rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Point is moot; Upton isn't going anywhere.
Probably not, but there's a better chance of him being dealt than most star players in his age group.
Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:18 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Point is moot; Upton isn't going anywhere.
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:39 pm
by pup » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:26 am
by skatingtripods » Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:32 am
pup wrote:Me thinks Mr. Hagadone should be more concerned with getting someone out than if he is "on the block".
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:37 pm
by WiscTribeFan » Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:28 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Wonder if Hagadone's moment of anger hampered what the Indians wanted to do and what they were talking with other teams about. I'd imagine he was one of the trade pieces we were dangling to teams. Obviously, he'll come back from this, but it may still hurt his value.
by skatingtripods » Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:44 pm
WiscTribeFan wrote:I have yet to see an official diagnosis on him. Did he break his hand? If so, I don't see him pitching again for quite a while, well past the trade deadline, and a guy like him won't clear waivers for a waiver type trade.
by WiscTribeFan » Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:12 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Lets throw the hypothetical out there. Say the Diamondbacks would accept a deal involving Lindor. Should the Indians make that deal?
While getting Justin Upton would definitely help, it by no means would put this team over the top to win a Title.
Justin Upton is available for the right offer, but his no-trade protection enables him to block trades to four teams. The Yankees, Red Sox, Cubs and Indians are the teams on Upton's list, Ken Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports report. As the FOX reporters note, players often include high-revenue teams like the Yankees on no-trade lists to maximize their leverage. Here are today’s latest Upton-related rumors:
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:34 pm
WiscTribeFan wrote:Maximize his leverage with the Yanks and Red Sox, and stay the hell out of Cleveland
by TouchEmAllTime » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:41 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:35 pm
TouchEmAllTime wrote:How soon before we become sellers?
by WiscTribeFan » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:59 pm
skatingtripods wrote:WiscTribeFan wrote:Maximize his leverage with the Yanks and Red Sox, and stay the hell out of Cleveland
What does this say about us overall? Is this just Upton having something against the idea of coming to Cleveland or is this the most obvious example of a negative perception of Cleveland and the Indians organization?
It seems very strange that he'd single us out. Granted, of the teams possibly in the hunt, we are probably the least attractive destination.
by TouchEmAllTime » Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:33 pm
skatingtripods wrote:TouchEmAllTime wrote:How soon before we become sellers?
To be honest, I was thinking about this. The next 11 games are big. 4 @ TB, 4 v. BAL, 3 v. DET. If we go something like 4-7 and wind up being 5 or 6 games back, it has to be considered. It's a very slim market with so many teams in the hunt. Hell, today's the first day in history that 11 teams in the AL were over .500.
However, what do we honestly have to sell? Joe Smith? Chris Perez? Does anybody want Derek Lowe? Choo would instantly become option 1b to Justin Upton, but would we want to trade him? We could probably ask the world for him and possibly get it.
Jose Lopez could be a viable sell piece, but he's only netting you a marginal prospect, if that.
The Indians, IMO, are f'd. They're probably not good enough to make the playoffs and definitely not good enough in the rotation to make a run if they get there. The farm system is awful. There's no help incoming for next season unless they get some free agents.
We're in a bad spot no matter what we do. Can't really buy or sell. Just have to hope the entire lineup catches fire for two months and the pitching is good enough to keep you in every game.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:39 pm
then they need to get as many pieces as they can to blend with the talent due in 2015-2016 that will be added to help our core players who will be under contract and start our 3 year window of contention all over again.
by Am I Here Again? » Mon Jul 16, 2012 10:23 pm
by pod2dawg » Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:22 am
by Dellucci TailGator » Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:04 am
by skatingtripods » Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:53 am
Dellucci TailGator wrote:::doh::
The Indians will not be sellers. They are a half game back in the wild card. They would have to lose the next 10 games for them to not be at least cosmetically in the race at the time of the trade deadline.
by pup » Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:23 am
by CleSportsTruth » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:18 pm
pup wrote:Take advantage of a seller's market at all costs. All you hear about is there are no sellers because of that 2nd wild card. Screw it. Your minors are pathetic at best.
by DanErie » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:23 pm
skatingtripods wrote:WiscTribeFan wrote:Maximize his leverage with the Yanks and Red Sox, and stay the hell out of Cleveland
What does this say about us overall? Is this just Upton having something against the idea of coming to Cleveland or is this the most obvious example of a negative perception of Cleveland and the Indians organization?
It seems very strange that he'd single us out. Granted, of the teams possibly in the hunt, we are probably the least attractive destination.
by CleSportsTruth » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:28 pm
by skatingtripods » Tue Jul 17, 2012 5:42 pm
DanErie wrote:Not really strange ...most top players have the Indians as a team they don;t want to go to, quite frankly.. Under the Dolan's ownership I don't thik we are percieved as a team that's very attractive, for whatever reason ...maybe they don't think they are willing to spend what it takes to succeed. Not sure..
by 7foot3 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:10 pm
DanErie wrote:skatingtripods wrote:WiscTribeFan wrote:Maximize his leverage with the Yanks and Red Sox, and stay the hell out of Cleveland
What does this say about us overall? Is this just Upton having something against the idea of coming to Cleveland or is this the most obvious example of a negative perception of Cleveland and the Indians organization?
It seems very strange that he'd single us out. Granted, of the teams possibly in the hunt, we are probably the least attractive destination.
Not really strange ...most top players have the Indians as a team they don;t want to go to, quite frankly.. Under the Dolan's ownership I don't thik we are percieved as a team that's very attractive, for whatever reason ...maybe they don't think they are willing to spend what it takes to succeed. Not sure..
by googleeph2 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:57 pm
7foot3 wrote:But go ahead and keep telling yourself that all of the Indians problems would magically disappear with a new owner.
by pup » Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:30 pm

by leadpipe » Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:24 pm
7foot3 wrote:DanErie wrote:skatingtripods wrote:WiscTribeFan wrote:Maximize his leverage with the Yanks and Red Sox, and stay the hell out of Cleveland
What does this say about us overall? Is this just Upton having something against the idea of coming to Cleveland or is this the most obvious example of a negative perception of Cleveland and the Indians organization?
It seems very strange that he'd single us out. Granted, of the teams possibly in the hunt, we are probably the least attractive destination.
Not really strange ...most top players have the Indians as a team they don;t want to go to, quite frankly.. Under the Dolan's ownership I don't thik we are percieved as a team that's very attractive, for whatever reason ...maybe they don't think they are willing to spend what it takes to succeed. Not sure..
Or as Cousineau just said:
"Remember that whole thing that Chris Perez posited about Carlos Beltran not wanting to come to Cleveland. If you don’t, here it is again:
“Guys don’t want to come over here and people wonder why…Why doesn’t Carlos Beltran want to come over here? Well, because of that. That’s part of it. It doesn’t go unnoticed — trust us. That’s definitely a huge reason. Nobody wants to play in front of 5,000 fans. We know the weather (stinks), but people see that. Other players know that.
“You had a choice of playing in St. Louis where you get 40,000 (fans) like Beltran chose to do, or you can come to Cleveland. It’s going to take more money to get him to come to Cleveland. That’s just how it is. That’s another thing that you have to go against. It’s not only the payrolls of the (American League) East teams, but that kind of stuff.”
Now, as much as Perez was vilified for those particular comments (and others, as his comments at the time went off the rails a bit), to see that quartet of teams listed by Upton with Rosenthal explaining the inclusion of three of those teams – and not Cleveland – is impossible to ignore."
But go ahead and keep telling yourself that all of the Indians problems would magically disappear with a new owner.
by leadpipe » Wed Jul 18, 2012 2:24 pm
7foot3 wrote:DanErie wrote:skatingtripods wrote:WiscTribeFan wrote:Maximize his leverage with the Yanks and Red Sox, and stay the hell out of Cleveland
What does this say about us overall? Is this just Upton having something against the idea of coming to Cleveland or is this the most obvious example of a negative perception of Cleveland and the Indians organization?
It seems very strange that he'd single us out. Granted, of the teams possibly in the hunt, we are probably the least attractive destination.
Not really strange ...most top players have the Indians as a team they don;t want to go to, quite frankly.. Under the Dolan's ownership I don't thik we are percieved as a team that's very attractive, for whatever reason ...maybe they don't think they are willing to spend what it takes to succeed. Not sure..
Or as Cousineau just said:
"Remember that whole thing that Chris Perez posited about Carlos Beltran not wanting to come to Cleveland. If you don’t, here it is again:
“Guys don’t want to come over here and people wonder why…Why doesn’t Carlos Beltran want to come over here? Well, because of that. That’s part of it. It doesn’t go unnoticed — trust us. That’s definitely a huge reason. Nobody wants to play in front of 5,000 fans. We know the weather (stinks), but people see that. Other players know that.
“You had a choice of playing in St. Louis where you get 40,000 (fans) like Beltran chose to do, or you can come to Cleveland. It’s going to take more money to get him to come to Cleveland. That’s just how it is. That’s another thing that you have to go against. It’s not only the payrolls of the (American League) East teams, but that kind of stuff.”
Now, as much as Perez was vilified for those particular comments (and others, as his comments at the time went off the rails a bit), to see that quartet of teams listed by Upton with Rosenthal explaining the inclusion of three of those teams – and not Cleveland – is impossible to ignore."
But go ahead and keep telling yourself that all of the Indians problems would magically disappear with a new owner.
by WiscTribeFan » Wed Jul 18, 2012 5:35 pm
The Indians are looking all over to acquire an outfield bat, but they are unable to take back a significant contract and are unwilling to move their best prospects.
Meanwhile, the Royals are trying to convince the Indians or Reds to take Jeff Francoeur so they can promote Wil Myers from Triple-A.
by Am I Here Again? » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:10 pm
WiscTribeFan wrote:From MLBTraderumors.comThe Indians are looking all over to acquire an outfield bat, but they are unable to take back a significant contract and are unwilling to move their best prospects.
Meanwhile, the Royals are trying to convince the Indians or Reds to take Jeff Francoeur so they can promote Wil Myers from Triple-A.
by NH Tribe Fan » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:46 pm

by CleSportsTruth » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:26 pm
WiscTribeFan wrote:From MLBTraderumors.comThe Indians are looking all over to acquire an outfield bat, but they are unable to take back a significant contract and are unwilling to move their best prospects.
Meanwhile, the Royals are trying to convince the Indians or Reds to take Jeff Francoeur so they can promote Wil Myers from Triple-A.
So we want a good player, but won't pay any salary and won't trade good prospects.
Wonder how that's gonna work out.
Cubs pay $40+M of Soriano's contract and we pull the trigger?
by jerryroche » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:44 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:Rebuild your minors, clear salary and start anew (with an established core).
by dazindiansfanuk » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:56 am
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:11 pm
by CleSportsTruth » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:37 pm
by Bigfist » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:54 pm
by dazindiansfanuk » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:56 pm
by Bigfist » Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:06 pm
by skatingtripods » Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:40 pm
by googleeph2 » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:37 pm
by Govbarney » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:40 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:05 pm

by Adverb Harry » Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:19 pm
Govbarney wrote:This thread , and the thread asking why the Tribe does not draw dick have a lot in common.
by jerryroche » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:34 am
by pup » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:01 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Yeah, fooey on you for not taking our scrubs and giving us Justin Upton!
by pup » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:02 am
by WiscTribeFan » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:19 am
pup wrote:Meanwhile, Hanley Ramirez just got dealt for Jenmar Gomez and an A baller.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:46 am
pup wrote:Meanwhile, Hanley Ramirez just got dealt for Jenmar Gomez and an A baller.
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:53 am
pup wrote:Meanwhile, Hanley Ramirez just got dealt for Jenmar Gomez and an A baller.

Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: Am I Here Again? and 1 guest