Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Thu May 10, 2012 1:07 pm

by Gradysmanldy » Thu May 10, 2012 2:07 pm
"Your admission.about those passes being thrown because they knee
They. Oils get away with it vs lesser tale t wa the honesty. I was trying. To
Get you to.convey in your original reply ."
by Hikohadon » Thu May 10, 2012 2:50 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:"Your admission.about those passes being thrown because they knee
They. Oils get away with it vs lesser tale t wa the honesty. I was trying. To
Get you to.convey in your original reply ."
lolwut
by peeker643 » Thu May 10, 2012 3:24 pm
Hikohadon wrote:But it's nice to finally have a guy that at least has a sperm's chance of finding the egg, instead of these schmoes that never made it out of the condom.
Typicially, a few hundred to a few thousand sperm reach the oviducts following a single mating, which usually represents far less than one percent of the sperm in the ejaculate.
The vagina represents a hostile environment for sperm, and their continued survival depends on getting into more hospitable regions of the female tract. In their journey from vagina to oviduct, sperm must overcome a series of barriers, each of which eliminates a substantial proportion of the original population of sperm:
by Hikohadon » Thu May 10, 2012 3:38 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:But it's nice to finally have a guy that at least has a sperm's chance of finding the egg, instead of these schmoes that never made it out of the condom.Typicially, a few hundred to a few thousand sperm reach the oviducts following a single mating, which usually represents far less than one percent of the sperm in the ejaculate.
So you're saying there's a chance!!!!
by SoulDawg74 » Thu May 10, 2012 4:37 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:But it's nice to finally have a guy that at least has a sperm's chance of finding the egg, instead of these schmoes that never made it out of the condom.Typicially, a few hundred to a few thousand sperm reach the oviducts following a single mating, which usually represents far less than one percent of the sperm in the ejaculate.
So you're saying there's a chance!!!!The vagina represents a hostile environment for sperm, and their continued survival depends on getting into more hospitable regions of the female tract. In their journey from vagina to oviduct, sperm must overcome a series of barriers, each of which eliminates a substantial proportion of the original population of sperm:
Substitute 'Pittsburgh' for 'vagina' and I think we're getting somewhere, so to speak. The rest would be eerily accurate if you also sub "NFL Playoffs" for "more hospitable regions of the female tract".
I could go on with this and make it awesomer, but I have to mix on some of what they pay me to do here.
Damnit.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu May 10, 2012 4:38 pm
Gradysmanldy wrote:"Your admission.about those passes being thrown because they knee
They. Oils get away with it vs lesser tale t wa the honesty. I was trying. To
Get you to.convey in your original reply ."
lolwut
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Thu May 10, 2012 6:21 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Throwing age aside, how does Weeden rate talent-wise? I think he's the 3rd best QB prospect in this year's draft, which isn't a slight on him since this draft had Luck and RG3.
How about the 2011 draft? Cam is probably still the #1 QB, but Weeden's a better prospect than anyone else in that class.
2010? He's probably the best prospect in that draft. His arm is stronger than Bradford's and he's less injury-prone.

by Hikohadon » Thu May 10, 2012 7:19 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Throwing age aside, how does Weeden rate talent-wise? I think he's the 3rd best QB prospect in this year's draft, which isn't a slight on him since this draft had Luck and RG3.
How about the 2011 draft? Cam is probably still the #1 QB, but Weeden's a better prospect than anyone else in that class.
2010? He's probably the best prospect in that draft. His arm is stronger than Bradford's and he's less injury-prone.
Knowing that, and knowing his age, how many current starting QBs in the NFL would you take Weeden over right now to start a franchise with?
by SoulDawg74 » Sun May 13, 2012 1:30 pm
Hikohadon wrote:CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Throwing age aside, how does Weeden rate talent-wise? I think he's the 3rd best QB prospect in this year's draft, which isn't a slight on him since this draft had Luck and RG3.
How about the 2011 draft? Cam is probably still the #1 QB, but Weeden's a better prospect than anyone else in that class.
2010? He's probably the best prospect in that draft. His arm is stronger than Bradford's and he's less injury-prone.
Knowing that, and knowing his age, how many current starting QBs in the NFL would you take Weeden over right now to start a franchise with?
This is impossible to say since I've seen them play in the NFL and I haven't seen down one from Weeden. Based on potential and the relative suckitude of the team's QB, I'd say Seattle, Arizona, KC, Miami... the usual suspects. It's hard to say I'd jettison Dalton for Weeden when I already know what Dalton can do and Weeden is a 28 year old wildcard. He's got more potential than Dalton, and if Weeden were 23 I might take that chance, but you can't give up a functional known for an unknown if that unknown is 28.
A better way to ask this question is which NFL QB's would I clearly take before Weeden if they were all in this year's draft and we don't know yet how they'll do in the NFL and they were all the same age.
Peyton Manning
Andrew Luck
RG3
Cam Newton
Mike Vick
In this scenario, I'd lump Weed about even prospect-wise with Matt Stafford, Matt Ryan, Eli, Rivers, Bradford, and POS since they're all kind of the same type of player. I would put Alex Smith on about the same level prospect-wise, b/c I thought he was just a decent passer coming out but very mobile.
I also think Jamarcus Russell was a better pure prospect than Weeden, which goes to show you that being a good prospect doesn't guarantee anything.
by noles1 » Sun May 13, 2012 4:28 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Sun May 13, 2012 6:12 pm
noles1 wrote:Means little 6 mos form now but nothing but positives and even "surprises" in remarks on Weeden, Richardson and Smelley.
Other surprise was the Cooper kid that played slot for OK St. this year. Really liked the bond he and Weeden have.
by Gradysmanldy » Sun May 13, 2012 7:29 pm
by Hikohadon » Mon May 14, 2012 12:23 am
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
Weeds looks the part Hiko , he also talks the part , enumerating that the Superbowl is the ultimate goal which is a refreshing take from the pablum of the past .
However as he talks that talk so shall we see if he can walk that walk .
If he can we're in the chips and champaign for everybody , except FMB who still grieving over the demise of his fan boyeee .
I've been hard on this dogshit regime , for good reason , they tried to sell shit warmed up and perfumed garbage at QB , with first Delhomme and a year of waste with Colt and no parachute .
But these asswipes may have gotten something right this time despite themselves, either accidentally or on purpose ,.
Lets hope so , the days of getting our ass kicked by every tom dick and Mary in the division have gotten old .
Finally somebody who can pull the trigger and put the onus on the receivers to make plays instead of using them as fall guys because your pitiful bitch ass QB can't throw further than he can piss with the wind .
He's got the arm , he looks the part , does he have the sand ................
SoulDawg
by Gradysmanldy » Mon May 14, 2012 10:29 am
by Govbarney » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:53 am
by Hikohadon » Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:57 am
Govbarney wrote:Did not want to create a new thread.
Any news on Weeden, and TRs contract? Between Mini camp, OTAs, and there little publicity tour, I think its got lost in the shuffle.
Are other teams in the same boat as far as 1st rounders go? Are we just waiting for one guy to sign , and then the rest of the dominoes fall?
by Govbarney » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:12 am
by Govbarney » Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:07 pm
jb wrote:Withe the new CBA I anticipate no holdouts.
by justmebd » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:52 pm
by motherscratcher » Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:55 pm
justmebd wrote:I hear MKC reported Colt won't be here by week one on the radio today.
Shocking reporting, I tell you, shocking. Making a prediction EVERYONE made about 10 seconds after Weeden's name was called in April.
by justmebd » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:02 pm
motherscratcher wrote:justmebd wrote:I hear MKC reported Colt won't be here by week one on the radio today.
Shocking reporting, I tell you, shocking. Making a prediction EVERYONE made about 10 seconds after Weeden's name was called in April.
Well, If Colt isn't here who's going to be throwing to Blackmon, who MKC assured us the Browns would be drafting?
by Gradysmanldy » Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:54 pm
by snuffy1384 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 9:44 am
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:06 am
snuffy1384 wrote:Brandon Weeden may not be Peyton Manning, but he is much better than anything we have right now. He will have growing pains, but if he can make throws that leave us saying wow then I will be happy. If you want to read more go to http://www.brownietheelf.com
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:16 am
by peeker643 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:19 am
snuffy1384 wrote:Brandon Weeden may not be Peyton Manning, but he is much better than anything we have right now. He will have growing pains, but if he can make throws that leave us saying wow then I will be happy. If you want to read more go to http://www.brownietheelf.com
BW3 I think will be a huge upgrade at the QB position. He may have flaws, but then again every rookie has them.
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:22 am
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:26 am
motherscratcher wrote:Thanks guys, now I actually have to go look at the link out of curiosity.
Edit: Fuck you guys. Assholes. I was fine without that.
by peeker643 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:28 am
motherscratcher wrote:Thanks guys, now I actually have to go look at the link out of curiosity.
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:35 am
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:46 am

by peeker643 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:54 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Feh.
by Govbarney » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:01 am
snuffy1384 wrote:Brandon Weeden may not be Peyton Manning, but he is much better than anything we have right now. He will have growing pains, but if he can make throws that leave us saying wow then I will be happy. If you want to read more go to http://www.brownietheelf.com
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:05 am
Govbarney wrote:snuffy1384 wrote:Brandon Weeden may not be Peyton Manning, but he is much better than anything we have right now. He will have growing pains, but if he can make throws that leave us saying wow then I will be happy. If you want to read more go to http://www.brownietheelf.com
Its still more insightful then anything Mike Florio wrote.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:20 pm

by Hikohadon » Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:39 pm
motherscratcher wrote:I think about it every day, and that's not an exaggeration. And then a year goes by.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:41 pm

by Hikohadon » Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:15 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:^ a follow-up to Cannibal The Musical?
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests