Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by rigs » Fri Nov 25, 2011 12:22 am
by skatingtripods » Fri Nov 25, 2011 12:51 am
by TonyIPI » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:27 am
rigs wrote:I can't help but reiterate that right now, we have the same crappy team (second worst in AL after May 15th), plus Lowe. There better be SEVERAL more moves to come. Look forward to matchup lefties going 7, 8, and 9 against our lineup of 7 lefties, and two switch hitters that hit better left handed. Have never seen anything like it at this level, and it is going to happen a 2nd year.
by swerb » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:10 pm
by WiscTribeFan » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:13 pm
by swerb » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:20 pm
8. The real question is "Are the Indians done spending?" It's hard to get a direct answer, but here is what I am hearing -- they may have an extra $3 million or so in the budget to spend. They also can create some more money with trades.
9. They know they need a right-handed hitter. They would love that hitter to be an outfielder, who can also play some first base. They doubt that player is available in free agency ... they don't have the $30 million over three years that they expect Michael Cuddyer to receive. So they are working on trades.
by Kingpin74 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:08 pm
swerb wrote:All you gotta do is read Pluto's Sunday column from a couple weeks back, which is fed to him right from the Indians front office.
Said they have 3 mill left to spend. Maybe a little more for the right player/scenario.
That's it. It is what it is.
That means no DLee. No Pena. No Cuddyer. No "impact bat" is gonna come here for 3-5 mill per, and it's more likely that $ is split up on a couple Casey Blake types.
They had about 15 mill to spend this off-season. Lowe got 5. Grady got 5-9. They got 3-5 mill left. Antonetti's gotta figure out the best way to maximize that cash.
by skatingtripods » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:18 pm
by pup » Mon Dec 05, 2011 2:50 pm
by paulcousineau » Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:30 pm
Now that they've checked Reyes off their to-do list, the Miami Marlins have an even bigger name on their radar screen -- Albert Pujols.
Sources told ESPN.com on Sunday night that the Marlins plan to make an aggressive run at Pujols over the next two days.
by gotribe31 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 3:38 pm
swerb wrote:Here's the link. "Here's what I am hearing" = "What Antonetti just told me".
http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/blog/ind ... he_43.html8. The real question is "Are the Indians done spending?" It's hard to get a direct answer, but here is what I am hearing -- they may have an extra $3 million or so in the budget to spend. They also can create some more money with trades.
9. They know they need a right-handed hitter. They would love that hitter to be an outfielder, who can also play some first base. They doubt that player is available in free agency ... they don't have the $30 million over three years that they expect Michael Cuddyer to receive. So they are working on trades.

by Adverb Harry » Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:16 pm
gotribe31 wrote:swerb wrote:Here's the link. "Here's what I am hearing" = "What Antonetti just told me".
http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/blog/ind ... he_43.html8. The real question is "Are the Indians done spending?" It's hard to get a direct answer, but here is what I am hearing -- they may have an extra $3 million or so in the budget to spend. They also can create some more money with trades.
9. They know they need a right-handed hitter. They would love that hitter to be an outfielder, who can also play some first base. They doubt that player is available in free agency ... they don't have the $30 million over three years that they expect Michael Cuddyer to receive. So they are working on trades.
Remember too that that $3 mil was before the new CBA raised the minimum salary by about 16%. Probably added a million to the payroll just from that.
by Adverb Harry » Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:18 pm
pup wrote:Nothing better than passing on Carlos Lee when he could have made a difference because of the fear of the player he might become at the end of that contract then taking him on at the end of that contract.
But hey, the price is right.
by Cleveland Matt » Mon Dec 05, 2011 11:53 pm


by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:19 am
Adverb Harry wrote:pup wrote:Nothing better than passing on Carlos Lee when he could have made a difference because of the fear of the player he might become at the end of that contract then taking him on at the end of that contract.
But hey, the price is right.
I mentioned this as a possibility a month or so ago. I hate that this is now probably our BEST option.
We'd only be liable for him for one year and at a much reduced rate. That's the only reason I'd be willing to do it.
Still sucks, though.
by TonyIPI » Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:49 am
paulcousineau wrote:Still think that a trade is how they add a bat (while clearing payroll in the process) and the destinations for Pujols, Prince, and Pena are going to shape the trade market. This team wasn't going to be a player on the FA market before re-signing Grady.
by bookelly » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:06 am
TonyIPI wrote:paulcousineau wrote:Still think that a trade is how they add a bat (while clearing payroll in the process) and the destinations for Pujols, Prince, and Pena are going to shape the trade market. This team wasn't going to be a player on the FA market before re-signing Grady.
Agree Paul. Unfortunately, the options available in FA are slim. There is interest in Willingham, but he wants too much money and too many years at the moment. If that price comes down their interest may increase, but with so many teams involved it is doubtful.
I really think the key may lie in what happens with this Pujols-MArlins thing. If Miami does sign him, it may make Gaby Sanchez available. While not an All Star, he would still be a big upgrade over LaPorta and a solid 5-6 hitter for the lineup. I still think they will need one more bat in the OF, but we will see. The Indians have the pitching depth at ML/AAA to make a deal for a guy like Sanchez and give the Marlins the pitching they may want.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:25 am

by TonyIPI » Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:27 am
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Just thinking outside the box here.
Say the Marlins do land Albert Pujols and Mark Buerhle and or CJ Wilson.
How bout a deal centering around Shin Soo Choo for Gaby and Anibal Sanchez
Or heck maybe they should be shopping Choo anyways to try to pull off a 2 for 1.
Then we would have to fill an OF void, but hey maybe Ryan Garko is available.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:30 pm
TonyIPI wrote:
You would be selling low on Choo. His trade value took a big hit last year, so the best option for the Indians is probably to keep him as he is probably more valuable in what he can do in a healthy 2012 than what he could bring back in a trade now.
by pup » Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:35 pm
by bookelly » Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:00 pm
pup wrote:Asdrubal, Choo and Fausto
for
Hanley, Gaby and Morrison
If they sign Pujols

by TonyIPI » Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:11 am
by Rusty » Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:11 am

by TonyIPI » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:25 pm
Rusty wrote:Grady hires a new hitting coach, puts up career year numbers in 2012, plays hurt, grinds, raises his stock, etc...![]()
Remember this message, because I am right.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:53 pm
by WiscTribeFan » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:49 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:If Marlins sign Pujols we call Florida. Just an Idea.
Kipnis , Putnam, Raffy Perez, and McAllister for Hanley. Also could expand talks to includ,e Choo, Fausto, and Chris Perez.
by skatingtripods » Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:52 pm
by pup » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:25 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I don't want Hanley. Why would he come here to play 3B? Do we want to alienate Asdrubal by making him move positions and then have zero shot at signing him to an extension?
Plus, as Wisc said in a nicer way, Hanley's an asshole.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:45 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I don't want Hanley. Why would he come here to play 3B? Do we want to alienate Asdrubal by making him move positions and then have zero shot at signing him to an extension?
Plus, as Wisc said in a nicer way, Hanley's an asshole.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:49 pm

by skatingtripods » Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:14 pm
pup wrote:Which is why you include Asdrubal and keep Kipnis.
by WiscTribeFan » Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:16 pm
by TonyIPI » Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:35 am
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: Prosecutor, skatingtripods and 3 guests