Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by jb » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:52 pm
by justmebd » Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:59 pm
by Hikohadon » Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:27 pm
by Liondrew » Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:37 pm

by Govbarney » Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:03 pm
Hikohadon wrote:I know a lot of you would go wild with joy, but there are a lot worse owners we could have than Randy Lerner.
Look at the douche in Miami if you want example one.
by leadpipe » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:04 pm
Hikohadon wrote:I know a lot of you would go wild with joy, but there are a lot worse owners we could have than Randy Lerner.
Look at the douche in Miami if you want example one.
by swerb » Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:25 pm
by Hikohadon » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:09 pm
leadpipe wrote:Hikohadon wrote:I know a lot of you would go wild with joy, but there are a lot worse owners we could have than Randy Lerner.
Look at the douche in Miami if you want example one.
I would disagree. Having an interest in what's going on is pretty important. Along with a myriad of other qualities he culled as Pops was carrying him thru.
You COULD do worse, but you'll PROBABLY do better.
Randy Lerner had a hell of a lot to do with the last dozen years.
by leadpipe » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:00 am
Hikohadon wrote:leadpipe wrote:Hikohadon wrote:I know a lot of you would go wild with joy, but there are a lot worse owners we could have than Randy Lerner.
Look at the douche in Miami if you want example one.
I would disagree. Having an interest in what's going on is pretty important. Along with a myriad of other qualities he culled as Pops was carrying him thru.
You COULD do worse, but you'll PROBABLY do better.
Randy Lerner had a hell of a lot to do with the last dozen years.
Having an active interest in what's going on combined with being an idiot/douchebag is worse than not giving a shit at all and leaving the biz in other people's hands.
You could easily do better. You could do worse.
Remember, if Randy sells... HE'LL BE CHOOSING WHO TO SELL TO.
by That_Guy™ » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:02 am

by justmebd » Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:49 am
by jb » Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:11 am
by jb » Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:13 am
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:52 am
by General » Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:29 am
swerb wrote:Through 15 years of embarrassing misery, there has been one constant. Lerner.
He's hired one band of idiots after another and let them hire all their unqualified drinking buddies without any accountability or checks and balances.
Failure after failure after failure. One horrible hire after another. The fact this organization has devolved into a league laughing stock starts at the top.
Not sure how it could be much worse. Cause he stays out of the way and spends money? All NFL owners make money and spend money. And while I don't want my owner deciding who we're gonna draft in the first round, I do want my owner to have balls and brains.
Guy is a silver spoon in his mouth failure that has had everything handed to him and has accomplished nothing in his life.
He may be a nice guy. He may genuinely care about the fans and the organization. So does my uncle and I don't want him as the owner either.
Please sell. Pretty please. With cherries on top.

by Hikohadon » Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:46 am
That_Guy™ wrote:He may make the choice, but doesn't it have to be approved by the other owners? I gotta think that the majority of the owners realize that a successful Brown's team will generate more for the league's coffers than what we have now. They've vetoed bad choices before (Rush Limbaugh), and they can do it again.
leadpipe wrote:No, it might be just as bad, but it ain't gonna be worse.
Point to all the Dolphins and Redskins you want, they've still had a better run in the last 12 then here.
by motherscratcher » Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:07 am
by pup » Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:31 am
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:32 am

by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:32 am
pup wrote:Pretty sure the GB situation has been outlawed by the NFL.

by pup » Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:50 am
e0y2e3 wrote:I actually and honestly think Randy is the best type of owner, guy opens up his check book and puts pure "football" talent in place to run the teams, be the Butch, Savage or Fat Fuck.
Now he hires these guys and they tend to go completely batshit insane on his watch, but if you give me a choice between him and Dan Gilber sitting in the draft room telling scouts what to do, I still take the blank check.
Guy needs a management class, but we all do... I fuck up with my underlings daily (mainly because I hate them)......
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:53 am

by pup » Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:14 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:By all acounts, Randy's "inner-circle"/board that included Jim Brown's piece of shit self and Bernie was the problem in all of the prior hires and power struggles, so he finally dumped them to the a CEO that was a big man and had a huge pedigree, only to be fucked by him back.
I don't argue with the results sucking, but I do see the guy always trying to adapt and learn. EVERY single person on this site begged for someone like Holmes being given the keys.... Holmes himself got them and turned around and fucked Randy in the ass.
And I only mention Gilbert because he is a Dan Snyder... you have one Cleveland.
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:55 pm
by JCoz » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:09 pm
Govbarney wrote:Hikohadon wrote:I know a lot of you would go wild with joy, but there are a lot worse owners we could have than Randy Lerner.
Look at the douche in Miami if you want example one.
Agree 100% , I hate to be a Lerner apologist, but I do honestly think the guy wants to win , and win bad, and someday (probably distant future) he will figure out how to do that.
In fact I think if anything The Browns are his passion , Villa is just his hobby.
by JCoz » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:10 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:
SD:
Smoke fire and all that .
Timed with the departure of the Philly front office shakeup , you have someone who has expressed a desire to seek ownership , and the Browns have the same philosophical system in place that New owner if its him would be intuned too.
Moreover you still have the Carmen Policy Debartlo faction who wouldn't be bashful to instigate a back door by in .
Just sayin , purely from a speculative stance.
I like Randy's money behind the team , but loathe his detached style , but watching the Indians under Jacobs and viewing the product under the Dolans , I'd caution anybody to e careful what you wish for.
SoulDawg
by JCoz » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:13 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:By all acounts, Randy's "inner-circle"/board that included Jim Brown's piece of shit self and Bernie was the problem in all of the prior hires and power struggles, so he finally dumped them to the a CEO that was a big man and had a huge pedigree, only to be fucked by him back.
I don't argue with the results sucking, but I do see the guy always trying to adapt and learn. EVERY single person on this site begged for someone like Holmes being given the keys.... Holmes himself got them and turned around and fucked Randy in the ass.
And I only mention Gilbert because he is a Dan Snyder... you have one Cleveland.
by JCoz » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:16 pm
Hikohadon wrote:That_Guy™ wrote:He may make the choice, but doesn't it have to be approved by the other owners? I gotta think that the majority of the owners realize that a successful Brown's team will generate more for the league's coffers than what we have now. They've vetoed bad choices before (Rush Limbaugh), and they can do it again.
Stephen Ross.leadpipe wrote:No, it might be just as bad, but it ain't gonna be worse.
Point to all the Dolphins and Redskins you want, they've still had a better run in the last 12 then here.
Stephen Ross. Ross hasn't been there 12 years. Just give him time.
Listen, I know that the norm of this site is to take any centrist comments I make and try to skew them into some kind of support simply because I haven't crucified the guy then set him on fire. There are literally TONS of owners that would be better. But Randy has made so many bad decisions in the past... at least he's not making the decisions any longer. To whom he sells would be one that HE would make, and I can just imagine the kind of douchebag he would choose.
I read somewhere yesterday that Randy's intention was to eventually sell the team back to the city in a Green Bay type situation, but I can't find it now. Let's set aside the unlikelihood of that for now... if he were to sell/give the team to the city of Cleveland, how does that work? Does the city sell shares to raise the funds? Who becomes the primary decision maker? A counsel?
by Hikohadon » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:52 pm
JCoz wrote:City Ownership is no longer allowed in the NFL.

by jb » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:53 pm
pup wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:By all acounts, Randy's "inner-circle"/board that included Jim Brown's piece of shit self and Bernie was the problem in all of the prior hires and power struggles, so he finally dumped them to the a CEO that was a big man and had a huge pedigree, only to be fucked by him back.
I don't argue with the results sucking, but I do see the guy always trying to adapt and learn. EVERY single person on this site begged for someone like Holmes being given the keys.... Holmes himself got them and turned around and fucked Randy in the ass.
And I only mention Gilbert because he is a Dan Snyder... you have one Cleveland.
He gets fucked in the ass because he allows himself to be fucked in the ass. There is a difference between someone standing in the draft room and ordering a pick and someone who is the god damn boss. If I leave my kids home alone for a few days, whose fault is it when I get home and the dog is covered in nail polish and the house looks like shit?
by jb » Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:57 pm
Hikohadon wrote:That_Guy™ wrote:He may make the choice, but doesn't it have to be approved by the other owners? I gotta think that the majority of the owners realize that a successful Brown's team will generate more for the league's coffers than what we have now. They've vetoed bad choices before (Rush Limbaugh), and they can do it again.
Stephen Ross.leadpipe wrote:No, it might be just as bad, but it ain't gonna be worse.
Point to all the Dolphins and Redskins you want, they've still had a better run in the last 12 then here.
Stephen Ross. Ross hasn't been there 12 years. Just give him time.
Listen, I know that the norm of this site is to take any centrist comments I make and try to skew them into some kind of support simply because I haven't crucified the guy then set him on fire. There are literally TONS of owners that would be better. But Randy has made so many bad decisions in the past... at least he's not making the decisions any longer. To whom he sells would be one that HE would make, and I can just imagine the kind of douchebag he would choose.
I read somewhere yesterday that Randy's intention was to eventually sell the team back to the city in a Green Bay type situation, but I can't find it now. Let's set aside the unlikelihood of that for now... if he were to sell/give the team to the city of Cleveland, how does that work? Does the city sell shares to raise the funds? Who becomes the primary decision maker? A counsel?
by Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:04 pm
swerb wrote:Through 15 years of embarrassing misery, there has been one constant. Lerner.
He's hired one band of idiots after another and let them hire all their unqualified drinking buddies without any accountability or checks and balances.
Failure after failure after failure. One horrible hire after another. The fact this organization has devolved into a league laughing stock starts at the top.
Not sure how it could be much worse. Cause he stays out of the way and spends money? All NFL owners make money and spend money. And while I don't want my owner deciding who we're gonna draft in the first round, I do want my owner to have balls and brains.
Guy is a silver spoon in his mouth failure that has had everything handed to him and has accomplished nothing in his life.
He may be a nice guy. He may genuinely care about the fans and the organization. So does my uncle and I don't want him as the owner either.
Please sell. Pretty please. With cherries on top.

by Hikohadon » Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:14 pm
jb wrote:1. It is shocking to me you don't know the GB situation is no longer permitted. Check your "knowledable fan" papers.
2. The City of Cleveland has such a supurb history of running things. Christ, can we exume and frankenstein Stepien while we're at it?
by peeker643 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:19 pm
Hikohadon wrote:jb wrote:1. It is shocking to me you don't know the GB situation is no longer permitted. Check your "knowledable fan" papers.
2. The City of Cleveland has such a supurb history of running things. Christ, can we exume and frankenstein Stepien while we're at it?
1. Who ever said I was knowledgeable? Logical, yes. Non-hysterical, check. Knowledgeable? Meh.
2. Touche.

by peeker643 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:23 pm
Hikohadon wrote:JCoz wrote:City Ownership is no longer allowed in the NFL.
Naturally.
Dare to dream, I guess.
If you dudes can spot me about a billion, I'll be happy to buy them and make you all partners. The new poker room at Berea will be epic.
by Hikohadon » Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:31 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:jb wrote:1. It is shocking to me you don't know the GB situation is no longer permitted. Check your "knowledable fan" papers.
2. The City of Cleveland has such a supurb history of running things. Christ, can we exume and frankenstein Stepien while we're at it?
1. Who ever said I was knowledgeable? Logical, yes. Non-hysterical, check. Knowledgeable? Meh.
2. Touche.
Whose the idiot that saidyou were logical and non-hysterical? Keep that guy away from the front office.
by peeker643 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:59 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:jb wrote:1. It is shocking to me you don't know the GB situation is no longer permitted. Check your "knowledable fan" papers.
2. The City of Cleveland has such a supurb history of running things. Christ, can we exume and frankenstein Stepien while we're at it?
1. Who ever said I was knowledgeable? Logical, yes. Non-hysterical, check. Knowledgeable? Meh.
2. Touche.
Whose the idiot that saidyou were logical and non-hysterical? Keep that guy away from the front office.
Everyone says it. Everyone I meet. Tall, light, and non-hysterical.
Please for the love of God don't sell the team to the ButtHurt. We'll be changing coaches every week.

by mattvan1 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 2:36 am
e0y2e3 wrote:I actually and honestly think Randy is the best type of owner, guy opens up his check book and puts pure "football" talent in place to run the teams, be the Butch, Savage or Fat Fuck.
Now he hires these guys and they tend to go completely batshit insane on his watch, but if you give me a choice between him and Dan Gilber sitting in the draft room telling scouts what to do, I still take the blank check.
Guy needs a management class, but we all do... I fuck up with my underlings daily (mainly because I hate them)......
by jb » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:25 am
mattvan1 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:I actually and honestly think Randy is the best type of owner, guy opens up his check book and puts pure "football" talent in place to run the teams, be the Butch, Savage or Fat Fuck.
Now he hires these guys and they tend to go completely batshit insane on his watch, but if you give me a choice between him and Dan Gilber sitting in the draft room telling scouts what to do, I still take the blank check.
Guy needs a management class, but we all do... I fuck up with my underlings daily (mainly because I hate them)......
Blank check? LOL - Lerner having an open checkbook and spending money are nothing but urban legend and yet more bullshit shoved down the throats of fans. Guy is the accidental owner who consistently spends well under the cap.
by SoulDawg74 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 12:54 pm
mattvan1 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:I actually and honestly think Randy is the best type of owner, guy opens up his check book and puts pure "football" talent in place to run the teams, be the Butch, Savage or Fat Fuck.
Now he hires these guys and they tend to go completely batshit insane on his watch, but if you give me a choice between him and Dan Gilber sitting in the draft room telling scouts what to do, I still take the blank check.
Guy needs a management class, but we all do... I fuck up with my underlings daily (mainly because I hate them)......
Blank check? LOL - Lerner having an open checkbook and spending money are nothing but urban legend and yet more bullshit shoved down the throats of fans. Guy is the accidental owner who consistently spends well under the cap.
by e0y2e3 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:01 pm

by e0y2e3 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:03 pm

by peeker643 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:26 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:And I don't think any of yall has ever hired anyone. I fucked up last round and got playyyyyyyed. I have to wait for her to do herself in because, well reality.
by pup » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:54 am
e0y2e3 wrote:And I don't think any of yall has ever hired anyone. I fucked up last round and got playyyyyyyed. I have to wait for her to do herself in because, well reality.
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:10 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:And I don't think any of yall has ever hired anyone. I fucked up last round and got playyyyyyyed. I have to wait for her to do herself in because, well reality.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:14 pm
by justmebd » Sun Jun 10, 2012 7:15 pm
peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:And I don't think any of yall has ever hired anyone. I fucked up last round and got playyyyyyyed. I have to wait for her to do herself in because, well reality.
Ha! Idiot.
Document, document, document.
Enjoy HR's input and bullshit. Precisely why I got away from managing at Progressive.
Understand you'll never fire her. You'll 'performance manage' her and document her every misstep while she sends out resumes and ultimately leaves before you get the pleasure.
Let me know if that ain't EXACTLY how it plays out.
by motherscratcher » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:20 pm
justmebd wrote:peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:And I don't think any of yall has ever hired anyone. I fucked up last round and got playyyyyyyed. I have to wait for her to do herself in because, well reality.
Ha! Idiot.
Document, document, document.
Enjoy HR's input and bullshit. Precisely why I got away from managing at Progressive.
Understand you'll never fire her. You'll 'performance manage' her and document her every misstep while she sends out resumes and ultimately leaves before you get the pleasure.
Let me know if that ain't EXACTLY how it plays out.
Or, you could get the situation I had. We hired a female for the position. One week in, it was obvious she could not perform the job.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Being female had nothing to do with her success or failure.
Starting the second week, I (A low level manager) recommended we cut ties with said female because we were spending a good hour every day fixing her mistakes and she wasn't learning. Mid level Management wanted to give her another week to see if stuff started "clicking."
Cue another low level manager finding a document on the printer with notes that only could be the beginnings of a sexual harrassment lawsuit. We immediately recommend to upper management she be let go immediately, we already had enough documentation to back it up.
Upper Level Management's response: If we fire her, she'll sue.
My reply: If we don't fire her, she will sue us anyway, except now she'll have more opportunity to take innocent statements and recast them as sexual harrassment.
End result: One manager (who was a complete idiot) framed and fired. Two other managers fired. Myself and the other manager who discovered the document protected ourselves adequately and kept our jobs. Upper Level management idiot subsequently forced both of us out after the fact because we "didn't have his back" while he was trying to stab us in ours.
Moral of the story: I tell very long-winded stories.
by FUDU » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:25 pm
by justmebd » Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:24 pm
motherscratcher wrote:justmebd wrote:peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:And I don't think any of yall has ever hired anyone. I fucked up last round and got playyyyyyyed. I have to wait for her to do herself in because, well reality.
Ha! Idiot.
Document, document, document.
Enjoy HR's input and bullshit. Precisely why I got away from managing at Progressive.
Understand you'll never fire her. You'll 'performance manage' her and document her every misstep while she sends out resumes and ultimately leaves before you get the pleasure.
Let me know if that ain't EXACTLY how it plays out.
Or, you could get the situation I had. We hired a female for the position. One week in, it was obvious she could not perform the job.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Being female had nothing to do with her success or failure.
Starting the second week, I (A low level manager) recommended we cut ties with said female because we were spending a good hour every day fixing her mistakes and she wasn't learning. Mid level Management wanted to give her another week to see if stuff started "clicking."
Cue another low level manager finding a document on the printer with notes that only could be the beginnings of a sexual harrassment lawsuit. We immediately recommend to upper management she be let go immediately, we already had enough documentation to back it up.
Upper Level Management's response: If we fire her, she'll sue.
My reply: If we don't fire her, she will sue us anyway, except now she'll have more opportunity to take innocent statements and recast them as sexual harrassment.
End result: One manager (who was a complete idiot) framed and fired. Two other managers fired. Myself and the other manager who discovered the document protected ourselves adequately and kept our jobs. Upper Level management idiot subsequently forced both of us out after the fact because we "didn't have his back" while he was trying to stab us in ours.
Moral of the story: I tell very long-winded stories.
You fucked her, didn't you.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
