Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by LakeErieWarriors » Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:54 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 03, 2012 12:14 am
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:38 am
by FUDU » Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by jb » Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:54 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:51 pm
jb wrote:Lars - could you please settle the east side / west side debate for us once and for all?
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:31 am
by pod2dawg » Sun Feb 12, 2012 1:19 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:14 pm
Jason Whitlock @WhitlockJason
Some lucky lady in NYC is gonna feel a couple inches of pain tonight.
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:27 am
by jb » Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:04 am
peeker643 wrote:This guy is my newest literary hero. Screw Clancy and King and all the others. Lars brings it every week and you won't find a better column anywhere in the country much less in Cleveland:
http://bit.ly/yiOS5R
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:57 pm

by HoodooMan » Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:00 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:00 pm
jb wrote:peeker643 wrote:This guy is my newest literary hero. Screw Clancy and King and all the others. Lars brings it every week and you won't find a better column anywhere in the country much less in Cleveland:
http://bit.ly/yiOS5R
Did he answer the question for you sufficiently so you don't ask the same question over nd over whenever a brother writes or says something inane and double-standard about race? No more Jimmy Stewart meets Allan Bakke posts from now on from you?
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:03 pm
HoodooMan wrote:Dear Lars,
Which is your preferred backhanded compliment: "solid, 40% correct work" or "better than Clancy & King"?
by LarsHancock » Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:42 pm
HoodooMan wrote:Dear Lars,
Which is your preferred backhanded compliment: "solid, 40% correct work" or "better than Clancy & King"?

by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:52 pm
peeker643 wrote:Holy Shit.
I just previewed tomorrow's OoB at the request of the author who scared me by saying this one was edgy.
I'm literally wiping tears from my face from laughing so hard and my wife thinks I'm an exponentially bigger asshole than she did half an hour ago. That's no small feat.
Oh my God.
Just tremendous. And if I die in my sleep you fucks won't get to read a word of it.
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:03 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:peeker643 wrote:Holy Shit.
I just previewed tomorrow's OoB at the request of the author who scared me by saying this one was edgy.
I'm literally wiping tears from my face from laughing so hard and my wife thinks I'm an exponentially bigger asshole than she did half an hour ago. That's no small feat.
Oh my God.
Just tremendous. And if I die in my sleep you fucks won't get to read a word of it.
SD:
Don't get cocky or i'll go thru your wallet when your dead and show the wife that fifty she doen't know about and tell her how you been holding out all along. :}
SoulDawg
by googleeph2 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:11 pm
peeker643 wrote:Dear Lars:
Last Friday night Jason Whitlock tweeted the following about Jeremy Lin, the Knicks Asian-American phenom:Jason Whitlock @WhitlockJason
Some lucky lady in NYC is gonna feel a couple inches of pain tonight.
How come Jason Whitlock's fat ass wasn't fired for that racially motivated tweet and where do Al Sharpton and the Reverend Jackson stand on all of this? I have not heard them speak passionately on this as of yet.
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:23 pm
peeker643 wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:peeker643 wrote:Holy Shit.
I just previewed tomorrow's OoB at the request of the author who scared me by saying this one was edgy.
I'm literally wiping tears from my face from laughing so hard and my wife thinks I'm an exponentially bigger asshole than she did half an hour ago. That's no small feat.
Oh my God.
Just tremendous. And if I die in my sleep you fucks won't get to read a word of it.
SD:
Don't get cocky or i'll go thru your wallet when your dead and show the wife that fifty she doen't know about and tell her how you been holding out all along. :}
SoulDawg
She knows I'm poor. She's been with me since 4/20/85 and legally since 5/19/90.
She found every fifty I ever made and knows all the hiding spots inside and outside that wallet.
And no. To answer the next logical question: She's neither deaf, dumb or blind and is suffering from no cognitive deficits we're aware of.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:27 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:33 pm
LarsHancock wrote:HoodooMan wrote:Dear Lars,
Which is your preferred backhanded compliment: "solid, 40% correct work" or "better than Clancy & King"?
if e0y2e3 says I'm 40% right, that's 39% higher than anyone else has scored on anything ever. That's like 57 sigmas outside normal - high praise indeed.
by LarsHancock » Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:13 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:LarsHancock wrote:HoodooMan wrote:Dear Lars,
Which is your preferred backhanded compliment: "solid, 40% correct work" or "better than Clancy & King"?
if e0y2e3 says I'm 40% right, that's 39% higher than anyone else has scored on anything ever. That's like 57 sigmas outside normal - high praise indeed.
SD:
Actually your both wrong Whitlock is just a big Phat opportunstic asshole who would sell his momma for a story who just happens to be Black .
If he was white he'd just be a bigger asshole who would sell his own momma for a story but probably worth more money .
Sharpton and Jackson are necessary evils so long as we have O reily's david Dukes and Rupert Murdochs slanting the world view .
No sense in ignorance racisim bigotry and stoopidity being hoarded by any one group .
Balance above all.
SoulDawg

by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:14 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:03 pm
LarsHancock wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:LarsHancock wrote:HoodooMan wrote:Dear Lars,
Which is your preferred backhanded compliment: "solid, 40% correct work" or "better than Clancy & King"?
if e0y2e3 says I'm 40% right, that's 39% higher than anyone else has scored on anything ever. That's like 57 sigmas outside normal - high praise indeed.
SD:
Actually your both wrong Whitlock is just a big Phat opportunstic asshole who would sell his momma for a story who just happens to be Black .
If he was white he'd just be a bigger asshole who would sell his own momma for a story but probably worth more money .
Sharpton and Jackson are necessary evils so long as we have O reily's david Dukes and Rupert Murdochs slanting the world view .
No sense in ignorance racisim bigotry and stoopidity being hoarded by any one group .
Balance above all.
SoulDawg
Whitlock's race is indeed irrelevant to his ignorance and bigotry, but it *may be* relevant to why he still has a job after a blatantly racist remark and half-hearted shit apology.
David Duke is irrelevant as well. He is shunned by most sentient whites because he's a feeble minded bigot. But where he has voice and following is largely amplified as a reaction to the "necessary evils" visible figures like Sharpton and Jackson perpetrate. White people don't like being unfairly discriminated against and vilified en masse any more than black people do, so the more either side shouts that inane bullshit, the stronger the counter-response in the other race will be. ALL races owe it to the good of mankind to shut the voices of intolerance within their ranks in order to prevent this action-reaction cycle from degenerating into a race-based civil war. Jackson was a great man as he stood behind Dr. King to deliver true legal equal rights to every race and creed. He just lost this idealism and became an opportunist that fans the flames of hate for profit, and that is absolutely not what America needs to heal our racial wounds.
O'Reilly is a masturbatory egotistical blowhard of an idiot, but he doesn't race bait. Murdoch doesn't race bait either. While they may be pundits for the right, suggesting the whole of the right is racist is disingenuous and serves only to deepen the racial divide. Ron Paul is a racist psychopath, and a lot of his followers are indeed racist. And it is shameful how much attention he gets, which just goes to show how far we need to come.
The first step is to remove the strong voices from each side, and eliminate the need to counterbalance bigotry.
You are right, bigotry and stupidity aren't hoarded in any one group. There is a balance. It is the responsibility of each group to eliminate its own fringe, so everyone can come closer to the middle and achieve harmony with balance.
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:46 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Tribalism
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:59 pm
peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Tribalism
I don't get this.
It's tribalism if I find what Jason Whitlock says and does daily, and gets away with, to be ridiculous. Is it tribalism that I think the same about Michael Reghi and Kenny Roda or The Bull and the Fox?
They suck. I don't know how they get away with sucking either.
Whitlock didn't get fired because he's black (and maybe because these things shouldn't necessarily be taken so seriously- but white dude woulda been gone). I don't really know why Roda and Reghi don't get fired either.
I agree with Lars. And I find it refreshing it can be addressed (at this second) here without it degenerating into something ugly.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:59 pm

by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:24 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I wasn't calling you out, I was just saying that the discussion of race cannot exist without a discussion of tribalism and tribalism cannot simply be ignored as Lars pretends is possible
You reacting to Whitlock, that isn't tribal anything, that is calling a spade a spade
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:28 pm

by LarsHancock » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:37 pm

by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:42 pm

by jb » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:51 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I wasn't calling you out, I was just saying that the discussion of race cannot exist without a discussion of tribalism and tribalism cannot simply be ignored as Lars pretends is possible
You reacting to Whitlock, that isn't tribal anything, that is calling a spade a spade
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:30 pm
jb wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:I wasn't calling you out, I was just saying that the discussion of race cannot exist without a discussion of tribalism and tribalism cannot simply be ignored as Lars pretends is possible
You reacting to Whitlock, that isn't tribal anything, that is calling a spade a spade
^^^ You can't say that (the last part). The rest you can cause you learned it is Soc class at an elite eastern university.
The phrase predates the use of the word "spade" as an ethnic slur against African Americans, which was not recorded until 1928; however, in contemporary U.S. society, the idiom is often avoided due to potential confusion with the slur.[1]
by LarsHancock » Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:46 pm

by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:47 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:53 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Congrats Gentlemen,
Speaking for all male pink-pigmented, orange-hair-follicled, blue-eyed, 6'2, atheists with high cholesterol, a deteriorating liver, and 3 scars on their head that hated living in Miami and have been married twice and once bit an EMT who was trying to save him from choking on his own vomit, you have managed to successfully regenerate the most boring and tired topic in the history of internet forums.
Awesome.

by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 7:20 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Congrats Gentlemen,
Speaking for all male pink-pigmented, orange-hair-follicled, blue-eyed, 6'2, atheists with high cholesterol, a deteriorating liver, and 3 scars on their head that hated living in Miami and have been married twice and once bit an EMT who was trying to save him from choking on his own vomit, you have managed to successfully regenerate the most boring and tired topic in the history of internet forums.
Awesome.
by jb » Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:53 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Congrats Gentlemen,
Speaking for all male pink-pigmented, orange-hair-follicled, blue-eyed, 6'2, atheists with high cholesterol, a deteriorating liver, and 3 scars on their head that hated living in Miami and have been married twice and once bit an EMT who was trying to save him from choking on his own vomit, you have managed to successfully regenerate the most boring and tired topic in the history of internet forums.
Awesome.
Shut up ginger
by jb » Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:54 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Congrats Gentlemen,
Speaking for all male pink-pigmented, orange-hair-follicled, blue-eyed, 6'2, atheists with high cholesterol, a deteriorating liver, and 3 scars on their head that hated living in Miami and have been married twice and once bit an EMT who was trying to save him from choking on his own vomit, you have managed to successfully regenerate the most boring and tired topic in the history of internet forums.
Awesome.
by Hikohadon » Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:46 pm
jb wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Congrats Gentlemen,
Speaking for all male pink-pigmented, orange-hair-follicled, blue-eyed, 6'2, atheists with high cholesterol, a deteriorating liver, and 3 scars on their head that hated living in Miami and have been married twice and once bit an EMT who was trying to save him from choking on his own vomit, you have managed to successfully regenerate the most boring and tired topic in the history of internet forums.
Awesome.
When did this become about Couch & Holcomb?

by HoodooMan » Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:54 pm
jb wrote:Lars, Ginger, Marry Ann or Jeanne? You get one on the casting couch.
by jb » Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:26 pm
HoodooMan wrote:jb wrote:Lars, Ginger, Marry Ann or Jeanne? You get one on the casting couch.
Lars, easy.
by jb » Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:31 am
LarsHancock wrote:The original phrase is "let's call a spade a bloody shovel", which makes perfect sense as a spade is a fancy way of describing a completely pedestrian object like a shovel. Evolving to "call a spade a spade" loses this flavor which is key to the idiom, and now with the modern slur context, the idiom itself takes a whole new misinterpretation which is best avoided.
But if you go back to the original, you can still use the idiom and be okay, even if the term "spade" for a shovel has become a complete anachronism.
by pod2dawg » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:44 pm
by LarsHancock » Fri Feb 24, 2012 12:57 am
jb wrote:LarsHancock wrote:The original phrase is "let's call a spade a bloody shovel", which makes perfect sense as a spade is a fancy way of describing a completely pedestrian object like a shovel. Evolving to "call a spade a spade" loses this flavor which is key to the idiom, and now with the modern slur context, the idiom itself takes a whole new misinterpretation which is best avoided.
But if you go back to the original, you can still use the idiom and be okay, even if the term "spade" for a shovel has become a complete anachronism.
Thanks Lars. What is the origin of the idiom, "A chink in the armor?"

by LarsHancock » Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:02 am
pod2dawg wrote:Lars,
How many microfracture surgeries can Greg Oden sustain?
Thanks!
Portland Front Office

by LarsHancock » Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:03 am
HoodooMan wrote:jb wrote:Lars, Ginger, Marry Ann or Jeanne? You get one on the casting couch.
Lars, easy.

by pod2dawg » Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:18 pm
by LarsHancock » Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:23 pm

Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests