Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by Orenthal » Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:33 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:53 pm

by StewieG » Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:03 pm
by Orenthal » Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:10 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:NONESENSE, TT SHOULD HAVE GONE #2 OVERALL
by Orenthal » Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:15 pm
StewieG wrote:When Irving gets some teammates who can hit shots, he's really going to rack up the assists. And he has a really high basketball IQ, especially when you consider he hasn't played even a full college season yet. He makes some really nifty passes, and moves without the ball very well.
by JCoz » Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:59 am
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:14 am
by rebelwithoutaclue » Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:47 pm
Orenthal wrote:StewieG wrote:When Irving gets some teammates who can hit shots, he's really going to rack up the assists. And he has a really high basketball IQ, especially when you consider he hasn't played even a full college season yet. He makes some really nifty passes, and moves without the ball very well.
Since you already wrote it...
Good vision of the floor. Mostly hits guys in motion, moves well without the ball, has a deceptive start and stop, good crossover, and is starting to convert on his outside shooting. No doubt the best player by far, and no matter of overthinking and scheming picks could have yeilded a better return.
by Prosecutor » Sat Jan 07, 2012 1:27 pm
by statmasta » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:10 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Shooting percentage is slightly below average but that should improve when he get's better at finishing at the rim. He can already get to the rim at will and once he starts finishing, look out; we could be looking at future 50/40/90 seasons with 8-10 assists per game.
I'm happier every day about the pick.
by dmiles » Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:11 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:
Add to that the fact that he's a surprisingly good rebounder, averaging nearly 4 per game which averages out to nearly 6 per 40 minutes. Considering he's an inch or two shorter than the prototypical point guard, that's really good. Rebounding is all about positioning and with Irving's very high basketball IQ, he can sense where the missed shot will be and position himself accordingly.

by rebelwithoutaclue » Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:35 pm
dmiles wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote:
Add to that the fact that he's a surprisingly good rebounder, averaging nearly 4 per game which averages out to nearly 6 per 40 minutes. Considering he's an inch or two shorter than the prototypical point guard, that's really good. Rebounding is all about positioning and with Irving's very high basketball IQ, he can sense where the missed shot will be and position himself accordingly.
Is that true? I thought he was of a decent size with plenty of filling out room but I honestly off the top of my head (google is cheating) was thinking he was a hair above average height-wise.
by StewieG » Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:46 pm
by dmiles » Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:33 pm

by Prosecutor » Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:07 am
by rebelwithoutaclue » Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:01 pm
dmiles wrote:Prolly beating the proverbial dead horse but if we assume 6'-3" is that below average?
by statmasta » Sun Jan 08, 2012 9:28 pm
dmiles wrote:Prolly beating the proverbial dead horse but if we assume 6'-3" is that below average?
by Orenthal » Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:35 pm
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
