Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:02 am
by pup » Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:48 am
jb wrote:We have our quarterback. After many years and wandering in the desert, the promised land of a legit calibur NFL strating QB is nigh. And long after some wide receivers drafted at the end of round one are NFL footnotes you're gonna all be revising history at what a steal this guy was because he was 28.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/06/brandon_weeden_has_the_look_of.html
by Gradysmanldy » Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:01 pm
by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:23 pm
pup wrote:jb wrote:We have our quarterback. After many years and wandering in the desert, the promised land of a legit calibur NFL strating QB is nigh. And long after some wide receivers drafted at the end of round one are NFL footnotes you're gonna all be revising history at what a steal this guy was because he was 28.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/06/brandon_weeden_has_the_look_of.html
Not there ^^^^^ yet.
But I did hear part of an interview with him and thought, I do not remember a Browns QB in a long time that sounded like he knew what he was doing and understood the job. Which he did.
by motherscratcher » Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:38 pm
by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:41 pm
by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:16 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:37 pm
by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:42 pm
peeker643 wrote:with a knock of getting panicky in the pocket and in traffic.
by peeker643 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:54 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:with a knock of getting panicky in the pocket and in traffic.
From everything I've seen of him, this seems like a complete horseshit knock, since there's absolutely no QB that isn't affected by pressure and he certainly never looked as panicky as a Colt or a Gabbert.
But only time will tell, so let 'em keep inventing knocks. I give the guy a less than 50% success chance no matter what.
Needs to improve his feel of the pocket – the few times per game he was pressured, he had a tendency to drift and throw off his back foot.
Footwork breaks down at times, throws off balance too often...
Read more at Sideline Scouting: http://sidelinescouting.com/rankings/20 ... z1x2LEI3eU
Negatives: Sails throws to either sideline; receivers make him look good with acrobatic catches.Back-foot throws are not accurate. Sometimes trusts his arm too much, trying to stick passes late in the play or when he is off-balance. Gets lazy with footwork at times; will flip balls into dangerous places. Pats the ball before throwing. Almost always works out of shotgun formation on passing plays. Fails to see blitzers, opening himself up to backside pressure. Tries to avoid pressure by throwing late over the middle. Old for a rookie at 28.
by pup » Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:56 pm

by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:29 pm
Hikohadon wrote:I think that some felt (and not without good reason) that Weeden might have been there at 37 and that a WR should've been taken at 22. Whether or not there was a WR worthy of that selection is up to the FO.
Personally, I felt that you couldn't "fix" the Offense totally without getting an extra 1st/2nd round pick. They had 4 needs - RB, WR, QB, and RT - and only 3 picks. You can't count on the 3rd rounder to be a quality starter. So they just didn't have enough picks to fill all the offensive holes this year.
RB at the first pick, fine. A big need, he's better than Blackmon as a prospect, no way do you take one of the remaining QB's at #4, no way do you take a RT there.
2 picks left to fill QB, RT, and WR. RT is a MUST since you have NO ONE at that position. So one of those 2 picks HAS to be a RT.
So that 3rd pick - whether it's 22 or 37 - goes to either QB or WR.
Which makes a bigger impact on the team?
Additionally, if you take WR over QB there, then you run the risk of the offense being just good enough under Colt of winning too many games to get a Top 10 pick. And it's not easy to get a really quality QB outside of the Top 10 (unless he's 28, since I will proclaim to my dying day that Weeden is a Top 10 pick and the 3rd QB taken if he's 23).
But you can get a really quality WR where the Browns will likely be picking next year (somewhere between 5 and 15).
Now, if you want to argue that the Browns should've gone RB (4), WR (22), QB (37), RT (3rd round), sure, I'd listen to that. But the way the chips fell, I just don't have the big WR angst that some do.
by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:32 pm
peeker643 wrote:Guy's our guy and that makes all of us all in for now. Just may lose the hand when all is said and done given you have a 29yr old (in October) with a knock of getting panicky in the pocket and in traffic.
That's a legit concern whether you're gulping kool-aid or not.
And not because it means anything, but just for a quirky bit of perspective, Bernie was designated as having diminishing skills at at Weeden's age and was sent a packing.
by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:37 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:with a knock of getting panicky in the pocket and in traffic.
From everything I've seen of him, this seems like a complete horseshit knock, since there's absolutely no QB that isn't affected by pressure and he certainly never looked as panicky as a Colt or a Gabbert.
But only time will tell, so let 'em keep inventing knocks. I give the guy a less than 50% success chance no matter what.
So butt hurt when Weeden gets knocked.![]()
It's being 'invented' and is all 'bullshit'? No QB may go unbothered under pressure. But they don't all react the same way. Or did DA and Brady respond in similar fashion when pressured, as all QBs are.
Whatever- I'm willing to bet if he fails it's mostly because he panics in the pocket or in crowds and makes mistakes with the football.
But we shall see one way or the other, regardless.
These were all pre-draft:
http://draftbreakdown.com/scouting-repo ... don-weedenNeeds to improve his feel of the pocket – the few times per game he was pressured, he had a tendency to drift and throw off his back foot.Footwork breaks down at times, throws off balance too often...
Read more at Sideline Scouting: http://sidelinescouting.com/rankings/20 ... z1x2LEI3eU
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1272538Negatives: Sails throws to either sideline; receivers make him look good with acrobatic catches.Back-foot throws are not accurate. Sometimes trusts his arm too much, trying to stick passes late in the play or when he is off-balance. Gets lazy with footwork at times; will flip balls into dangerous places. Pats the ball before throwing. Almost always works out of shotgun formation on passing plays. Fails to see blitzers, opening himself up to backside pressure. Tries to avoid pressure by throwing late over the middle. Old for a rookie at 28.

by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:43 pm
peeker643 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:with a knock of getting panicky in the pocket and in traffic.
From everything I've seen of him, this seems like a complete horseshit knock, since there's absolutely no QB that isn't affected by pressure and he certainly never looked as panicky as a Colt or a Gabbert.
But only time will tell, so let 'em keep inventing knocks. I give the guy a less than 50% success chance no matter what.
So butt hurt when Weeden gets knocked.![]()
It's being 'invented' and is all 'bullshit'? No QB may go unbothered under pressure. But they don't all react the same way. Or did DA and Brady respond in similar fashion when pressured, as all QBs are.
Whatever- I'm willing to bet if he fails it's mostly because he panics in the pocket or in crowds and makes mistakes with the football.
But we shall see one way or the other, regardless.
These were all pre-draft:
http://draftbreakdown.com/scouting-repo ... don-weedenNeeds to improve his feel of the pocket – the few times per game he was pressured, he had a tendency to drift and throw off his back foot.Footwork breaks down at times, throws off balance too often...
Read more at Sideline Scouting: http://sidelinescouting.com/rankings/20 ... z1x2LEI3eU
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1272538Negatives: Sails throws to either sideline; receivers make him look good with acrobatic catches.Back-foot throws are not accurate. Sometimes trusts his arm too much, trying to stick passes late in the play or when he is off-balance. Gets lazy with footwork at times; will flip balls into dangerous places. Pats the ball before throwing. Almost always works out of shotgun formation on passing plays. Fails to see blitzers, opening himself up to backside pressure. Tries to avoid pressure by throwing late over the middle. Old for a rookie at 28.
by Triple-S » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:43 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by peeker643 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:55 pm

by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:58 pm
peeker643 wrote:Meh.... I'm sure Weeden will be excellent back there.
No worries/concerns.
Scouts are morons for the most part. Unless their reports fit a pre-conceived agenda and my wishes, of course.
I'm sure the guy will be a steal at 22 and every team in the league will rue the day they passed him up or didn't offer more to move up and get him.
Am I back on the team?
by peeker643 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:02 pm
jb wrote:peeker643 wrote:Meh.... I'm sure Weeden will be excellent back there.
No worries/concerns.
Scouts are morons for the most part. Unless their reports fit a pre-conceived agenda and my wishes, of course.
I'm sure the guy will be a steal at 22 and every team in the league will rue the day they passed him up or didn't offer more to move up and get him.
Am I back on the team?
Wait.
We drafted him at 22 and not 37?
Shit.
Nevemind.
We suck.
by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:04 pm
peeker643 wrote:I just want back in contention for one of your playoff tickets.
by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:05 pm
by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:15 pm
peeker643 wrote:Meh.... I'm sure Weeden will be excellent back there.
No worries/concerns.
Scouts are morons for the most part. Unless their reports fit a pre-conceived agenda and my wishes, of course.
I'm sure the guy will be a steal at 22 and every team in the league will rue the day they passed him up or didn't offer more to move up and get him.
Am I back on the team?
by peeker643 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:15 pm
jb wrote:Being serious for a half-second.
One of the knowcks mentioned was his footwork.
What did the article mention he & the coaches addressed and was looking night and day better compared to jyst a week or so ago?
Throw me a fickin' bone, Scotty.
by peeker643 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:19 pm

Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Meh.... I'm sure Weeden will be excellent back there.
No worries/concerns.
Scouts are morons for the most part. Unless their reports fit a pre-conceived agenda and my wishes, of course.
I'm sure the guy will be a steal at 22 and every team in the league will rue the day they passed him up or didn't offer more to move up and get him.
Am I back on the team?
Was it every Scout that said that? No.
It was a couple Scouts that lemmings grabbed onto like it was gospel.
I'll believe what I see.
Your insistence to twist my words to support your agenda is a huge yawn, but I guess this place would be super-dead if we didn't manufacture some dissent.
I have worries/concerns about ANY player the Browns draft. I would put nice money on his eventual failure. But to puppet a party line that I myself don't see? I'll leave that to the butthurt.
by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:23 pm
peeker643 wrote:
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Meh.... I'm sure Weeden will be excellent back there.
No worries/concerns.
Scouts are morons for the most part. Unless their reports fit a pre-conceived agenda and my wishes, of course.
I'm sure the guy will be a steal at 22 and every team in the league will rue the day they passed him up or didn't offer more to move up and get him.
Am I back on the team?
Was it every Scout that said that? No.
It was a couple Scouts that lemmings grabbed onto like it was gospel.
I'll believe what I see.
Your insistence to twist my words to support your agenda is a huge yawn, but I guess this place would be super-dead if we didn't manufacture some dissent.
I have worries/concerns about ANY player the Browns draft. I would put nice money on his eventual failure. But to puppet a party line that I myself don't see? I'll leave that to the butthurt.
by peeker643 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:30 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Yep, that's exactly what I was saying.peeker643 wrote:
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:Meh.... I'm sure Weeden will be excellent back there.
No worries/concerns.
Scouts are morons for the most part. Unless their reports fit a pre-conceived agenda and my wishes, of course.
I'm sure the guy will be a steal at 22 and every team in the league will rue the day they passed him up or didn't offer more to move up and get him.
Am I back on the team?
Was it every Scout that said that? No.
It was a couple Scouts that lemmings grabbed onto like it was gospel.
I'll believe what I see.
Your insistence to twist my words to support your agenda is a huge yawn, but I guess this place would be super-dead if we didn't manufacture some dissent.
I have worries/concerns about ANY player the Browns draft. I would put nice money on his eventual failure. But to puppet a party line that I myself don't see? I'll leave that to the butthurt.
by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:40 pm
peeker643 wrote::cheers:
by motherscratcher » Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:17 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote::cheers:
Dammit, no! I found a whole bunch more butt-hurt pics that I like!
I'll tell you what DOES concern me... RDE, one DT, at least one LB, one CB, at least one Safety. In other words, the whole freakin' Defense.
I think increased Offensive production will demand that our opponents stop trying to run out the clock in the 2nd Quarter, and then the lack of playmakers on D will be more glaring.
by justmebd » Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:17 pm
by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:50 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote::cheers:
Dammit, no! I found a whole bunch more butt-hurt pics that I like!
I'll tell you what DOES concern me... RDE, one DT, at least one LB, one CB, at least one Safety. In other words, the whole freakin' Defense.
I think increased Offensive production will demand that our opponents stop trying to run out the clock in the 2nd Quarter, and then the lack of playmakers on D will be more glaring.
You're acting like we didn't sign Frostee Rucker.
We're fine.
by jb » Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:53 pm
justmebd wrote:I like cheese.
Wait . . . What are we talking about again?
by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:00 pm
jb wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote::cheers:
Dammit, no! I found a whole bunch more butt-hurt pics that I like!
I'll tell you what DOES concern me... RDE, one DT, at least one LB, one CB, at least one Safety. In other words, the whole freakin' Defense.
I think increased Offensive production will demand that our opponents stop trying to run out the clock in the 2nd Quarter, and then the lack of playmakers on D will be more glaring.
You're acting like we didn't sign Frostee Rucker.
We're fine.
Laugh all you want, fuck face. Frostee is actually a very good run defender. But that means he'd be at LDE and maybe Sheard gets another shot at what is probably his more natural Sunsday position (outsiode of a true 5 tampa 2 DL scheme).
FO is pretty bullish on Bernard growing up and showing up in perfect RDE shape. Between that and the Philly old guy I think they have enough Chicken McNuggets for DE. The drafted kids better show something at DT and Heckert is really on the hook to nut up or shut up with Hughes. I'm really nervous about the CB opposite Joe.
In fact, if I had a list of "Oh Shit" positions, it'd go, in this order:
CB
RG
DT without Phil
WSOLB (assuming Gocong is SSOLB)
FS
FB
As we know, QB is all set.
by rk » Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:22 pm
jb wrote:We have our quarterback. After many years and wandering in the desert, the promised land of a legit calibur NFL strating QB is nigh. And long after some wide receivers drafted at the end of round one are NFL footnotes you're gonna all be revising history at what a steal this guy was because he was 28.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/06/brandon_weeden_has_the_look_of.html
by Hikohadon » Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:34 pm
rk wrote:Also Grossi is an asshat and whatever misreading rotoworld (and KSK too) did to change the headlines to 'Browns Think...' rather than 'Shitty opinion writer who got canned from a dreamjob because he's a jaded assclown who never knew much about football thinks...'. He has the same number of sources in the Browns FO as I do and his article is careful to never actually say what the Browns were thinking. Just what he assumes they were thinking.
Dude needs to just go to another town.
Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck? Ideal fits, to be sure … but unobtainable. Manning didn’t want to play here and the Colts weren’t stupid enough to trade the No. 1 pick.
Of the more realistic candidates, free agent Matt Flynn was no bigger than McCoy with a similarly popgun arm. He was never seriously considered.
Media darling Robert Griffin III also was too small. And too eager to show how fast he could run. The Browns never seemed all-in on Griffin. They pursued him just enough to say they tried.
Ryan Tannehill had the size and the arm, but his maturity as a quarterback and field leader were so lacking that he turned them off in personal interviews. He didn’t project as a leader.
So Brandon Weeden emerged as the best option. Great arm. Great size. Great production. And the very thing that scared off every other team – he’s a 28-year-old rookie because of a failed five-year stint in professional baseball – actually became an attraction to the Browns.
Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck? Ideal fits, to be sure … but unobtainable. Manning didn’t want to play east of the Mississippi and the Colts didn't pay their phone bills.
Of the more realistic candidates, free agent Matt Flynn was a Muppet like McCoy with a similarly popgun arm. He was never seriously considered.
Media darling Robert Griffin III also was too small. And too eager to show how to run a Ponzi scheme. The Browns never seemed all-in on Griffin because of his penchant for white-collar crime. They pretended they pursued him, but actually offered St. Louis picks to NOT trade.
Ryan Tannehill had the size and the arm, but the fact that he is actually dead turned them off in personal interviews. Zombies don't project as leaders.
So Brandon Weeden emerged as the only human option. Great arm. Great size. Great toothbrush. And the very thing that scared off every other team – he’s a former assassin that once ate a man's liver with a nice Chianti – actually became an attraction to the Browns.
by justmebd » Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:18 am
jb wrote:justmebd wrote:I like cheese.
Wait . . . What are we talking about again?
We're talking about the fact that your take of Colt as being a victim rather than part of the problem is crap. ;-)
by jb » Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:21 am
rk wrote:jb wrote:We have our quarterback. After many years and wandering in the desert, the promised land of a legit calibur NFL strating QB is nigh. And long after some wide receivers drafted at the end of round one are NFL footnotes you're gonna all be revising history at what a steal this guy was because he was 28.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/06/brandon_weeden_has_the_look_of.html
We have the same guy we drafted. Nothing has changed since April.
by peeker643 » Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:36 pm
jb wrote:rk wrote:jb wrote:We have our quarterback. After many years and wandering in the desert, the promised land of a legit calibur NFL strating QB is nigh. And long after some wide receivers drafted at the end of round one are NFL footnotes you're gonna all be revising history at what a steal this guy was because he was 28.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/06/brandon_weeden_has_the_look_of.html
We have the same guy we drafted. Nothing has changed since April.
Ur an idiot. Noone said lady Quinn looked good in any camp.
Reports are Weeds is picking up the O and coaching at a rapid rate an has improved every practice. Fastest learner since BK.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:08 pm
jb wrote:I'm fine wit7h that. Wait.
But I'm sick of the nattering nabobs of negativity being all "whaaaah! whaaahhhh!, we needed a WR!". Well that's like getting sweet ass rims and putting them on a 1997 Dodge Neon. Only in the Ohio valley, right? It's ass beckwards. This kid may not have run a pro offense, I mean, outside the Slack 10, and the Cogs of Jethro playing for Saban and the labotomized so-called athletes Miles trots out who really does anymore? The facts ar ethat Weeden has a plus arm; a top 5% arm for Sunday. He seems like he lerans quickly and has great size and his shit is together. Yeah, he'll struggle as a rook. Duh. But this is no Great White Dope they are trottig out there selling as the answer. This ain't yo momma's Chuckles, Lady Quinn, Dumbass Anderson or Shine Boy McCoy.
Recognize.
I'm fine being all in -- right now. Why the hell not?
by Hikohadon » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:16 pm
peeker643 wrote:I was smarter at 30 than 20 as well.
Relatively speaking, anyway.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Jun 07, 2012 2:18 pm
jb wrote:We have our quarterback. After many years and wandering in the desert, the promised land of a legit calibur NFL strating QB is nigh. And long after some wide receivers drafted at the end of round one are NFL footnotes you're gonna all be revising history at what a steal this guy was because he was 28.
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/06/brandon_weeden_has_the_look_of.html
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: peeker643 and 3 guests
