JCoz wrote:Don't confuse the nfl for college. Simon IS, flat out, a better college defensive lineman than Heyward. Simon just put up the best season for an OSU Dlineman since Will Smith as far as I'm concerned. Simon is also at this point the best defensive lineman on this college team. The value of 300lbers with Hankins feet in the NFL does not make him the default better player on OSU this season. Simon may or may not be a 2nd rounder. I can find several early mocks that have him there, so I'm not some lone homer slotting him there.
Instead of having an arbitrary standard for elite, why don't you just name me 5 defensive lines in the country that are clearly better....
We just have very different opinions of this Dline and the results will be on the field. I think the real reason your position annoys me is because it's out of context. Whatever you think about Simons nfl prospects and lack of sacks, this is in all probability the best dline in the B1G, probably better than any in the PAC 12 or big east, and possibly the big twelve as well. You have LSU, UGA, USCe, possibly bama, possibly Texas that are in the conversation. I'm missing knowledge of the top dines in the ACC. But there is the list outside the B1G. So I find it hard to believe that OSU can not be termed one of the bet in the country going into this season.
That point in contrast with your take/optimism on the LBers is just beyond strange to me.
I am very much aware of the difference between NCAA DE's and NFL DE's. What I said earlier was that Cam Heyward's Jr. year was every bit the equal of Simon's. You think that Simon had the best year by an OSU DL since Smith, Vernon Gholston's 2006 and 2007 seasons were both better statistically and in terms of impact on the field, Quinn Pitcocks 2006 season was better, Hank's season was better last year, Heyward's '09 season was a push, Kudla's '05 season (10sacks and 45 tackles) was a push. You are clearly suffering from the "recency bias."
Simon had a nice season last year, but you are making him sound like superman. Hankins was 3rd on the team last year in tackles.... AS A DT. He made more plays than Simon from a position where you do not expect guys to make plays. Hankins' year last year was among the best in the nation for a DT (or any DL). His numbers were comparable to Nick Fairley's ridiculous 2010 season in tackles. So while he may not inspire the same feelings in the cockles of your heart that Simon did, he had a better year. That is why Hank will be a top 10 pick this year, because he is the best DL on this team.
As for mocks that have Simon in the second round, so what. I'll believe it next April when I see it. The list of NFL DE's at 6'2" is pretty short. Would you want the Browns to use a second on him? If so what position would you use him at? Where does he play? John Simon is a rich man's version of Mike Kudla, great NCAA player, stupidly strong, adequate NCAA size and quickness, but not good enough size and quicks for the NFL.
Last year's defense was bad. Last year's DL played OK, but nothing on that line has changed. It is the exact same line that it was last year (aside from trading Bellamy for Bennett). Did you think that last year's line was a top 5 line? This one IS THE SAME. It is a good DL, but not an all time line.
I cannot for the life of me figure out what you are basing your assessment of the line on. They don't sack the QB and they gave up 141 YPG on the ground against one of the weakest B1G's ever to take the field.
Here are some lines that are likely to be better this year:
LSU, USCe, GA, AL, Auburn, probably FL depending on how Ronald Powell comes back from injury, FSU, VaTECH, Texas are just a few off the top of my head. Best in the B1G just isn't that big of a deal right now, it is like being one of the world's tallest dwarves.
The key difference between my take on LBs and your take on the DL is that I did NOT SAY, that the LBs would be the best in the nation or among the best in the nation. I said that LB would be a position of strength on this team, because there are significant changes at LB this year and they are upgrades over last year's abortion. Storm Klein is gone, Andrew Sweat is gone and if Sabino does not play well, then he is gone to. I am excited about the LB play because it will be better, I am not as excited about the DL play because this same unit was not great last year. DL play this year will probably be better than the LB play, but the LB play will improve much more this year than the DL play.
Coming from a Wolverine, we're the football equivalent of a formerly abused wife of a meth addict who just remarried the safe nice guy. We're just glad we have someone who's aware that it's a rivalry and that tackling on defense is integral. Baby steps.
-Kingpin74