Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by Adverb Harry » Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:54 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:59 pm
by leadpipe » Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:31 pm
by Adverb Harry » Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:46 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:08 pm
by dpdad » Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:56 am
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:47 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:00 am

by andrew6586 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:33 am
by WiscTribeFan » Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:32 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Dude, I got my DUI at 24. Stupid shit happens and when you are drunk you do stupid.
by Adverb Harry » Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:43 pm
by pup » Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:46 pm
Alex White could be charged with an "extreme" DUI.
White's blood-alcohol content was measured at 0.174 after his arrest Saturday night in Scottsdale. Under Arizona law, anything over 0.15 is considered extreme and carries additional consequences. The situation continues to worsen for the 23-year-old rotation hopeful.
by redneckofsc » Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:55 pm
WiscTribeFan wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Dude, I got my DUI at 24. Stupid shit happens and when you are drunk you do stupid.
Yeah, like killing someone.
There is no such thing as a 'meh' DUI.
by Dellucci TailGator » Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:49 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:Too lazy to do the research--and I wouldn't know where to look anyway--but it seems like spring training has by far the highest incident rate for DUIs.
by NH Tribe Fan » Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:57 pm
andrew6586 wrote:The reason I get so pissed off at DUIs is because you know from a young age about its danger. Everyone knows it's wrong and can kill multiple people.
by gotribe31 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:41 pm
NH Tribe Fan wrote:andrew6586 wrote:The reason I get so pissed off at DUIs is because you know from a young age about its danger. Everyone knows it's wrong and can kill multiple people.
Not trying to defend drinking and driving, but....
So do you text while driving? Talk on the phone? Read the newspaper? Eat? All have been shown to be as bad or worse than a .08-.10 driver. Texting in particular has been shown to be twice as bad on response times as a legally impaired driver, yet in some states it's legal to do that...

by Adverb Harry » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:36 pm

by NH Tribe Fan » Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:47 pm
gotribe31 wrote:NH Tribe Fan wrote:andrew6586 wrote:The reason I get so pissed off at DUIs is because you know from a young age about its danger. Everyone knows it's wrong and can kill multiple people.
Not trying to defend drinking and driving, but....
So do you text while driving? Talk on the phone? Read the newspaper? Eat? All have been shown to be as bad or worse than a .08-.10 driver. Texting in particular has been shown to be twice as bad on response times as a legally impaired driver, yet in some states it's legal to do that...
Who reads a newspaper while driving?
by pup » Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:47 pm
NH Tribe Fan wrote:gotribe31 wrote:NH Tribe Fan wrote:andrew6586 wrote:The reason I get so pissed off at DUIs is because you know from a young age about its danger. Everyone knows it's wrong and can kill multiple people.
Not trying to defend drinking and driving, but....
So do you text while driving? Talk on the phone? Read the newspaper? Eat? All have been shown to be as bad or worse than a .08-.10 driver. Texting in particular has been shown to be twice as bad on response times as a legally impaired driver, yet in some states it's legal to do that...
Who reads a newspaper while driving?
You'd be surprised, if you do longer highway commutes, you will see it. Everyday I drive past people reading the paper, a book, dog on their lap, etc. Let alone the cell phone talkers.
Driving while distracted is dangerous no matter the cause, but our society only severely punishes one of those distractions. I am not advocating abandoning drinking and driving laws, just pointing out the hypocrisy.
by NH Tribe Fan » Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:53 pm
pup wrote:NH Tribe Fan wrote:gotribe31 wrote:NH Tribe Fan wrote:andrew6586 wrote:The reason I get so pissed off at DUIs is because you know from a young age about its danger. Everyone knows it's wrong and can kill multiple people.
Not trying to defend drinking and driving, but....
So do you text while driving? Talk on the phone? Read the newspaper? Eat? All have been shown to be as bad or worse than a .08-.10 driver. Texting in particular has been shown to be twice as bad on response times as a legally impaired driver, yet in some states it's legal to do that...
Who reads a newspaper while driving?
You'd be surprised, if you do longer highway commutes, you will see it. Everyday I drive past people reading the paper, a book, dog on their lap, etc. Let alone the cell phone talkers.
Driving while distracted is dangerous no matter the cause, but our society only severely punishes one of those distractions. I am not advocating abandoning drinking and driving laws, just pointing out the hypocrisy.
Guilty of all of the above at some point.
And never have I waken up in the morning and thought to myself "christ, I texted so much last night I have no idea which way I got home".
Are those other things distractions? Certainly. Are the as distracting as driving drunk?
Not even close.
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:57 pm
by NH Tribe Fan » Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:00 pm
peeker643 wrote:NH is right. Texting while driving is as bad or worse from an accident standpoint. Worse yet is far, far, far more people are doing it.
by pup » Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:14 pm
peeker643 wrote:NH is right. Texting while driving is as bad or worse from an accident standpoint. Worse yet is far, far, far more people are doing it.
by pup » Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:17 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:54 pm
pup wrote:And the whole .08 thing? I know people that could score 30 on the ACT at .08. I also know some that couldn't recite the alphabet at .08. So let's not act like .08 is some magic number decided upon to screw those poor cats that just can't get by keeping it under a beer per hour before jumping behind the wheel.
by gotribe31 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:01 am

by peeker643 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:18 am
gotribe31 wrote:Also, texting and driving is a temporary condition...as in, send the text and be distracted for the 10 seconds it takes to text. Driving drunk is for the whole ride, unless you're driving cross-country and sober up by the end of the ride.
by gotribe31 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:21 am
peeker643 wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Also, texting and driving is a temporary condition...as in, send the text and be distracted for the 10 seconds it takes to text. Driving drunk is for the whole ride, unless you're driving cross-country and sober up by the end of the ride.
You ever check out the sheer number of texts from kids (and adults more and more)?
It's not just one text. It's not just texts. Kids checking email, Facebook, twitter, sending tweets, emails and texts.
It's absolutely horrifying to think about what percentage of them are sent while driving.
It's staggering. Couple that with the fact technology and texting far more prevalent in young kids and young adults who already lack experience and believe they're immortal and you seriously have a potential epidemic with this. People bitch about guns? More fucking people will die because of phones in the next two months than will dies from gun shots all year.

by pup » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:34 am
peeker643 wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Also, texting and driving is a temporary condition...as in, send the text and be distracted for the 10 seconds it takes to text. Driving drunk is for the whole ride, unless you're driving cross-country and sober up by the end of the ride.
You ever check out the sheer number of texts from kids (and adults more and more)?
It's not just one text. It's not just texts. Kids checking email, Facebook, twitter, sending tweets, emails and texts.
It's absolutely horrifying to think about what percentage of them are sent while driving.
It's staggering. Couple that with the fact technology and texting far more prevalent in young kids and young adults who already lack experience and believe they're immortal and you seriously have a potential epidemic with this. People bitch about guns? More fucking people will die because of phones in the next two months than will dies from gun shots all year.
by leadpipe » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:08 am
by pod2dawg » Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:37 am
pup wrote:
Guilty of all of the above at some point.
And never have I waken up in the morning and thought to myself "christ, I texted so much last night I have no idea which way I got home".

by gotribe31 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:41 pm
leadpipe wrote:Not gonna speak for Peeker, but he's seeing the numbers every day.
I think it's interesting that his company has an IMMEDIATE TERMINATION policy just for being on the phone in a moving vehicle.
Why would a huge national insurance company have an immediate termination policy for that? Cause they're seeing the numbers every day - they're seeing what's causing accidents every day.
Can't imagine how worse the numbers are for texters.
Not here to make a case for drunken driving, just saying that there is a FAR greater chance that you or your loved ones will be killed by a texter rather than a drunk.
Never understood why, where in the largest opportunity position you are in to shorten your life, people don't take it seriously. If you text while driving, you should never say a bad word about drunk, cause you're at least just as dangerous.
Take driving seriously. Really.

by WiscTribeFan » Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:25 pm
peeker643 wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Also, texting and driving is a temporary condition...as in, send the text and be distracted for the 10 seconds it takes to text. Driving drunk is for the whole ride, unless you're driving cross-country and sober up by the end of the ride.
You ever check out the sheer number of texts from kids (and adults more and more)?
It's not just one text. It's not just texts. Kids checking email, Facebook, twitter, sending tweets, emails and texts.
It's absolutely horrifying to think about what percentage of them are sent while driving.
It's staggering. Couple that with the fact technology and texting far more prevalent in young kids and young adults who already lack experience and believe they're immortal and you seriously have a potential epidemic with this. People bitch about guns? More fucking people will die because of phones in the next two months than will dies from gun shots all year.
by redneckofsc » Wed Mar 07, 2012 3:02 pm
WiscTribeFan wrote:peeker643 wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Also, texting and driving is a temporary condition...as in, send the text and be distracted for the 10 seconds it takes to text. Driving drunk is for the whole ride, unless you're driving cross-country and sober up by the end of the ride.
You ever check out the sheer number of texts from kids (and adults more and more)?
It's not just one text. It's not just texts. Kids checking email, Facebook, twitter, sending tweets, emails and texts.
It's absolutely horrifying to think about what percentage of them are sent while driving.
It's staggering. Couple that with the fact technology and texting far more prevalent in young kids and young adults who already lack experience and believe they're immortal and you seriously have a potential epidemic with this. People bitch about guns? More fucking people will die because of phones in the next two months than will dies from gun shots all year.
The stretch of highway I take to get into work is 4 lanes (each way) typically entertains speeds of 80mph+ with really heavy truck traffic. I've seen folks reading, texting, reaching around to find something, reaching back to handle something with their kids in car seats, and several times women putting on their makeup (using their rear-view mirror), including eye liner or mascara.
Nothing shocks me when it comes to people behind the wheel.
by peeker643 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 3:16 pm
by andrew6586 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:47 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:I'm a teacher. I get a DUI, my teaching license is permanently revoked. No gray area at all. Kinda makes it easy to figure out who the D.D. is everytime when you're with me.
by WiscTribeFan » Wed Mar 07, 2012 6:09 pm
redneckofsc wrote:
Point is, yes shit like textin, putting on makeup, etc can be distracting, but it can't be enforced.
by NH Tribe Fan » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:54 pm
WiscTribeFan wrote:redneckofsc wrote:
Point is, yes shit like textin, putting on makeup, etc can be distracting, but it can't be enforced.
It can be if the driver is driving erratically, ie...weaving, crosses lane lines without signalling. You just need to find somebody stupid enough to be doing any of those distracting things with a cop behind them...
by redneckofsc » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:03 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:21 pm
where do you draw the line?
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:10 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:where do you draw the line?
Where it causes a person to be a danger behind the wheel. I don't care if someone is eating a banana and swerving, they should pulled over.
by leadpipe » Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:23 am
by ChoccoIndians » Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:09 am
Adverb Harry wrote:Too lazy to do the research--and I wouldn't know where to look anyway--but it seems like spring training has by far the highest incident rate for DUIs.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:57 am
ChoccoIndians wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:Too lazy to do the research--and I wouldn't know where to look anyway--but it seems like spring training has by far the highest incident rate for DUIs.
I guess when half the players leave half way through a game, they have a little more time to themselves. During the season they are either on a bus, plane or the field.
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests