Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by fairvis » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:53 pm
by Spin » Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:26 am
by pup » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:05 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:09 pm

by Madre Hill, Superstar » Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:50 pm
Spin wrote:Fuck, that means no Notre Dame or Pittsburgh in the Big 10.

by Spin » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:25 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Spin wrote:Fuck, that means no Notre Dame or Pittsburgh in the Big 10.
And this is a bad thing?
by peeker643 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:36 pm
Spin wrote:Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Spin wrote:Fuck, that means no Notre Dame or Pittsburgh in the Big 10.
And this is a bad thing?
And what are he chances of JoePa taking PSU to the ACC now?
by pup » Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:01 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:A shit ton of money and prestige (particularly academicly).
The craziest part of all of this to me is Texas willingly joining the Pac 12 just because they are the only idiots that will take Texas Tech.
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:52 pm
Spin wrote:Who's left?
And what are he chances of JoePa taking PSU to the ACC now?

by e0y2e3 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 5:40 pm

by e0y2e3 » Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:16 pm

by Spin » Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:13 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Spin wrote:Fuck, that means no Notre Dame or Pittsburgh in the Big 10.
And this is a bad thing?
by Spin » Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:14 pm
peeker643 wrote:Spin wrote:Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Spin wrote:Fuck, that means no Notre Dame or Pittsburgh in the Big 10.
And this is a bad thing?
And what are he chances of JoePa taking PSU to the ACC now?
You're kidding me, right? JoePa is a coin flip to see fucking Thursday and there's a chance he wouldn't know what day that was anyway. Yet he's going to be leading Penn State to the ACC?
He can't fucking lead them onto the field. Or is it the traditionally powerful Penn St hoops team that will be the driving force?
by e0y2e3 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:34 am

by mattvan1 » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:46 am
e0y2e3 wrote:I'm really glad Spin new better what was going to happen than the finished expanding Pac http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_ ... -now-.html
"After careful review we have determined that it is in the best interests of our member institutions, student-athletes and fans to remain a 12-team conference," Commissioner Larry Scott said in the statement.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:42 pm
by JoJo White » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:15 pm

by peeker643 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:22 pm
JoJo White wrote:Conference realignment = cry about Texas
by mattvan1 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:51 pm
JoJo White wrote:Conference realignment = cry about Texas
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:54 pm
mattvan1 wrote:JoJo White wrote:Conference realignment = cry about Texas
Dude, your own peeps (UT grad Richard Justice, Houston Chronicle, among many others) are widely reporting the PAC 10/12 simply told UT to either drop the Longhorn Network or go back to the Big 12/11/10/9?. It's not crying - it's news.
At least UT bitch boy Bebee is out as B12/11/10/9? Commish. Not compalining about the Texas sense of entitlement,(very similar to OSU, btw) but please don't deny it exists, and whether you will admit to it or not UT and their network is the primary reason for the eventual collapse of the B12/11/10/9?
by mattvan1 » Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:10 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:mattvan1 wrote:JoJo White wrote:Conference realignment = cry about Texas
Dude, your own peeps (UT grad Richard Justice, Houston Chronicle, among many others) are widely reporting the PAC 10/12 simply told UT to either drop the Longhorn Network or go back to the Big 12/11/10/9?. It's not crying - it's news.
At least UT bitch boy Bebee is out as B12/11/10/9? Commish. Not compalining about the Texas sense of entitlement,(very similar to OSU, btw) but please don't deny it exists, and whether you will admit to it or not UT and their network is the primary reason for the eventual collapse of the B12/11/10/9?
You seem angry, Matt.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:13 am

by mattvan1 » Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:26 am
e0y2e3 wrote:OSU and Texas deserve each other, most self-entitled fan bases of all.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:26 am
e0y2e3 wrote:OSU and Texas deserve each other, most self-entitled fan bases of all.
by Spin » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:20 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:OSU and Texas deserve each other, most self-entitled fan bases of all.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:22 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:57 pm
by JoJo White » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:15 pm
peeker643 wrote:JoJo White wrote:Conference realignment = cry about Texas
Funny. They whined and threatened to take their ball and run away and everyone else is 'crying' about Texas.
Shake yourself. No one actually gives a fuck about Texas except the people in Texas.

by peeker643 » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:22 pm
The University of Oklahoma is considering remaining in the Big 12, but only in a “reformed” version of the conference that includes hard and fast rules for Texas' Longhorn Network and removal of Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe, a high-ranking Big 12 source told The Oklahoman on Tuesday.
by mattvan1 » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:59 pm
by BruceK » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:02 pm

by fairvis » Thu Oct 06, 2011 10:09 pm
by pup » Fri Oct 07, 2011 8:59 am
fairvis wrote:OK, so Mizzou is now considering joining the SEC... and TCU has an invite to the Big XII (Southwest Conference Redux...) if Mizzou goes SEC, is that a loss for the B1G? I always thought Mizzou fit in better in the Big Ten, with their rivalry with Illinois, borders with Iowa (and now Nebraska), as well as the St. Louis market. They aren't a big target, but certainly a worthy school for expansion (like Maryland).
The SEC isn't convinced, either, especially since Mizzou has let it be known that it's their #2 choice.
by YahooFanChicago » Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:51 am
by Spin » Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:45 am
YahooFanChicago wrote:As the Big East is losing schools it looks like they are going to try and raid the best schools from Conference USA.
I wonder if the MAC would consider combining with what is left of Conference USA after the Big East gets done?![]()
I guess this is where the jokes about the MAC and CUSA being the JV of NCAA can start.
by mattvan1 » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:11 am
Spin wrote: .....the MAC weaker in basketball.
by pup » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:25 am
mattvan1 wrote:Gents, I give thee the understatement of the year nominee, NCAA Hoops category
Comparing the Big East and the MACSpin wrote: .....the MAC weaker in basketball.
by mattvan1 » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:53 am
pup wrote:mattvan1 wrote:Gents, I give thee the understatement of the year nominee, NCAA Hoops category
Comparing the Big East and the MACSpin wrote: .....the MAC weaker in basketball.
I am all for calling Spin the MACphisto when need be...but I am pretty sure he is comparing the MAC to C-USA in hoops. At least I hope so.
by pup » Tue Oct 11, 2011 11:56 am
mattvan1 wrote:pup wrote:mattvan1 wrote:Gents, I give thee the understatement of the year nominee, NCAA Hoops category
Comparing the Big East and the MACSpin wrote: .....the MAC weaker in basketball.
I am all for calling Spin the MACphisto when need be...but I am pretty sure he is comparing the MAC to C-USA in hoops. At least I hope so.
![]()
Apologies to Spin (although based on his history I was certain he believed the comparison plausible)
by Spin » Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:46 pm
by fairvis » Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:59 am
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:47 pm

by fairvis » Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:53 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 4:50 pm

by Govbarney » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:29 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:42 pm

by furls » Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:17 pm
by pup » Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:43 pm
by neoleo » Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:51 am

by jb » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:11 pm
furls wrote:Great, we get some more good academic, football bottom feeders. Just what the conference needed. Maybe we can get MIT to field a team for next year's expansion.
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
