Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by motherscratcher » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:19 pm
by Adverb Harry » Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:43 pm
by Dnthateonthepronk » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:57 pm
Adverb Harry wrote:The best part is that when he finally returns (beginning of 2013?), he'll still have a suspension to serve. Nice.

by motherscratcher » Fri Sep 02, 2011 6:59 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:The best part is that when he finally returns (beginning of 2013?), he'll still have a suspension to serve. Nice.
by peeker643 » Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:02 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:The best part is that when he finally returns (beginning of 2013?), he'll still have a suspension to serve. Nice.
Why don't they just add him to the roster now, let him serve his suspension, and then add him to the 60DL?
by bookelly » Sat Sep 03, 2011 1:38 am
peeker643 wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:The best part is that when he finally returns (beginning of 2013?), he'll still have a suspension to serve. Nice.
Why don't they just add him to the roster now, let him serve his suspension, and then add him to the 60DL?
Might not sit well given it would be a complete shamockery.

by andrew6586 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:42 am
motherscratcher wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:The best part is that when he finally returns (beginning of 2013?), he'll still have a suspension to serve. Nice.
Why don't they just add him to the roster now, let him serve his suspension, and then add him to the 60DL?
by gotribe31 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:44 am
andrew6586 wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:The best part is that when he finally returns (beginning of 2013?), he'll still have a suspension to serve. Nice.
Why don't they just add him to the roster now, let him serve his suspension, and then add him to the 60DL?
I thought that the suspension was voided when he went on the DL. I'm pretty sure that's what Hoynsie put on twitter unless I read it wrong.

by andrew6586 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:01 pm
gotribe31 wrote:andrew6586 wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:Adverb Harry wrote:The best part is that when he finally returns (beginning of 2013?), he'll still have a suspension to serve. Nice.
Why don't they just add him to the roster now, let him serve his suspension, and then add him to the 60DL?
I thought that the suspension was voided when he went on the DL. I'm pretty sure that's what Hoynsie put on twitter unless I read it wrong.
Suspension isn't voided, just put on hold. He'll have to serve it when he comes back.
by googleeph2 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:07 pm
by peeker643 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 12:11 pm
googleeph2 wrote:We knew some of this impressive wave of young pitchers would get hurt.

by WiscTribeFan » Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:49 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:03 pm
MLBastian Jordan Bastian
Indians RHP Carlos Carrasco will undergo Tommy John surgery on Wednesday. Likely to miss all of 2012 season.
23 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply
MLBastian Jordan Bastian
Acta, on Carrasco: "He's going to miss a year, basically. That's hard to swallow."
20 minutes ago Unfavorite Retweet Reply
by peeker643 » Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:14 pm
MLBastian Jordan Bastian
Soloff: Carrasco likely suffered "traumatic" elbow injury as a teenager. MRI now revealed damage consistent with old injury. Surgery needed.
8 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply
MLBastian Jordan Bastian
Not giving MRIs during trades is normal. The only player in 5-player Ubaldo trade to undergo full physical exam (MRI included) was Ubaldo.
6 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply »
MLBastian Jordan Bastian
Carrasco's 1st MRI as a pro was this past April. RT @smyry: How did that not turn up in comprensive physical before the Lee deal?
7 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply
by skatingtripods » Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:19 pm
by leadpipe » Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:46 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Can't believe with TINSTAAPP, teams don't require a full physical/MRI on every trade involving a prominent pitching prospect. I can't hate on the Indians because it's not standard operating procedure, but for christ sake, it was an injury the kid suffered somewhere between 6-10 years ago.
Furthermore, if he had an MRI in April, why didn't they see it then, do TJS, and have him back by May of 2012?
by peeker643 » Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:22 pm
The irrational exuberance that develops over teenagers who can propel horsehide at high velocity is one of those inside-baseball things that, as an outsider, I just don't get and don't want to. The path from dominating teenagers in states with two-word names to being a successful major-league pitcher is long and difficult. One-hundred forty years into the baseball industry, how to navigate that path is still an open question, and while there's been progress, I see no one turning teenagers into rotation starters on a regular basis.
Then again, I'm dogmatic about TNSTAAPP. I pretty much believe that you can throw all pitchers into a bin until they're 21 years old or in Triple-A. (If a pitcher is at Triple-A at 20, that's a warning sign as well.) It's not a performance analysis thing, because even great numbers from teenagers aren't going to sway me. It's just a concession to what we know about physics and physiology, and how the two intersect at the corner of Jobe and Andrews.
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: TouchEmAllTime and 4 guests