Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by jb » Wed Feb 01, 2012 5:41 pm
by HoodooMan » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:16 pm
"They were frustrated," Lerner says. "We were all frustrated. We thought we were going to win more games this season. We improved — we were in a lot of those games — but they wanted to go up there with tangible evidence that there's improvement. We know it's happening, but they wanted to be able to say, 'Here, here's how many more games we won this season.' You can only say 'trust us' so many times. This isn't a religion. This is football.
"We have to win more games next year," he says. "We will win more games next year. I truly believe that. And there's a small part of me that hopes that as we've been going like this [miming one step at a time], that this offseason, if things go right, that we'll make a big jump."
by jb » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:19 pm
by HoodooMan » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:31 pm
by mattvan1 » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:09 pm
HoodooMan wrote:I read that second paragraph as Randy expecting mediocrity--at minimum--next year, hoping for playoffs.
Which, in itself, is perfectly fine. Tangible improvement is kind of a necessary step in the process.
But parts of that quote suggest to me that he's lying to himself about what he's seeing on the field and that he might as well be referring to himself when he brings up football's relation to religion, which it seems to me is a shaky foundation for belief in H&H, and I think he's setting himself up to be devastated by another 5-6 win year, regardless of whether or not there actually IS some real progress made on the field.
by LakeErieWarriors » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:50 pm
by Triple-S » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:55 pm
"They said when they started it was a three-to-five-year plan," Lerner says. "Mike said, 'Here's how long it's going to take to do this right,' and I said OK."
Lerner say all of their internal metrics say they need at least 30 or so highly-graded players to make the playoffs. "You look at any playoff team, and sure, there are going to be exceptions, but you look at any playoff team and that's what you're going to find. Now, in any given year, between free agency and the draft, the best you can typically hope for is to add seven of that type of player that can help your team. More often, it's more like five. So you take seven players times five years, and that's where you get those numbers."
And the cupboard Holmgren and Heckert inherited was pretty bare of highly-graded players.
If you're looking for comparisons — beacons of hope even — look no further than the Houston Texans and the San Fransisco 49ers, both of which made the playoffs this year after relatively recent streaks of lowliness, and both of which are models of sort for how Cleveland hopes to rebuild.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by jb » Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:59 pm
HoodooMan wrote:
But parts of that quote suggest to me that he's lying to himself about what he's seeing on the field and that he might as well be referring to himself when he brings up football's relation to religion, which it seems to me is a shaky foundation for belief in H&H, and I think he's setting himself up to be devastated by another 5-6 win year, regardless of whether or not there actually IS some real progress made on the field.
by HoodooMan » Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:19 pm
jb wrote:But as a football owner? He's still a muppet. When Randy's lips move regarding football, Holmgren's arm is awfully smelly a few minutes later.
by mattvan1 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:10 am
HoodooMan wrote:jb wrote:But as a football owner? He's still a muppet. When Randy's lips move regarding football, Holmgren's arm is awfully smelly a few minutes later.
Yep, which is still the problem. Randy's support for H&H, like his support for everyone else in the past, is based on pure faith, rather than this-is-the/a-right-way-to-build-a-football-team conviction. And that's why his resolve is so easily broken. He has no principles of process. He has faith in what his top football guy tells him, and he sees nothing beyond results. Then once his faith is exhausted after 0.5-3 years, his top football guy is F'd.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:50 am
HoodooMan wrote:jb wrote:But as a football owner? He's still a muppet. When Randy's lips move regarding football, Holmgren's arm is awfully smelly a few minutes later.
Yep, which is still the problem. Randy's support for H&H, like his support for everyone else in the past, is based on pure faith, rather than this-is-the/a-right-way-to-build-a-football-team conviction. And that's why his resolve is so easily broken. He has no principles of process. He has faith in what his top football guy tells him, and he sees nothing beyond results. Then once his faith is exhausted after 0.5-3 years, his top football guy is F'd.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:06 am
mattvan1 wrote:HoodooMan wrote:jb wrote:But as a football owner? He's still a muppet. When Randy's lips move regarding football, Holmgren's arm is awfully smelly a few minutes later.
Yep, which is still the problem. Randy's support for H&H, like his support for everyone else in the past, is based on pure faith, rather than this-is-the/a-right-way-to-build-a-football-team conviction. And that's why his resolve is so easily broken. He has no principles of process. He has faith in what his top football guy tells him, and he sees nothing beyond results. Then once his faith is exhausted after 0.5-3 years, his top football guy is F'd.
Randy doesn't know how to build a team--and neither does anyone else, really. There are a few models which have worked elsewhere - and Randy seems hellbent on trying them all. He's tried the hot young GM with ex Super Bowl co-ord route, the Tao of Kraft get the guru and all is well approach, and now he's onto get a HMFIC and put a proper org in place. Harmony. Continuity. Kumbaya.
Randy may be intelligent and well read, but deep down inside he's a kid. Hopefully smart enough to learn from his mistakes. I think he's starting to get it. And I think he stays the course through the end of 2013.
by pup » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:49 am
by leadpipe » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:50 am
by jb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:08 pm
leadpipe wrote:There's a possibility Randy learns some lessons, but ideally, you'd like the owner to fall into the "super-smart" category from the bump, like many of these guys who built their own wealth.
Look, the guy's not David Modell, but he ain't Al Lerner either.
Al was driven and supremely intelligent. Randy has been able to skate along because of this. And what you're seeing as far as the perceptions of complacency and lack of urgency and so forth, pretty much fall in line.
So we can assume Randy will figure things out, but that's a bigger assumption then it should be.
by HoodooMan » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:22 pm
mattvan1 wrote:Randy doesn't know how to build a team--and neither does anyone else, really. There are a few models which have worked elsewhere - and Randy seems hellbent on trying them all. He's tried the hot young GM with ex Super Bowl co-ord route, the Tao of Kraft get the guru and all is well approach, and now he's onto get a HMFIC and put a proper org in place. Harmony. Continuity. Kumbaya.
by HoodooMan » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:29 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Well if you don't stand for something , you'll fall for anything , and too often it seems Randy has fallen prey to the last voice he hears in the room.
SoulDawg74 wrote:Randy's speech means that change will be RG3 or Flynn , and not Kolb or fake suede tannehill.
by HoodooMan » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:36 pm
jb wrote:Unless the owner is a complete disaster like Jerruh or a skin flint , I think most of this is luck.
by jb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:42 pm
HoodooMan wrote: As far as I can tell, Randy is still incapable of this.
by HoodooMan » Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:59 pm
jb wrote:Begging your pardon in advance Hoo doo, but how the fuck can you have the insight to make this statement? Not saying you are wrong or right, just saying there is no way you have enough access to formulate any sort of valid opinion on this one.
But as a football owner? He's still a muppet. When Randy's lips move regarding football, Holmgren's arm is awfully smelly a few minutes later.
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:37 pm
HoodooMan wrote:Which took me right back to how I felt about him as an owner before reading it. His faith in H&H isn't based on anything more substantial than his faith in past regimes has been. He's still Fickle Randy.

by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:23 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:HoodooMan wrote:Which took me right back to how I felt about him as an owner before reading it. His faith in H&H isn't based on anything more substantial than his faith in past regimes has been. He's still Fickle Randy.
Eh, I see the seating arrangements of the Politburo differently. From the point where Modell blew everything up to Al getting the expansion team was but a few years, and a few years after that Al passes. In something like five years Randy goes from zero NFL experience to multimillionaire NFL franchise owner. To top it all off, Butch runs Al's consigliere Carmen and summarily guns himself down at the toll booth. Randy's left with nothing more than the owner's manual, and I'm not even sure he wanted it as he's still got a fancy for socer.
However, he's not going to abandon his father's legacy. So he puts his faith in his advisers' advice, hires whoever they say is good, and jets of to Leeds. Butch, Collins, and Savage are left to fester until they melt into full blown China Syndromes. Then comes ManKok and its not even a year before everything goes to hell in Berea. At this point something changes, Lerner finally decides enough is enough and/or gets a friendly nudge from Goodell. The advisers get fired, Kokinis gets hauled out of Berea, and Lerner gets a brand new consigliere in Holmgren.
Only now the warning signs are popping right back up again. Shurmur gets feisty with the media, Holmgren gets feisty with the media, the PD's beat writer is calling Lerner himself out in Twitter, and I can imagine the WTF going on in polite conversation over Holmgren hiring noted failure Brad Childress to stand at the sideline and hold a clipboard. He wants to put his faith in Holmgren and Heckert, but there's that niggling feeling of deja vu again. Hence hedging his faith in the Walrus with 'can we start winning now?'
by peeker643 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:34 pm
Don't shoot the messenger.
by HoodooMan » Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:42 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Rizzo stole my line and was blasting the airwaves , two years in and twenty million payed out to holmgren and we don't have a QB .
by Fire Marshall Bill » Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:48 pm
peeker643 wrote:I liked the last two posts.
Seriously, I did.
Well done.![]()
I'm still sticking with the Kevin Kolb acquisition though.Don't shoot the messenger.
by jb » Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:50 pm
HoodooMan wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Rizzo stole my line and was blasting the airwaves , two years in and twenty million payed out to holmgren and we don't have a QB .
^Kind of childish whining. And it's why so many Browns fans deserve to be condescended to by H&H.
List of starting QBs acquired in the last 2 years:
Matt Moore (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Cam Newton (no one but you thinks trading up for him was within the realm of sane possibility)
Matt Hasselbeck (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Kevin Kolb (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Carson Palmer (we still wouldn't have a QB, and we'd have 2 less first rounders)
Andy Dalton (wouldn't have made sense for us in the 2nd round last year, would have made even less sense to deal up ahead of the Bengals to get him...and we still probably wouldn't have a QB)
Tavaris Jackson (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Tim Tebow (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Rex Grossman (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Sam Bradford (we probably still wouldn't have a QB, and we'd probably have 3 less first rounders and 2 less second rounders)
Christian Ponder (we probably still wouldn't have a QB)
Blaine Gabbert (we probably still wouldn't have a QB)
Jason Campbell (we still wouldn't have a QB)
^REALITY
At least I give you credit SD for having the somewhat (IMO) less-than-sane position of "We should have dealt up for Cam Newton. That guy should be our QB." At least there's accountability there. Most seem incapable of even that.

by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:18 pm
HoodooMan wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Rizzo stole my line and was blasting the airwaves , two years in and twenty million payed out to holmgren and we don't have a QB .
^Kind of childish whining. And it's why so many Browns fans deserve to be condescended to by H&H.
List of starting QBs acquired in the last 2 years:
Matt Moore (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Cam Newton (no one but you thinks trading up for him was within the realm of sane possibility)
Matt Hasselbeck (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Kevin Kolb (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Carson Palmer (we still wouldn't have a QB, and we'd have 2 less first rounders)
Andy Dalton (wouldn't have made sense for us in the 2nd round last year, would have made even less sense to deal up ahead of the Bengals to get him...and we still probably wouldn't have a QB)
Tavaris Jackson (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Tim Tebow (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Rex Grossman (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Sam Bradford (we probably still wouldn't have a QB, and we'd probably have 3 less first rounders and 2 less second rounders)
Christian Ponder (we probably still wouldn't have a QB)
Blaine Gabbert (we probably still wouldn't have a QB)
Jason Campbell (we still wouldn't have a QB)
^REALITY
At least I give you credit SD for having the somewhat (IMO) less-than-sane position of "We should have dealt up for Cam Newton. That guy should be our QB." At least there's accountability there. Most seem incapable of even that.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:20 pm
jb wrote:HoodooMan wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Rizzo stole my line and was blasting the airwaves , two years in and twenty million payed out to holmgren and we don't have a QB .
^Kind of childish whining. And it's why so many Browns fans deserve to be condescended to by H&H.
List of starting QBs acquired in the last 2 years:
Matt Moore (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Cam Newton (no one but you thinks trading up for him was within the realm of sane possibility)
Matt Hasselbeck (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Kevin Kolb (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Carson Palmer (we still wouldn't have a QB, and we'd have 2 less first rounders)
Andy Dalton (wouldn't have made sense for us in the 2nd round last year, would have made even less sense to deal up ahead of the Bengals to get him...and we still probably wouldn't have a QB)
Tavaris Jackson (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Tim Tebow (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Rex Grossman (we still wouldn't have a QB)
Sam Bradford (we probably still wouldn't have a QB, and we'd probably have 3 less first rounders and 2 less second rounders)
Christian Ponder (we probably still wouldn't have a QB)
Blaine Gabbert (we probably still wouldn't have a QB)
Jason Campbell (we still wouldn't have a QB)
^REALITY
At least I give you credit SD for having the somewhat (IMO) less-than-sane position of "We should have dealt up for Cam Newton. That guy should be our QB." At least there's accountability there. Most seem incapable of even that.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:33 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:35 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:I want you to remeber my plan two in that draft failing a trade up was to sign Hasselback and draft Luck which would have secured the position immediately , a plan Tennessee followed to the letter.
If you had bought shares of Facebook you'd be a multi millionaire
That was at least a possibility
...but seriously,
by JCoz » Fri Feb 03, 2012 12:57 pm
by jb » Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:12 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:I want you to remeber my plan two in that draft failing a trade up was to sign Hasselback and draft Luck which would have secured the position immediately , a plan Tennessee followed to the letter.
If you had bought shares of Facebook you'd be a multi millionaire
That was at least a possibility
...but seriously,
by SoulDawg74 » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:41 pm
jb wrote:Fire Marshall Bill wrote:I want you to remeber my plan two in that draft failing a trade up was to sign Hasselback and draft Luck which would have secured the position immediately , a plan Tennessee followed to the letter.
If you had bought shares of Facebook you'd be a multi millionaire
That was at least a possibility
...but seriously,
So funny. So spot on.
by Hikohadon » Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:33 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
snide comments won't get you any of my SuperBowl tickets when i turn this thing around.
Souldawg
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
