Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by e0y2e3 » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:17 pm

by fairvis » Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:19 pm
by motherscratcher » Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:51 pm
by JCoz » Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:41 am
ANOTHER THREE BITE THE DUST. Ignore everything I just said about the long and cold offseason being over. As if the Tat Five suspensions weren't buzzkill enough, Ohio State officials announced Thursday that another three players will be suspended for the season opener against Akron tomorrow. Junior RB Jordan Hall, Junior DB Travis Howard and Sophomore DB Corey Brown received impermissible benefits of up to $300 in total value at a charity event earlier this year. While current, unconfirmed, speculation claims the "impermissible benefits" were gift bags given to attendees at the event, taking a gift bag would be a no-no for someone whose standing as a student-athlete was their ticket to the event. Drew Tate probably thinks this rule sucks 83 times as much as the Charity Three do.
In case you're in need of a few silver linings to the latest dark cloud hovering over the Horseshoe, here they are:
1. We now have three more players we know won't get injured on Saturday.
2. We're playing Akron. While I wouldn't go as far as to say my grandmother could beat them, Gardner-Webb did last year. I'm simultaneously hoping that's close enough, and that I didn't just jinx something here.
3. They were doing charity, not hookers. Antonio Henton could not be reached for comment.
by peeker643 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:52 am
by skatingtripods » Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:39 pm
peeker643 wrote:The more you read and hear the more you come to the conclusion that there's not an epidemic at the university as much as there is an epidemic of really stupid kids being brought to any and all schools.
At least that's what I'm going with til the heat is somewhere else.
by peeker643 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:53 pm
skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:The more you read and hear the more you come to the conclusion that there's not an epidemic at the university as much as there is an epidemic of really stupid kids being brought to any and all schools.
At least that's what I'm going with til the heat is somewhere else.
Or a bunch of bullshit NCAA bylaws.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:07 pm

by peeker643 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:36 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Sure Peeks, but if it was really a gift bag that everyone at the charity event got (this is all rumor at this point) then it is a pretty shitty NCAA rule.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:39 pm

by peeker643 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:06 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:No doubt, but a bag w/ a breast cancer awareness mouse pad, T and other "trinkets" strikes me as a shrug and walk away thing.
by danwismar » Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:07 pm
by skatingtripods » Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:27 pm
skatingtripods wrote:peeker643 wrote:The more you read and hear the more you come to the conclusion that there's not an epidemic at the university as much as there is an epidemic of really stupid kids being brought to any and all schools.
At least that's what I'm going with til the heat is somewhere else.
Or a bunch of bullshit NCAA bylaws.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:48 pm

by Erie Warrior » Fri Sep 02, 2011 11:56 pm
fairvis wrote: Get ready for a lot of Hyde and Smith this weekend, especially with Berry's hammy situation.


by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:10 am
by e0y2e3 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:18 am

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:20 am
e0y2e3 wrote:shut up CDT, dan already said it's not gift bags.
by peeker643 » Fri Sep 09, 2011 8:31 pm
Ohio State University announced Friday that three football players suspended for taking $200 at a Cleveland charity event earlier this year will miss the upcoming Toledo game.
Adding to the football team's recent troubles, a statement by the NCAA indicated the university will face more scrutiny over the most recent rules transgression.
The "facts submitted by the university have raised further questions that need to be answered before the reinstatement process is complete," the NCAA said.
The three players violated NCAA rules by taking $200 at a Cleveland charity event earlier this year, according to records released Thursday.
The records indicated the athletes gave varying accounts for why they received the money and who they received it from.
by furls » Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:40 pm
Varying accounts surely because they're naive and were duped by people preying on that naivete. Definitely not entitled, selfish and stupid given the circumstances.
by pup » Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:46 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:39 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:43 pm
Everything I have EVER heard about these guys is that they are all ideal teammates, great guys and that they are revered by their coaches..
by pup » Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:40 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I've been to several charity events where they pay people who work them cash. It's not uncommon.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:27 am
by peeker643 » Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:27 am
furls wrote:Varying accounts surely because they're naive and were duped by people preying on that naivete. Definitely not entitled, selfish and stupid given the circumstances.
Boy Brian, I hope you are basing this on your direct interaction with these guys (or perhaps reliable second hand info). I would hate to think that you are implying that every NCAAF player is the same, particularly guys volunteering at a charity event.
Everything I have EVER heard about these guys is that they are all ideal teammates, great guys and that they are revered by their coaches. I am not familiar enough with the NCAA bylaws to say how stupid they are. I am not sure if there are any provisions for reimbursement for non profit events (I would tend to think so, but I would also think that it would have to be more above board than grabbing cash out of some guys hand), of if these guys just took a 200 handshake or what, nor do we know the timeframe of the event.
I would hope that they could at least give these guys gas money up and down I-71. Not excusing what could be dumb actions, I am just sick of the sanctimonious, rush to judgment bullshit from the media and the fans.
by pup » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:10 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Or maybe they just received payment for services rendered. I think that's a possibility.
by furls » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:20 pm
peeker643 wrote:furls wrote:Varying accounts surely because they're naive and were duped by people preying on that naivete. Definitely not entitled, selfish and stupid given the circumstances.
Boy Brian, I hope you are basing this on your direct interaction with these guys (or perhaps reliable second hand info). I would hate to think that you are implying that every NCAAF player is the same, particularly guys volunteering at a charity event.
Everything I have EVER heard about these guys is that they are all ideal teammates, great guys and that they are revered by their coaches. I am not familiar enough with the NCAA bylaws to say how stupid they are. I am not sure if there are any provisions for reimbursement for non profit events (I would tend to think so, but I would also think that it would have to be more above board than grabbing cash out of some guys hand), of if these guys just took a 200 handshake or what, nor do we know the timeframe of the event.
I would hope that they could at least give these guys gas money up and down I-71. Not excusing what could be dumb actions, I am just sick of the sanctimonious, rush to judgment bullshit from the media and the fans.
"Given the circumstances...."
It's not complicated. Really. And they didn't 'volunteer' if 'volunteer means donate your time for a cause. They were paid more money than many people make for a full day's work. There are people on these boards who would rightfully kill for a $200/day job. Many of them with college educations and student loans they owe on.
Given the circumstances doing what they did is selfish and stupid. Like I said, I understand that's not going to go over well with alum and people more invested than I am.
Makes it no less true.
And that's not being a good teammate. You can have at it all day and call me what you will, but taking that cash fucking money without checking to see if it was cool or even confirming they could be there is stupid and selfish. Most of the time that's the antithesis of 'good teammate'. Regardless of who you're playing, 'good teammates' are typically the ones on the field with you and not the ones serving NCAA/University suspensions that come less than a couple months after 5 more good teammates were suspended and your program was hung on a cross to the joy and glee of the nation.
Tired of the excuses. People try and minimize the story down there initially with it being 'breast cancer charity gift bags'. That's fucking sick. I mean it really is. Could there be a more sympathetic excuse?
It was simply fucking money. And it was simply fucking stupid.
I guess ymmv. I just don't know how.
by peeker643 » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:20 pm
pup wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Or maybe they just received payment for services rendered. I think that's a possibility.
No it is not. You cannot be paid for services rendered. You can be reimbursed for the costs you incur to attend the function. That is all.
by e0y2e3 » Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:49 pm

by e0y2e3 » Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:12 pm

by peeker643 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:36 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:48 pm
peeker643 wrote:nm- just not worth it.
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:07 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:peeker643 wrote:nm- just not worth it.
What? No more preaching? C'mon, Cotton Mather, let's hear more of your incredible character assessments.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:17 pm
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:peeker643 wrote:nm- just not worth it.
What? No more preaching? C'mon, Cotton Mather, let's hear more of your incredible character assessments.
Nope. Nothing gets through the impenetrable scarlet vests. These are just young kids who deserve our love and forgiveness. Unless they're from Free Shoes Univ or The U. Then they're fucking low life criminals.
You guys can judge when it's convenient for you to do so. You don't need me to excel there.
by motherscratcher » Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:01 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:05 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:13 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 11, 2011 7:32 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:02 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Mather might be Peek's great great great great great great great grandfather. They look very similar. Instead of The Devil In New England, it's The Devil In Columbus.
Powdered wigs are coming back.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:26 pm
It's funny because you used to the winking smiley.Carry on.![]()
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:40 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I changed my mind, uncle Cotton. You get the stake ready and i'll stoke the pyre.
Fact: Jordan Hall turned my neighbor into a newt.It's funny because you used to the winking smiley.Carry on.![]()
I still remember when you said "fuck you, Mr. Moral Compass" to Jfill, that was fun.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:52 pm
it's just insulting when the best I get is that my life needs to be perfect for me to say what I said or that it's throwing morality stones.
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:59 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Now adress my neighbor the newt, asshole.
oh almost forgot

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:05 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:10 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:lol.
I ran over my own damn hose with the mower today..
by furls » Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:05 pm
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I changed my mind, uncle Cotton. You get the stake ready and i'll stoke the pyre.
Fact: Jordan Hall turned my neighbor into a newt.It's funny because you used to the winking smiley.Carry on.![]()
I still remember when you said "fuck you, Mr. Moral Compass" to Jfill, that was fun.
Holy Ted Ginn Jr. A KO return for a TD and 59 seconds later a PR for a TD.
I spoke nothing in regard to their morality.
I said they were stupid for doing what they did when they did it.
And those who can't own it (but who are fine with judging kids/criminals at other schools) make me laugh.![]()
Disputing it's stupid is stupid.
Nothing to do with morality.
You sound like a politician spinning an uncomfortable truth into something else entirely. I understand the tactic. It works with regularity. I'm just not getting sidetracked with Cotton Mather blather.![]()
It's just insulting when the best I get is that my life needs to be perfect for me to say what I said or that it's throwing morality stones.
It's not. It's a simple statement of opinion backed up by the fact that hat they did is stupid. Buckeye fans act like you're anally raping their Labs should you be critical of their poor, naive, oppressed student athletes.![]()
Stupid is as stupid does.
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:26 pm
Nope Peek, you missed the point. Is taking money stupid, yep. Do you understand/know all the facts? I don't. If you do, please enlighten me. All I have is rumors. Rumors I got is that it was some charity event in Feb of this year.
Please point me to all your data points that label these three guys as entitled. Is this event one? Yep. So can I characterize you as a criminal because of a speeding ticket?
Calling someone entitled, and they may well be I don't know, is a pretty serious thing (particularly if you have never had any interaction or second hand interaction with them). You are painting all these guys with the same brush and it really isn't fair.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:41 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:46 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:So I guess it's entirely impossible it was just an honest mistake.
Didn't you learn anything from Fredo's fishing trip? You never go against the family.
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests