Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by pup » Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:11 pm
by pup » Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:13 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:19 pm

by mistero » Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:20 pm
by Hikohadon » Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:21 pm
by Govbarney » Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:30 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Well, everyone should breathe a sigh of relief, since this means that Big Phil Dawson will be back for 2012.
by Hikohadon » Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:45 pm
Govbarney wrote:Hikohadon wrote:Well, everyone should breathe a sigh of relief, since this means that Big Phil Dawson will be back for 2012.
Better be Dawson, if they give Hillis $7.7 Mil for one year they are out of there bloody minds.
by JCoz » Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:16 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:23 pm
JCoz wrote:I'm good with the deal. He played well this season, if he gets hurt again, so be it, this isn't baseball. Would have been idiotic to let him walk with the cap space on hand and other holes to fill.
by TouchEmAllTime » Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:58 pm
by JCoz » Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:24 am
by jb » Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:28 am
pup wrote:That is a lot of money for tackles the safety should be making.
by wmurphyhh » Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:42 am
by pup » Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:55 am
by JCoz » Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:02 pm
pup wrote:The hole is the same with Jackson here as it would be without him here. At MLB.
MLB, #2 in NFL for tackles. Yet Browns 3rd most yards allowed on the ground. Sorry, my MLB's job is to not be the leader on the 30th ranked rush defensive unit.
by peeker643 » Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:13 pm
JCoz wrote:pup wrote:The hole is the same with Jackson here as it would be without him here. At MLB.
MLB, #2 in NFL for tackles. Yet Browns 3rd most yards allowed on the ground. Sorry, my MLB's job is to not be the leader on the 30th ranked rush defensive unit.
Bullshit. That's a false frame around the issue and a vast oversimplification of the rushing d issues. Look, dude isn't ray Lewis, but he's fills a starting position just fine. The outside linebackers need to be replaced along with our LE, 2nd CB, and FS before any upgrades in the middle need to be considered. Letting him go would have been fucking stupid. Period the end.
by pup » Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:49 pm
by pup » Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:49 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:53 pm
pup wrote:So there is no middle ground between giving a guy that contract and keeping him in the fold?
Would prefer to franchise him, make him stay healthy for another year and visit his contract again in a year.
by JCoz » Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:53 pm
pup wrote:So there is no middle ground between giving a guy that contract and keeping him in the fold?
Would prefer to franchise him, make him stay healthy for another year and visit his contract again in a year.
by JCoz » Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:54 pm
Hikohadon wrote:pup wrote:So there is no middle ground between giving a guy that contract and keeping him in the fold?
Would prefer to franchise him, make him stay healthy for another year and visit his contract again in a year.
Personally, I prefer to lock up my core players, free up cap room, send a message to the locker room, and use my Franchise elsewhere if I need to.
That contract isn't that big a deal. Much ado about nothing.
by mattvan1 » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:07 pm
JCoz wrote: Look, dude isn't ray Lewis,.....
by jb » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:38 pm
pup wrote:The hole is the same with Jackson here as it would be without him here. At MLB.
MLB, #2 in NFL for tackles. Yet Browns 3rd most yards allowed on the ground. Sorry, my MLB's job is to not be the leader on the 30th ranked rush defensive unit.
by Hikohadon » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:54 pm
by JCoz » Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:54 pm
by Hikohadon » Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:16 pm
JCoz wrote:Could be worse, you could be washington who overpays even worse, and where Free Agents go to steal from your franchise while they do nothing.
by jb » Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:33 pm
Hikohadon wrote:There is no Cleveland discount right now.
by Believeland » Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:00 pm
wmurphyhh wrote:WTF does Good Lord on a Pony mean?
by Hikohadon » Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:46 am
by pup » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:10 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Looks like the guaranteed money is only $10.4 mil, not $19 mil as originally reported.
And the last 2 years are backloaded with much higher base salaries. It's actually a nice deal for the Browns.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/01/dqwell-deal-has-10-4-million-guaranteed/
by Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:53 pm
Believeland wrote:wmurphyhh wrote:WTF does Good Lord on a Pony mean?
I for one fully endorse "good lord on a pony" as a colloquialism although I prefer "christ on a pony"
by Hikohadon » Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:26 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:Believeland wrote:wmurphyhh wrote:WTF does Good Lord on a Pony mean?
I for one fully endorse "good lord on a pony" as a colloquialism although I prefer "christ on a pony"
I was brought up with 'Christ on a pogo stick'
by FUDU » Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:35 pm
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests