Moderators: peeker643, swerb, mitch
by Dnthateonthepronk » Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:56 pm
by Gradysmanldy » Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:16 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:19 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:Couldn't disagree more. Truly enjoyed the flick, was on the edge of my seat the entire way. The plot shifts/devices and the different storylines really kept the movie fresh, imo.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:23 pm
by Adverb Harry » Fri Jul 20, 2012 4:59 pm
by Dnthateonthepronk » Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:26 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:Couldn't disagree more. Truly enjoyed the flick, was on the edge of my seat the entire way. The plot shifts/devices and the different storylines really kept the movie fresh, imo.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:27 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:Seeing it Tuesday (first day the wife and I can get someone to watch the kids). I've been trying to stay in the dark as much as possible, but I'm a little pissed at some soon-to-be deleted Facebook "friends" who couldn't help but spoil some pretty big plot points, particularly about the ending and some of the supporting characters. I guess that's what I get for scanning the news feed on Facebook.
Oh well...I might know the ending, but I've still got no idea what happens for 95% of the movie. I guess that means I can beat the rush out to the johns afterward.
by Adverb Harry » Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:39 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:Seeing it Tuesday (first day the wife and I can get someone to watch the kids). I've been trying to stay in the dark as much as possible, but I'm a little pissed at some soon-to-be deleted Facebook "friends" who couldn't help but spoil some pretty big plot points, particularly about the ending and some of the supporting characters. I guess that's what I get for scanning the news feed on Facebook.
Oh well...I might know the ending, but I've still got no idea what happens for 95% of the movie. I guess that means I can beat the rush out to the johns afterward.
wouldnt have mattered you would have figured out what was going to happen pretty easily
by Love child of shawn kemp » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:46 am
by RickNashEquilibrium » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:03 am
by Dnthateonthepronk » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:47 pm
RickNashEquilibrium wrote:Overall, I thought the movie was excellent and easily rivaled The Dark Knight in terms of sheer enjoyability. .
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:06 pm
But for it to rival The Dark Knight, that means this movie would now have to be considered one of the greatest movies of all time. I don't think its in that discussion.
It was a good movie there were just a lot of plot holes and small things that added up.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:25 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:
For that discussion to even take place, wouldn't The Dark Knight first have to be considered one of the greatest movies of all time? Because other than to Batman fanboys, it isn't.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:34 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:
Does this take into account the biggest plot hole in The Dark Knight where Batman/Rachael should have been pancaked after falling 40 stories onto a car?
And maybe it was so "predictable" because if you read up on the plot of the Bane/Ra's Al-Ghul storyline beforehand, you would know exactly what would happen. I knew what was going to happen but that doesn't mean it was predictable.
But I do have a somewhat functional understanding of the batmen rogue's gallery, and actors and actresses like Colliard and Levvitt are not likely to get bit parts in a Nolan movie. That coupled with lines from the movie made it predictable, which actually Im okay with, its just the middle was a complete mess, and figuring out the ending limited the impact. That didnt happen to me with The Dark Knight but to each their own.
by RickNashEquilibrium » Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:43 am
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:But for it to rival The Dark Knight, that means this movie would now have to be considered one of the greatest movies of all time.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:16 pm

by RickNashEquilibrium » Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:55 am
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Sorry I just picked up on the word rivaled, I thought you meant TDKR rivaled TDK in terms of being just as good of a movie. You meant enjoyment. I get that.
This is why I hate typing stuff, you cant hear inflection or tone on a message board and you don't have to type short sentences that come off Assholish because your boss could walk in
by Adverb Harry » Sat Jul 28, 2012 2:09 pm
by jb » Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:34 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:But for it to rival The Dark Knight, that means this movie would now have to be considered one of the greatest movies of all time. I don't think its in that discussion.
For that discussion to even take place, wouldn't The Dark Knight first have to be considered one of the greatest movies of all time? Because other than to Batman fanboys, it isn't.
by e0y2e3 » Sat Jul 28, 2012 7:51 pm

by jerryroche » Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:34 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:The Dark Knight : The Aughts :: Star Wars : The Old Fucks in here
by e0y2e3 » Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:32 pm

by Dnthateonthepronk » Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:01 am
e0y2e3 wrote:*yawn*
Man those special effects and audio Oscar's sure were something.... The Dark Knight had a more meaningful win with Ledger.
I spit at anyone who is dumb enough to call either Star Wars of Batman an all-time movie. They are good at being what they are, which is irrelevant now for Star Wars and a good Marvel movie for Batman. I'm glad Star Wars was important in 1970, it doesn't change the fact it was nothing more than your generations Avatar/Batman/Indian Jones.
Feh.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:03 am
jb wrote:
+ 1
This franchise is for adolescent and 20 something males who don't smirk with sarcasm when they say the words "graphic novel".
by e0y2e3 » Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:57 am

by jb » Sun Jul 29, 2012 10:14 am
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:jb wrote:
+ 1
This franchise is for adolescent and 20 something males who don't smirk with sarcasm when they say the words "graphic novel".
Thats just not true.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:44 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Stop making things up, the critic response to Dark Night, universally is no where near considering it an all tome great, the damn thing didn't even win a single meamingful best picture award for its year. You can go by your fan note IMBD bullshit and that is fine, but stop inventing critical acclaim that is limited to a very small group of critics and panning it as universal.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:46 am
jb wrote:
Is to. ;-)
Look, if Imina turn off the brain and just enjoy a super dooper hero movie (not film) for what it is, spare me the preachey overreaching BS. Just gimme Hulk slamming Loki around and blow up a bunch of stuff.
They are what they appear to be.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:56 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Stop making things up, the critic response to Dark Night, universally is no where near considering it an all tome great, the damn thing didn't even win a single meamingful best picture award for its year. Y.

by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:00 pm

by jb » Mon Jul 30, 2012 12:41 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:jb wrote:
Is to. ;-)
Look, if Imina turn off the brain and just enjoy a super dooper hero movie (not film) for what it is, spare me the preachey overreaching BS. Just gimme Hulk slamming Loki around and blow up a bunch of stuff.
They are what they appear to be.
I am in no way saying The Avengers is one of the greatest Films of all Time. They are 2 totally different movies.
by FUDU » Mon Jul 30, 2012 1:51 pm
by jb » Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:39 pm
FUDU wrote:It's a good movie just go see it, FFS.
by leadpipe » Mon Jul 30, 2012 3:48 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Because I actually follow this type of thing closely and there are somewhere between zero and very very few critics that have ever put TDK down as an All-Time great movie and you are inventing shit?
Again, it took down one of EIGHT best picture awards for that year, it's a nice movie, but no one except FANBOIS consider it an all time great.
You are free to feel however you feel about it and I don't give two shits, just stop lying.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:19 pm
jb wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:jb wrote:
Is to. ;-)
Look, if Imina turn off the brain and just enjoy a super dooper hero movie (not film) for what it is, spare me the preachey overreaching BS. Just gimme Hulk slamming Loki around and blow up a bunch of stuff.
They are what they appear to be.
I am in no way saying The Avengers is one of the greatest Films of all Time. They are 2 totally different movies.
This is the point of contention.
They are the same movie. They are well produced and lots of things blow up and guys run around in suits with a fantasy story line for a 14 year old boy.
One understands that and another tries to make a preachey agenda laden case that is trite, contrived, and boring. If the Batman trilogy is so deep, then the Dirty Harry series is fuckin' Dosteyevsky and Death Wish is Shakespeare.
Look, if I wan a candy bar, cool. Gimme a frikcin Snickers and it is what it is. I enjoy it. Don't BS me with some candy bar for $ 10.00 and tell me how sophisticated it is. Its a fuckin candy bar, not Kobe.
by FUDU » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:22 pm
jb wrote:FUDU wrote:It's a good movie just go see it, FFS.
Concur.
Just dont tell me it's Citizen Kane" in its cinematic influence.
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:24 pm
FUDU wrote:In my mind the only legit premise was Unfaithful.
by FUDU » Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:36 pm
peeker643 wrote:FUDU wrote:In my mind the only legit premise was Unfaithful.
I hate you.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:51 pm

by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:55 pm
FUDU wrote:jb wrote:FUDU wrote:It's a good movie just go see it, FFS.
Concur.
Just dont tell me it's Citizen Kane" in its cinematic influence.
I get your point about the premise of the Superhero flicks, but honestly we can nit pick the shit out of so many premises of great movies.
Silence of the Lambs, awesome movie, but cmon, the whole premise is only slightly more nutty than that of Batman. Same goes for Alien(s), Dirty Harry...could go on & on.
In my mind the only legit premise was Unfaithful.

by peeker643 » Mon Jul 30, 2012 11:59 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:FUDU wrote:jb wrote:FUDU wrote:It's a good movie just go see it, FFS.
Concur.
Just dont tell me it's Citizen Kane" in its cinematic influence.
I get your point about the premise of the Superhero flicks, but honestly we can nit pick the shit out of so many premises of great movies.
Silence of the Lambs, awesome movie, but cmon, the whole premise is only slightly more nutty than that of Batman. Same goes for Alien(s), Dirty Harry...could go on & on.
In my mind the only legit premise was Unfaithful.
Out of all of the stupid shit you have written over the years, this is top five.
by FUDU » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:02 am
by e0y2e3 » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:27 am

by FUDU » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:14 am
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:11 pm
jb wrote:
This is the point of contention.
They are the same movie. They are well produced and lots of things blow up and guys run around in suits with a fantasy story line for a 14 year old boy.
One understands that and another tries to make a preachey agenda laden case that is trite, contrived, and boring. If the Batman trilogy is so deep, then the Dirty Harry series is fuckin' Dosteyevsky and Death Wish is Shakespeare.
Look, if I wan a candy bar, cool. Gimme a frikcin Snickers and it is what it is. I enjoy it. Don't BS me with some candy bar for $ 10.00 and tell me how sophisticated it is. Its a fuckin candy bar, not Kobe.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:13 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:
The Batman trilogy is so far different from every other modern superhero movie, which I take as everything post-Tobey Maguire Spiderman, to compare them to the rest is an insult. Just the fact that The Dark Knight was in the discussion for a BP nom changed how people perceive "superhero" movies. Just look at the new Superman trailer for the Christopher Nolan effect. The Batman movies were films with themes and character development; the rest are borderline camp nonsense.
Avengers/Ironman/Spiderman/Fantastic Four/Silver Surfer/Daredevil = Superhero, popcorn, action movie drivel; some are better than others but every single one is the same damn movie
Batman trilogy = Crime dramas that happen to be about a superhero
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:14 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:
You are free to feel however you feel about it and I don't give two shits, just stop lying.
by jb » Tue Jul 31, 2012 6:22 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Batman trilogy = Crime dramas that happen to be about a superhero
by FUDU » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:34 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:50 pm
FUDU wrote:rebel is actually right about a lot of the Batman trilogy, it is much different than most superhero movies, in character development and plot thickness
Hell the presence of evil in DKR is pretty overwhelming and the internal conflicts in this trilogy are rather deep compared to the other SH flicks.
Arguing movies is really dumb though, so subjective and so little concrete material to accurately evaluate for comparisons. Movies are so much about perceptions and expectations going in.
Return to Movies, Music, TV, Books, Pop Culture
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests