Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by furls » Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:22 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:30 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Also, the Buckeye fans running around screaming "NEENER, NEENER, SERVES YOU RIGHT FOR MAKING FUN OF TATGATE!!#%!" or "WHAT RECRUITS CAN WE STEAL!@#%$!!!???" should all be shot.
by OldDawg » Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:47 pm

by noles1 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:37 pm

by mattvan1 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:43 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Where ^ misses the point is that the community is already punishing itself. Knowing their role in this isn't something that is going to ever or easily be forgotten.
It's not I know a guy, it's a few people, very close and very tied in are telling me (and told me beforehand) the reaction and how it is going to grow and evolve within the Community.
Letting a seemingly squeeky clean guy like Joe Pa grow to what he did sure was delusional, just like it is in every single football town. But it's not like that Community had any idea 5 guys were hiding an America Horror Story.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:08 pm

by FUDU » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:15 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:20 pm

by FUDU » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:24 pm
by HoodooMan » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:31 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:37 pm

by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:43 pm

by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:49 pm

by noles1 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:50 pm

by HoodooMan » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:52 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:52 pm
FUDU wrote:Penn State can't go unscathed in this just b/c their alumni and fans (that were no part of this) need something to hang on to and heal.

by FUDU » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:56 pm
noles1 wrote:I'm not for a shutdown of the program forever either. What is the definition of the death penalty that people are proposing here? Forever or 1 year or 2 years? Would welcome perspective on
The SMU comparisons are silly. Apples to oranges. And I don't subscribe to the theory that "PSU was raping kids". That type of sensationalism and generalization is what has us to where we are in politics and the media today. Blame Sandusky, blame the 4, blame McQueary, blame the janitors but to blame all of PSU is incredibly broad and rash claim, IMO.
And I've been someone critical and anti-PSU over the past 8 mos.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:58 pm
HoodooMan wrote:1. Is the DEATH PENALTY(!) (which for SMU only meant one NCAA-cancelled season anyway) justified for anything, ever?
2. What would ever be worse than this?

by noles1 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:59 pm
HoodooMan wrote:1. Is the DEATH PENALTY(!) (which for SMU only meant one NCAA-cancelled season anyway) justified for anything, ever?
2. What would ever be worse than this?

by FUDU » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:02 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Seriously, how many of you actually know how a higher-education institution works?
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:06 pm
FUDU wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Seriously, how many of you actually know how a higher-education institution works?
Think about that statement for a second, in relation to the context at hand. It goes beyond making this mind numbing.
This didn't happen at a day care center next to a run down Arthur Treachers.
It certainly isn't the easiest decision in the world to make, but it is justifiable of the harshest penalty, no doubt.

by FUDU » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:07 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:HoodooMan wrote:1. Is the DEATH PENALTY(!) (which for SMU only meant one NCAA-cancelled season anyway) justified for anything, ever?
2. What would ever be worse than this?
That's the problem here. Can you let five guys who do the most heinous crime this year destroy a sport that said crime didn't directly impact while also laying waste to a large chunk of the university as collateral damage?
I agree with your earlier posts regarding the issue being a deep seeded and disgusting human display where we let false gawds become so untouchable they were allowed to pull the wool over our eyes (for the 4,000th time... this year) but just because this one was disgusting I fail to see why the enablers here should be punished more than the enablers anywhere else?
I'm struggling to wrap my head around all of this, because it does speak to a larger societal issue (one most won't acknowledge and you do). I just don't see how "SACRIFICE 20,000 to save 2,000,000!!!" comes into play when all other fan-bases will just fall back to "free tatoos" and "cocaine and whores isn't raping kids!" to justify their further deifications.
This is the point I was trying to make when FUDU was celebrating. This a fucking tragedy. And I don't know the way out, but I hope it involves rebuilding more than nuking.
by FUDU » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:12 pm
Over react much...e0y2e3 wrote:Stop being a fuck.
I'm not defending anything anyone did that was in charge here. This was fucked up, head to torso to achilles.
My point is, you cut an arm off of a higher education institution, or even infect said arm, it spreads quickly and decisively.
We have a poster here that works in said field and probably could add more on this, but, he may choose not to.
by HoodooMan » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:13 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Can you let five guys who do the most heinous crime this year destroy a sport that said crime didn't directly impact while also laying waste to a large chunk of the university as collateral damage?
e0y2e3 wrote:I fail to see why the enablers here should be punished more than the enablers anywhere else?
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:33 pm

by HoodooMan » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:40 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:41 pm
FUDU wrote:Over react much...e0y2e3 wrote:Stop being a fuck.
I'm not defending anything anyone did that was in charge here. This was fucked up, head to torso to achilles.
My point is, you cut an arm off of a higher education institution, or even infect said arm, it spreads quickly and decisively.
We have a poster here that works in said field and probably could add more on this, but, he may choose not to.
I'm just saying think about that, higher education and a world where "men make men"...and the most low life uneducated crime takes place. Hard to hold back on the trigger, that's the point I was making.

by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:47 pm
HoodooMan wrote:A) I guess I don't see much difference between protecting PSU football in '01 and protecting Joe Paterno.
Two) ?
III) If the wrong we're talking about is enabling, then the reason you'd punish one fanbase's enabling over another's (or at least not give a damn about their hurt feelings as collateral damage) is that one fanbase's enabling led to something much worse than the other's. DON"T MIX YOUR WRONGZ.

by mattvan1 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:48 pm
HoodooMan wrote: Say I was to throw a Haitian cabby off of a 4-storey building. I haven't done anything more or less wrong, based on the level of injuries sustained by this unfortunate Haitian cabby. I've done the same wrong thing, whether he lives or dies, whether he breaks all his arms & legs or merely walks away with hurt feelings. Yet, in the interest of deterring others from killing Haitian cabbies, I would be punished more for what I did if this Haitian cabby did in fact die.
Same theory.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:51 pm

by FUDU » Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:56 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:04 am
FUDU wrote:Real question, even though "only 5 guys" are the problem here, does anyone at all really believe there weren't a lot more people in some sort of level of know about this? People talk, period. No different than how so many murderers get caught, b/c they told somebody they trusted along the way.
Doesn't mean it can be necessarily proven in a court of law, but surely there are X number of people outside the aforementioned that knew enough to do enough. Not sure I can get all sympathetic for them.

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:12 am

by FUDU » Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:16 am
by peeker643 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:28 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Also, my scout membership was cancelled tonight. And my elevenwarriors account I have never posted from was deleted.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:31 am
peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Also, my scout membership was cancelled tonight. And my elevenwarriors account I have never posted from was deleted.
You may as well lock yourself in a dark room with a blanket and a bottle. Idiocy is like death; you can't lock it out, cancel it or avoid no matter what you do.

by peeker643 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:37 am
e0y2e3 wrote:peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Also, my scout membership was cancelled tonight. And my elevenwarriors account I have never posted from was deleted.
You may as well lock yourself in a dark room with a blanket and a bottle. Idiocy is like death; you can't lock it out, cancel it or avoid no matter what you do.
Naw, I can treat message boards like Twitter and only read what I want. I'm invested in this group of assholes so I end up reading all the fucks here. Anywhere else I can avoid. And my friends certainly don't fall into those groups.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:42 am

by peeker643 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:47 am
by HoodooMan » Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:02 am
peeker643 wrote:Just wondering how JoePa set it straight in his mind...

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:24 am
Nevada/Bill,
With the Freeh report making NATIONAL headlines, not just ESPN headlines, I was wondering if we could have a discussion that was NOT around what should happen to Penn State or whether the NCAA should be involved or if anything will be done at all. We have plenty of threads for that.
Instead was wondering if there was any insight into currently committed PSU players for 2013 AND any PSU leans that would be legitimate possibilities for tOSU in 2013 given our positions of need. Thanks in advance for any insight anyone has!
Below are the prospects listed in Scout that had tOSU interested and currently committed to PSU.
Zayd Issah (Scout says no OSU offer)
Dorian Johnson
Greg Webb
Adam Breneman
Garrett Sickels
Ross Douglas (Scout says no OSU offer)

by StewieG » Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:46 am
by OldDawg » Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:09 am

by The Score » Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:28 am
by peeker643 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 7:38 am
OldDawg wrote:It makes me sick that JoePa said this was not a football issue. For him, it should have been. His top assistant was raping kids in their lockerroom shower. He knew about it. Sounds like a football issue. And now, here I am saying it may not be an NCAA issue.
Again, worse than any NCAA violation ever. But I am confused about it...
by Erie Warrior » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:27 am


by Spin » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:38 am

by Spin » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:42 am
Erie Warrior wrote:Jay Paterno did a good job in his interview w/ Rinadli this morning on SC.
Is it possible to find anyone who has an unbiased opinion? Is it possible that the Freeh report is exactly what Jay Paterno says it is, an opinion that was formed by drawing conclusions from partial facts?
by JCoz » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:44 am
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest