Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by swerb » Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:41 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:10 am
by swerb » Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:18 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I'm shocked at how big 2 went down.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:29 am
by Cease » Wed Nov 09, 2011 11:54 am

by comish » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:42 pm
by Ziner » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:43 pm
by skatingtripods » Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:12 pm
by Orenthal » Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:36 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:20 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Cleveland mayor Frank Jackson announces that fire and EMS will be trained to do both jobs so they can be interchangeable based on who is on scene first, giving the line of how they can provide the best immediate care.
I see right through that. If you train them to do both, you need fewer fire and fewer EMS. So, in two years once this change is fully implemented, they'll just start cutting jobs in both fields. You know, which Issue 2 was supposed to prevent.
by FUDU » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:24 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Cleveland mayor Frank Jackson announces that fire and EMS will be trained to do both jobs so they can be interchangeable based on who is on scene first, giving the line of how they can provide the best immediate care.
I see right through that. If you train them to do both, you need fewer fire and fewer EMS. So, in two years once this change is fully implemented, they'll just start cutting jobs in both fields. You know, which Issue 2 was supposed to prevent.
Probably. But plenty of cities (I won't say most, cuz I don't have the numbers, but I'll bet it's most) have combined EMS/firefighters. So this is a step in the right direction.
I once read a study which said people who buy parenting books aren't better parents than those who don't. But being the type of person who reads parenting books makes you apt to be a better parent than the type who doesn't want these books. Similar to Issue 2, I don't believe SB 5 failed b/c the union side raised more money. I believe the amount of money raised on each side reflected the support for each side. Same with the yard signs. There were few pro-SB 5 signs because there were few pro-SB 5 voters, not because people were afraid of having them.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:58 pm
FUDU wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Cleveland mayor Frank Jackson announces that fire and EMS will be trained to do both jobs so they can be interchangeable based on who is on scene first, giving the line of how they can provide the best immediate care.
I see right through that. If you train them to do both, you need fewer fire and fewer EMS. So, in two years once this change is fully implemented, they'll just start cutting jobs in both fields. You know, which Issue 2 was supposed to prevent.
Probably. But plenty of cities (I won't say most, cuz I don't have the numbers, but I'll bet it's most) have combined EMS/firefighters. So this is a step in the right direction.
I once read a study which said people who buy parenting books aren't better parents than those who don't. But being the type of person who reads parenting books makes you apt to be a better parent than the type who doesn't want these books. Similar to Issue 2, I don't believe SB 5 failed b/c the union side raised more money. I believe the amount of money raised on each side reflected the support for each side. Same with the yard signs. There were few pro-SB 5 signs because there were few pro-SB 5 voters, not because people were afraid of having them.
LOL, let me know your opinion of this change after you need the help of a Fireman.
Cleveland cannot afford a significant cut back in the number of LEGIT fireman, they've had one of the country's busiest company's for many years.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:28 pm
by comish » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:46 pm
Orenthal wrote:I thought it would be closer as polls on complicated state issues have huge margins of error. As many of my friends from across the aisle stated in earlier threads Kasich overreached, and it may very well leave a lasting injury to him as Governor. The way Obamacare was pushed through was similar to SB5. While I still see aspects of SB5 as positive (merit over seniority) for the state, the issues should have been taken peiece by piece. If they had a positive result, you can continue reform.
Most unions prefer layoffs to pay cuts. So all those ads about SB5 causing cuts, when it was an attempt to lower cost per employee, had me a bit baffled. Sloth is the correct assesment of Kasich's and the Republicans handling of this...
by FUDU » Wed Nov 09, 2011 6:52 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:And I'll be clearer on my opinion:
It appears to me that many cities have paramedics/firefighters. It appears to me that there are so many of these that perhaps this is how the majority of cities do it. Since this appears to be effective for these cities, it is a good idea for the City of Cleveland to also have paramedics/firefighters.
This does not mean I think Cleveland should have less paramedics and firefighters. Cleveland will probably have less paramedics and firefighters regardless of whether or not they combine departments.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:01 pm
by comish » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:11 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:So much for the "silent majority"..... I heard so much about 'em, how they would all show up and back Kasich's water head plan. Whaaaa happen?

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:19 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:54 pm
FUDU wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:And I'll be clearer on my opinion:
It appears to me that many cities have paramedics/firefighters. It appears to me that there are so many of these that perhaps this is how the majority of cities do it. Since this appears to be effective for these cities, it is a good idea for the City of Cleveland to also have paramedics/firefighters.
This does not mean I think Cleveland should have less paramedics and firefighters. Cleveland will probably have less paramedics and firefighters regardless of whether or not they combine departments.
I don't think it is an applicable apples to apples approach though. CTown is a whole different animal when it comes to safety forces as opposed to her suburbs.
I'm not knocking any fireman in any suburb (they do something I don't and cannot) but in general they see jack squat in terms of fires compared to CTown fireman, and I know some CTown fireman refer to suburban fireman as "just" paramedics due to those differences. Some are serious some just kid. Is what it is.
by comish » Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:11 pm
Orenthal wrote:I thought it would be closer as polls on complicated state issues have huge margins of error. As many of my friends from across the aisle stated in earlier threads Kasich overreached, and it may very well leave a lasting injury to him as Governor. The way Obamacare was pushed through was similar to SB5. While I still see aspects of SB5 as positive (merit over seniority) for the state, the issues should have been taken peiece by piece. If they had a positive result, you can continue reform.
Most unions prefer layoffs to pay cuts. So all those ads about SB5 causing cuts, when it was an attempt to lower cost per employee, had me a bit baffled. Sloth is the correct assesment of Kasich's and the Republicans handling of this...
by Orenthal » Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:07 pm
comish wrote:If you approve of this for teachers you got your wish because King John snuck it through with the budget bill (HB 153).....chaos soon to ensue
by Orenthal » Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:09 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:So much for the "silent majority"..... I heard so much about 'em, how they would all show up and back Kasich's water head plan. Whaaaa happen?
by mistero » Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:29 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests