Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by googleeph2 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:38 pm
by skatingtripods » Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:30 pm
by dazindiansfanuk » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:54 pm
by RedDawg53 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:55 pm
by googleeph2 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:08 pm
by googleeph2 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:09 pm
RedDawg53 wrote:What a stupid place to have a hill... Idc how unique it is. The day is coming where a CF will get fauked up with a shattered leg
by dazindiansfanuk » Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:12 pm
by RedDawg53 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 4:13 pm
dazindiansfanuk wrote:deja vu?!
Tribe pitcher perfect in the early going and hanging on to a 1-0 lead..... let's hope it's not a repeat of yesterday!

by Crooked River » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:29 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:33 pm
Crooked River wrote:The decision to not offer Willingham the extra year is getting worse by the day, regardless of his 2-run moonshot off Chapman today.
This team is dying on the vine and it's only a matter of time until it drops off the map in this race despite the suckiness of the Central Division.
How in the hell can the Tribe muster 4 runs in a weekend against Astro pitching? Oh wait, I forgot. The Astros also have left-handers on their roster.
Frustration does not even begin to describe the feeling watching this team. The 90s teams would be 30 games over .500 by now and kicking up their boots dreaming about October. Disgusting.
Time for Antonetti to man up and make another bold move. Oh, and Manny Acta, sit Santana's garbage ass down for good.
by RedDawg53 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:39 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Crooked River wrote:The decision to not offer Willingham the extra year is getting worse by the day, regardless of his 2-run moonshot off Chapman today.
This team is dying on the vine and it's only a matter of time until it drops off the map in this race despite the suckiness of the Central Division.
How in the hell can the Tribe muster 4 runs in a weekend against Astro pitching? Oh wait, I forgot. The Astros also have left-handers on their roster.
Frustration does not even begin to describe the feeling watching this team. The 90s teams would be 30 games over .500 by now and kicking up their boots dreaming about October. Disgusting.
Time for Antonetti to man up and make another bold move. Oh, and Manny Acta, sit Santana's garbage ass down for good.
So you're sayin' there's a chance.

by RedDawg53 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:40 pm
by skatingtripods » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:41 pm
by statmasta » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:41 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:41 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:42 pm
by skatingtripods » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:48 pm
by Crooked River » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:51 pm
by dazindiansfanuk » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:51 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:51 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Esmil Rogers was a solid addition.
by RedDawg53 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:55 pm
dazindiansfanuk wrote:Also, looking more and more like the White Sox have just acquired Youkillis.
by davemanddd » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:57 pm

by skatingtripods » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:59 pm
Crooked River wrote:When is Radinsky going to be called to the carpet? This junk and inconsistency with the "other" bullpen guys and the starters has sooner or later got to fall on his shoulders. Hagadone was okay for a couple weeks. Then not so much. Scouting reports catching up to him or is it Radinsky's tutelage? Hmmmm...
If it is not his fault then the only guy to blame is Antonetti for not giving the club the proper pieces. It's an effing disgrace that this first-place ballclub can only win ONE way: seven strong innings from a starter, somehow get a lead during that time, and then turn it over to the bullpen. You can count on 1 hand the number of come-from-behind-in-the-late-inning wins and with the other hand you can count the number of 7-6 or 10-9 games. Doing so would still leave you plenty of digits.
by Crooked River » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:59 pm
by statmasta » Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:00 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Crooked River wrote:When is Radinsky going to be called to the carpet? This junk and inconsistency with the "other" bullpen guys and the starters has sooner or later got to fall on his shoulders. Hagadone was okay for a couple weeks. Then not so much. Scouting reports catching up to him or is it Radinsky's tutelage? Hmmmm...
If it is not his fault then the only guy to blame is Antonetti for not giving the club the proper pieces. It's an effing disgrace that this first-place ballclub can only win ONE way: seven strong innings from a starter, somehow get a lead during that time, and then turn it over to the bullpen. You can count on 1 hand the number of come-from-behind-in-the-late-inning wins and with the other hand you can count the number of 7-6 or 10-9 games. Doing so would still leave you plenty of digits.
The pitchers have to perform. It's that simple.
Blaming it on Radinsky is futile.
by statmasta » Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:01 pm
Crooked River wrote:One more word on Antonetti:
He is starting to make Mark Shapiro look like Billy "Moneyball" Beane.
The Jimenez trade is what it is, but the off-season moves and the in-season moves of these past few months have been absolutely f-ing terrible. All of them. I loved watching him squirm the other day when Drennan absolutely undressed him about denying LaPorta an opportunity in LF, Jimenez's underwhelming results, and the signing of Dead Johnny Damon. These are the moves we make in the window of opportunity? Re-signing Sizemore and Carmona? Casey Kotchman? Damon?
by Crooked River » Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:05 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Crooked River wrote:When is Radinsky going to be called to the carpet? This junk and inconsistency with the "other" bullpen guys and the starters has sooner or later got to fall on his shoulders. Hagadone was okay for a couple weeks. Then not so much. Scouting reports catching up to him or is it Radinsky's tutelage? Hmmmm...
If it is not his fault then the only guy to blame is Antonetti for not giving the club the proper pieces. It's an effing disgrace that this first-place ballclub can only win ONE way: seven strong innings from a starter, somehow get a lead during that time, and then turn it over to the bullpen. You can count on 1 hand the number of come-from-behind-in-the-late-inning wins and with the other hand you can count the number of 7-6 or 10-9 games. Doing so would still leave you plenty of digits.
The pitchers have to perform. It's that simple.
Blaming it on Radinsky is futile.
by Crooked River » Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:12 pm
statmasta wrote:Crooked River wrote:One more word on Antonetti:
He is starting to make Mark Shapiro look like Billy "Moneyball" Beane.
The Jimenez trade is what it is, but the off-season moves and the in-season moves of these past few months have been absolutely f-ing terrible. All of them. I loved watching him squirm the other day when Drennan absolutely undressed him about denying LaPorta an opportunity in LF, Jimenez's underwhelming results, and the signing of Dead Johnny Damon. These are the moves we make in the window of opportunity? Re-signing Sizemore and Carmona? Casey Kotchman? Damon?
Calm down, man. It's just one series. The world is not ending. Everything will be ok.
by skatingtripods » Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:40 pm
Crooked River wrote:So I am wondering why Nunnally was thrown under the bus last year yet Radinsky gets a free pass this year?
by Crooked River » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:10 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Crooked River wrote:So I am wondering why Nunnally was thrown under the bus last year yet Radinsky gets a free pass this year?
The impression that I got was that Nunnally was an abrasive asshole with young hitters and wasn't very approachable. They'd never say that and it's easy to make him the scapegoat when the hitters are struggling, so that's what they did.
The inconsistency in pitching has nothing to do with Radinsky. It has to do with the lack of talent and the lack of quality secondary stuff that most of our pitchers deal with. You could argue that Radinsky must be doing something right with Jimenez for him to have bounced back. IMO, Masterson's talent carried him back to this level.
Gomez doesn't have the stuff to cut it in the Majors. Hagadone can't spot his slider and can't live on a straight fastball without it. Sipp is probably tipping his pitches and only has two of them anyway. Plus, with his motion, everything is up because he's lazy and not finishing his delivery. He either wants to fix it or he doesn't.
The part you're not getting is that a lot of these guys are pitching as exactly what they are. This is Josh Tomlin. For better or worse, he's a guy who'll mix in an occasional good start, give up 35 HR a season, and do his best to keep you in the ballgame. Gomez is the same way, but he doesn't have the cutter or curve ball that Tomlin has and because he can't change the eye level and has no separation in speeds, he gets rocked. Lowe is what he is. Veteran guy nearing the end of the rope.
Radinsky can't drastically overhaul all of these guys at once. Trying to get Ubaldo right is enough.
Fact is, the Indians rotation is Masterson, occasionally Jimenez, and then a bunch of guys. The bullpen is Pestano, Perez, and then a bunch of guys, Joe Smith included, who has gotten by solely on his odd delivery. Radinsky can't make foie gras out of processed chicken with rib meat.
You can get on Antonetti if you want to, but 10M per season for a #3 starter in today's MLB is just ludicrous. That's not his fault.
by googleeph2 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:42 pm
by leadpipe » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:46 pm
by skatingtripods » Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:49 pm
Crooked River wrote:Fair enough. BTW, I should have mentioned Tomlin earlier. I agree that he is what he is. I have no expectations regarding him because of his ability level, but as far as the rest of the staff goes, most guys are getting worse rather than better (Gomez, Hagadone, Sipp). At the very least I think Radinsky's work with these guys should be examined because I feel all three I have mentioned have the stuff to be ML-level contributors.
We will agree to disagree regarding Radinsky.
by googleeph2 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:53 pm
leadpipe wrote: Torre and Stengel are HOF managers when they stumbled into New York, and laughingstocks when surrounded by stiffs.
by googleeph2 » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:58 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Well, keep in mind that Gomez is getting worse because his stuff isn't getting any better and he's not making adjustments in-game. You can place that on Radinsky if you want, but Gomez is essentially a 1-1.5 pitch pitcher with no deception and very little secondary stuff. Second/third time through the order (4th, 5th, 6th): 8.25, 11.12, 8.10 ERAs. Hitters go from .219 to .293 to .343 from 1st, 2nd, 3rd plate appearance. That's not on Radinsky. That's on Gomez and his catcher not making adjustments, or, quite frankly, it says that Gomez's stuff isn't good enough.
by skatingtripods » Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:11 pm
googleeph2 wrote:I've been coming around to thinking Gomez needs to be a long man- agree?
What is the comfort level here for him coming in in a jam?
by leadpipe » Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:28 am
googleeph2 wrote:leadpipe wrote: Torre and Stengel are HOF managers when they stumbled into New York, and laughingstocks when surrounded by stiffs.
Of course young guys eventually need to adjust to the adjustments the league makes to them. Coaches are important for that.
Re: Stengel, he didn't make players great (so your point taken), but he was credited by guys like Mel Harder as being a good mgr.
http://books.google.com/books?id=2LYDAA ... el&f=false
Interestingly, Bill Veeck wanted to replace Lou Boudreau with Stengel prior to the WS championship 1948 season but the public rebelled. Historians think Stengel would have been way better as a mgr, but besides the PR problem, Veeck would have taken a huge hit in losing his star shortstop.
by peeker643 » Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:57 am

by Dnthateonthepronk » Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:32 pm
by Adverb Harry » Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:38 pm
by dazindiansfanuk » Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:50 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:Didn't know where else to put this, as it's hardly warranting of its own thread, but supposedly Scott Barnes has been called up. No word on who is going down, but I would imagine it would be Gomez, with McCallister in line to pitch his next scheduled start. Then, I suppose they could send down Sipp or Hagadone when that happens.
by Adverb Harry » Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:58 pm
dazindiansfanuk wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:Didn't know where else to put this, as it's hardly warranting of its own thread, but supposedly Scott Barnes has been called up. No word on who is going down, but I would imagine it would be Gomez, with McCallister in line to pitch his next scheduled start. Then, I suppose they could send down Sipp or Hagadone when that happens.
They'd probably just send Barnes straight back down when McAllister comes up for his Thursday start.
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: ekauff86, Prosecutor and 3 guests
