Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by peeker643 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:45 pm
by Hikohadon » Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:48 pm
peeker643 wrote:Read between the lines in Heckert press conference:
We want Dawson back.
We want D'Qwell back.
We'll evaluate Colt at end of year.
Do you have enough to evaluate him w/o receivers and OL- Yes.
And Holmgren hasn't spoken to the QB?
Gone.
Unofficially official.
by peeker643 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:06 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:08 pm

by Lubber » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:23 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:23 pm

by Hikohadon » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:27 pm
peeker643 wrote:Negative. Seneca will be the backup. Especially after he acquits himself as such the next 3 weeks where McCoy won't play.
by Hikohadon » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:28 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Seriously, did Chuckles have any endorsement deals?
Because if he did, him + Quinn + McCoy has to be a unprecedented level of suck getting paid advertising $$$$.
by Prosecutor » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:36 am
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:56 am
peeker643 wrote:Read between the lines in Heckert press conference:
Do you have enough to evaluate him w/o receivers and OL- Yes.
by Sea Foam Green » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:58 am
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:43 am
Prosecutor wrote:Dawson is in his 13th season with the Browns and is still going strong, having kicked 4-5 field goals over 50 yards. Jackson has played 62 games with the Browns and has 125 tackles and 3.5 sacks this year. It's not too hard to figure out that these guys are productive.
McCoy is in his first season as the full-time starting QB. He's working with a new offense that relies heavily on timing and his receivers lead the league in dropped passes. I don't think it's a done deal that the McCoy era is "over".
But I agree it's not looking good when Holmgren says that Shurmur will definitely be back but McCoy will be evaluated at the end of the season.
by jerryroche » Fri Dec 16, 2011 11:54 am
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:02 pm
jerryroche wrote:What is it about Holmgren that makes everyone think he could admit he was wrong about McCoy but will not admit being wrong about Shurmur?
I think McCoy sticks. If the Browns have the opportunity to take one of the Big Three collegiate QBs with their high first-round choice, they'll grab him. But packaging numerous picks to take one of the Big Three is just not very smart, given glaring needs elsewhere. (Of course, how many times can we say that the front office has been "smart" in the past 13 years?)
Admittedly, this is a talent-rich draft in QBs. But that doesn't mean that it won't necessarily be talent-rich at that position in Year 3 or 4 of the "rebuild." If the Browns continue to stock-pile future draft picks as they have the last couple of years, they could put themselves in great position to eventually get their man—if they even think they need him after Colt's rating goes up to 90+ with some talent around him next season!
by JCoz » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:05 pm
by jerryroche » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:07 pm
by Govbarney » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:15 pm
by Ziner » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:18 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Seriously, did Chuckles have any endorsement deals?
Because if he did, him + Quinn + McCoy has to be a unprecedented level of suck getting paid advertising $$$$.
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:23 pm
Sea Foam Green wrote:Don't you think it's just political posturing so he doesn't back himself into a corner on the draft? I mean, it is a pretty deep year for QB's. Maybe he wants to wait and see if he'll have a shot at Luck or RG3. Maybe he likes one of the 2nd tier guys and wants to do a little more research.
Point is, now he can draft a QB and say they didn't like Colt's evaluation, or they can not draft a QB and say Colt's evaluation was sterling. If he says, right now, that he is or isn't going with Colt, one of those doors closes.
by JCoz » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:26 pm
by Spin » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:28 pm
by motherscratcher » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:34 pm
Hikohadon wrote:Sea Foam Green wrote:Don't you think it's just political posturing so he doesn't back himself into a corner on the draft? I mean, it is a pretty deep year for QB's. Maybe he wants to wait and see if he'll have a shot at Luck or RG3. Maybe he likes one of the 2nd tier guys and wants to do a little more research.
Point is, now he can draft a QB and say they didn't like Colt's evaluation, or they can not draft a QB and say Colt's evaluation was sterling. If he says, right now, that he is or isn't going with Colt, one of those doors closes.
Personally, I'd be saying how much I think Colt has grown and how much we like Colt, etc. etc., everything short of guaranteeing him the starting job next year.
This would be done to maybe keep QB needy teams from trading up ahead of me to steal RG3/Barkley. If they think I'm married to Colt, they might be more apt to wait.
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:34 pm
Spin wrote:It's simple. If Career Backup Wallace is better than Colt, the Browns really need to draft a QB.
by JCoz » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:42 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Or maybe, Holmgren knows that the other GMs know that Holmgren would say he likes Colt if he wanted to draft a QB. But, if the other GMs know that Holmgren knows that they know what he would say, then they wouldnt be fooled by his ruse and trade up to steal RG3. But I thnk Holmgren is smarter than that. Which leads to only 1 obvious conclusion...
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 16, 2011 12:44 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Or maybe, Holmgren knows that the other GMs know that Holmgren would say he likes Colt if he wanted to draft a QB. But, if the other GMs know that Holmgren knows that they know what he would say, then they wouldnt be fooled by his ruse and trade up to steal RG3. But I thnk Holmgren is smarter than that. Which leads to only 1 obvious conclusion...
by FUDU » Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:46 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Or maybe, Holmgren knows that the other GMs know that Holmgren would say he likes Colt if he wanted to draft a QB. But, if the other GMs know that Holmgren knows that they know what he would say, then they wouldnt be fooled by his ruse and trade up to steal RG3. But I thnk Holmgren is smarter than that. Which leads to only 1 obvious conclusion...
by peeker643 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:31 pm
Sea Foam Green wrote:Don't you think it's just political posturing so he doesn't back himself into a corner on the draft? I mean, it is a pretty deep year for QB's. Maybe he wants to wait and see if he'll have a shot at Luck or RG3. Maybe he likes one of the 2nd tier guys and wants to do a little more research.
Point is, now he can draft a QB and say they didn't like Colt's evaluation, or they can not draft a QB and say Colt's evaluation was sterling. If he says, right now, that he is or isn't going with Colt, one of those doors closes.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:40 pm

by Erie Warrior » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:09 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Drafting a second teir QB would be the most Browns thing ever.


by Spin » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:25 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Drafting a second teir QB would be the most Browns thing ever.
Yes. Barkley = McCoy.
If you can't get a guy with a better skill set, then why move to get him? The combine will send RG3 through the roof. Him and Luck go 1-2.
Browns need to look at the next best guys (which aren't bad).
I've said this for years, but how can the botch a draft when they need everything?
by motherscratcher » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:38 pm
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:44 pm
peeker643 wrote:I also will not be shocked if McCoy has some success wherever he ends up and that's something I never said about guys like DA or Frye, etc.
by JCoz » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:44 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Drafting a second teir QB would be the most Browns thing ever.
Yes. Barkley = McCoy.
If you can't get a guy with a better skill set, then why move to get him? The combine will send RG3 through the roof. Him and Luck go 1-2.
Browns need to look at the next best guys (which aren't bad).
I've said this for years, but how can the botch a draft when they need everything?
by JCoz » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:46 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:I also will not be shocked if McCoy has some success wherever he ends up and that's something I never said about guys like DA or Frye, etc.
Yeesh, you'd better put that caveat in, since there have been people that have trumpeted the immenent success of the Browns Cutting Crew from Couch to Quinn.
by Hikohadon » Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:15 pm
JCoz wrote:Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:I also will not be shocked if McCoy has some success wherever he ends up and that's something I never said about guys like DA or Frye, etc.
Yeesh, you'd better put that caveat in, since there have been people that have trumpeted the immenent success of the Browns Cutting Crew from Couch to Quinn.
Dont forget Bray Bray.
by JCoz » Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:21 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:28 pm
Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:I also will not be shocked if McCoy has some success wherever he ends up and that's something I never said about guys like DA or Frye, etc.
Yeesh, you'd better put that caveat in, since there have been people that have trumpeted the immenent success of the Browns Cutting Crew from Couch to Quinn. And we all know how much success ANY of the QB's that have left here have had.
I'm not trying to be down on Colt, I just don't know where he goes to get a starting job. There's not a huge market for undersized guys with below average arms.
by Erie Warrior » Fri Dec 16, 2011 4:36 pm
JCoz wrote:Are you saying that Barkley does not have a better skillset


by JCoz » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:39 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:JCoz wrote:Are you saying that Barkley does not have a better skillset
Mostly. More precisely would Barkley be a bigger upgrade over Colt vs. the next best college player and whatever stiff currently occupies that roster spot in Cleveland.
Particularly when you compare what the Browns have on OL/DL/WR/LB and what should be available.
Richardson vs Obi-wan
Blackmon vs Pure Awfulness
by Gradysmanldy » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:50 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:JCoz wrote:Are you saying that Barkley does not have a better skillset
Mostly. More precisely would Barkley be a bigger upgrade over Colt vs. the next best college player and whatever stiff currently occupies that roster spot in Cleveland.
Particularly when you compare what the Browns have on OL/DL/WR/LB and what should be available.
Richardson vs Obi-wan
Blackmon vs Pure Awfulness
by Cleveland Matt » Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:32 am


by Madre Hill, Superstar » Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:42 am
Erie Warrior wrote:Mostly. More precisely would Barkley be a bigger upgrade over Colt vs. the next best college player and whatever stiff currently occupies that roster spot in Cleveland.

by Prosecutor » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:10 pm
Cleveland Matt wrote:I think Holmgren has too big of an ego to draft a Qb with the Browns first round picks, especially in the top 5 or top 10 picks. Holmgren believes he is so good at finding talent at the Qb position. He can find someone later in the draft that will be just as good as the top QB's drafted.
Also Heck is the same way with the WR position. So I doubt they use either one of those two picks in the first on a WR.
On a serious note. I hope the Browns get the #3 or #4 pick in the draft and then trade down and take the Dolphins or Redskins for all they got and then draft Trent Richardson.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:20 pm
Prosecutor wrote:Cleveland Matt wrote:I think Holmgren has too big of an ego to draft a Qb with the Browns first round picks, especially in the top 5 or top 10 picks. Holmgren believes he is so good at finding talent at the Qb position. He can find someone later in the draft that will be just as good as the top QB's drafted.
Also Heck is the same way with the WR position. So I doubt they use either one of those two picks in the first on a WR.
On a serious note. I hope the Browns get the #3 or #4 pick in the draft and then trade down and take the Dolphins or Redskins for all they got and then draft Trent Richardson.
Agree on no QB or WR with that first pick. I think Luck and RG3 go 1-2 and Barkley also goes before the Browns pick at 5 or 6, probably via a trade-up. So the Browns stand pat and take the top cornerback to replace Sheldon Brown. There are a lot of great receivers in the AFC North and the Browns need to consider that. They won't take a running back that high, not in the WCO. They'll go with a committee of Obi, Hardesty, and Brandon Jackson.
by Cleveland Matt » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:40 pm


by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:31 pm
by sonoranreptile » Sun Dec 18, 2011 8:58 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:40 pm
sonoranreptile wrote:Barkley IS Colt........dude has some of the best receivers and O-Line "money" can buy........wait until he gets to Cleveland.......lmao
by mitch » Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:55 pm
Hikohadon wrote:JCoz wrote:Hikohadon wrote:peeker643 wrote:I also will not be shocked if McCoy has some success wherever he ends up and that's something I never said about guys like DA or Frye, etc.
Yeesh, you'd better put that caveat in, since there have been people that have trumpeted the immenent success of the Browns Cutting Crew from Couch to Quinn.
Dont forget Bray Bray.
Compared to the production of the QB's that have left here, Braylon is a Hall of Famer.
Couch, 0 starts, out of league.
Holcomb, 11 starts, out of league.
Frye, 4 starts, out of league.
DA, 9 starts, 3rd string in Carolina.
Quinn, 0 starts, 2nd string in Denver.
by Hikohadon » Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:43 am
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: gbot and 3 guests
