Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by Prosecutor » Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:03 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:38 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:48 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Meh teams upsetting West Coast teams, no matter what the circumstances, happens all the effin time and means little to nothing.Horray, good win, nice, cut.... big picture it changes little to nothing and this team is what it is, a deeply flawed team that has enough hustle to win a meh amount of games resulting in a big bowl of meh.The roster is TERRIBLY constructed (as it should be, they are rebuilding), so please forgive people for not jumping up and down and thanking hustle (a lot of other teams really not caring because this schedule is the worst thing ever) for a meh amount of wins.Hell, kudos on Scott for getting his meh team to take advantage of this schedule and the assfucking it has laid on the quality of the product.And don't pretend for a second that the quality of play isn't down A LOT this year. Fourth Quarters at this point are more often then not a battle of who can find their legs for more than a minute or two.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Feb 09, 2012 2:27 pm
by Prosecutor » Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:24 pm
I can't root against them. But I can't justify wanting them to win either.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:32 pm
by Orenthal » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:16 pm
Prosecutor wrote:Look at it this way. If the Cavs won 12 games and got the first pick would they be better off in the long run than if they won 30 games and got the 14th pick?
Look at it this way. If the Cavs won 12 games and got the first pick would they be better off in the long run than if they won 30 games and got the 14th pick?
by Prosecutor » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:35 am
Orenthal wrote:Prosecutor wrote:Look at it this way. If the Cavs won 12 games and got the first pick would they be better off in the long run than if they won 30 games and got the 14th pick? Yes.
by Orenthal » Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:40 am
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:49 am
Orenthal wrote:^That's funny. Don't ask a stupid question.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:00 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:11 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Pros is clinging to the belief that you can hit on good prospects later in the draft and have them turn Rondo style elite.This is true.My point is when you are fresh into a reload you rely on higher probablity (aka a Davis/MKG/Drummond) because misses hurt a lot more.But hey, Rondo went at 21!!! WE CAN DO IT
Jonathan Givony @DraftExpress Reply Retweet Favorite · OpenRT @teamziller: Only five of the 24 All-Stars were drafted outside of the top 10. #keepontankingRetweeted by The Greek
by Orenthal » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:29 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:47 pm
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Fri Feb 10, 2012 2:01 pm
by Prosecutor » Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:28 pm
by JJN » Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:39 am
Prosecutor wrote:I'm under no illusion that the Cavs can trade Sessions, Jamison, or Varajao for a pick in the 20s and end up with a Rajon Rondo. Yes, we landed Carlos Boozer and Daniel Gibson in the second round, but those are anomalies. We got J.J. Hickson at #19 and Eyenga at #30, so those are the kind of players I expect we would end up with if we traded Varajao to a Finals team for two 1st round picks. Anybody want to trade Andy for JJ and Eyenga? I agree Sessions has to be traded for whatever he'll bring, or we end up with nothing.I think letting Jamison's contract expire and freeing up $15 million in cap space might be preferrable to trading him for the 30th pick. The savings could be used to help sign a better player than we could draft at #30. Did somebody mention Gordon?We wouldn't be taking on anywhere near Jamo's salary long term for the #30, so the point is moot.As for the rhetorical question, I'm trying to say that I would rather have a 30-win team populated by some fairly talented players like AV, Irving, Sessions, Boobie, TT, and Jamison, and then add the #14 pick, than have a group of stiffs who couldn't win 12 games and add a Kyrie Irving. I understand not everyone agrees. No problem.I'd rather stink for another two years and end up with Durant, Westbrook, and Harden later on.
by Larvell Blanks » Sat Feb 11, 2012 11:02 am
by e0y2e3 » Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:59 pm
by Prosecutor » Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:44 pm
by motherscratcher » Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:38 pm
Prosecutor wrote:Tonight could get ugly with AV and KI out and Tawn having played 43 minutes last night. The Sixers are one of the better defensive teams. I don't know how the Cavs get 80 points.
by Prosecutor » Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:16 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:10 pm
Larvell Blanks wrote:Well part 1 of the tank plan is in effect w/ AV going out w/ a wrist injury and leaaving the arena with a brace on. Now if Browns management could take over the Irving concussion recovery the Cavs could be really short handed for a while. Well at least until DHoward comes via trade.
by e0y2e3 » Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:19 pm
by motherscratcher » Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:51 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Can't wait till they draft Henson and I die of laughter.
by Prosecutor » Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:29 am
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest