Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by Dnthateonthepronk » Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:38 pm
by gotribe31 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:49 pm

by GodHatesClevelandSport » Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:54 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:00 pm

by e0y2e3 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:01 pm

by gotribe31 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:29 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:This front office gets stupider by the minute.

by GodHatesClevelandSport » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:47 pm
gotribe31 wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:This front office gets stupider by the minute.
Whys that, exactly? You don't even know who's involved in the proposed deal.
by motherscratcher » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:52 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:gotribe31 wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:This front office gets stupider by the minute.
Whys that, exactly? You don't even know who's involved in the proposed deal.
They spent all offseason signing 47 washed up bums, sentimentally kept Sizemore and Fauxsto, and are forced to trade for another old man on the downswing who can't play defense anymore. They should have just signed Josh Willingham.
by pup » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:56 pm
motherscratcher wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:gotribe31 wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:This front office gets stupider by the minute.
Whys that, exactly? You don't even know who's involved in the proposed deal.
They spent all offseason signing 47 washed up bums, sentimentally kept Sizemore and Fauxsto, and are forced to trade for another old man on the downswing who can't play defense anymore. They should have just signed Josh Willingham.
Are you saying you wouldn't trade Trevor Crowe and change for Abreu?
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:36 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Because they just gave Pujols $200MM and are cutting payroll?
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:38 am
by bookelly » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:43 am
by motherscratcher » Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:18 am
Govbarney wrote:Is this really a improvement over Shelly Duncan?
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:29 am
by gotribe31 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:46 am
pup wrote:Being better than Shells Duncan should not be the criteria. And marginally better is kind of pointless.
Like trading for Colt McCoy when you have Seneca Wallace.

by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:04 am
gotribe31 wrote:pup wrote:Being better than Shells Duncan should not be the criteria. And marginally better is kind of pointless.
Like trading for Colt McCoy when you have Seneca Wallace.
Maybe it shouldn't be the criteria, but the simple fact is that right now, that's the criteria. So why complain about trying to improve? How is getting better pointless? Why is trying to improve the team a bad thing? Should they tank for the draft?
Abreu, even at this stage of his career, is a better offensive and defensive option than Shelly Duncan in LF. If they can get him on the cheap, why not do it?
by gotribe31 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:06 am
pup wrote:gotribe31 wrote:pup wrote:Being better than Shells Duncan should not be the criteria. And marginally better is kind of pointless.
Like trading for Colt McCoy when you have Seneca Wallace.
Maybe it shouldn't be the criteria, but the simple fact is that right now, that's the criteria. So why complain about trying to improve? How is getting better pointless? Why is trying to improve the team a bad thing? Should they tank for the draft?
Abreu, even at this stage of his career, is a better offensive and defensive option than Shelly Duncan in LF. If they can get him on the cheap, why not do it?
Because, as marginally better as he may or may not be, the second half of last year shows he may not be better at all. With the spring he is having (numbers wise obviously haven't seen him) it kind of drives that point home. So unless Angels are picking up all of his salary, you have a team that is going to scream limited financial resources dumping some of those into this player.
Teams no longer fear bobby abreu as a hitter, which means his one skill (drawing walks) that he has left in his bag will be limited by guys not nibbling.

by andrew6586 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:26 am
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:53 am
gotribe31 wrote:pup wrote:gotribe31 wrote:pup wrote:Being better than Shells Duncan should not be the criteria. And marginally better is kind of pointless.
Like trading for Colt McCoy when you have Seneca Wallace.
Maybe it shouldn't be the criteria, but the simple fact is that right now, that's the criteria. So why complain about trying to improve? How is getting better pointless? Why is trying to improve the team a bad thing? Should they tank for the draft?
Abreu, even at this stage of his career, is a better offensive and defensive option than Shelly Duncan in LF. If they can get him on the cheap, why not do it?
Because, as marginally better as he may or may not be, the second half of last year shows he may not be better at all. With the spring he is having (numbers wise obviously haven't seen him) it kind of drives that point home. So unless Angels are picking up all of his salary, you have a team that is going to scream limited financial resources dumping some of those into this player.
Teams no longer fear bobby abreu as a hitter, which means his one skill (drawing walks) that he has left in his bag will be limited by guys not nibbling.
I saw him last week when the Angels played the Indians. He started in RF, was moving around well. He looked fine. Spring numbers mean nothing, especially for vets.
If they give up Crowe and the Angels pick up $6m in salary, how can this be a bad trade? Even if he crashes and burns, who cares? How is trying to improve the team a bad thing?
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:09 am

by Jumbo » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:17 am
motherscratcher wrote:Govbarney wrote:Is this really a improvement over Shelly Duncan?
that depends.
He's better than regular Shelly Duncan.
Hes worse than extrapolated MVP Shelly Duncan.
by Jumbo » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:22 am
pup wrote:Because if they pick up 6, that leaves us on the hook for 3. And if he is as washed up as he appeared in the 2nd half of last year and his numbers say he could be this Spring...that is $3M that cannot go to improve if need be at the deadline.
If he comes in and hits .220 and his walk rate shits the bed, is that worth any number of dollars? Just because it isn't a lot of money, if he is a disaster he is a disaster.
by Govbarney » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:59 am
by e0y2e3 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:02 am

by motherscratcher » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:03 am
Govbarney wrote:This is scraping the bottom of the barrel, and replacing young shit "Crowe" for Old shit.
All indications are this guy cant play LF anymore, and he hits no better then Duncan. I suppose if they are worried about Hafner's health he makes a little sense as a back up DH, but you cant tell me that this is the best trade option for a Left Fielder. If Vlad is option F, Abreu is option D-.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:04 am

by neoleo » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:17 am
Govbarney wrote:This is scraping the bottom of the barrel, and replacing young shit "Crowe" for Old shit.
All indications are this guy cant play LF anymore, and he hits no better then Duncan. I suppose if they are worried about Hafner's health he makes a little sense as a back up DH, but you cant tell me that this is the best trade option for a Left Fielder. If Vlad is option F, Abreu is option D-.

by gotribe31 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:23 am

by British_Pharaoh » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:26 am

by e0y2e3 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:27 am

by idoctribefan » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:21 pm

by motherscratcher » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:25 pm
Jumbo wrote:Heyman just tweeted that the Abreu deal fell apart.
by skatingtripods » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:30 pm

by GodHatesClevelandSport » Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:01 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:The overall reaction here is hilarious. A no cost walk machine that hit well for half of last year is all of the sudden something to be outraged about?
by Govbarney » Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:04 pm
gotribe31 wrote:He's been a below average RF for a couple of years. That does not mean he can't play a passable LF. He's a veteran, professional hitter, a known quantity with 16 years of MLB experience. He played in 142 games last year, the LEAST since his rookie year in 1997. Yes, he's old. Yes, he's trending downward. But can you really sit there and tell me that he's going to be WORSE than Shelly Duncan? Can you really sit there and say that he's not worth Trevor Crowe and a few million of Larry Dolan's dollars? As it stands right now, this is a low-cost option that may improve our OF defense and our offense. If they're trading Austin Adams for him, then we can bitch.
Gov, you say that there are better options out there available via trade. Care to offer up these options?
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:10 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Well, you can thank Grady for that.
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:01 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Indians fans: "Larry Dolan is cheap!!!" wait "Larry Dolan is wasting money!!!"
by Kingpin74 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:22 pm
by gotribe31 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:44 pm
Govbarney wrote:gotribe31 wrote:He's been a below average RF for a couple of years. That does not mean he can't play a passable LF. He's a veteran, professional hitter, a known quantity with 16 years of MLB experience. He played in 142 games last year, the LEAST since his rookie year in 1997. Yes, he's old. Yes, he's trending downward. But can you really sit there and tell me that he's going to be WORSE than Shelly Duncan? Can you really sit there and say that he's not worth Trevor Crowe and a few million of Larry Dolan's dollars? As it stands right now, this is a low-cost option that may improve our OF defense and our offense. If they're trading Austin Adams for him, then we can bitch.
Gov, you say that there are better options out there available via trade. Care to offer up these options?
I am frustrated , fact is with our inability to absorb payroll, Abreu very likely may be the best trade option. Though it appears now the deal is dead based on what LA was willing to pay off.
Question: Is Damon's Defense any worse then Abreu's, or is he just type cast as a DH at this point in his career?

by Spin » Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:22 pm
Govbarney wrote:Is this really a improvement over Shelly Duncan?
by pup » Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:16 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I've long maintained that the Indians are the best run org in Cleveland.
by peeker643 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:47 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:34 pm
If they give up Crowe and the Angels pick up $6m in salary, how can this be a bad trade? Even if he crashes and burns, who cares? How is trying to improve the team a bad thing?
by TribeinLA » Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:23 am
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: ClevelandFanInNewYork and 3 guests
