Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by Triple-S » Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:20 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.
by rk » Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:52 pm
Triple-S wrote:http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704133804575198154038855396.htmlI recall reading this in the WSJ a few years back.Seeing the Browns get screwed out of RG3 and about to possibly be screwed out of Trent Richardson..really has me reconsidering this.The idea that the Browns could have had their chance at bidding at Luck, RG3, instead of sitting on their hands, and praying that they can outsuck other teams, or have to trade the entire draft for the next 10 years is sort of lame if you think about it.
by motherscratcher » Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:59 pm
by OldDawg » Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:08 pm
motherscratcher wrote:I've thought for a while that this would be a good way to do it. Besides, think of how awesome it would be if it was all online and we can follow along.After work I'll work out the details. It will be perfect
by rk » Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:17 pm
by motherscratcher » Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:55 pm
by Triple-S » Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:16 pm
by pup » Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:17 pm
Triple-S wrote:In the auction like scenario I pointed out.There would be a cap of some sorts depending on how bad you've been the previous season.IE, the Colts would be give 15 million, Rams 14.75, Vikes 14.5, Browns 14.25, etc. Money could be slightly skewed there..perhaps, again, there's a certain amount of cash allotted towards every round, and if you don't want to nab an elite player, you can just wait a round or so, and spend like mad.The Browns would have the right to spend as much cash as they'd so desire. In this case, if they want RG3? They could go all in, and beat the skins in that scenario. There's no way the Rams can trade their allotted cash, nor anyone else. they're stuck. It allows a lot of franchises to be flexible as well. Perhaps the Colts don't want to go and get luck. They can invest in a couple of picks that'd be considered lower in the 2nd round.
by Triple-S » Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:27 pm
pup wrote:Couldn't the Rams bid for RG3 and trade the player to Washington?
by rk » Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:09 pm
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: ybot and 2 guests