Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 9:39 pm

by FUDU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:11 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:36 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:43 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:46 pm

by FUDU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:07 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:10 pm
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:15 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:This is the opposite of nice things. Now shake internet hands and be bestest friends .
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:18 pm
by FUDU » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:33 pm
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:35 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I'm the worst bowler in the history of the world.
by peeker643 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:39 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I'm the worst bowler in the history of the world.
That's OK. The whole point is to get FUDU and eoy together sharing a few beers and a few laughs as they find some common ground on this crazy merry-go-round we like to call "life".
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:44 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:10 am
peeker643 wrote:
And that's when we cut the rope and the boulder drops and kills them?
Or is that afterward?
When do we kill them again?
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:11 am

by peeker643 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:48 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:peeker643 wrote:
And that's when we cut the rope and the boulder drops and kills them?
Or is that afterward?
When do we kill them again?
A bit Wile E Coyote, no?
by pod2dawg » Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:48 pm
by jb » Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:33 pm
pod2dawg wrote:Lars,
Did Anthony Dinozzo of NCIS really play for Ohio State?
thanks!
pod
by FUDU » Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:34 pm
by pod2dawg » Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:01 am
by LarsHancock » Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:18 pm
pod2dawg wrote:Lars,
Did Anthony Dinozzo of NCIS really play for Ohio State?
thanks!
pod

by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:04 pm
pod2dawg wrote:Lars,
My uncle used to make marijuana brownies while living in Mexico, he says leaving in a few seeds for the crunch was a nice touch and added to the experience.
If you lived in Mexico , liked brownies, and considered MaryJane a naturally occurring herb with relaxing/entertainment value with less side effects than alcohol, would you consider seeds in the batter?
Thanks!
pod
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:44 pm
by mattvan1 » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:35 am
by FUDU » Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:02 am
by LarsHancock » Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:30 pm
FUDU wrote:Lars I disagree with your outcome.
IMO the Gorilla would win over the bear due to it's a agility, and superior strength, yes superior strength. Gorillas upper bodies are ridiculous and in general they are considered anywhere from 8-20 times stronger than us male humans. While bears have the bite, and the claws in their favor they are not as strong (considered 3-5 times stronger than you and I. Esp. considering lb to lb) and not as adept at problem solving.
http://www.montana.edu/cpa/news/nwview.php?article=3827
http://www.seaworld.org/animal-info/info-books/gorilla/physical-characteristics.htm
http://en.allexperts.com/q/Wild-Animals-705/Gorilla-strength.htm
Gorilla wins that battle 4 our of 5 times IMO.
I would never say this to a bear mind you.

by Nicastro13 » Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:49 am
by googleeph2 » Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:12 am
by pod2dawg » Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:03 pm
Nicastro13 wrote:Who still buys weed with seeds in? Havent seen a seed since the 90's!
by RickNashEquilibrium » Thu Jul 26, 2012 2:35 pm
googleeph2 wrote:Lars, really appreciated the tips on CDs-old-classic-rock-guys-need-to-hear a couple weeks ago.
Really liking White Stripes, a lot. I was familiar with the first Wolfmother CD. Gaslight Anthem's Wallflowers-y vibe is good. So much I have not gotten to yet, but I have it all in my .mp3 library now. I feel like a kid at Christmas. Or like Rip Van Winkle.
I'll reply more fully in the right board when I've listened more. Just wanted to say thanks.
Also- Them Crooked Vultures, and the Neil Young CD Fork in the Road belong in the same conversation.
Really appreciate it.
by Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 » Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:01 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Can't. Dude owns a hot rod.
Christ.
by pod2dawg » Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:23 am
Fire Marshall Bill 2.0 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Can't. Dude owns a hot rod.
Christ.
Says the guy who lives at a corner bus stop....
I hear ya tho.....there is nothing uglier than a Dodge Dart
by justmebd » Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:41 pm
by Hikohadon » Fri Aug 03, 2012 2:21 am
by LarsHancock » Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:57 pm

by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:46 pm

by pod2dawg » Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:35 pm
by FUDU » Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:04 am
by Hikohadon » Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:22 am
by jb » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:17 pm
by gotribe31 » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:34 am

by Hikohadon » Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:41 am
by LarsHancock » Fri Aug 24, 2012 2:36 pm
Hikohadon wrote:"I’ve got a plan to save over 30,000 lives a year. Guaranteed. 30,000 people that would otherwise die in 2013 will be saved under my plan, and it is foolproof. Is there any reason not to implement it?"
_____________________________________
Yes, the world's already overcrowded enough.
Just perusing google, in the US alone, right now it appears that about 4.3 million people are being born to only 2.7 million dying. That's a 1.6 million person surplus per year that will only keep growing.
30,000 is only a drop in the bucket if we were trying to maintain input/output integrity. We need to figure out ways to have MORE people die, not less.

by Hikohadon » Fri Aug 24, 2012 3:23 pm
LarsHancock wrote:Hikohadon wrote:"I’ve got a plan to save over 30,000 lives a year. Guaranteed. 30,000 people that would otherwise die in 2013 will be saved under my plan, and it is foolproof. Is there any reason not to implement it?"
_____________________________________
Yes, the world's already overcrowded enough.
Just perusing google, in the US alone, right now it appears that about 4.3 million people are being born to only 2.7 million dying. That's a 1.6 million person surplus per year that will only keep growing.
30,000 is only a drop in the bucket if we were trying to maintain input/output integrity. We need to figure out ways to have MORE people die, not less.
Now there's a whole nother can of worms there
Certainly the generational cycle has got out of balance. When people only lived to 40, one new generation would replace the old one, and but two generations existed concurrently. Now we can have up to five, and the top two to three require extensive resources to care for, and they produce little. You can be retired for 40 years if you play your cards right.
Eventually that will balance itself out, assuming we don't extend the life expectancy any further, but that will require a population in the US of over a billion people. How much can the world handle? And with an ever-increasing number of the current people nursing off the government's teats, how much can our economic system handle?
Maybe the architects of the Georgia Guidestones (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones) have a plan that is better than anything our government got up it's sleeve. Of course, the holocaust of 6.5 billion people may be a bit of a moral issue for some...
oh, and I got your announcer question next week.
by FUDU » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:42 pm
by LarsHancock » Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:56 pm
Hikohadon wrote:LarsHancock wrote:Hikohadon wrote:"I’ve got a plan to save over 30,000 lives a year. Guaranteed. 30,000 people that would otherwise die in 2013 will be saved under my plan, and it is foolproof. Is there any reason not to implement it?"
_____________________________________
Yes, the world's already overcrowded enough.
Just perusing google, in the US alone, right now it appears that about 4.3 million people are being born to only 2.7 million dying. That's a 1.6 million person surplus per year that will only keep growing.
30,000 is only a drop in the bucket if we were trying to maintain input/output integrity. We need to figure out ways to have MORE people die, not less.
Now there's a whole nother can of worms there
Certainly the generational cycle has got out of balance. When people only lived to 40, one new generation would replace the old one, and but two generations existed concurrently. Now we can have up to five, and the top two to three require extensive resources to care for, and they produce little. You can be retired for 40 years if you play your cards right.
Eventually that will balance itself out, assuming we don't extend the life expectancy any further, but that will require a population in the US of over a billion people. How much can the world handle? And with an ever-increasing number of the current people nursing off the government's teats, how much can our economic system handle?
Maybe the architects of the Georgia Guidestones (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones) have a plan that is better than anything our government got up it's sleeve. Of course, the holocaust of 6.5 billion people may be a bit of a moral issue for some...
oh, and I got your announcer question next week.
You might want to include 5 suggestions for people to dispose of themselves, thus depopulating the planet and ceasing to strain the social and financial systems. Perhaps a bonus system for volunteered suicide - your family gets the money and we can finally answer the question "What is a life worth?"
Nature will most likely provide the real solution (which I am convinced will happen at some point) in the form of a pandemic. So many people living in such close concert is just a smorgasbord for a nice plague. Ashes, ashes, we all fall down.
Otherwise, the enterprising entrepreneur should start buying up land on the moon for space condos.

by LarsHancock » Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:58 pm
FUDU wrote:Lars I can dig your choice of martial arts, but I would disagree in that 90% of all fights end up on the ground, so wrestling would be more practical and effective IMO, but I'm biased.

by jb » Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:15 pm
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Mon Aug 27, 2012 6:58 pm

Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: smalls1129 and 3 guests