Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by googleeph2 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 6:01 pm
by Govbarney » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:24 pm
ShadowDawg wrote:Adios Carlton Mitchell.

by OldDawg » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:39 pm
So in 2-3 years, Gordon will be ready to start. And Weeden will be ready to retire. Way to go, Browns!

by bookelly » Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:39 am
by mattvan1 » Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:11 am
bookelly wrote:So what are we looking at;
1/2 - Little and Flash
3 (slot) - Norwood
4 - Mass/Cribbs
5 - Undrafted kid from Ok St. and Weeden's buddy. So he's likely to make squad./ or 4th round track star who ran 4.2?
Maybe one of the #5 guys play the slot. Cribbs is on the team as the backup WR but essential ST player regardless.
/I like this potential. Key word...potential.
Do we keep 7? Really 6 since Cribbs is hybrid guy?
They're gonna have to cut down on the # of LB's they carry regardless. May as well cull a TE, with the flex you get with Smelly.
by Hikohadon » Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:17 pm
OldDawg wrote:I saw this in a comments section following an article about this draft pick and chuckled:So in 2-3 years, Gordon will be ready to start. And Weeden will be ready to retire. Way to go, Browns!
by comish » Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:31 pm
OldDawg wrote:I saw this in a comments section following an article about this draft pick and chuckled:So in 2-3 years, Gordon will be ready to start. And Weeden will be ready to retire. Way to go, Browns!
by jerryroche » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:01 pm
by Govbarney » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:11 pm
Hikohadon wrote:OldDawg wrote:I saw this in a comments section following an article about this draft pick and chuckled:So in 2-3 years, Gordon will be ready to start. And Weeden will be ready to retire. Way to go, Browns!
Oh, those cutsie little posters. 28 year old Weeden is too old to play!
And yet giving 33 year old Drew Brees a record 5 year contract was a good thing.
And what was that deal that 36 year old Peyton Manning just got?
Give me 6 good years Weed and I'll be fine.
by Hikohadon » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:46 pm
Govbarney wrote:Hikohadon wrote:OldDawg wrote:I saw this in a comments section following an article about this draft pick and chuckled:So in 2-3 years, Gordon will be ready to start. And Weeden will be ready to retire. Way to go, Browns!
Oh, those cutsie little posters. 28 year old Weeden is too old to play!
And yet giving 33 year old Drew Brees a record 5 year contract was a good thing.
And what was that deal that 36 year old Peyton Manning just got?
Give me 6 good years Weed and I'll be fine.
If Weeds is still the starting QB when he hits 36 , he will be the most successful Browns QB since Bernie.
by bac5665 » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:48 pm
by OldDawg » Sat Jul 14, 2012 4:35 pm
comish wrote:OldDawg wrote:I saw this in a comments section following an article about this draft pick and chuckled:So in 2-3 years, Gordon will be ready to start. And Weeden will be ready to retire. Way to go, Browns!
I know this isn't directly your opinion, BUT
I don't think it takes Gordon three years or even two in order to contribute. If Gordon puts up Little numbers from last year (60+ receps and 700+ yards) and Little holds steady or even progresses, you are looking at two receivers at those stat lines or better which compared to other offenses in the league is no longer at unwatchable levels.
It seems that most feel he is more polished than Little coming in....let's hope for the same results minus all the maddening drops.
Very excited to see this youthful product hit the field

by Govbarney » Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:16 pm
OldDawg wrote:....The majority of the folks in the comments section of this article spent a bunch of time saying that nobody any good ever comes out of the supplemental draft.
by Hikohadon » Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:58 pm
OldDawg wrote:But seemingly, most of the non-Browns fans out there seemed to think we made another stretch taking him with a #2. Heck, those guys don't know how bad our receiving crew is! The majority of the folks in the comments section of this article spent a bunch of time saying that nobody any good ever comes out of the supplemental draft.
by peeker643 » Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:09 pm
jerryroche wrote:Gordon will start this year. Maybe not the first or second game, but he will eventually start. And he will contribute.
Can't see MoMass or Cribbs being more productive than Gordon over the course of a season. It's a matter of talent, fellas. I can think of hundreds of rookies who contributed at once--because they were simply more talented than the rummies they were replacing.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:11 pm
peeker643 wrote:jerryroche wrote:Gordon will start this year. Maybe not the first or second game, but he will eventually start. And he will contribute.
Can't see MoMass or Cribbs being more productive than Gordon over the course of a season. It's a matter of talent, fellas. I can think of hundreds of rookies who contributed at once--because they were simply more talented than the rummies they were replacing.
Nope. I agree.
Someone name me one area where MoMass stands out.
His speed? No.
Size? No.
Hands. They're okay.
Toughness and tenacity? No. He gets a concussion whenever a window closes and his life outside the hash marks is now likely over too. He's not quick enough to be that slot midget.
He's just a guy. Maybe one day you look back and his career was as good as a Chancey Stuckey but he ain't even close to that right now.
You better hope this 2nd round kid is waaay beyond 2nd round MoMass or we're all still looking for that WR.
by rk » Mon Jul 16, 2012 12:18 pm
bookelly wrote:So what are we looking at;
1/2 - Little and Flash
3 (slot) - Norwood
4 - Mass/Cribbs
5 - Undrafted kid from Ok St. and Weeden's buddy. So he's likely to make squad./ or 4th round track star who ran 4.2?
by Hikohadon » Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:06 pm
rk wrote:bookelly wrote:So what are we looking at;
1/2 - Little and Flash
3 (slot) - Norwood
4 - Mass/Cribbs
5 - Undrafted kid from Ok St. and Weeden's buddy. So he's likely to make squad./ or 4th round track star who ran 4.2?
It would be helpful to your credibility if you knew the names of people on the Browns.
Little/Gordon and Benjamin/Norwood are in and paired. It's silly to try to pin them into positions since all moved around last year. Cribbs will be in with a reduced role but will still be on the team and can play all positions while Benjamin/Norwood can back him up in ST. Cooper is almost certainly headed to the practice squad as it will be highly unlikely that anyone claims him barring a huge preseason.
That leaves the final spot between Mass and Mitchell. Money should be on Massaquoi who as other's note is essentially an average receiver but a known performer.

by danwismar » Tue Jul 17, 2012 3:27 pm
by rk » Tue Jul 17, 2012 4:21 pm
danwismar wrote:Shurmur's development (if this is even something to be hoped for?) is the biggest key to progress in 2012.
by googleeph2 » Tue Jul 17, 2012 5:18 pm
by Erie Warrior » Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:36 pm
danwismar wrote: but the complete transformation of offensive personnel in just a couple of years is very encouraging to me.


by Hikohadon » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:01 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:danwismar wrote: but the complete transformation of offensive personnel in just a couple of years is very encouraging to me.
And every year this is were they get me. They pick up a couple of yutes that look good on highlight reels, and I get that Brown and Orange boner.
And by mid-October I'm left unsatisfied and uninterested. Fuck 'em until they prove otherwise.
Paper dragons.
by snuffy1384 » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:42 am
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:37 am
snuffy1384 wrote:I think Josh will be a great asset to our team. If he can stay out of trouble and focus on getting better, we will have a very good receiver and a steal in the draft. Here are my thoughts on the subject at http://www.brownietheelf.com
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:31 pm
motherscratcher wrote:snuffy1384 wrote:http://www.brownietheelf.com
OK, here's where I invite you to go fuck yourself with your shitty blog. Go away.

by justmebd » Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:09 pm
by OldDawg » Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:33 pm
justmebd wrote:Had a discussion about this whole WR thing this weekend with family/friends and we came to this consensus:
The Bad:
1. If Gordon doesn't work out, it's not like we haven't thrown away a second-round pick on a WR before.
2. If this season does not work out, not having a second-round pick next year will be a problem for the next front office not this one.
The Good:
1. Gordon has as much ability to realize his potential as any other WR with his background. You don't know until you know.
2. It's not like Gordon is going to push somebody more worthy out of a job.
Random thoughts from the conversation:
1. We have zero confidence in Pat Shurmur. We hope to be proven wrong, but don't expect to be.
2. Weeden looks big enough to take a cheap shot from James Harrisson and get back up, an ability severely lacking in too many other areas of the offense.
3. MoMass doesn't make the final roster cut. I just don't see it happening.

by Gradysmanldy » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:40 am
by jb » Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:16 pm
rk wrote:danwismar wrote:Shurmur's development (if this is even something to be hoped for?) is the biggest key to progress in 2012.
Shurmer was fine last year as a HC. Kept the team focused throughout the year on the field. Made a handful of mistakes on gameday (bad timeoutes, personel changes) that could be attributed to acting as a dual responsibilities coach. He failed miserably as an OC and was unable to successfully implement anything but the most vanilla scheme in the NFL.
Chilly replaced him as OC and has enough of a portfolio of work with an offense that we should consider that a big improvement. Not to mention he has experience working an offense centered around a versatile, game changing RB.
by jb » Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:18 pm
justmebd wrote:Had a discussion about this whole WR thing this weekend with family/friends and we came to this consensus:
The Bad:
1. If Gordon doesn't work out, it's not like we haven't thrown away a second-round pick on a WR before.
2. If this season does not work out, not having a second-round pick next year will be a problem for the next front office not this one.
The Good:
1. Gordon has as much ability to realize his potential as any other WR with his background. You don't know until you know.
2. It's not like Gordon is going to push somebody more worthy out of a job.
by Triple-S » Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:15 pm
jb wrote:Having said that, I wonder what we could do had they made the logical and correct choice and hired John Fox?
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Hikohadon » Thu Jul 19, 2012 9:05 pm
Triple-S wrote:jb wrote:Having said that, I wonder what we could do had they made the logical and correct choice and hired John Fox?
Still wish Gruden would have come back home instead of SHUR.
by Triple-S » Thu Jul 19, 2012 10:59 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by justmebd » Thu Jul 19, 2012 11:23 pm
by OldDawg » Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:53 am
justmebd wrote:I keep hearing this defense of Shurmur: Short camp, no OTAs, inheriting poor talent, blah, blah, blah -- I. Don't. Give. A. Shit.
Harbaugh faced the exact same conditions as Shurmur, and his team looked MUCH better. Yes, their division sucked, but Shurmur just looked like he was in over his head while Harbaugh always looked completely in control. While Shurmur got that Brian Daboll* look on his face one too many times for my liking on the sideline, Harbaugh looked like he already knew what was going to happen.
Most importantly, Shurmur failed to notice his starting QB got decapitated by James Harrison. The head coach of the team should be aware of things like this, just sayin'
*Brian Daboll Face: That pained, constipated look Brian Daboll got when his 15th attempt at running Metcalf up the Middle on 3rd and 21 once again failed to produce results.
Sidenote: 20 years later and I still had to watch the Browns run Metcalf up the Middle plays. I'd be in bars watching the game and hear the Yinzers yell "Metcalf up the Middle" as whatever RB we had would pointlessly crash into the line and promptly lose five yards.

by motherscratcher » Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:07 am
by justmebd » Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:26 am
motherscratcher wrote:Wasn't Daboll in middle school when Eric Metcalf was running up the middle? In fact, I'm pretty sure one of the guys running Eric Metcalf up the middle is arguably the best coach in the history of the NFL.
by jb » Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:44 pm
justmebd wrote:I keep hearing this defense of Shurmur: Short camp, no OTAs, inheriting poor talent, blah, blah, blah -- I. Don't. Give. A. Shit.
Harbaugh faced the exact same conditions as Shurmur, and his team looked MUCH better.
by jb » Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:47 pm
justmebd wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Wasn't Daboll in middle school when Eric Metcalf was running up the middle? In fact, I'm pretty sure one of the guys running Eric Metcalf up the middle is arguably the best coach in the history of the NFL.
That doesn't mean running Metcalf up the Middle was smart. In fact, it was fucking stupid, and a big reason why Hoodie can go fuck himself.
by justmebd » Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:10 pm
jb wrote:justmebd wrote:I keep hearing this defense of Shurmur: Short camp, no OTAs, inheriting poor talent, blah, blah, blah -- I. Don't. Give. A. Shit.
Harbaugh faced the exact same conditions as Shurmur, and his team looked MUCH better.
I'm sorry. I thought you knew NFL football.
by jb » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:07 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:15 pm
jb wrote:Shit team my white ass. 9ers loaded with talent compared to 2011 browns.
by justmebd » Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:32 pm
jb wrote:BD, if I were betting with Pod's uncles gwop I'd a put it on you coaching the 9ers over Harbaugh coaching the Browns last season.
Shit team my white ass. 9ers loaded with talent compared to 2011 browns.
by motherscratcher » Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:48 pm
justmebd wrote:jb wrote:BD, if I were betting with Pod's uncles gwop I'd a put it on you coaching the 9ers over Harbaugh coaching the Browns last season.
Shit team my white ass. 9ers loaded with talent compared to 2011 browns.
Not arguing that point, but they're not the 2007 Patriots. At the end of the day, this coaching staff blows, I guess I should have just said that and been done with it.
Over/under on wins for me is 4.5, and I'm taking the under -- including the preseason. We have more talent but Shurmur will remain Shurmur. I would love to eat that last sentence.
by pod2dawg » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:50 pm
justmebd wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Wasn't Daboll in middle school when Eric Metcalf was running up the middle? In fact, I'm pretty sure one of the guys running Eric Metcalf up the middle is arguably the best coach in the history of the NFL.
That doesn't mean running Metcalf up the Middle was smart. In fact, it was fucking stupid, and a big reason why Hoodie can go fuck himself.
by justmebd » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:23 am
pod2dawg wrote:justmebd wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Wasn't Daboll in middle school when Eric Metcalf was running up the middle? In fact, I'm pretty sure one of the guys running Eric Metcalf up the middle is arguably the best coach in the history of the NFL.
That doesn't mean running Metcalf up the Middle was smart. In fact, it was fucking stupid, and a big reason why Hoodie can go fuck himself.
Metcalf was a receiver playing RB and I was never thrilled watching him pinball up the middle & stone face in the hoody can go fuck himself but I checked out Metcalf's #'s and was surprised to find :
91***** 3.6 yds/carry
92***** 4.1
93***** 4.7
94***** 3.5
by pup » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:25 am
justmebd wrote:jb wrote:BD, if I were betting with Pod's uncles gwop I'd a put it on you coaching the 9ers over Harbaugh coaching the Browns last season.
Shit team my white ass. 9ers loaded with talent compared to 2011 browns.
Not arguing that point, but they're not the 2007 Patriots. At the end of the day, this coaching staff blows, I guess I should have just said that and been done with it.
Over/under on wins for me is 4.5, and I'm taking the under -- including the preseason. We have more talent but Shurmur will remain Shurmur. I would love to eat that last sentence.
by justmebd » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:27 am
motherscratcher wrote:justmebd wrote:jb wrote:BD, if I were betting with Pod's uncles gwop I'd a put it on you coaching the 9ers over Harbaugh coaching the Browns last season.
Shit team my white ass. 9ers loaded with talent compared to 2011 browns.
Not arguing that point, but they're not the 2007 Patriots. At the end of the day, this coaching staff blows, I guess I should have just said that and been done with it.
Over/under on wins for me is 4.5, and I'm taking the under -- including the preseason. We have more talent but Shurmur will remain Shurmur. I would love to eat that last sentence.
I hope you do. I hope it was just "rookie coach jitters" or some such shit. The alternative (likelihood) is too damn depressing to consider. He HAS to improve as a coach because I'm not sure I could survive another change.
And, as we all know, it is all about me.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests