Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by bookelly » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:03 pm
by dpdad » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:22 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:29 pm

by bookelly » Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:00 pm
by bookelly » Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:37 pm
by peeker643 » Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:31 am
by Hikohadon » Sun Aug 26, 2012 6:06 pm
peeker643 wrote:Looking good.
All of it.
Nothing to be concerned about at all.
Just takes time...time...time...time.
Good news is the pressure in the pocket didn't affect Weeden at all and there doesn't appear there will be much of it this season.
At least they didn't turn the ball over and the first team dominated the Eagles 2s and 3s.
Wallace looked good. Very engaged.
by peeker643 » Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:51 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Looking good.
All of it.
Nothing to be concerned about at all.
Just takes time...time...time...time.
Good news is the pressure in the pocket didn't affect Weeden at all and there doesn't appear there will be much of it this season.
At least they didn't turn the ball over and the first team dominated the Eagles 2s and 3s.
Wallace looked good. Very engaged.
When defenders are basically taking the snap along with you, ANY QB can't handle the pressure.
by jerryroche » Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:22 pm
dpdad wrote:Eagles defense way too quick for Browns o-line to handle.
Hardesty probably packing his bags after tonight. Weeden struggling, not impressive at all.
by pod2dawg » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:14 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:41 pm
pod2dawg wrote:
Compound that by Little deciding not to show up and Shurmur deciding stay vanilla and have us get our asses kicked in all night.
by Hikohadon » Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:44 pm
jerryroche wrote:What I'm saying is that it wasn't all the OL's fault. A lot of it was, but not all of it.
by Hikohadon » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:10 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:When defenders are basically taking the snap along with you, ANY QB can't handle the pressure.
No shit? Really?
If only this issue could have been identified and addressed when they drafted in April.
Probably coulda really upgraded the OL with a pick at 22 AND one where Schwartz was picked.
by peeker643 » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:27 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:When defenders are basically taking the snap along with you, ANY QB can't handle the pressure.
No shit? Really?
If only this issue could have been identified and addressed when they drafted in April.
Probably coulda really upgraded the OL with a pick at 22 AND one where Schwartz was picked.
Uh, wouldn't that have left them with Colt McCoy as their QB?
by FUDU » Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:34 pm
by Hikohadon » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:52 am
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Uh, wouldn't that have left them with Colt McCoy as their QB?
Doesn't matter. Weeden is a band-aid on a sucking chest wound. Better than McCoy but as I'll-suited as anyone else would be to play here and now. Could have gone a long way toward righting the OL wrongs and building from inside out.
Could have gotten a Weeden next year or the year after or the year after...He's not special enough or mobile enough to overcome this and 'this' is the entire situation he faces with this regime and this offensive roster.
by mattvan1 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:05 am
by Hikohadon » Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:19 am
mattvan1 wrote:You two should be on that new Bravo show entitled The Real Browns Fans posters of TCF. More drama than Real Housewives of New York but not as nauseating as Jersey Shore. CDT could make a guest appearance as some tall lazy fuck who knows nothing about football.
So like, did you guys break up or what?
by peeker643 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:44 am
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Uh, wouldn't that have left them with Colt McCoy as their QB?
Doesn't matter. Weeden is a band-aid on a sucking chest wound. Better than McCoy but as I'll-suited as anyone else would be to play here and now. Could have gone a long way toward righting the OL wrongs and building from inside out.
Could have gotten a Weeden next year or the year after or the year after...He's not special enough or mobile enough to overcome this and 'this' is the entire situation he faces with this regime and this offensive roster.
Of course they should've waited another year to address the most important position on the field. It would've been awesome to watch them muddle their way to another 4 win season. They should've waited 2 maybe, since there's not really anyone very appetizing in the 2013 draft. They should've waited until there was a sure-fire Master of the Universe coming up then shot Colt b/c he was probably just good enough to blow a #1 overall pick. What's another 4 years?
I love the "Build everything else and then with this Super Bowl winning except for QB team they will still somehow suck enough to be in position to take Andrew Luck version 2015" solution to solving the QB problem. I don't see how that wouldn't work.
Their actions were especially stupid because there's no way that DeCastro would've been a band-aid replacing Lauvao or Hightower would've been a band-aid for Fujita or Mercilus would've been a band-aid for Juqua Parker. They're sure things.

by Hikohadon » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:08 am
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Uh, wouldn't that have left them with Colt McCoy as their QB?
Doesn't matter. Weeden is a band-aid on a sucking chest wound. Better than McCoy but as I'll-suited as anyone else would be to play here and now. Could have gone a long way toward righting the OL wrongs and building from inside out.
Could have gotten a Weeden next year or the year after or the year after...He's not special enough or mobile enough to overcome this and 'this' is the entire situation he faces with this regime and this offensive roster.
Of course they should've waited another year to address the most important position on the field. It would've been awesome to watch them muddle their way to another 4 win season. They should've waited 2 maybe, since there's not really anyone very appetizing in the 2013 draft. They should've waited until there was a sure-fire Master of the Universe coming up then shot Colt b/c he was probably just good enough to blow a #1 overall pick. What's another 4 years?
I love the "Build everything else and then with this Super Bowl winning except for QB team they will still somehow suck enough to be in position to take Andrew Luck version 2015" solution to solving the QB problem. I don't see how that wouldn't work.
Their actions were especially stupid because there's no way that DeCastro would've been a band-aid replacing Lauvao or Hightower would've been a band-aid for Fujita or Mercilus would've been a band-aid for Juqua Parker. They're sure things.
Because that's clearly what I said. Quit trying to win an argument and listen.
Another 4 years is another 8 years if they keep fucking it up. There were smarter, healthier ways to do this than taking Weeden there. I said it when it happened and it's clearer every day.
And you're going to watch them muddle their way to another 4-win season anyway. If they catch a break or two.
My God. Take a guy there who's limited in moving in and out of the pocket behind that offensive line and then keep telling me how it was justifiable and that it makes them better long term?
You got it bad, brother. And it's not getting better.
And if I'm stupid (and may well be) and can see this is really doesn't bode well for others.
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:13 am
FUDU wrote:I think what we will learn this season, and frightfully early, is that there is a bigger gap between our HC and an average NFL HC than the gap between our QB and an average NFL QB.
by peeker643 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:14 am
Hikohadon wrote:Yes dear.![]()
You'll forgive me however if I foolishly wait until the end of the season to shoot the old gray mare that is Weeden. He might be the only reason I bother watching this shit team this year.
by rk » Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:30 am
by FUDU » Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:37 am

by rk » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:02 pm
FUDU wrote:Yeah if only we had a full regular season's worth of goods on Shurmur to make such outlandish claims.
by peeker643 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:30 pm
rk wrote:FUDU wrote:Yeah if only we had a full regular season's worth of goods on Shurmur to make such outlandish claims.
What exactly is the 'claim' of bad coaching from Friday? The game is a non sequitur to his ability to coach.
Might have well just started talking about how there's a hurricane in the Gulf and closed with the Browns were poorly coached last year.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:36 pm

by FUDU » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:44 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:52 pm

by peeker643 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:31 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:KC? That is an odd inclusion.
by motherscratcher » Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:12 pm
peeker643 wrote:I have no faith in Shurmur's ability to teach and motivate. But that (for me) is a lot further down the worry list than the fact the Browns were man-handled physically Friday.
True enough, the Eagles have as talented a group of DL as you're likely to find. Hopefully Weeden survives those kinds of ballgames and makes hay against the really terrible defenses in the NFL. Liek the ones in Pittsburgh and Baltimore, NYG, KC, etc.
by peeker643 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:27 pm
motherscratcher wrote:peeker643 wrote:I have no faith in Shurmur's ability to teach and motivate. But that (for me) is a lot further down the worry list than the fact the Browns were man-handled physically Friday.
True enough, the Eagles have as talented a group of DL as you're likely to find. Hopefully Weeden survives those kinds of ballgames and makes hay against the really terrible defenses in the NFL. Liek the ones in Pittsburgh and Baltimore, NYG, KC, etc.
Yup.
That has been my favorite narrative that I've heard a half dozen times since friday. The "Philly's DL is good" explanation for why our OL is yet again being treated like they are Ball State. If only we had some high draft picks on the line we'd be a lot better.
Yeah, I know the OL looked like shit but don't worry about it. Philly just had a good DL so we should be OK. It's not like we play in the same NFL or anything.
by smalls1129 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:38 pm
by motherscratcher » Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:40 pm
by smalls1129 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:53 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Why didn't Philly seem to be all that concerned about showing their hand?
by Gradysmanldy » Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:03 pm
by jb » Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:18 pm
peeker643 wrote:But I'd have preferred someone like DeCastro at 22 and Schwartz where he went and filled in with shitty QB play this season.
by peeker643 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:43 pm
jb wrote:peeker643 wrote:But I'd have preferred someone like DeCastro at 22 and Schwartz where he went and filled in with shitty QB play this season.
How many high picks does it take to create a quality NFL OL? You have 2 number one's already and a high two. Saying you need a 1st round guard is overkill when you have a 3rd and 5th rounder already invested. Now, the quality of the play I can't debate, but suggesting we need more number one round resources there is to me, nonsense. It's a gurad man. We're talkin' guards. I know, I think it's funny too. I mean, guards. Not the guys who score points. Not the guys who make game changing D plays, guards man. We're talking guards.
I saw Howard Mudd take goat piss and turn it into gasoline, and you did too in that era. I saw Kurt Ferentz convert a DLman and young, raw, lowpicks & UDFA's players into a first rate unit under BB after a couple rockey seasons.
Something stinks on the OL, but it isn't a case where they are putting out Jim Pyne, Scott Rehberg, Homeboi Steve Zahursky and Roger Chenoine and telling us it will gel in time. We need to draft a fuckin' guard number one like we need a hole in the head. On a roster with one legit awe ite pass rusher in today's NFL, zero decent skilled players except Joe Don Looney last year, NyQuel vs the world at LBer, and a patchwork of bustas besides haden in coverage, what we need is some coaching and a trigger finger to make a move if these "inconsistencies" can't get corrected.
by jb » Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:46 pm
peeker643 wrote:The answer is you devote as many resources as necessary. I don't care if it's a guard or not, really. I don't care if it's a center. The Steelers were okay drafting guys like Faneca and DeCastro. They also took Kendall Simmons (which doesn't help my argument, I know) but they've been willing to spend big resources on that OL. You have a pocket passer in Weeden, right?
Theoretically he needs a pocket.
And if your coaches aren't developing them then you need guys who require less development or you need coaches who can turn shit to shinola. And you talk Mudd and Ferentz, only two of the very best in the business at that coaching spot. Go get a guy like that then. I don't care how they cobble it together. And Mudd benefitted tremendously here from the USFL defections in building his line. At least for a few years until Bernie was abused as badly as Weeden promises to be.
DeCastro and Zeitler went in RD 1 this year. Watkins and Iupati in years before. I know it ain't sexy and I'd rather have impact players too, but if you need a pocket to protect a passer you may need to dedicate more resources to it or make sure you have someone to develop them.
Weeden's going to be a pinata at this rate. And whether you believe in him or not you're never going to know if he's buried more often than not.jb wrote:peeker643 wrote:But I'd have preferred someone like DeCastro at 22 and Schwartz where he went and filled in with shitty QB play this season.
How many high picks does it take to create a quality NFL OL? You have 2 number one's already and a high two. Saying you need a 1st round guard is overkill when you have a 3rd and 5th rounder already invested. Now, the quality of the play I can't debate, but suggesting we need more number one round resources there is to me, nonsense. It's a gurad man. We're talkin' guards. I know, I think it's funny too. I mean, guards. Not the guys who score points. Not the guys who make game changing D plays, guards man. We're talking guards.
I saw Howard Mudd take goat piss and turn it into gasoline, and you did too in that era. I saw Kurt Ferentz convert a DLman and young, raw, lowpicks & UDFA's players into a first rate unit under BB after a couple rockey seasons.
Something stinks on the OL, but it isn't a case where they are putting out Jim Pyne, Scott Rehberg, Homeboi Steve Zahursky and Roger Chenoine and telling us it will gel in time. We need to draft a fuckin' guard number one like we need a hole in the head. On a roster with one legit awe ite pass rusher in today's NFL, zero decent skilled players except Joe Don Looney last year, NyQuel vs the world at LBer, and a patchwork of bustas besides haden in coverage, what we need is some coaching and a trigger finger to make a move if these "inconsistencies" can't get corrected.
by peeker643 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:52 pm
by jb » Mon Aug 27, 2012 4:33 pm
peeker643 wrote:They do, you're right. They need to pour more resources into more spots than the next three drafts can fill.
But that doesn't mean the OL, despite the resources they've already spent, is set and ready for 9/9/2012 and beyond.
And a little luck wouldn't hurt. Be great if one of these 4th-6th picks turned into the next big thing. But luck is on your side a lot more when you know exactly what you're doing. And when you're not changing systems, coaches, QBs, skilled personnel and owners every couple of years.
by Hikohadon » Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:12 pm
[/quote]peeker643 wrote:But I'd have preferred someone like DeCastro at 22 and Schwartz where he went and filled in with shitty QB play this season.
by Hikohadon » Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:15 pm
jb wrote:But more importantly, Wintrop gets canned from every jhob aftyer a couple seasons. He's a mangina holdover. We have Guards who were college OLT's and they can't seem to move laterally on Sunday. I don't see guys getting blown up physically so much as guys running around them as they can't move in any sort of coordinated rhyme or reason. I therefore choose to scapegoat the OL coach in the absence of a better theory.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:13 pm

by Erie Warrior » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:32 pm


by leadpipe » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:46 pm
by Hikohadon » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:47 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:If you move up to draft your guy at RB, why not make sure he has the hogs in front of him?
OL was the pick at 22, and they blew it. Again.
Russell Wilson would have been available after. Maybe even Weeden.

by bookelly » Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:01 am
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:34 am
bookelly wrote:Splitting hairs here;
but DeCastro out for season with a whatever - a fucked up leg. And the guy they got in the 2nd round is playing like shit and may not start.
Bungles lost their Center for the year and the RG too...
by jb » Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:50 am
peeker643 wrote:bookelly wrote:Splitting hairs here;
but DeCastro out for season with a whatever - a fucked up leg. And the guy they got in the 2nd round is playing like shit and may not start.
Bungles lost their Center for the year and the RG too...
Not sure what that has to do with anything?
The Browns moved up another needless spot to take a guy who had knee surgery in February and just had a nother one 3 weeks ago.
At least the Steelers took a dude who was healthy at the time they turned in the card in DeCastro.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
