Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by swerb » Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:45 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:48 pm

by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:49 pm
swerb wrote:What's it gonna cost us to move up to #2? #4 and #22 for sure. Plus some.
I pay the price, no matter how steep. Get to #2. The quicker the better.
by leadpipe » Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:00 pm
by HoodooMan » Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:07 pm
by NoWearMan » Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:13 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:28 pm
NoWearMan wrote:First off, I have to apologize for being late to the discussion. This may have already been discussed at length so slap me down as need be.
Are there any other realistic options besides both #1's this year?
#4, a second rounder this year (i really don't even know if we have a 2nd rounder this year, that's how dumb i am) and next years first rounder? or some combination where we can keep #22?
To answer the question as asked, my answer is....well...whatever it takes. I am firmly in the camp of taking RG3.
Lame ass post, I know.
by googleeph2 » Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:41 pm
HoodooMan wrote:Impossible to answer until FA, but if I was H&H (and I liked RG3) I'd be blowing smoke about how much we're in love with RG3 and how we'll pay whatever it takes to get him.
Every other suitor knows that if that's the case, they're SOL, since we have more to give than anyone else. Let one or two of them face that reality and settle for Manning or Flynn in FA. If you can bluff Washington into moving on to a FA option, that would do wonders for our leverage.
by andrew6586 » Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:45 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:36 pm
andrew6586 wrote:Don't offer 22 until you have to. When you think about it, 4 and 37 should be more than enough to move down 2 spots. It's not a big jump at all.
by swerb » Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:50 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:andrew6586 wrote:Don't offer 22 until you have to. When you think about it, 4 and 37 should be more than enough to move down 2 spots. It's not a big jump at all.
That was before, when the contract that came along with a top 5 pick was a big negative. With the new CBA, top picks are more valuable than ever. You aren't moving up to 2 for any less than the two 1st's.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:52 pm
swerb wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote:andrew6586 wrote:Don't offer 22 until you have to. When you think about it, 4 and 37 should be more than enough to move down 2 spots. It's not a big jump at all.
That was before, when the contract that came along with a top 5 pick was a big negative. With the new CBA, top picks are more valuable than ever. You aren't moving up to 2 for any less than the two 1st's.
Exactly. And especially in a year with two #1 pick worthy franchise QBs on the board, and the 3rd and 4th best players are a tackle and a wide receiver.
#4, #22, and something else its gonna take. You can take it to the bank.
And you pay it.
by swerb » Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:01 am
by Erie Warrior » Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:12 am


by Hikohadon » Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:47 am
NoWearMan wrote:First off, I have to apologize for being late to the discussion. This may have already been discussed at length so slap me down as need be.
Are there any other realistic options besides both #1's this year?
#4, a second rounder this year (i really don't even know if we have a 2nd rounder this year, that's how dumb i am) and next years first rounder? or some combination where we can keep #22?
To answer the question as asked, my answer is....well...whatever it takes. I am firmly in the camp of taking RG3.
Lame ass post, I know.
by mistero » Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:53 am
by swerb » Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:22 am
mistero wrote:I'm giving 4,22, a 4th and next year's 2nd.
by JCoz » Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:54 am
by Erie Warrior » Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:30 am
JCoz wrote:I think the 4, our 2nd and next years 1st is a more valuable package than anyone will be able to or willing to match.


by Govbarney » Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:44 am
by jerryroche » Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:46 am
by Erie Warrior » Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:54 am
Govbarney wrote:If Dan Snyder wants to give away more value the a 4,37, & a late round next year, then I say he can have him, there is all ways Barkley next year.


by jb » Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:20 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:15 pm
swerb wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote:andrew6586 wrote:Don't offer 22 until you have to. When you think about it, 4 and 37 should be more than enough to move down 2 spots. It's not a big jump at all.
That was before, when the contract that came along with a top 5 pick was a big negative. With the new CBA, top picks are more valuable than ever. You aren't moving up to 2 for any less than the two 1st's.
Exactly. And especially in a year with two #1 pick worthy franchise QBs on the board, and the 3rd and 4th best players are a tackle and a wide receiver.
#4, #22, and something else its gonna take. You can take it to the bank.
And you pay it.
by SoulDawg74 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:32 pm
jb wrote:Two firsts this year and whatever crap they want after round 3 this year and next. No more 1sts, ends and 3rds.
by bookelly » Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:51 pm
swerb wrote:The Giants had the #4 overall pick in the 2004 Draft.
And traded that pick, their third round pick, and their first and fifth round picks the following year to move up to get Eli. That Giants team had lots of holes too. I don’t think they’re regretting it.
by e0y2e3 » Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:53 pm

by peeker643 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:04 pm

by noles1 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:19 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:jb wrote:Two firsts this year and whatever crap they want after round 3 this year and next. No more 1sts, ends and 3rds.
SD:
Two interesting developments have come out recently besides the fact of RG3 being closer to 6' 2 and a half rather than six foot.
Jeff fisher seems amenable to make the deal for the pick prior to the draft .
Which makes since so he can plan his free agency moves , as could we if we snagged the choice now .
and secondly
Shurmur has been given an emboldened voice , it was his comments scrolled across the bottom of NFLN stating we have our #4 and #22 to use in moving up .
Kinda unprecedented statements so early and shows he's had enough and isn't gonna take anymore Colt McCoy poured on his plate with a garnish warmed over or tossed and served .
Most new coaches want their own guy , ...
I think Shurmur just told us he's bought the ring and signed the mortgage papers.
Al Micheals asks """Do you believe in miracles """
SoulDawg

by Hikohadon » Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:37 pm
Govbarney wrote:If Dan Snyder wants to give away more value the a 4,37, & a late round next year, then I say he can have him, there is all ways Barkley next year.
by Triple-S » Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:43 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by leadpipe » Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:50 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Govbarney wrote:If Dan Snyder wants to give away more value the a 4,37, & a late round next year, then I say he can have him, there is all ways Barkley next year.
Dangerous line of thinking which I see other people have as well.
There's "Barkley next year"? You sure about that?
Let's say he plays the way people think he will and is in line for #1 overall. You sure the Browns will even be as high as #4 to even have a remote shot of trading it all next year to get him? With a good draft and some slightly better QB play, it's not hard to see the Browns winning 6 or 7 games, which puts them well out of Barkley territory.
Then there's the possibility that Barkley has some massive injury, or plays like shit.
I think RG3 is a better prospect than Barkley anyway, but that's just opinion. What's fact is that the odds are incredibly low that the Browns will be able to acquire the #1 (or even #2) overall pick next year. Counting on it is CRAZY.
The way I see it, even the bad franchises don't get this high every year, and even this high it looks like you STILL need to trade up to get that elite prospect. Even from #4 this ain't gonna be easy.
Waving your hand and saying you'll take care of it later is the response you give when you have no real intention of ever painting that bathroom.
by motherscratcher » Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:59 pm
by leadpipe » Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:57 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Heard on the radio that Washington is prepared to offer this year's 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and next year's 1st.
So that's the jump off point.
Personally, I'd pay that in a heartbeat, even though I was hoping the price would be less. I'd let them know they can take 1-3 this year and either next year's 1st OR #22 this year. Either way, Washington (or anybody) Simply cannot hang with the Browns if we H&H decide that RG3 is our guy. I would absolutely shout that from the rooftops. Make Wash have to consider the real fact that they simply do not have the ammo this year.
Something to consider: I really believe that StL would rather deal with the Browns. I believe that Kalil is their guy. I believe that they know there is a good chance that Kalil will be sitting there at #4 if they trade with us. They have to know that Kalil will definitely be long gone at #6 if they trade with Washington.
In the end, that is going to matter to them, and I believe that because of Kalil, Washington is going to have to crush the Browns offer to get that spot, and I don't think they can do it.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:17 pm
by bookelly » Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:32 pm
by Hikohadon » Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:57 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Heard on the radio that Washington is prepared to offer this year's 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and next year's 1st.
So that's the jump off point.
Personally, I'd pay that in a heartbeat, even though I was hoping the price would be less. I'd let them know they can take 1-3 this year and either next year's 1st OR #22 this year. Either way, Washington (or anybody) Simply cannot hang with the Browns if we H&H decide that RG3 is our guy. I would absolutely shout that from the rooftops. Make Wash have to consider the real fact that they simply do not have the ammo this year.
Something to consider: I really believe that StL would rather deal with the Browns. I believe that Kalil is their guy. I believe that they know there is a good chance that Kalil will be sitting there at #4 if they trade with us. They have to know that Kalil will definitely be long gone at #6 if they trade with Washington.
In the end, that is going to matter to them, and I believe that because of Kalil, Washington is going to have to crush the Browns offer to get that spot, and I don't think they can do it.
by e0y2e3 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:05 pm

by Hikohadon » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:09 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Geezes christ, this is insanity.
by e0y2e3 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:12 pm

by swerb » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:59 pm
by CleSportsTruth » Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:59 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:I don't see St Louis dropping to 6 and risk missing out on both Blackmon and Kalil, FTR
I offer up both this yrs #1's and next yrs as an Ace in the hole if thats what it takes not only because of RG's skillset but, also to energize a fanbase than has absofuckinglootly run out of patience....
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:01 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Heard on the radio that Washington is prepared to offer this year's 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and next year's 1st.
So that's the jump off point.
Personally, I'd pay that in a heartbeat, even though I was hoping the price would be less. I'd let them know they can take 1-3 this year and either next year's 1st OR #22 this year. Either way, Washington (or anybody) Simply cannot hang with the Browns if we H&H decide that RG3 is our guy. I would absolutely shout that from the rooftops. Make Wash have to consider the real fact that they simply do not have the ammo this year.
Something to consider: I really believe that StL would rather deal with the Browns. I believe that Kalil is their guy. I believe that they know there is a good chance that Kalil will be sitting there at #4 if they trade with us. They have to know that Kalil will definitely be long gone at #6 if they trade with Washington.
In the end, that is going to matter to them, and I believe that because of Kalil, Washington is going to have to crush the Browns offer to get that spot, and I don't think they can do it.
by CleSportsTruth » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:02 pm
swerb wrote:If thats what the Skins are offering in late Feb, that means that's not the max they'll go.
Agree 100% with Hiko's thoughts and counter. I think that's what'll happen, and then the Skins will up the ante and move to their final, improved offer.
Perfect effing storm for the Rams at #2 with this pick. They're going to get the mother load in return for it.
by motherscratcher » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:06 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:swerb wrote:If thats what the Skins are offering in late Feb, that means that's not the max they'll go.
Agree 100% with Hiko's thoughts and counter. I think that's what'll happen, and then the Skins will up the ante and move to their final, improved offer.
Perfect effing storm for the Rams at #2 with this pick. They're going to get the mother load in return for it.
Yep, and sorry, don't think we should try to match them. Maybe, maybe for Luck, but no one else.
by CleSportsTruth » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:12 pm
motherscratcher wrote:CleSportsTruth wrote:swerb wrote:If thats what the Skins are offering in late Feb, that means that's not the max they'll go.
Agree 100% with Hiko's thoughts and counter. I think that's what'll happen, and then the Skins will up the ante and move to their final, improved offer.
Perfect effing storm for the Rams at #2 with this pick. They're going to get the mother load in return for it.
Yep, and sorry, don't think we should try to match them. Maybe, maybe for Luck, but no one else.
I agree that it will be a lot to give up (whatever it ends up being) and it will be painful. But, if we do not go up and get RG3 this year, who is our long term solution at QB and how do we get him?
by motherscratcher » Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:21 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:motherscratcher wrote:CleSportsTruth wrote:swerb wrote:If thats what the Skins are offering in late Feb, that means that's not the max they'll go.
Agree 100% with Hiko's thoughts and counter. I think that's what'll happen, and then the Skins will up the ante and move to their final, improved offer.
Perfect effing storm for the Rams at #2 with this pick. They're going to get the mother load in return for it.
Yep, and sorry, don't think we should try to match them. Maybe, maybe for Luck, but no one else.
I agree that it will be a lot to give up (whatever it ends up being) and it will be painful. But, if we do not go up and get RG3 this year, who is our long term solution at QB and how do we get him?
The problem is, OK, you get RGIII, but by the time it's all done, you might not have a way to help him at all for, oh, 2 yrs. That helps no one, IMHO.
Me, I guess go for Flynn then.
by peeker643 » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:07 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:19 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:24 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Matt Flynn has started 2 NFL games.....2!
Snyder is driving the price up because he's a moron and willing to pay way too much.
I like RGIII, but that's too much to give up IMO.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests
