Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:38 pm
by Triple-S » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:41 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by OldDawg » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:44 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:46 pm
OldDawg wrote:Gee, SD, you need to repost that stuff verbatim???
Not getting enough love??
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:47 pm
Triple-S wrote:Kent State's starting QB > Ryan Tannehill
Spencer Keith FTW.
by Ziner » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:50 pm
OldDawg wrote:Gee, SD, you need to repost that stuff verbatim???
Not getting enough love??
by Triple-S » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:51 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
Thats too bad because we don't draft players that close , ask gates and jack lambert
SoulDawg
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:55 pm
Ziner wrote:OldDawg wrote:Gee, SD, you need to repost that stuff verbatim???
Not getting enough love??
My guess is that this is just his worst double post yet.
by CleSportsTruth » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:08 pm
by OldDawg » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:29 pm

by OldDawg » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:34 pm

by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:44 pm
OldDawg wrote:Tanney will fall like Lady Quinn on draft day.
If we get Tanney, it will be in the same fashion that we got Lady... drafting a real football player at 4, and then trading up when Tanney drops like a lead balloon.

by Spin » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:18 pm
by motherscratcher » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:25 pm
by jb » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:27 pm
Spin wrote:TRADED.
by OldDawg » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:31 pm
jb wrote:Spin wrote:TRADED.
1 of about 2 times we've ever agreed on anything.

by jb » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:37 pm

by Triple-S » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:39 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Ziner » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:40 pm
Triple-S wrote:why is Jim Brown making the pick?
Isn't he pissed at the org. at the moment?
by Triple-S » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:45 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Madre Hill, Superstar » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:53 pm

by Triple-S » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:06 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Triple-S » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:24 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by jerryroche » Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:47 pm
by Hikohadon » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:08 pm
by pod2dawg » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:17 pm
by swerb » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:45 pm
by swerb » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:48 pm
by scott » Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:49 pm
swerb wrote:Anything is possible .. I'd be surprised but not shocked if it was Tannehill.
I think they're gonna take Claiborne. WR at #22. BPA at #37.
Fans want Richardson. I want a trade down. Try and add another #1 next year, or try and get like 5 of the top 50 picks.
Blackmon is the only pick that would piss me off. I think you can get a very similar player at #22.
by andrew6586 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:21 pm
Triple-S wrote:http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/825/howitsgoingdowjn.jpg
Here's how I think it will look on Thursday, assuming there's no trades..and knowing New England? There will be.
I think Heckert will be sold on the fact that corners have a longer life span, and that Claiborne edges TR out at this point overall as a prospect.
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:21 pm
swerb wrote:And I still cannot effing believe we whiffed on a gift wrapped chance to get Robert Griffin III.


by andrew6586 » Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:23 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:30 am
swerb wrote:And I still cannot effing believe we whiffed on a gift wrapped chance to get Robert Griffin III.
by mistero » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:05 am
by OldDawg » Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:51 am
mistero wrote:I think there is still chance to hit this out of the park.
Take Richardson at 4. Then call Jacksonville. They have been crying about trading out of 7. Offer them 22 for 7 swap, a 3rd and 5th this year, a 2nd (a 1 if you have to) and 4th next year.
Come back up to 7 and take Tannehill in front of Miami.
Take the best WR at 37...Jeffries,Randle,Wright whoever falls. Get your RT in the 4th.
BPA in the rest of the rounds.

by rk » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:12 am
mistero wrote:I think there is still chance to hit this out of the park.
Take Richardson at 4. Then call Jacksonville. They have been crying about trading out of 7. Offer them 22 for 7 swap, a 3rd and 5th this year, a 2nd (a 1 if you have to) and 4th next year.
by rk » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:16 am
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:01 am
rk wrote:Blackmon, Richardon, and Weeden/Tannehill at 37 would be a legitimate possibility if they managed to hang on to 37 and still get the Jags 7. Hard to argue that the Browns would not have managed to address their offense. I believe it is safe to say the Browns would be happy with that draft.
BTW I put that scenario at about .000058%. But it's fun to imagine. Like winning the Lotto.

by mistero » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:19 am
by Hikohadon » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:43 am
by rebelwithoutaclue » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:59 am
rk wrote:As mentioned elsewhere the pick is going to be Blackmon. Or Richardson if Blackmon is gone (including if the Browns swap with St. Louis) but I still believe it will be Blackmon. Blackmon was consensus 2nd pick before the skins trade and he and Richardson were consensus 1/2 skill players. Nothing has happened to change that. The Browns are in need of skill players so no reason to avoid either.
So Blackmon at 4, J. Martin at 22, and Weeden at 37.
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:25 pm
motherscratcher wrote:I'll say TR. I think that's how this goes down.
Although Mary Kay has had some good insight on this. IIRC, she had the Browns taking Blackmon, unless it was Claiborne or Richardson, as long as Kalil was already gone, with the possibility of a trade down, and an outside shot at Tannehill.
You should read her stuff if you're not. It's very insightful.
by Hikohadon » Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:27 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:rk wrote:As mentioned elsewhere the pick is going to be Blackmon. Or Richardson if Blackmon is gone (including if the Browns swap with St. Louis) but I still believe it will be Blackmon. Blackmon was consensus 2nd pick before the skins trade and he and Richardson were consensus 1/2 skill players. Nothing has happened to change that. The Browns are in need of skill players so no reason to avoid either.
So Blackmon at 4, J. Martin at 22, and Weeden at 37.
I don't think Blackmon was ever the consensus #2 pick. Hell, he was the consensus #3 receiver last year. If the Browns wanted a receiver, they would have just taken Julio Jones last year, who is bigger/stronger/faster than Blackmon.
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:53 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:rk wrote:Blackmon, Richardon, and Weeden/Tannehill at 37 would be a legitimate possibility if they managed to hang on to 37 and still get the Jags 7. Hard to argue that the Browns would not have managed to address their offense. I believe it is safe to say the Browns would be happy with that draft.
BTW I put that scenario at about .000058%. But it's fun to imagine. Like winning the Lotto.
If its Blackmon, Richardson, and Weeden, I'm doing cartwheels down Pearl Road.
by jb » Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:57 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:58 pm
andrew6586 wrote:Triple-S wrote:http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/825/howitsgoingdowjn.jpg
Here's how I think it will look on Thursday, assuming there's no trades..and knowing New England? There will be.
I think Heckert will be sold on the fact that corners have a longer life span, and that Claiborne edges TR out at this point overall as a prospect.
No disrespect, but no way Floyd makes it to the Steelers. I don't seem him making it past Zona.
by rk » Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:33 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:I don't think Blackmon was ever the consensus #2 pick. Hell, he was the consensus #3 receiver last year. If the Browns wanted a receiver, they would have just taken Julio Jones last year, who is bigger/stronger/faster than Blackmon.
by OldDawg » Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:00 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:motherscratcher wrote:I'll say TR. I think that's how this goes down.
Although Mary Kay has had some good insight on this. IIRC, she had the Browns taking Blackmon, unless it was Claiborne or Richardson, as long as Kalil was already gone, with the possibility of a trade down, and an outside shot at Tannehill.
You should read her stuff if you're not. It's very insightful.
SD:
Our three biggest needs are QB RB and wideout in that order , with RT as the first alternate .
Unless Tannehills arm falls off between now and Thursday , the Browns wll look to fill their greatest need , something they supposedly cough cough , yeah right tried so hard to do with multiple number one picks , not so very long ago.
They don't value running backs any more than they value linebackers in the NFL hierarchy , but will most likely pick TR if Miami sneaks them, after foolishly letting a back who rushed for 1200 yards and caught 500 via the pass walk right out the door.
SoulDawg

by SoulDawg74 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:00 pm
jb wrote:SD - I think thread title should be changed to, "Pick won't be Tannyhill no matter how much you cry".
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:08 pm
OldDawg wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:motherscratcher wrote:I'll say TR. I think that's how this goes down.
Although Mary Kay has had some good insight on this. IIRC, she had the Browns taking Blackmon, unless it was Claiborne or Richardson, as long as Kalil was already gone, with the possibility of a trade down, and an outside shot at Tannehill.
You should read her stuff if you're not. It's very insightful.
SD:
Our three biggest needs are QB RB and wideout in that order , with RT as the first alternate .
Unless Tannehills arm falls off between now and Thursday , the Browns wll look to fill their greatest need , something they supposedly cough cough , yeah right tried so hard to do with multiple number one picks , not so very long ago.
They don't value running backs any more than they value linebackers in the NFL hierarchy , but will most likely pick TR if Miami sneaks them, after foolishly letting a back who rushed for 1200 yards and caught 500 via the pass walk right out the door.
SoulDawg
If the Browns draft Tanney with their first pick, it will be the worst 4th pick in the draft since, since, since TT.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 1 guest
