Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:52 pm
by OldDawg » Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:16 am

by peeker643 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 2:10 pm
OldDawg wrote:Its amazing how the game of college basketball has evolved. The Bobby Knight "motion" offense impact years ago created 1000s of coaches who taught kids to screen and cut and move without the ball. You were NEVER supposed to dribble nor set any ball screens.
Now, the two most prominent offensive schemes are ball screens and the "dribble drive" offense. The dribble drive offense is basically all about spacing the floor to create penetration opportunities. Even most "motion" offenses are run just to spread the floor out and create penetration opportunities.
I am amazed at how many teams spend a majority of their time setting ball screens. I am equally amazed at how many different ways people defend them, and how poorly some people defend them.
There is a ton of stuff you need to watch to study what is going on with ball screens. Its no longer the old "pick and roll" from the old days. Most people set ball screens not only to create penetration opportunities, they set them for pick-and-pop jump shooting big men. But the most intriguing thing is teams set ballscreens to simply attack how people defend them.
For example, Ohio U, who just happens to set a ton of ball screens, has double-teamed every ball screen. That is very high risk - high reward. That means that leaves 3 guys guarding the other 4. OU must rotate VERY aggressively with those other 3 guys and "zone up" those 4. Teams set ballscreens against OU knowing the dribbler won't score, but just to attempt to attack with the 4 vs 3 after the ball comes out of the trap. I am shocked that OU will still do that late in the game protecting a small lead. But they are very good at it.
I am also amazed how poorly folks defend the ball screen at the end of shot clock situations. It seems all folks have to do is send your center to ball screen the point guard and people will switch that screen, leaving your center guarding their point guard, tripping all over himself.
Aaron Craft is the best on getting through ball screens. He is quite 'crafty,' pardon the pun.
Why the ball screen lecture? Just encouraging you to watch what's going on with ball screens on both sides of the ball and off the ball. Its pretty intriguing stuff. Like I said, its not your father's pick and roll.
by skatingtripods » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:16 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:28 pm

by OldDawg » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:41 pm
Thanks. I don't always have a lot of time to post during basketball season. NCAA tourney is my favorite sporting event of the year. The neat thing is getting to watch teams we haven't seen nor heard of all year and find out that folks are playing some pretty good hoops out there that never hit ESPN.peeker643 wrote:And that's why e0y2e3 asked you to post more on hoops.
That was a good read and I, for one, appreciate it.
More rotating than "zoning," but zoning in the effect that there are 3 guys guarding 4. They usually rotate and leave the guy furthest from the ball open, banking on the aggressiveness of the trap on the ball making a long pass impossible.peeker643 wrote:Never considered the constant state of rotating and zoning that the OU defenders were doing all game long.

by OldDawg » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:47 pm
Huh??e0y2e3 wrote:<-- still doesn't know why won any games aside from this Ohio crap <--'s hearing from third hand sources

by OldDawg » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:53 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I think what makes Craft so good at defending the ball screen is that he undercuts it so fast that he either challenges the guy to make a jump shot or try a contested drive. Since possessions are so important against OSU, guys don't want to take the long threes off the first or second ball screen.

by e0y2e3 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:54 pm

by peeker643 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:00 pm
OldDawg wrote:Thanks. I don't always have a lot of time to post during basketball season. NCAA tourney is my favorite sporting event of the year. The neat thing is getting to watch teams we haven't seen nor heard of all year and find out that folks are playing some pretty good hoops out there that never hit ESPN.peeker643 wrote:And that's why e0y2e3 asked you to post more on hoops.
That was a good read and I, for one, appreciate it.More rotating than "zoning," but zoning in the effect that there are 3 guys guarding 4. They usually rotate and leave the guy furthest from the ball open, banking on the aggressiveness of the trap on the ball making a long pass impossible.peeker643 wrote:Never considered the constant state of rotating and zoning that the OU defenders were doing all game long.
There was a possession late in the OU/USF game when OU double teamed a ball screen on the wing. A post defender had to rotate over to pick up the pick and pop post man. That rotating defender had to leave his post man alone in the key. A much smaller guard then had to dive inside to cover the post. The offensive post went to war with the smaller guard, pinning him on his back. They fed him and the guard ended up fouling him on the catch. The whole reason USF set the ball screen was to create that mismatch. OU either had to leave the pick and pop big alone for a jumper, or defend a post man with a guard. I love watching that kind of chess match.
Like I said, though, I am a little surprised that late in the game that OU doesn't go a little more conservative on that. When you double team the ball like that you are vulnerable to mismatches and fouls. You see a lot of guards dribbling into the leg or hip of the trapper to draw the foul. Late in the game, I don't like gambling. However, it creates turnovers and is very disruptive. I don't know if they do it all the time. But in the MAC tourney and NCAA tourney I think they have done it almost every time. The old saying, "dance with who brung ya." I have a little bit of a tie with John Groce at OU so I follow them closely.
Other teams do a lot of switching on ballscreens. Others "hedge," which looks like a temporary double team and recover. That is what you see in the NBA on ball screens.
You can also see what teams think of certain players, scouting report wise. I think it was St Louis's point guard. The other team went under every ball screen. Leaving him wide open for 15-17 foot jumpers. That other team is saying he cant make jumpers. Kinda like when the Cavs defended Rondo in the playoffs a few years ago.
by OldDawg » Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:33 pm
peeker643 wrote:I dig![]()
That's one reason I think the injury to UNC's PG Kendall marshall is a big this week. UNC would have all week to focus on the OU tendencies and game plan around that. I think that losing their PG (who's not a scorer himself) evens the odds a bit in that UNC will be focused on getting eithera true freshman PG or a senior w/limited experience running the point and feeling more comfortable. They have to worry about that while also game planning. Those big, smart, well-coached athletes would have a decided advantage against OU any other day (and still do to an extent) but this will make it a bit closer IMO.
OU makes the PG uncomfortable and it gets interesting. And their doubling/rotating/'zoning' may be more effective if they can confidently leave the PG out there to shoot what he wants to shoot.
Wouldn't be surprised for UNC to just tell the kid to bring the ball up, dump it down low and let the offense work inside out. But again, that may take some TarHeels out of their comfort zone.
Or UNC could win by 30 and I'm all wet.

by peeker643 » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:17 pm
OldDawg wrote:peeker643 wrote:I dig![]()
That's one reason I think the injury to UNC's PG Kendall marshall is a big this week. UNC would have all week to focus on the OU tendencies and game plan around that. I think that losing their PG (who's not a scorer himself) evens the odds a bit in that UNC will be focused on getting eithera true freshman PG or a senior w/limited experience running the point and feeling more comfortable. They have to worry about that while also game planning. Those big, smart, well-coached athletes would have a decided advantage against OU any other day (and still do to an extent) but this will make it a bit closer IMO.
OU makes the PG uncomfortable and it gets interesting. And their doubling/rotating/'zoning' may be more effective if they can confidently leave the PG out there to shoot what he wants to shoot.
Wouldn't be surprised for UNC to just tell the kid to bring the ball up, dump it down low and let the offense work inside out. But again, that may take some TarHeels out of their comfort zone.
Or UNC could win by 30 and I'm all wet.
Great points. Doubling an uncomfortable point guard could aid OU. However, you are leaving one of 4 all-americans open somewhere, too.
UNC has to decide if they want to try to force those rotations and mismatches by setting those ballscreens. Or make life easy on the point guard and not set ballscreens for him. If they run other guys off ball screens, guess who OU leaves open... the "uncomfortable" point guard... putting pressure on him. Even if the point guard plays with the wrist injury, how well will he handle the traps?
What we all forget is that every kid on UNC's roster was considered to be way above MAC level in high school, or UNC would never have recruited them. It is not like they are bringing in chopped liver off the bench.
by pod2dawg » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:56 pm
by jb » Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:22 am
pod2dawg wrote:I am wearing green but OU loses by 20 to the f%^^&&cking tarheels ( yes I went to Wake Forest) regardless of who those baby blue wine & cheesers put out at point.
by peeker643 » Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:48 am
jb wrote:pod2dawg wrote:I am wearing green but OU loses by 20 to the f%^^&&cking tarheels ( yes I went to Wake Forest) regardless of who those baby blue wine & cheesers put out at point.
Don't discount UNC's attrition. If healthy, I thin they win it all. But...
FTR - I have UK beating UNC in the final
by FUDU » Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:10 pm
by OldDawg » Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:44 am

by OldDawg » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:18 pm

by bac5665 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:20 pm
by LakeErieWarriors » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:34 pm
OldDawg wrote:'Cuse dodges the bullet. Wisconsin has horrible last possession. But they have an offensive rebound hit them in the hands 1 foot from the rim and the dude doesn't snag it.
Louisville looking to upset MSU
by OldDawg » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:38 pm
LakeErieWarriors wrote:OldDawg wrote:'Cuse dodges the bullet. Wisconsin has horrible last possession. But they have an offensive rebound hit them in the hands 1 foot from the rim and the dude doesn't snag it.
Louisville looking to upset MSU
Wisconsin has horrible last possessionS; plural. Awful shot selection. Jezuz Chryst they're like a 5th grade CYO team. Gotta pass the ball at least 15 times, everyone has to touch it, and then someone can shoot. Attack the damn hoop, get fouled, do something other than heave up a prayer when ya got 15 seconds to work with! I took Wisc +3 which I won obviously, but I also had them winning in my bracket, so I'm pretty pissed; also obviously.

by OldDawg » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:40 pm
LakeErieWarriors wrote:they're like a 5th grade CYO team. Gotta pass the ball at least 15 times, everyone has to touch it, and then someone can shoot. .

by LakeErieWarriors » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:48 pm
by pod2dawg » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:50 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:14 pm

by peeker643 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:37 pm
OldDawg wrote:LakeErieWarriors wrote:OldDawg wrote:'Cuse dodges the bullet. Wisconsin has horrible last possession. But they have an offensive rebound hit them in the hands 1 foot from the rim and the dude doesn't snag it.
Louisville looking to upset MSU
Wisconsin has horrible last possessionS; plural. Awful shot selection. Jezuz Chryst they're like a 5th grade CYO team. Gotta pass the ball at least 15 times, everyone has to touch it, and then someone can shoot. Attack the damn hoop, get fouled, do something other than heave up a prayer when ya got 15 seconds to work with! I took Wisc +3 which I won obviously, but I also had them winning in my bracket, so I'm pretty pissed; also obviously.
Did Wiscy have timeouts left? I was flipping between the games.
by fairvis » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:54 pm
by furls » Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:22 am
by peeker643 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:14 am
furls wrote:Buford is a ghost.... again. I look like a prophet re: Thomas. I said after Buford and Sullinger announced that they were coming back that Thomas' development would be the most important factor for this team in 2012. Buford is sooo bad tonight that I am seriously beginning to wonder if he is point shaving in these big games. He is making inexplicably bad plays today. He isn't just 3-16 (or something terrible like that), he is turning the ball over and giving dumb fouls.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:37 am
by JCoz » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:51 am
peeker643 wrote:That may have been the closest, most nerve-wracking 15-point win in tourney history.
Sure hope Willie the Sieve shows up in Boston before 7pm Saturday. Against that zone they're gonna need all hands on deck.
Jardine ain't getting to 10. Hope the 'Cuse have a Plan B because their frontline fits right into Sully's wheelhouse. There's no hulking 7-footer to lean on him and if Buford/DT can loosen up the zone Sully can actually earn his keep Saturday night.
Syracuse extended that zone out to the arc against Wiscy because Badgers had ZERO inside presence and didn't even send cutters to try and chop it up. Buckeyes will get in the paint. If Buford shows up they should win that game.
by pup » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:56 am
by FUDU » Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:50 pm
by Larvell Blanks » Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:51 pm
by jb » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:40 pm
by jb » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:41 pm
Larvell Blanks wrote:Barnes is playing his way to a return to school and not the draft.
by LakeErieWarriors » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:05 am
FUDU wrote:Well shut my mouth.
Have to admit this Buckeye team has definitely put forth an effort to up their game so to speak. Granted they may not be playing lights out but they look a ton better than 2-3 weeks ago. If Buford happens to show up big soon they could take a legit shot at this thing.
by pup » Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:32 am
by pup » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:53 pm
pup wrote:Has anyone seen tOSU versus a zone?
Be lucky to > 50 tonight.

by dmiles » Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:37 pm

by pup » Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:43 pm
dmiles wrote:If anyone watches more games why doesn't Amir Williams get a little less pine time? Sure he's green and loses himself defensively at times, but Ravenel is foul and turnover prone and I've yet to see much of a positive outside of being decent at boxing out. I like the length of Williams, with his ability to alter shots and take it up strong.
by pup » Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:43 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:24 am
pup wrote:We have to be hoping for Kansas tomorrow, no?
by furls » Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:57 am
by pod2dawg » Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:43 am

by OldDawg » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:43 pm

by e0y2e3 » Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:11 pm

by e0y2e3 » Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:12 pm

by peeker643 » Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:33 pm
OldDawg wrote:OSU showed a lot last night. Sully plays 6 mins in the first half and they win.
Then Sully is a beast in the second half. A beast. Most teams don't attack the inside of 'Cuse's zone, but the Bucks went right to Sully, and he showed no fear at all. I have never been more impressed with Sully than I was last night. He made some tough shots.
Also impressed with Matta. You have one day to prepare for Syracuse's vaunted zone, and your kids attacked it with poise.
I am stunned. OSU reached the final four last night. And there is no buzz on here about it.
by FUDU » Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:58 pm
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], psbot [Picsearch] and 2 guests
