Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:43 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:44 pm
hiko wrote:By the way, Browns up to #7 in the Draft now. Behind fellow 4-8 teams Washington and Carolina in strength of schedule, but I can certainly see both those teams winning at least one more.
For the first time in my life, I actually want the Browns to lose out. It's a strange feeling.

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:50 pm

by peeker643 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:52 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:You act is if I am raging? I really don't give a fuck beyond pointing out that there were THOUSANDS of teeth gnashing posts last year about this shit.
I mean christ go read the start of the lock-out shit.
What goes around comes around, my board got shit on and ruined because of the assholes. I'm going to take the opportunity to point out the hypocrisy when I can.
by hiko » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:52 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:hiko wrote:By the way, Browns up to #7 in the Draft now. Behind fellow 4-8 teams Washington and Carolina in strength of schedule, but I can certainly see both those teams winning at least one more.
For the first time in my life, I actually want the Browns to lose out. It's a strange feeling.
This first time ever?
What finally broke you?
by Triple-S » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:20 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:That goes around comes around, my board got shit on and ruined because of the assholes.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Fire Marshall Bill » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:02 pm
hiko wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:hiko wrote:By the way, Browns up to #7 in the Draft now. Behind fellow 4-8 teams Washington and Carolina in strength of schedule, but I can certainly see both those teams winning at least one more.
For the first time in my life, I actually want the Browns to lose out. It's a strange feeling.
This first time ever?
What finally broke you?
I finally stopped pretending that we could get by with whatever shmoe we had at QB and embraced the concept that the Browns go nowhere without an elite QB.
My opinion is that there are 2 elite QB's in this draft (Luck and RG3) with a 3rd "pretty good" QB (Barkley, who I don't think will be elite but could be in that Matt Ryan, Philip Rivers area). I want one. If that means losing a bunch of meaningless games that they'll probably lose anyway, I accept that.
Makes the losing worth something.
by hiko » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:05 pm
by bookelly » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:29 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:35 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:40 pm

by hiko » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:34 pm
by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:43 pm
by hiko » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:48 pm
FUDU wrote:Archie is kind of a goof ball, and he can say stuff that Peyton can't, but it doesn't mean Archie is even accurate.
Colts have to get something for Manning if possible. No secret I'm a fan of Peyton but I'm sorry you cannot be short sighted if you are the Colts franchise. They do not owe Peyton another shot, even though the org would obviously benefit if it worked out with another SB win. Peyton has been rewarded by means of big money and an awesome career with lots to be proud of. Not to mention the risk that Manning could get hurt again...
The best chance Manning probably has of another ring just might be outside of Indianapolis anyway.
IMO they almost have to trade Manning for the boat load they could get, draft Luck with the top pick they are earning, then use the Manning picks to surround him with talent to keep that train rolling.
Let's say the Colts keep Manning for one year and then trade him. They would take a $28.8 million cap hit the year he leaves. Add Luck's contract and his backup, you're spending nearly $35 million on quarterbacks. They will not be competitive.
Let's say the Colts keep Manning for two years and then trade him. (I'm tossing out this option for conversation's sake; there's no way Luck is coming here, or should come here, if he's sitting for two years). In that case, the Colts will take an immediate $19.2 million cap hit on the remainder of Manning's contract. Add Luck's contract and a backup, you're looking at about $27 million in quarterbacks.
As team owner Jim Irsay said during the Manning negotiations shortly after the lockout, you can't field a competitive team when the quarterback is counting $20 million against the cap.
And let's not even entertain this goofy idea of paying Manning his option bonus in March and then trading him; that would be a $38.8 million cap hit. They'll be using me at the mike linebacker.
by peeker643 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:51 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Everytime an NBA Star demands out of a shitty team I read about it on this boards.
Manning lays the groundwork and not a peep.
And don't give me the what market shit, it's not even remotely relevant to this.
Manning is the same as them, but no one cares to bring it up. Selective finger pointing.
by leadpipe » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:52 pm
by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 pm
by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:57 pm
peeker643 wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Everytime an NBA Star demands out of a shitty team I read about it on this boards.
Manning lays the groundwork and not a peep.
And don't give me the what market shit, it's not even remotely relevant to this.
Manning is the same as them, but no one cares to bring it up. Selective finger pointing.
Bullshit.
Market means everything. And quyit acting like we're not talking about a gassed 37 yr old that just had copious amounts of cadaver bone fused to where two of his fucking vertebrae used to be. A 37 yr-old legend whose best days are behind him and who's trading on sympathy and pride to squeeze out a few more years.
This ain't LBJ, Howard, Melo, CP3, Bosh or any of those guys in their primes dictating which of the 6 markets that are desireable for them to manipulate their way toward.
It's not. And before you even intimate race where I'm concerned, shake yourself. Manning is a petulant and whiny bitch and the family as a whole always has been. He's a prima donna clinging to a dying career that's threatened by his own career mortality and the one kid who could threaten it even more by potentially being game ready the day training camp opens.
When Rodgers or Rivers or Cam Newton manipulate the NFL system to go to the Jets or Giants or Dolphins to play with their buddies in major media/cultural centers, and it actually happens, then get back to me about how I'm ignoring similar systems by selectively pointing a finger.

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:13 pm

by peeker643 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:27 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:The Big Markets were the ones smart enough and with enough forsight to provide the opportunites for these players to go there.
You mean the foresight back when people landed there 225 years ago? or the foresight to put their franchise on a beach where it never snows? I'm thinking Nick Mileti looked as hard as he could here for something like that and just came up short.
CP3 backed off his Knicks whatever statements within 12 hours, realizing he couldn't fuck his small market to go play with his buddies.
Or he realized it was unrealistic given NY's lack of tradeable commodities and then he set his sites on the West Coast.
We have no idea what happens if the teams that had these stars in the NBA actually build real teams around them and the big markets don't strategicly blow long enough to provide them clean slates and all-star playgrounds....
It's impossible to talk about this without making up bullshit statements, especially when the bulls weren't relevant for how long? The Celtics bottomed out this decade... The Clippers... BAHAHA. Bulls bottomed out....
Only The Lake Show are impenetrable.
They are all assholes, and these guys in the NBA gave 6 and 7 years to their teams. That's a fuck of a long time in sports. Not 37, sure, but not exactly young when looking at six year contracts to stay where they are.
These guys are 25 and 26 when they're bolting.
KG locking up in Minny as long as he did led to a lot of this, IMO.
And Archie realizing he could control the NFL when he FORCED HIS SON INTO NEW YORK FOR MEDIA EXPOSURE led to him realizing he could control the NFL too.
It's not about New York or Indy, it's about greedy fucks deciding they get whatever they want and certain markets taking maximum advantage of this reality.
When someone in the NBA goes TO Indy or TO Milwaukee or TO Cleveland then I'll put some credence in that statement. Hell, if one of 'em goes TO OKC while the KD and RWB are there I'll be stunned. Unless you can tell me one time when it has happened in the past 20 years....
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:35 pm

by Ziner » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:40 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:
BTW, no one left at 25, 26-27-28.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:47 pm

by peeker643 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:59 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:07 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:10 pm

by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:24 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I see a father who has placed his youngest in New York because San Diego wasn't good enough for him.
I see a father indicating his eldest, who has been given and worshipped more in his current town than just about any football player ever, should leave if they draft a threat.
I see this as doing whatever you want and exerting your control over a sport because you can.
I see players grouping up to win titles because the NBA competition right now is off the charts and their franchise failed miserably to build around them for 6 and 7 years (again, look at the drafting histories from where these people left there redefine horrible). I see this as exerting control over your own career.
None of them were traded before playing a down from a talented young team.
None of them talked down a perennial playoff team that won a title.
The situations are closer than you want to realize.
All I'm asking is for people to accept this.
by peeker643 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:26 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:32 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:35 pm

by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:37 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:38 pm

by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:41 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:He did, in Miami.
As did Wade and Bosh.
Even if he signed for zero dollars, Cavs were still in bad cap shape.
by Orenthal » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:41 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:43 pm
FUDU wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:He did, in Miami.
As did Wade and Bosh.
Even if he signed for zero dollars, Cavs were still in bad cap shape.
Exactly.
Thank you.

by Orenthal » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:53 pm
by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:55 pm
by Orenthal » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:58 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:59 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:03 pm
FUDU wrote:He's no different than how you're describing Manning. I mean if Wade (and/or Bosh) wasn't sticking around of course LeBron would have jumped at the opportunity to play with the Wadeless roster Miami would have had to deal with.
Plus, I mean seriously, we'er comparing a guy who legitimately tanked post season games to....well anyone.

by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:09 pm
by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:15 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:FUDU wrote:He's no different than how you're describing Manning. I mean if Wade (and/or Bosh) wasn't sticking around of course LeBron would have jumped at the opportunity to play with the Wadeless roster Miami would have had to deal with.
Plus, I mean seriously, we'er comparing a guy who legitimately tanked post season games to....well anyone.
LeBron never could have won a title in Cleveland.
LeBron had a title window he had to take advantage of.
Peyton had his ring and has very few great rosters that just need a QB.
Peyton is spitting just to spit.
LBJ spit because he almost had to.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:17 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:18 pm

by Orenthal » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:23 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:24 pm

by FUDU » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:28 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:My point isn't that the differences between the games exist, it is that the differences between the games are why the players show different levels of loyalty.
When LBJ reupped the Cavs had a blank slate and were not in cap hell.
You are dancing around my core statement, the rules of the sport are what cause the loyalty in the NFL, not the rules of the CBA.
And LBJ's first extension was actually fairly small, he wasn't eligible for a true max till this deal. His contract was, uhm, far from huge and he made like nill money for his first three years due to the rookie cap that Peyton never dealt with.
Plus, again, had he signed for free after the second contract they were still already headed to cap hell. You have to draft well in the first three years of an NBA stars career these days, period.
I don't understand why you are trying to force these two things into being equal. I get your point, the situations that unfolded makes it moot.
by Orenthal » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:35 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I love how this board now just randomly logs me out while I am typing posts.
Anyhow.
Yes.
It is easily because NFL QBs are white.
(OJ had a few beers tonight and that only happens like twice a year, we all should be excited he is in here)
by e0y2e3 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:38 pm

by Orenthal » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:51 pm
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: gbot and 3 guests