Cerebral_DownTime wrote:FUDU wrote:You know what I meant, taking of a life is taking of a life, sometimes it is justifiable.
IMO you can make an argument that both of those guys are more sick than the other.
No. Taking a life in cold blood is not the same thing as taking a life to defend yourself. They're not even comparable, legally or morally.
The 2nd statement is maybe the dumbest shit i've ever heard you say. Dahmer KILLED AND ATE HUMAN BEINGS.
Murder is worse, simply because that person is gone forever. This is common sense shit.
And FTR before some cunt says i'm defending pedos, i'm not, i'm just saying it's not on par with murder. Which is common sense. I hope Sandusky gets put in general population, but he won't because a prison is required to protect inmates the best they can. Which means PC.
Of course you're not defending pedo's, that is common sense shit.
But you are completely under estimating the damage done by sexual abuse to a child.
Abusing a child in any way is the most gutless act on the planet, period.
Plus morality can be very subjective, so that is why there would be differing opinions on this.
In the end their both extremely bad things, so I'm not sure in the sense of arguing the minute details of either.