Govbarney wrote:Doesn't hurt that he was also a stellar running back in a conference with the best Defenses in the College game.
Well, Ryan Tannyhill played in the Big 12.
What's that?
Shit.
Nevermind.
Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by jb » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:11 pm
Govbarney wrote:Doesn't hurt that he was also a stellar running back in a conference with the best Defenses in the College game.
by Triple-S » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:21 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:36 pm
Hikohadon wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
The Browns scouted both Tanny and Richardson at the same time , but I ask ya whats more impressive a 6'4' 225 QB running a 4.6 or a running back running the prerequisite 4.5 .
Value wise I say take the QB who can throw in a passing league ..
By the time the draft gets here , he;ll no longer be a reach ,, but teams will have to use to trade up to three by then to draft him.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d ... ce=dlvr.it
Put me down for the big athletic QB Cam newton type clone , who needs some seasoning an just happens to be white .
Project this kid in next years College draft , and Barkley ends up carrying his luggage
SoulDawg
This is certainly a lot warmer on him for you than a month ago.
I like his size. I like his athletic ability.
I don't like his passing so much. His arm is plenty strong enough, but hardly a cannon. His accuracy is erratic. His decision-making seems spotty.
There are a lot of guys in the NFL that are 6'4, 225 that run a 4.6. That doesn't mean they should be QB's.
Cam was so successful last year due to his passing ability, much more so than his running. I worry about Tannehill ever getting to even Cam's level, much less the Sooper-Elite.
by mattvan1 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:49 pm
peeker643 wrote: Gil Brandt agrees with you, SD: http://bit.ly/GZViq4
by skatingtripods » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:58 pm
by Hikohadon » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:59 pm
mattvan1 wrote:peeker643 wrote: Gil Brandt agrees with you, SD: http://bit.ly/GZViq4
Tannehill threw 68 passes in a scripted workout coordinated by Chris Weinke,
Man, if that sentenance doesn't make you quiver, I don't know what will..........
Anyway, love the subplot of renewing the A&M vs. Texas rivalry, in Berea of all places. Hell ya!
Let's use Tannehill as the rebound chick after getting dumped by RG3. Wonder what happens after we spend the next 4 weeks salavating over the guy only to have the "let's get value and trade down" plan backfire as we slide to #6 but then watch the Dolphins move up to #5 by trading with the Bucs to grab him one pick before us.
by Hikohadon » Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:12 pm
by Triple-S » Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:20 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Mayock on Path to the Draft, saying Browns should take Tanny at 4, says he's got a stronger arm and is a more natural passer than Luck.
Casserly says too much risk to take at #4.
Billick doesn't think he should be drafted in the Top 10.
Physically, he looks like a less-ugly POS.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by CleSportsTruth » Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:43 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Mayock on Path to the Draft, saying Browns should take Tanny at 4, says he's got a stronger arm and is a more natural passer than Luck.
Casserly says too much risk to take at #4.
Billick doesn't think he should be drafted in the Top 10.
Physically, he looks like a less-ugly POS.
by CleSportsTruth » Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:47 pm
by mattvan1 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:13 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:On the off chance THIS mock came to fruition, we'd take Kalil, right?
by JCoz » Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:54 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:On the off chance THIS mock came to fruition, we'd take Kalil, right?
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:55 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Mayock on Path to the Draft, saying Browns should take Tanny at 4, says he's got a stronger arm and is a more natural passer than Luck.
Casserly says too much risk to take at #4.
Billick doesn't think he should be drafted in the Top 10.
Physically, he looks like a less-ugly POS.
Did Mayock, err, WATCH any real games? Luck is a million times better (and smarter) than Tanny.![]()
Oh, if they do take him at 4, he MUST start from Gm. One.
by pup » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:04 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:42 pm
pup wrote:If there is one attribute that rarely, if ever, improves once you get into the league it is decision making.
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:00 am
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:00 am
pup wrote:Dude was a QB his entire life. Recruited to A&M as a QB. Lost battle as a freshman and played WR because he is an athlete. Let's not make it sound like he was cocking off one day in practice throwing the ball around and someone said, man this kid can throw let's throw him behind center.
Had we traded up to, we would be lauhging our balls off at Washington or Miami for thinking about taking Tanny in the top 10. Don't let the hate for Colt and the need for a position cloud your head.
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:33 am
by jb » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:07 am
Hikohadon wrote:
Casserly says too much risk to take at #4.
Billick doesn't think he should be drafted in the Top 10.
by jb » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:11 am
pup wrote:You are out of your god damned mind brother.
You don't learnt how to be careful with the football.
You don't learn how to to be NFL accurate.
You don't learn reading defenses and making snap decisions in the NFL.
Those are all talents, not skills.
by Hikohadon » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:24 am
mattvan1 wrote:Plus get ready for a ration of crap from him, his agent, and the NFLPA about drafting the best LT prospect since JT and then playing him at RT so you can pay him less.
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:23 pm
pup wrote:You are out of your god damned mind brother.
You don't learnt how to be careful with the football.
You don't learn how to to be NFL accurate.
You don't learn reading defenses and making snap decisions in the NFL.
Those are all talents, not skills.
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:41 pm
jb wrote:pup wrote:You are out of your god damned mind brother.
You don't learnt how to be careful with the football.
You don't learn how to to be NFL accurate.
You don't learn reading defenses and making snap decisions in the NFL.
Those are all talents, not skills.
Nailed it.
You can't argue with a crazy man, Pup. SD is the drunk guy at the bar whose struck out with the ladies all night staring at the easy tipsy chubby girl at 1:50 am convincing him self she's the hottie he's been looking to bed all night. He'll never budge that she ain't a dead ringer for Hallie Berry no matter how many facts you lay out.
Just say Daryl Clark.
by CleSportsTruth » Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:41 pm
Hikohadon wrote:mattvan1 wrote:Plus get ready for a ration of crap from him, his agent, and the NFLPA about drafting the best LT prospect since JT and then playing him at RT so you can pay him less.
That won't matter anymore with the rookie scale. He'll get what he's slotted to get.
But I don't see how you don't get good value for a trade down if Kalil drops to #4.
by Hikohadon » Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:55 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:Hikohadon wrote:mattvan1 wrote:Plus get ready for a ration of crap from him, his agent, and the NFLPA about drafting the best LT prospect since JT and then playing him at RT so you can pay him less.
That won't matter anymore with the rookie scale. He'll get what he's slotted to get.
But I don't see how you don't get good value for a trade down if Kalil drops to #4.
B/c the Browns (esp. Heckert) love them some tackles. Tom's said so.
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:11 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:28 pm
pup wrote:For the cheap seats
Ryan Tannehill being available at 4 does not make him any better of a QB. He is just there. You can hope all you want, a stiff is a stiff and wasting resources because you have extra resources is as stupid as stupid gets.
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:19 pm
by jb » Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:20 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:30 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:18 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:Arguing with SD is like being in a battle of wits with a 4 yr old....
There's not a QB who ever walked the face of the earth or stepped on the field that he hasn't "rated" or whose future he cannot predict
If he says Tannehill is worthy of the 3 pick then by God he's worthy and there's no way he'll ever turn into Trent Dildofer
Tannehill is destined to the HoF.....of that you can be sure
Right SD?
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
