Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by British_Pharaoh » Tue Feb 21, 2012 11:24 pm

by British_Pharaoh » Tue Feb 21, 2012 11:35 pm


by swerb » Tue Feb 21, 2012 11:44 pm
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:34 am
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:36 am
swerb wrote:This Irving kid can play. My God.
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:40 am
peeker643 wrote:swerb wrote:This Irving kid can play. My God.
Can you even imagine how good he'll be for the Lakers or Knicks when he matures in 5 years?
Tick...tock...
Keep squeaking out those all important wins over the Kings and Pistons.
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:50 am
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:59 am
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:59 am
peeker643 wrote:They need to lose basketball games.
Y'all can get excited about narrow wins over shitty teams that does nothing except make keeping that talented kid a bit more difficult and a bit more justified when you can't surround him with talent.
Maybe we can dvr the thrilling win over the Kings and this one tonight and watch it down the road.
Rich is right: dude can play and does so without fear. You can enjoy that, appreciate it and still lose basketball games.
You better hope they start doing that if you care about the long term health of the club.
by motherscratcher » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:06 am

by British_Pharaoh » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:20 am
peeker643 wrote:They need to lose basketball games.
Y'all can get excited about narrow wins over shitty teams that does nothing except make keeping that talented kid a bit more difficult and a bit more justified when you can't surround him with talent.
Maybe we can dvr the thrilling win over the Kings and this one tonight and watch it down the road.
Rich is right: dude can play and does so without fear. You can enjoy that, appreciate it and still lose basketball games.
You better hope they start doing that if you care about the long term health of the club.

by pod2dawg » Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:56 am
British_Pharaoh wrote: How do you expect Irving and TT to progress if they are stifled but a losing mentality.
by Prosecutor » Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:46 am
by British_Pharaoh » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:35 am
Prosecutor wrote:Nobody needs to try to lose. All the organization needs to do for the long term benefit of the franchise is to trade Jamison and Sessions immediately (for draft picks) and they won't win five games the rest of the year. They really should have traded them already.
Sessions needs to be traded by March 15 since he'll be a free agent and won't be back. Jamison's contract is up and he wants to finish his career in his hometown of Charlotte.
Management has clearly decided to try and win as many games as possible this year despite the draft implications. The decision has been made and there's nothing the fans can do about it short of boycotting Cavs games to protest them winning too often. That's not going to happen, so we might as well enjoy the wins.
Last night's win almost was a loss when Gee and Erden got hurt in the 2nd quarter. It screwed up the rotation and the Cavs were outscored 26-14. Fortunately they both were able to return. Gee was huge with 16 pts, 11 boards, 3 assists, 2 steals, and only one turnover. I want to like Casspi, but the difference between him and Gee is night and day. Last night the Cavs were -13 with Casspi in the game; +14 with Gee. It's painful to watch Casspi chuck up bricks from the 3-point line and get stripped when he takes the ball into the paint. The worst was when he was alone under the basket for an easy dunk, but Rodney Stuckey (a guard!) came up from behind and cleanly blocked his dunk and grabbed the ball.
Great job in the 4th quarter as the Cavs scored 35 points with Casspi on the bench. Good job by Boobie as he forced a missed layup without commiting a foul in the final seconds with the Cavs up by 2.
Jamison had a great night with 32 points and 10 boards, but his 7 missed free throws almost cost them the game. They lost against Milwaukee because of his missed free throws. He really needs to clean that up - he's way off his career norm.
New Orleans lost in OT to Indiana last night and had to travel, so hopefully they'll be tired tonight. But like Detroit, they've been playing much better lately.

by peeker643 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:39 am
British_Pharaoh wrote:peeker643 wrote:They need to lose basketball games.
Y'all can get excited about narrow wins over shitty teams that does nothing except make keeping that talented kid a bit more difficult and a bit more justified when you can't surround him with talent.
Maybe we can dvr the thrilling win over the Kings and this one tonight and watch it down the road.
Rich is right: dude can play and does so without fear. You can enjoy that, appreciate it and still lose basketball games.
You better hope they start doing that if you care about the long term health of the club.
Why is it difficult to understand that you can't ask a coach and in turn a coach can never ask or expect his players to shit away ball games.
We'd lose every player if that were the case. Everyone in the organisation knows it would be more beneficial for us to finish in the lottery but players are there to win and play well. We'd be the disgrace of basketball if we tank every game. How do you expect Irving and TT to progress if they are stifled but a losing mentality.
by Kingpin74 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:44 am
peeker643 wrote:
You're kidding, right??
Kyrie needs to win with Hollins and Ehrden on the roster so he knows how to win?
Come on.
Charlotte was the 8th seed a couple years back. How'd that 'learning to win' thing work out for those young players? Would they have fewer than 4 wins this season had they missed the playoffs then?
Fuck that. You know what I've learned about winning? When you have better players you win. And you give yourself a better chance at better players by picking higher in the draft.
The Cavs won LBJ when they lost 65 games. They won Kyrie when the lost 65 games. If y'all don't see the handwriting on the wall then there's nothing I can do to change it.
And yes, the best and most honest way to do it is to trade your more valuable chips for picks. If you can get a 1st for Jamison and another for Sessions then do it. I don't care where in the 1st they are. Do it. And do it soon. Stockpile picks. You'll have the Heat and Kings pick at some point too in the next couple drafts. Those are leverage. Go get more.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:51 am

by peeker643 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:35 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:38 pm

by Prosecutor » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:11 pm
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:35 pm
peeker643 wrote:British_Pharaoh wrote:peeker643 wrote:They need to lose basketball games.
Y'all can get excited about narrow wins over shitty teams that does nothing except make keeping that talented kid a bit more difficult and a bit more justified when you can't surround him with talent.
Maybe we can dvr the thrilling win over the Kings and this one tonight and watch it down the road.
Rich is right: dude can play and does so without fear. You can enjoy that, appreciate it and still lose basketball games.
You better hope they start doing that if you care about the long term health of the club.
Why is it difficult to understand that you can't ask a coach and in turn a coach can never ask or expect his players to shit away ball games.
We'd lose every player if that were the case. Everyone in the organisation knows it would be more beneficial for us to finish in the lottery but players are there to win and play well. We'd be the disgrace of basketball if we tank every game. How do you expect Irving and TT to progress if they are stifled but a losing mentality.
You're kidding, right??
Kyrie needs to win with Hollins and Ehrden on the roster so he knows how to win?
Come on.
Charlotte was the 8th seed a couple years back. How'd that 'learning to win' thing work out for those young players? Would they have fewer than 4 wins this season had they missed the playoffs then?
Fuck that. You know what I've learned about winning? When you have better players you win. And you give yourself a better chance at better players by picking higher in the draft.
The Cavs won LBJ when they lost 65 games. They won Kyrie when the lost 65 games. If y'all don't see the handwriting on the wall then there's nothing I can do to change it.
And yes, the best and most honest way to do it is to trade your more valuable chips for picks. If you can get a 1st for Jamison and another for Sessions then do it. I don't care where in the 1st they are. Do it. And do it soon. Stockpile picks. You'll have the Heat and Kings pick at some point too in the next couple drafts. Those are leverage. Go get more.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:37 pm

by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:42 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Tyson Chandler was still not healthy with the Bobcats and was very meh that year (that is how Dallas got him for free).
Wallace was dumped last year with virtually the same roster because the water even out and the suck shined through.
Stop pretending, getting eight seeds are bullshit in the NBA unless you have a young team with a lot of developing kids (Indy/Philly).
The Cavs have one developing kid, one sixth man candidate young SF and a TERRIBLE PF, that is their fucking core.
Stop pretending it isn't.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:43 pm

by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:48 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Yes, if the Cavs went into this season without Jameson, Session and Andy they would still have the same record they have now.
WTF is your point beyond stupid and false?
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:00 pm

by peeker643 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:08 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:If Jameson doesn't go for 32 and 10 they lose last night, period.
And Andy has no future on a team that draft a black hole athlete to play the four. The FO crushed his value the minute they invested in Tristan "I shoot 42% from the field and the line!!" Thompson.

by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:10 pm

by pod2dawg » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:14 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:If Jameson doesn't go for 32 and 10 they lose last night, period.
And Andy has no future on a team that draft a black hole athlete to play the four. The FO crushed his value the minute they invested in Tristan "I shoot 42% from the field and the line!!" Thompson.
OK ei, ei yO. We all concur TT ain't the bag of chips we had hoped and we flushed on that one. He isn't hideous, just not a serviceable NBA 4.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:18 pm

by peeker643 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:40 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Sullinger is an unathletic pussy that will be a servicable rotation player but never a star.
Wishes he was Milsap.
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:50 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:If Jameson doesn't go for 32 and 10 they lose last night, period.
And Andy has no future on a team that draft a black hole athlete to play the four. The FO crushed his value the minute they invested in Tristan "I shoot 42% from the field and the line!!" Thompson.
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:53 pm
peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Sullinger is an unathletic pussy that will be a servicable rotation player but never a star.
Wishes he was Milsap.
If Sullinger can't/doesn't hit the open baseline 15' shot I don't know if he's even a serviceable rotation player. To me, and I have nothing against the guy, you just hit his upside. I think it's likely he's less than that although there's a lot of wiggle room in "serviceable".
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:54 pm

by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:54 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Biyombo is getting better every week while TT is mired in suck.
That's what happens when you go for a pure athletic project and don't even draft the best option.
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:56 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Last year's draft was terrible.
This year's is not.
Stop being stupid.
Every quality team in the league that contends for the playoffs was built through the draft outside of NYC and LA.
It's the only way.
And you can get excited about mediocre teams, I'm not. There are for more entertaining mediocre teams in the league I would rather spend my time watching. Getting excited about this young core, which is amongst the worst in the league WITH KYRIE is, well, a sign you a pretty effin stupid.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:00 pm
statmasta wrote:peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Sullinger is an unathletic pussy that will be a servicable rotation player but never a star.
Wishes he was Milsap.
If Sullinger can't/doesn't hit the open baseline 15' shot I don't know if he's even a serviceable rotation player. To me, and I have nothing against the guy, you just hit his upside. I think it's likely he's less than that although there's a lot of wiggle room in "serviceable".
I thought the same thing about Kevin Love in college. Undersized, unathletic 4 in college who was a smooth low post player but didn't seem to have the athleticism to be a good scorer or rebounder in the NBA.
And then he changed his game at the next level and became a finesse player and an outside shooter. Jared Sullinger needs to do the same thing. He can shoot from the outside, he just doesn't. If he can make his game mimick Kevin Love's, he'll have a much higher ceiling. If he settles for just trying to score inside and doesn't expand his game, he'll just be a decent rotation player.

by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:03 pm

by Orenthal » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:03 pm
statmasta wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Tyson Chandler was still not healthy with the Bobcats and was very meh that year (that is how Dallas got him for free).
Wallace was dumped last year with virtually the same roster because the water even out and the suck shined through.
Stop pretending, getting eight seeds are bullshit in the NBA unless you have a young team with a lot of developing kids (Indy/Philly).
The Cavs have one developing kid, one sixth man candidate young SF and a TERRIBLE PF, that is their fucking core.
Stop pretending it isn't.
I never said I want the 8th seed. My point was Charlotte's young players aren't the reason they won. They won because of veterans they no longer have. They got this bad by dumping the vets. But for the Cavs, the only way we'll start losing is by trading the players keeping us afloat....Kyrie Irving, Alonzo Gee, and Antawn Jamison. Trade Antawn? Sure. How about Irving and Gee? Irving alone is going to carry this team to a bunch of victories. Do you just want to bench him until 2015 when we have more talent?
by Orenthal » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:08 pm
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:13 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:statmasta wrote:peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Sullinger is an unathletic pussy that will be a servicable rotation player but never a star.
Wishes he was Milsap.
If Sullinger can't/doesn't hit the open baseline 15' shot I don't know if he's even a serviceable rotation player. To me, and I have nothing against the guy, you just hit his upside. I think it's likely he's less than that although there's a lot of wiggle room in "serviceable".
I thought the same thing about Kevin Love in college. Undersized, unathletic 4 in college who was a smooth low post player but didn't seem to have the athleticism to be a good scorer or rebounder in the NBA.
And then he changed his game at the next level and became a finesse player and an outside shooter. Jared Sullinger needs to do the same thing. He can shoot from the outside, he just doesn't. If he can make his game mimick Kevin Love's, he'll have a much higher ceiling. If he settles for just trying to score inside and doesn't expand his game, he'll just be a decent rotation player.
No, just fucking no, just go away and stop posting.
Sullinger is about as like Kevin Love as I am Kyrie Irving. There is NOTHING similar between their games. Like zero. Kevin Love has always had an EXTREMELY unique skill set and the question was a matter if that UNIQUE set of skills would translate or not, it did.
Sullinger is the mehest of meh and is elite or unique in no ways.
by Orenthal » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:14 pm
by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:15 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Frankly what do you want then? Not a high-pick? More shitty wins that hurt draft position because they have vets on this team they shouldn't have? A marquee FA?
Stop fucking talking about not tanking like it is a nice alternative if you aren't advocating for mediocrity, they are one in the same.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:18 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:22 pm
Orenthal wrote:Let's slow down on TT v BB since um, they both blow at this point. His "trend" is absolutely TT esque. Anyway HAL is rocking today, to $50!

by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:24 pm

by Kingpin74 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:24 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Orenthal wrote:Let's slow down on TT v BB since um, they both blow at this point. His "trend" is absolutely TT esque. Anyway HAL is rocking today, to $50!
Biyombo's February has been markedly trending upward, TT has not.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:25 pm

by statmasta » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:48 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Yes, stat, you are the only fucking moron in existence (please go read a single Scouting report on Sullinger and Love from age 15 on up) that is going to compare two entirely different players.
They are not similar in any way.
Not even in the slightest tiny bit.
Skill-sets are skill-sets.
by Prosecutor » Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:54 pm
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
