thing takes up for the 2x a year I'd use it.
I don't see how that's any different than your head?
by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:45 am
Aside: how soon until the hipsters bring back the Andre Thornton glasses?

by Hikohadon » Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:07 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Aside: how soon until the hipsters bring back the Andre Thornton glasses?
They've been back.
Hipster trifecta with the scarf, glasses, and mustache.
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:43 pm
by Hikohadon » Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:14 am
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:03 am
Hikohadon wrote:Guess for the Friday cuts: the reason that GB hasn't made an offer for Colt is that they know the Browns will have to cut one of them and are fine taking whichever one they cut sine Colt/Wallace are pretty much interchangeable. So lucky you, Seneca, you'll be a Packer by Sunday.
by Hikohadon » Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:54 am
peeker643 wrote:I'd much rather give up a late round pick or a conditional pick and get the guy I wanted. The one who's younger, cheaper, higher "upside"...etc. If it truly doesn't matter which of them you get then you're better off with neither.
Though I would take the guy who's not a raging, anti-social, non-mentoring, entitled douchebag.
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:41 am
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:I'd much rather give up a late round pick or a conditional pick and get the guy I wanted. The one who's younger, cheaper, higher "upside"...etc. If it truly doesn't matter which of them you get then you're better off with neither.
Though I would take the guy who's not a raging, anti-social, non-mentoring, entitled douchebag.
As if you don't look in the dictionary under "entitled douchebag" and see a picture of passive-aggressive, whiny Colt McCoy. Not sure why the populace thinks Colt is such a "good kid", must be that he's so cute and cuddly.
And... upside? Colt? Where? Guy's got one of the lowest ceilings of any QB in the league.
I would agree that Colt's probably the better option, but it's not by that much, and if either Colt or Seneca have to see the field for any extended action then this season is useless anyway.
by Hikohadon » Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:00 pm
peeker643 wrote:Colt puts more effort into faking being genuine. Shows initiative.![]()
He has more 'upside' than Wallace who will never be a mentor or a starter. Colt could one day be the former once he gets pasts his visions of grandeur.
peeker643 wrote:Not to mention the incentive of having him gone from here so he's someone else's cute and cuddly issue to deal with.
by mistero » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:25 pm
by municipalmutt » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:32 pm
by mistero » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:34 pm
by googleeph2 » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:37 pm
by googleeph2 » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:41 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Pretty sure that's a chick with a fake 'stache.
by googleeph2 » Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:44 pm
by municipalmutt » Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:05 pm
mistero wrote:Now hearing McCoy will be cut too and we're adding AJ Feeley....stupid twitter second hand from my wife
by scott » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:13 pm
municipalmutt wrote:Surprised at the Wallace cut. In Colt's showcase game last night, he pretty much stunk up the place. I thought Wallace brought more to the table than McCoy. Oh well.
Young over Sims is another head scratcher.
by Hikohadon » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:33 pm
googleeph2 wrote:I still find it hard to believe that no team offered a deal for McCoy since cut or not, he was available.
(And no, I don't think he has any business being the Browns' starter.)
by Hikohadon » Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:37 pm
mistero wrote:Cuts tweeting in.
Seneca Wallace QB
Gronkowski TE
Sims S
so far....
by peeker643 » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:41 am
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:50 am
Hikohadon wrote:googleeph2 wrote:I still find it hard to believe that no team offered a deal for McCoy since cut or not, he was available.
(And no, I don't think he has any business being the Browns' starter.)
I don't. QB's of his ilk are a dime a dozen. It's not like he's a project with potential/upside.
by Hikohadon » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:51 am
peeker643 wrote:I truly don't understand how Owen Marecic makes this roster before Smelley.
Marecic is a mediocre football player who plays stiffly and does nothing well.
Nothing.
by khetti » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:54 am
The following 22 roster moves were made as the Cleveland Browns got down to the mandatory 53-player limit:
Waived (18)
Dominic Alford OL
Ronnie Cameron DL
Josh Cooper WR
Stanley Daniels OL
James Dockery DB
Garth Gerhart OL
William Green DL
Dan Gronkowski TE
Benjamin Jacobs LB
Ernest Owusu DL
Brian Schaefering DL
Jarrod Shaw OL
Jeff Shugarts OL
Brad Smelley FB
Quinton Spears LB
Adonis Thomas RB
Kiante Tripp DL
Rod Windsor WR
Contract Terminated (2)
Evan Moore TE
Seneca Wallace QB
by pod2dawg » Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:58 am
peeker643 wrote:I truly don't understand how Owen Marecic makes this roster before Smelley.
Marecic is a mediocre football player who plays stiffly and does nothing well.
Nothing.
by justmebd » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:48 am
pod2dawg wrote:peeker643 wrote:I truly don't understand how Owen Marecic makes this roster before Smelley.
Marecic is a mediocre football player who plays stiffly and does nothing well.
Nothing.
Yep.
Even more perplexing is why did we let Vickers go? Was he too good a blocker...too physical?....actually seemed to enjoy playing here?...show too much enthusiasm?.........actually was never intimidated by Steeler Linebackers and put his helmut on them?
by justmebd » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:54 am
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests