Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:22 pm
by Hikohadon » Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:38 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:50 pm
Hikohadon wrote:That truly is orgasmic.
Are you able to tell who he had us take at 22 since we were able to keep all our picks and still get RG3?
by Hikohadon » Wed Feb 15, 2012 5:19 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 5:23 pm
Hikohadon wrote:I only got the top 5 without signing in (which I cannot do).
Kendall Wright, exactly the kind of WR the Browns need, comes in with his college QB, giving both a sense of comfort. You get your (hopeful) franchise QB and #1 WR in one round, breathing all kinds of new life into your woeful offense.
T-Minus 30 seconds until someone loses their shit over the fact that this draft will have the Browns last 3 first rounders all coming from football powerhouse Baylor. 29... 28...
by Triple-S » Wed Feb 15, 2012 6:56 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by bookelly » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:47 pm
Triple-S wrote:If it takes getting rid of that 2nd first round pick to move up and nab this guy, then I'd be in full support of it.
I'm kind of hoping though, STL is just bullshitting, sticks with Bradford, and Minnesota sticks with Ponder (who showed some promise).
Hope to god that Miami nabs Flynn, and Peyton ends his career with 'Skins. That'd be ideal.
by Triple-S » Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:24 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by CleSportsTruth » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:41 pm
peeker643 wrote:http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2012/story/_/id/7575960/mel-kiper-second-mock-draft-year
Supposed to be insider but it isn't locked so I'm posting it.
And if this happened I think the majority of Clevleand would simultaneously orgasm.

by Hikohadon » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:53 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:I think we underestimate the stubborn/"resilient" degree of Colt support in this town. I'd love to see a scientific poll done of NE Ohio. I'd guess it'd be close to 50-50 on the Colt v. non-Colt as starter question, with the Colt supporters outnumbering the rest of us. I'd also be intrigued as to the racial breakdown on that too, but that's not gonna happen.
H=ll, I had someone four yrs. ago tell me we'd regret dumping Chuck Frye. Never underestimate the stupid loyalty in this town.
by peeker643 » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:55 pm
CleSportsTruth wrote:peeker643 wrote:http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2012/story/_/id/7575960/mel-kiper-second-mock-draft-year
Supposed to be insider but it isn't locked so I'm posting it.
And if this happened I think the majority of Clevleand would simultaneously orgasm.
I question this last assumption. I think we underestimate the stubborn/"resilient" degree of Colt support in this town. I'd love to see a scientific poll done of NE Ohio. I'd guess it'd be close to 50-50 on the Colt v. non-Colt as starter question, with the Colt supporters outnumbering the rest of us. I'd also be intrigued as to the racial breakdown on that too, but that's not gonna happen.
H=ll, I had someone four yrs. ago tell me we'd regret dumping Chuck Frye. Never underestimate the stupid loyalty in this town.
by Hikohadon » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:57 pm
peeker643 wrote:CleSportsTruth wrote:peeker643 wrote:http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2012/story/_/id/7575960/mel-kiper-second-mock-draft-year
Supposed to be insider but it isn't locked so I'm posting it.
And if this happened I think the majority of Clevleand would simultaneously orgasm.
I question this last assumption. I think we underestimate the stubborn/"resilient" degree of Colt support in this town. I'd love to see a scientific poll done of NE Ohio. I'd guess it'd be close to 50-50 on the Colt v. non-Colt as starter question, with the Colt supporters outnumbering the rest of us. I'd also be intrigued as to the racial breakdown on that too, but that's not gonna happen.
H=ll, I had someone four yrs. ago tell me we'd regret dumping Chuck Frye. Never underestimate the stupid loyalty in this town.
I wondered when I posted that if there would be any discussion on that aspect. I know there are people who are still pro-Colt, but I think once the RGIII hype machine went full throttle that they'd be jumping off the Colt bandwagon. Add in the Baylor WR pick and people would be, for the most part, geeked up and convinced of the fact that a playoff appearance was around the corner.
YMMV
by CleSportsTruth » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:05 pm
Hikohadon wrote:CleSportsTruth wrote:I think we underestimate the stubborn/"resilient" degree of Colt support in this town. I'd love to see a scientific poll done of NE Ohio. I'd guess it'd be close to 50-50 on the Colt v. non-Colt as starter question, with the Colt supporters outnumbering the rest of us. I'd also be intrigued as to the racial breakdown on that too, but that's not gonna happen.
H=ll, I had someone four yrs. ago tell me we'd regret dumping Chuck Frye. Never underestimate the stupid loyalty in this town.
Amen to that. I slip into thinking it doesn't exist b/c I don't see it here, but then I listen to 92.3 or KNR and there are an alarming amount of "if we do this, this, this, this, and this, then we can get by with Colt" calls.
As if "getting by" were the freakin' goal.
by CleSportsTruth » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:08 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:CleSportsTruth wrote:peeker643 wrote:http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2012/story/_/id/7575960/mel-kiper-second-mock-draft-year
Supposed to be insider but it isn't locked so I'm posting it.
And if this happened I think the majority of Clevleand would simultaneously orgasm.
I question this last assumption. I think we underestimate the stubborn/"resilient" degree of Colt support in this town. I'd love to see a scientific poll done of NE Ohio. I'd guess it'd be close to 50-50 on the Colt v. non-Colt as starter question, with the Colt supporters outnumbering the rest of us. I'd also be intrigued as to the racial breakdown on that too, but that's not gonna happen.
H=ll, I had someone four yrs. ago tell me we'd regret dumping Chuck Frye. Never underestimate the stupid loyalty in this town.
I wondered when I posted that if there would be any discussion on that aspect. I know there are people who are still pro-Colt, but I think once the RGIII hype machine went full throttle that they'd be jumping off the Colt bandwagon. Add in the Baylor WR pick and people would be, for the most part, geeked up and convinced of the fact that a playoff appearance was around the corner.
YMMV
It would take all of one Preseason game for the Pro-Colt crowd to STFU forever.

by HoodooMan » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:18 pm
by swerb » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:37 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:38 pm
peeker643 wrote:CleSportsTruth wrote:peeker643 wrote:http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2012/story/_/id/7575960/mel-kiper-second-mock-draft-year
Supposed to be insider but it isn't locked so I'm posting it.
And if this happened I think the majority of Clevleand would simultaneously orgasm.
I question this last assumption. I think we underestimate the stubborn/"resilient" degree of Colt support in this town. I'd love to see a scientific poll done of NE Ohio. I'd guess it'd be close to 50-50 on the Colt v. non-Colt as starter question, with the Colt supporters outnumbering the rest of us. I'd also be intrigued as to the racial breakdown on that too, but that's not gonna happen.
H=ll, I had someone four yrs. ago tell me we'd regret dumping Chuck Frye. Never underestimate the stupid loyalty in this town.
I wondered when I posted that if there would be any discussion on that aspect. I know there are people who are still pro-Colt, but I think once the RGIII hype machine went full throttle that they'd be jumping off the Colt bandwagon. Add in the Baylor WR pick and people would be, for the most part, geeked up and convinced of the fact that a playoff appearance was around the corner.
YMMV
by HoodooMan » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:44 pm
swerb wrote:I can't see any way RG3 doesn't go #2 to someone. I do feel like there's a good chance its us though that moves up to #2. All the "stay the course" and "it took us a while in GB and SEA" talk aside, I think Walrus is really starting to feel the pressure, and that he also knows drafting RG3 buys his boy Shur another couple years.
by pup » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:57 pm
by leadpipe » Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:51 am
swerb wrote:I can't see any way RG3 doesn't go #2 to someone. I do feel like there's a good chance its us though that moves up to #2. All the "stay the course" and "it took us a while in GB and SEA" talk aside, I think Walrus is really starting to feel the pressure, and that he also knows drafting RG3 buys his boy Shur another couple years.
by jb » Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:54 am
Hikohadon wrote:Kendall Wright, exactly the kind of WR the Browns need, comes in with his college QB, giving both a sense of comfort.
by Hikohadon » Thu Feb 16, 2012 1:35 pm
HoodooMan wrote:I enjoy this combination of things:
1) Mock drafts, at their very best, projecting, what, about 1 out of 5 things accurately?
2) Draft geeks still taking mock drafts seriously.
3) Draft geeks refusing to take mock drafts seriously when they also include trade projections, because, "How can you project that!"
So we're left with mock drafts projecting RG3 to fall to us at 4 when very, very few people seem to think there's any chance of that happening.
^The most meaningless principled stand since the last time an ESPN announcer refused to pick a game he was scheduled to announce.
by Erie Warrior » Thu Feb 16, 2012 9:28 pm
leadpipe wrote:Hell, at this point all there is are workouts and interviews - guy is gonna knock it out of the park in both areas.


by motherscratcher » Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:13 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:leadpipe wrote:Hell, at this point all there is are workouts and interviews - guy is gonna knock it out of the park in both areas.
When he runs a 4.2 and throws it through the roof of the big oil drum, there'll be serious talk of him as #1.
by leadpipe » Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:00 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:leadpipe wrote:Hell, at this point all there is are workouts and interviews - guy is gonna knock it out of the park in both areas.
When he runs a 4.2 and throws it through the roof of the big oil drum, there'll be serious talk of him as #1.
Even if there is, it doesn't matter. There was also talk of Durant going ahead of Oden. But for reasons I'm still not sure I completely understand, it just couldn't happen.
Luck over RG3 has that same feeling for me. Even if Indy decides they like RG3 better, they'll still take Luck. They have to. It's a foregone conclusion.
by jb » Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:05 am
Erie Warrior wrote:leadpipe wrote:Hell, at this point all there is are workouts and interviews - guy is gonna knock it out of the park in both areas.
When he runs a 4.2 and throws it through the roof of the big oil drum, there'll be serious talk of him as #1.
by Prosecutor » Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:14 am
by mattvan1 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:06 pm
Prosecutor wrote:With regard to Colt, first impressions are powerful. Colt made a great first impression by playing surprisingly well against the Steelers in his first pro start despite only three days of practice as the #1. He followed that up by beating the Patriots and Saints. At this point most Browns fans, including me, were thinking "He doesn't look that impressive but we can win with this guy". The same thing we said about Sipe and Kosar.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:16 pm

by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:23 pm
by pup » Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:50 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:You don't post about college sports, right Pros? Cause I'm really getting tired of scrolling over your novellas.
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:56 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Listening to all the LeBron bullshit the last couple days, I can't help but wonder if some Clevelanders aren't afraid of having a guy with superstar potential because of the potential heartache.
Stick with nice, safe, mediocre QB that won't leave you (because there's no demand for him).
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:36 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:08 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Where is it written that wanting to stick with an incredibly underwhelming and low-potential QB is rational?
And, yes, I can see the whole "If we draft him, he'll probably suck!" irrationality as well.
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:04 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:32 pm
Prosecutor wrote:With regard to Colt, first impressions are powerful. Colt made a great first impression by playing surprisingly well against the Steelers in his first pro start despite only three days of practice as the #1. He followed that up by beating the Patriots and Saints. At this point most Browns fans, including me, were thinking "He doesn't look that impressive but we can win with this guy". The same thing we said about Sipe and Kosar.
It's not easy to admit that's not the case, especially since it would be so nice to have the QB problem solved so we can use ALL the draft picks and cap space to add speed and playmakers on both sides of the ball. Which is why there's a solid argument to sign Flynn, or Kolb if he's released.
Assuming Flynn ends up in Miami, it's questionable whether Holmgren will approve a move up to #2 considering the cost. His philosophy is to either trade for another team's backup (Hasselbeck, Favre) or draft a mid-round project (McCoy) every year until you hit on somebody. They talked about wanting to accumulate extra picks because there were so many holes to fill. It seems unlikely they would sacrifice picks to trade up for RG3 even if they did not get a QB in free agency.
However, someone made an excellent point in that Holmgren offered a very rich package of picks for Sam Bradford, so it's not like he's opposed to paying up for what he considers to be a can't miss blue chip QB. If he would do it for Bradford, why not Griffin, who probably has even more upside?
The final piece is that he's moving into Year 3 of a five year contract and has only 9 wins to show for it. He has to be feeling some urgency. Also, the success of rookie QBs like Newton, Dalton, Flacco, Ryan, Roethlisberger and others the last few years has to be changing some attitudes about how long it will take a blue chip prospect to start contributing.
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:35 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:35 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD: take this to the bank and send Peeker the memo .
If Indy didn't have the obligation to fill the vacuum of Peyton Manning with another white statue them hayseeds can worship , Griffin would be picked ahead of Luck .
and before either of you two cry foul and sacriledge that I would denegrate the mighty power of Luck be advised .
I'm telling you both ahead of time what the rest of the world will soon find out , Luck is a great talent at QB , but Griffin is the rarest of rare finds .
and the best part , as soon as you two numbnuts get in line , and make about another million similarly retarded Browns fans with Brain freeze get instep .
This absolute bad Mutha Fucka will be a Brown .
SoulDawg
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:51 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:57 pm
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:00 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:03 pm

by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:20 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:rebel needs to update his avatar, Ron looks young there, need to get the more aged and wiser version in production.

by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:29 pm
Hikohadon wrote:RG3 is every bit as intelligent as Luck (and Luck is clearly a smart guy), and I have no worries about his ability to read defenses or learn offense X or learn to take snaps (who the fuck can't do that) or make multiple reads or what not. Peek makes a point that even smart guys sometimes can't grasp NFL Defenses, and it's valid, but I personally give smart guys the benefit of the doubt on that until they prove otherwise (just like I give accurate guys the benefit of the doubt that they'll still be accurate in the NFL - I don't see why we need to invent possible drawbacks).
by jerryroche » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:30 pm
Hikohadon wrote:The only - ONLY - worry I can see on RG3 is him getting killed trying to use his enviable mobility in the NFL. He's not an overly big guy, and there will be a time when his college instincts will kick in and he'll try something that he could get away with in the Big 12, except Ray Lewis will be there this time.
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:35 pm
jerryroche wrote:Hikohadon wrote:The only - ONLY - worry I can see on RG3 is him getting killed trying to use his enviable mobility in the NFL. He's not an overly big guy, and there will be a time when his college instincts will kick in and he'll try something that he could get away with in the Big 12, except Ray Lewis will be there this time.
RG3 is 6-1, 220. Michael Vick—who has rushed for 5,219 yards in his career—is 6-0, 215. Vick has also started every game for 6 of his 8 full years in the league. Fran Tarkenton (6-0, 190) rushed for 3,674 yards in his 13-year career, during which he started 239 of 246 games.
Ain't saying that RG3 will remain that healthy. Nobody can say that. But it's been done before by scrambling QBs of his size.
by Hikohadon » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:36 pm
jerryroche wrote:Hikohadon wrote:The only - ONLY - worry I can see on RG3 is him getting killed trying to use his enviable mobility in the NFL. He's not an overly big guy, and there will be a time when his college instincts will kick in and he'll try something that he could get away with in the Big 12, except Ray Lewis will be there this time.
RG3 is 6-1, 220. Michael Vick—who has rushed for 5,219 yards in his career—is 6-0, 215. Vick has also started every game for 6 of his 8 full years in the league. Fran Tarkenton (6-0, 190) rushed for 3,674 yards in his 13-year career, during which he started 239 of 246 games.
Ain't saying that RG3 will remain that healthy. Nobody can say that. But it's been done before by scrambling QBs of his size.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:39 pm

by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:50 pm
jerryroche wrote:Hikohadon wrote:The only - ONLY - worry I can see on RG3 is him getting killed trying to use his enviable mobility in the NFL. He's not an overly big guy, and there will be a time when his college instincts will kick in and he'll try something that he could get away with in the Big 12, except Ray Lewis will be there this time.
RG3 is 6-1, 220. Michael Vick—who has rushed for 5,219 yards in his career—is 6-0, 215. Vick has also started every game for 6 of his 8 full years in the league. Fran Tarkenton (6-0, 190) rushed for 3,674 yards in his 13-year career, during which he started 239 of 246 games.
Ain't saying that RG3 will remain that healthy. Nobody can say that. But it's been done before by scrambling QBs of his size.
by jerryroche » Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:15 pm
peeker643 wrote:Nope-Can't go there. There is not an athlete on earth with the athletic ability at that position that Vick has. Not one, not ever. Vick's quick-twitch is ungodly and it's his alone. RG3 is an athlete too but it's not Mike Vick we're talking about.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: gbot and 4 guests