Moderators: peeker643, swerb, mitch
by e0y2e3 » Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:17 pm

by motherscratcher » Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:15 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jun 24, 2012 12:54 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:06 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:23 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:20 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:01 pm

by skatingtripods » Mon Jun 25, 2012 2:00 am
by mattvan1 » Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:48 am
skatingtripods wrote:God damn, that was an excellent show. Hard for me to get past Jeff Daniels as Harry Dunne in Dumb & Dumber, but, the first episode went a long way to getting that out of my head.
Terrific from top to bottom. The writing, the acting, all of it.
by Govbarney » Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:14 am
by noles1 » Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:49 pm

by jb » Mon Jun 25, 2012 2:28 pm
by jb » Mon Jun 25, 2012 2:30 pm
mattvan1 wrote:Try acting tipsy without actually being so. Kudos to Sam Waterson.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:10 pm
mattvan1 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:God damn, that was an excellent show. Hard for me to get past Jeff Daniels as Harry Dunne in Dumb & Dumber, but, the first episode went a long way to getting that out of my head.
Terrific from top to bottom. The writing, the acting, all of it.
Try acting tipsy without actually being so. Kudos to Sam Waterson. I'm a bit skeptical on the whole "I gave an impassioned speech about America but can't remember a word of it because I am taking medication for vertigo" but let's see how it plays out.
by jb » Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:17 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote: Gotta see the next few before I give it the 100% seal of approval as, as others have pointed out, the reviews haven't been kind to the post-pilot episodes.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:23 pm
jb wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote: Gotta see the next few before I give it the 100% seal of approval as, as others have pointed out, the reviews haven't been kind to the post-pilot episodes.
Predictable.
Sorkin is a formulaic lefty. As predicatble as a boy band song and about as complex.
by swerb » Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:26 pm
by noles1 » Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:19 pm
swerb wrote:I'm on board. Thought the first episode was good.
Previews for next week failed to inspire me though. Was my first comment after seeing em last night, before seeing all the previews that say the next couple episodes blow. Was also disappointed to see em introduce the former lover angle between Harry Dunne and the gal. Show doesn't need that. Unless it causes someone to dump Turbo-Lax in his tea.
Dialogue was outstanding, as expected. Show itself ... we'll see. Only a matter of time before Sorkin ruins great dialogue and acting with shitty love stories and his flaming liberalism. Can see it being JUST good enough to not stop watching, yet eternally disappoingting. Like Dexter.

by jb » Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:22 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:jb wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote: Gotta see the next few before I give it the 100% seal of approval as, as others have pointed out, the reviews haven't been kind to the post-pilot episodes.
Predictable.
Sorkin is a formulaic lefty. As predicatble as a boy band song and about as complex.
That's the feeling that I'm getting. Every episode will be: Fast-talking dialogue for the 1st 10-15 minutes --> a breaking story --> multiple arguments --> newcast --> Jeff Daniels simultaneously accepting praise for awesome newcast while berating his staff --> "moment" between Daniels & executive producer
And scene.
by jb » Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:23 pm
swerb wrote:I'm on board. Thought the first episode was good.
Previews for next week failed to inspire me though. Was my first comment after seeing em last night, before seeing all the previews that say the next couple episodes blow. Was also disappointed to see em introduce the former lover angle between Harry Dunne and the gal. Show doesn't need that. Unless it causes someone to dump Turbo-Lax in his tea.
Dialogue was outstanding, as expected. Show itself ... we'll see. Only a matter of time before Sorkin ruins great dialogue and acting with shitty love stories and his flaming liberalism. Can see it being JUST good enough to not stop watching, yet eternally disappoingting. Like Dexter.
by cozmeesah » Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:46 pm
mattvan1 wrote:I'm a bit skeptical on the whole "I gave an impassioned speech about America but can't remember a word of it because I am taking medication for vertigo" but let's see how it plays out.
by skatingtripods » Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:27 pm
by jb » Mon Jun 25, 2012 6:36 pm
cozmeesah wrote:ETA: I don't personally think it will turn too liberal. Because I don't think Will McAvoy is either a liberal or a conservative. I think it will be about actually BEING fair and balanced, as opposed to MSNBC and FauxNews saying they are, yet not in the slightest being so.
by motherscratcher » Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:17 pm

by mattvan1 » Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:23 pm
jb wrote:mattvan1 wrote:Try acting tipsy without actually being so. Kudos to Sam Waterson.
Dude, that's like giving Pesci credit for acting like a tough wise guy or lauding Pacino for being bombastic in a scene.
by mattvan1 » Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:40 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:mattvan1 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:God damn, that was an excellent show. Hard for me to get past Jeff Daniels as Harry Dunne in Dumb & Dumber, but, the first episode went a long way to getting that out of my head.
Terrific from top to bottom. The writing, the acting, all of it.
Try acting tipsy without actually being so. Kudos to Sam Waterson. I'm a bit skeptical on the whole "I gave an impassioned speech about America but can't remember a word of it because I am taking medication for vertigo" but let's see how it plays out.
Skeptical of what, the aftermath? He already admitted that he wasn't even taking medication.
Good 1st episode. The opening speech articulated exactly how I feel about the 'Merica that we now find ourselves in. Gotta see the next few before I give it the 100% seal of approval as, as others have pointed out, the reviews haven't been kind to the post-pilot episodes.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:03 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:15 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:19 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I couldn't find anything concrete about Jeff Daniels's politics, but his family owns their own company and he was the spokesman some commercials for the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, so I'm going to assume he at least leans right. In a role like this, you would think he'd talk to Sorkin and be sure that he wouldn't have to openly compromise what he believes in, even if it's just for a role in a TV show. He probably wouldn't sign on if he had to play Sorkin's puppet for liberalism.
by skatingtripods » Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:32 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
"conpromise what he believes" "puppet for liberalism" Oh wow...
He believes whatever the script says, he's an actor, dummy.
Assume he leans right, it doesn't matter. It's a fucking TV show.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:56 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
"conpromise what he believes" "puppet for liberalism" Oh wow...
He believes whatever the script says, he's an actor, dummy.
Assume he leans right, it doesn't matter. It's a fucking TV show.
Yep, he's an actor. Which means he has no thoughts of his own. It's no coincidence that the vast majority of actors who were in "An American Carol" identified themselves with the right.
I'm just speculating. Some people have beliefs and stand up for them. I don't know Jeff Daniels, don't know what his politics are, and have no idea if he would pass on a role that he didn't feel comfortable doing.
But, clearly you do and you know everything, as you have proven to us all countless times.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:00 pm
But, clearly you do and you know everything, as you have proven to us all countless times.
by mattvan1 » Tue Jun 26, 2012 4:48 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:This country sucks sweaty balls, a pile of rancid sewage. Sorkin has his finger on the pulse.
by jb » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:28 pm
mattvan1 wrote:jb wrote:mattvan1 wrote:Try acting tipsy without actually being so. Kudos to Sam Waterson.
Dude, that's like giving Pesci credit for acting like a tough wise guy or lauding Pacino for being bombastic in a scene.
Is Waterson a known boozer?
Did not know that.
by jb » Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:29 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:This country sucks sweaty balls, a pile of rancid sewage. Sorkin has his finger on the pulse.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:27 pm
jb wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:This country sucks sweaty balls, a pile of rancid sewage. Sorkin has his finger on the pulse.
Go move to the post-Weimar republic then. Or take a holiday in Cambodia. Now you can go where people are one.
by jb » Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:47 am
skatingtripods wrote:I couldn't find anything concrete about Jeff Daniels's politics, but his family owns their own company and he was the spokesman some commercials for the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, so I'm going to assume he at least leans right. In a role like this, you would think he'd talk to Sorkin and be sure that he wouldn't have to openly compromise what he believes in, even if it's just for a role in a TV show. He probably wouldn't sign on if he had to play Sorkin's puppet for liberalism.

by skatingtripods » Wed Jun 27, 2012 1:56 pm
jb wrote:
by motherscratcher » Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:16 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jun 27, 2012 4:36 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 am
by Hikohadon » Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:05 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:With all the talk of the steep drop off after the pilot, I was prepared for the worst with the 2nd episode. Maybe a bit long on the Maggie/Jim convo's/fights but I still enjoyed it. Unfortunately it did follow the structure of the 1st episode with expositions leading into the story/crisis and closing with post-show revelations (the only difference was the shitty show instead of the great one) so hopefully they move away from that crutch, but I doubt it.
My least favorite part is the hokey theme song. Just unbearable.
by cozmeesah » Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:22 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:28 am
by Hikohadon » Mon Jul 09, 2012 11:35 am
skatingtripods wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
"conpromise what he believes" "puppet for liberalism" Oh wow...
He believes whatever the script says, he's an actor, dummy.
Assume he leans right, it doesn't matter. It's a fucking TV show.
Yep, he's an actor. Which means he has no thoughts of his own. It's no coincidence that the vast majority of actors who were in "An American Carol" identified themselves with the right.
I'm just speculating. Some people have beliefs and stand up for them. I don't know Jeff Daniels, don't know what his politics are, and have no idea if he would pass on a role that he didn't feel comfortable doing.
But, clearly you do and you know everything, as you have proven to us all countless times.
by swerb » Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:51 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:29 pm
swerb wrote:I give. Can't take any more.
The cue card dialogue (who talks like this in regular conversations?) ... the terribly veiled liberal agenda (I'm a card carrying Republican!) ... the shitty acting ... the forced love stories and unlikable characters.
Pretentious garbage. Even John From Cincinnati thinks this sucks.
HBO about one for their last ten since the Six Feet Under, The Sopranos and the Wire. Boardwalk Empire and a bunch of dog shit.
by cozmeesah » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:14 pm
skatingtripods wrote:swerb wrote:I give. Can't take any more.
The cue card dialogue (who talks like this in regular conversations?) ... the terribly veiled liberal agenda (I'm a card carrying Republican!) ... the shitty acting ... the forced love stories and unlikable characters.
Pretentious garbage. Even John From Cincinnati thinks this sucks.
HBO about one for their last ten since the Six Feet Under, The Sopranos and the Wire. Boardwalk Empire and a bunch of dog shit.
Meh, I still like it a lot. It's a lot of Sorkin-esque dialogue and workplace interaction. Doesn't seem to be much different than Sports Night or The West Wing. Personally, I like that style of dialogue. Sure, it's not how most people interact. I don't know, maybe it's an acquired taste.
Agree with the show turning more and more left, although, I feel the same way about the tea party that "card-carrying Republican Will McAvoy" feels.
I like the acting a lot. I think everybody's playing their role pretty well. I don't know what it would be like to be in a cable newsroom, but this is what I picture it being like.
Still a fan and I'll still keep watching. I think Jeff Daniels is doing a phenomenal job.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:37 pm
swerb wrote:(I'm a card carrying Republican!).
Return to Movies, Music, TV, Books, Pop Culture
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests