Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by jb » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:20 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:29 pm
by jb » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:47 pm
Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:When it ruins everyday people who had nothing to do with it?
by furls » Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:16 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:45 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:21 pm
Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:....and an ESPN article suggests the NCAA may be severly overstepping its authority
The only winners will be the lawyers
by leadpipe » Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:13 pm
peeker643 wrote:Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:....and an ESPN article suggests the NCAA may be severly overstepping its authority
The only winners will be the lawyers
Be great PR in the face of the last 20 years to fight whatever it is. Especially if you don't have the collective balls to penalize yourself or at least look like you're considering doing the right thing.
I hope they do sue the NCAA. That town will be basically radioactive for ten years if they do.
And I have nothing against those people there. I believe PSU is about the most unique college football town I've ever seen, but not so unique that this wouldn't happen somewhere other than PSU.
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:08 pm
peeker643 wrote:Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:....and an ESPN article suggests the NCAA may be severly overstepping its authority
The only winners will be the lawyers
Be great PR in the face of the last 20 years to fight whatever it is. Especially if you don't have the collective balls to penalize yourself or at least look like you're considering doing the right thing.
I hope they do sue the NCAA. That town will be basically radioactive for ten years if they do.
And I have nothing against those people there. I believe PSU is about the most unique college football town I've ever seen, but not so unique that this wouldn't happen somewhere other than PSU.
by furls » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:45 am
Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:peeker643 wrote:Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:....and an ESPN article suggests the NCAA may be severly overstepping its authority
The only winners will be the lawyers
Be great PR in the face of the last 20 years to fight whatever it is. Especially if you don't have the collective balls to penalize yourself or at least look like you're considering doing the right thing.
I hope they do sue the NCAA. That town will be basically radioactive for ten years if they do.
And I have nothing against those people there. I believe PSU is about the most unique college football town I've ever seen, but not so unique that this wouldn't happen somewhere other than PSU.
IMHO its a criminal case and s far as 'being radioactive for 10 yrs'....what differnce would it make if the recent talk about punishment play out?
Sounds like it will be more than 10 yrs worth of pain to me...[shrugs]
In the end ...I don't really give a shit
Its summer, I'm semi retired and just bought a used Corvette...I really couldn't care any less about Professional College Football and its archaic, Prima Donna, phoney, money grubbing leadership
...and I wonder how many pedos there are within the NCAA Postulation itself...?
by danwismar » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:59 am
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:14 am
by Spin » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:19 am
peeker643 wrote:$60million fine
4 year bowl ban
10 scholarships lost for next four years
Vacate wins from 1998-2011
Five year probation.
Transfers from PSU immediately eligible to compete at new university
by comish » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:19 am
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:21 am

by fairvis » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:23 am
by danwismar » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:28 am
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:32 am
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:34 am
by dpdad » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:38 am
by motherscratcher » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:02 am
by LakeErieWarriors » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:09 am
by Govbarney » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:09 am
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:09 am
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:13 am
Govbarney wrote:I have always seen vacating wins as sort of a empty gesture, sure a official media guide or two will need to be adjusted , but its not like you can erase all those wins from people's memories, or more importantly take back all the money the university, and community made off those wins.
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:15 am
LakeErieWarriors wrote:All this talk about Penn State avoiding the death penalty? I mean, what's the difference? They're going to be 100% irrelevant for the next half decade, at the very least.
by Govbarney » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:31 am
peeker643 wrote:Govbarney wrote:I have always seen vacating wins as sort of a empty gesture, sure a official media guide or two will need to be adjusted , but its not like you can erase all those wins from people's memories, or more importantly take back all the money the university, and community made off those wins.
99% of the time I agree. But I like the fact it forever takes Paterno off the top of the coaching victories list in a formal manner.
I think that's about the best way you could crack the family across the head. It was very important to him and to them.
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:36 am
Govbarney wrote:I am conflicted here. Granted he is total spit on his grave scum for essentially allowing children to be raped. That being said , as far as we know he did not cheat to get those victories on the football field through either on field action, or recruiting. All of those victories where garnered in a legit way. So while I have no issue with removing his name from a record book, or adding a Wikipedia astrix, when my grandchildren ask me which coach won more games then any other in history, I still think I tell them it was Jo Pa. Just like I would tell them that Pete Rose is the hit king, and the Buckeyes went to the 1999 final four
by Govbarney » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:43 am
skatingtripods wrote: Had the AD and the President done the right thing and fired Paterno for covering up for Sandusky and the child abuse, Paterno would have never won those games from 1998-2011.
by pup » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:06 pm
Govbarney wrote:skatingtripods wrote: Had the AD and the President done the right thing and fired Paterno for covering up for Sandusky and the child abuse, Paterno would have never won those games from 1998-2011.
I could be wrong, but from what I read, Paterno did not hide anything from the AD, and President, all three had a equal part in the cover-up. But I see your point.
If Paterno would have done the right thing and gone to the cops the moment he heard about the allegations, I cant see why he would not retain his Job. That's the sad part, had Joe Pa done the right thing from jump street, I have no doubt he would be considered even a greater figure today then he was prior to this scandal breaking out.
by Spin » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:24 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:25 pm
Spin wrote:One Q about this feeding frenzy of schools poaching PSU players. Aren't all the other schools maxed out on scholarships? So if they do pick up a player or two, does that send one or two players already commited to that team home? Redshirt them? Or do they "find other" non-athletic scholarships at that school?
Also, says that the NCAA is considering waiving the scholarship limit for teams that accept PSU transfers.
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:33 pm
peeker643 wrote:
99% of the time I agree. But I like the fact it forever takes Paterno off the top of the coaching victories list in a formal manner.
I think that's about the best way you could crack the family across the head. It was very important to him and to them.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:05 pm

by danwismar » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:29 pm
Spin wrote:So if they do pick up a player or two, does that send one or two players already commited to that team home? Redshirt them? Or do they "find other" non-athletic scholarships at that school?
by leadpipe » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:45 pm
Govbarney wrote:skatingtripods wrote: Had the AD and the President done the right thing and fired Paterno for covering up for Sandusky and the child abuse, Paterno would have never won those games from 1998-2011.
I could be wrong, but from what I read, Paterno did not hide anything from the AD, and President, all three had a equal part in the cover-up. But I see your point.
If Paterno would have done the right thing and gone to the cops the moment he heard about the allegations, I cant see why he would not retain his Job. That's the sad part, had Joe Pa done the right thing from jump street, I have no doubt he would be considered even a greater figure today then he was prior to this scandal breaking out.
by furls » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:56 pm
IIRC last season they had only 11 Srs on the team with only 4 starting. No matter what a homo...errrr,,,,homer like furls thinks, they're going to be dangerous this yr
I'll also go out on a limb and say not too many will transfer, if any at all
by furls » Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:04 pm
by Spin » Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:52 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:23 pm
furls wrote:I forgot the real reason I came here to talk about the sanctions.
Holy shit. I bet those bastards that didn't want a "death penalty" are re-thinking that now. These penalties are "HOLY FUCKING SHIT BAD" and will keep PSU in the dark ages for a decade. When the scholarship reductions end in 2016 PSU will be down to 60ish scholarship players and they will be unable to actually get back up to 85 until 2018 or so. Not only that, but most of the upper classmen are going to be guys that frankly would have had no business in a PSU uniform a decade earlier. Honestly, I don't know if PSU will recover. 6-7 years is a long time to be irrelevant.
This is so much worse than the USC sanctions. The reductions in #s are the same, but the duration, an entire recruiting lifetime, is devastating. Lane Kiffin was able to sell USC to recruits because they would only be foregoing one bowl game as freshman (for his first class) and that is an easy sell. It hurt his 2010 class, but you can miss one class; you cannot miss 3.

by noles1 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:36 pm
Spin wrote:OK, so far so good. Sandusky in jail, everyone else who knew (according to the report) is dead or headed to jail. The program (and those fans who saw nothing wrong with what Joe and the rest did) have been punished.
Nice start.
Next step, what happened to the prosecutor, state investigator, and PSU detective who were involved with the case in 1998?

by dmiles » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:40 pm
furls wrote:I forgot the real reason I came here to talk about the sanctions.
This is so much worse than the USC sanctions. The reductions in #s are the same, but the duration, an entire recruiting lifetime, is devastating. Lane Kiffin was able to sell USC to recruits because they would only be foregoing one bowl game as freshman (for his first class) and that is an easy sell. It hurt his 2010 class, but you can miss one class; you cannot miss 3.

by Spin » Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:51 pm
noles1 wrote:Spin wrote:OK, so far so good. Sandusky in jail, everyone else who knew (according to the report) is dead or headed to jail. The program (and those fans who saw nothing wrong with what Joe and the rest did) have been punished.
Nice start.
Next step, what happened to the prosecutor, state investigator, and PSU detective who were involved with the case in 1998?
Didn't the Prosecutor vanish in 2005? And rumors of foul play have long been suspected. Could have swore that was the case from months ago.
by furls » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:21 pm
Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:furls wrote:I forgot the real reason I came here to talk about the sanctions.
Holy shit. I bet those bastards that didn't want a "death penalty" are re-thinking that now. These penalties are "HOLY FUCKING SHIT BAD" and will keep PSU in the dark ages for a decade. When the scholarship reductions end in 2016 PSU will be down to 60ish scholarship players and they will be unable to actually get back up to 85 until 2018 or so. Not only that, but most of the upper classmen are going to be guys that frankly would have had no business in a PSU uniform a decade earlier. Honestly, I don't know if PSU will recover. 6-7 years is a long time to be irrelevant.
This is so much worse than the USC sanctions. The reductions in #s are the same, but the duration, an entire recruiting lifetime, is devastating. Lane Kiffin was able to sell USC to recruits because they would only be foregoing one bowl game as freshman (for his first class) and that is an easy sell. It hurt his 2010 class, but you can miss one class; you cannot miss 3.
You're as bad as any 'bad' PSU fan with your 2000 word blutherings
All you can talk about is how it affects football
I hope the syetem breaks down for a day and he's put in a cell with some whacko like that Boston priest was, then beaten to death by a guy doing life...
Same with that Pedo Priest found guilty in Philly...... the same day?
Jerry Sandusky needs to be tortured...
by FUDU » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:31 pm
by furls » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:41 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:04 pm

by motherscratcher » Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:22 am

by furls » Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:59 pm
by danwismar » Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:14 pm
by dmiles » Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:22 pm

Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests