Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:31 pm
by Am I Here Again? » Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:19 pm
'Bout time!!! 

by WiscTribeFan » Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:24 pm
by Am I Here Again? » Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:37 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:53 pm
Am I Here Again? wrote:But if there are more men on the bench there are fewer opportunities for Matty to be put in to play.Maybe. Depends on if Acta thinks more playing time will improve the quality of his work. Yeah, haven't we been there-done that?
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:58 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:00 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:This is bullshit, Columbus should have the option to decline him.
by skatingtripods » Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:12 pm
by NH Tribe Fan » Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:34 pm
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:39 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Santana at 1B everyday. He might work almost exclusively at 1B all next spring because his days as a catcher look numbered.
by Spin » Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:09 pm
NH Tribe Fan wrote:Yeah, more than anything I think this is a strong shot across the bow for LaPorta. I expect they bring in a low priced veteran or use Carlos to battle Matt at 1b next spring.

by Am I Here Again? » Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:39 pm
statmasta wrote:...According to this July article...
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2011/7 ... ly-edition
...he's above average defensively, ranking 35th out of 94 catchers.
by leadpipe » Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:42 pm
statmasta wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Santana at 1B everyday. He might work almost exclusively at 1B all next spring because his days as a catcher look numbered.
I don't see why that's the case. It's not like he doesn't have the ability. He's a very skilled athlete. He just needs to learn how to play the position better and more consistently. It's not a matter of he can't do it, just a matter of he isn't doing it ...yet.
Once he learns to stay down on balls on the dirt so they hit his chest protector, and gets better footwork when throwing on base stealers, he could be great. Hell, he's not even THAT bad right now.
According to this July article...
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2011/7 ... ly-edition
...he's above average defensively, ranking 35th out of 94 catchers.
by motherscratcher » Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:31 pm
WiscTribeFan wrote:Until Th when the rosters expand. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I'd be shocked if he stayed in C-Bus for very long.
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:47 pm
motherscratcher wrote:WiscTribeFan wrote:Until Th when the rosters expand. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I'd be shocked if he stayed in C-Bus for very long.
He has to spend 10 days in AAA before he can be recalled. Unless there is an injury we won't be seeing him until football season.

by RedDawg53 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:55 pm
motherscratcher wrote:WiscTribeFan wrote:Until Th when the rosters expand. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I'd be shocked if he stayed in C-Bus for very long.
He has to spend 10 days in AAA before he can be recalled. Unless there is an injury we won't be seeing him until football season.
by redneckofsc » Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:59 pm
by gotribe31 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:03 pm
leadpipe wrote:statmasta wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Santana at 1B everyday. He might work almost exclusively at 1B all next spring because his days as a catcher look numbered.
I don't see why that's the case. It's not like he doesn't have the ability. He's a very skilled athlete. He just needs to learn how to play the position better and more consistently. It's not a matter of he can't do it, just a matter of he isn't doing it ...yet.
Once he learns to stay down on balls on the dirt so they hit his chest protector, and gets better footwork when throwing on base stealers, he could be great. Hell, he's not even THAT bad right now.
According to this July article...
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2011/7 ... ly-edition
...he's above average defensively, ranking 35th out of 94 catchers.
Ask every pitcher on the staff who he'd rather throw to.
That counts more than any data they are throwing in their defensive calculators. Not to mention, if those same guys were actually watching the games. I'm sure his ranking would not be that high.
To the point of him having the skills to improve, fine, but right now he's CLEARLY not in Marson's league back there, as a matter of fact, he's been close to as big a hack there as he's been at first, but not quite.
Again, for the hundreth time on this subject, there's a reason nearly every damn team has a guy back there that appears to have little idea how to hit. It's also a fact that every one of these teams could find some big dummy to throw back there and rake. There's a reason they don't. Cause you control the pitcher, you control the game. And it's hard for the stat crew to comprehend, but there's a hell of a lot you can't quantify. Those same pitchers that would choose Marson over Santana - hell, a few of them probably couldn't tell you why, but a good receiver has that something, and it has a ton of value. Again, if it didn't, we'd be seeing a hell of a lot more hitting catchers.
At this moment, Santana is a young promising guy back there that can hit.
Marson is a catcher.

by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:06 pm
redneckofsc wrote:LaPorta sucks.
So does Magruder

by skatingtripods » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:07 pm
gotribe31 wrote:I have a hard time thinking that if Santana came up to Sandy after this season and said "hey coach, can you turn me into a catcher over the next 4 months?" that Sandy would say no. He does that, and I think he could be 100% better next season. If not, we'll be looking at more of the same behind the dish.
by motherscratcher » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:16 pm
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:25 pm
motherscratcher wrote:You guys are probab,y right. He has been brutal at times behind the plate. He ultimately might end up at 1st or DH.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:26 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:motherscratcher wrote:You guys are probab,y right. He has been brutal at times behind the plate. He ultimately might end up at 1st or DH.
sorry couldnt get it any bigger
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:36 pm
leadpipe wrote:statmasta wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Santana at 1B everyday. He might work almost exclusively at 1B all next spring because his days as a catcher look numbered.
I don't see why that's the case. It's not like he doesn't have the ability. He's a very skilled athlete. He just needs to learn how to play the position better and more consistently. It's not a matter of he can't do it, just a matter of he isn't doing it ...yet.
Once he learns to stay down on balls on the dirt so they hit his chest protector, and gets better footwork when throwing on base stealers, he could be great. Hell, he's not even THAT bad right now.
According to this July article...
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2011/7 ... ly-edition
...he's above average defensively, ranking 35th out of 94 catchers.
Ask every pitcher on the staff who he'd rather throw to.
That counts more than any data they are throwing in their defensive calculators. Not to mention, if those same guys were actually watching the games. I'm sure his ranking would not be that high.
To the point of him having the skills to improve, fine, but right now he's CLEARLY not in Marson's league back there, as a matter of fact, he's been close to as big a hack there as he's been at first, but not quite.
Again, for the hundreth time on this subject, there's a reason nearly every damn team has a guy back there that appears to have little idea how to hit. It's also a fact that every one of these teams could find some big dummy to throw back there and rake. There's a reason they don't. Cause you control the pitcher, you control the game. And it's hard for the stat crew to comprehend, but there's a hell of a lot you can't quantify. Those same pitchers that would choose Marson over Santana - hell, a few of them probably couldn't tell you why, but a good receiver has that something, and it has a ton of value. Again, if it didn't, we'd be seeing a hell of a lot more hitting catchers.
At this moment, Santana is a young promising guy back there that can hit.
Marson is a catcher.
by motherscratcher » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:38 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:motherscratcher wrote:You guys are probab,y right. He has been brutal at times behind the plate. He ultimately might end up at 1st or DH.
sorry couldnt get it any bigger
by motherscratcher » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:40 pm
by motherscratcher » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:41 pm
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:41 pm
motherscratcher wrote:You guys are probab,y right. He has been brutal at times behind the plate. He ultimately might end up at 1st or DH.
But, he has the potential. And an average defensive catcher that can mash like this guy can (and he's just scratching the surface) is such a rare and wonderful thing, I just hate the thought of bailing on that too early. Hate it.
Looks like I'm in the minority, but I don't want him moved from behind the plate yet.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:42 pm
motherscratcher wrote:BYW Statmasta, Santana is far from worthless at first base. But I get what you're saying.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:46 pm
skatingtripods wrote:gotribe31 wrote:I have a hard time thinking that if Santana came up to Sandy after this season and said "hey coach, can you turn me into a catcher over the next 4 months?" that Sandy would say no. He does that, and I think he could be 100% better next season. If not, we'll be looking at more of the same behind the dish.
Why hasn't this been done already? Or, maybe it has, and Santana just doesn't care about anything but hitting.
Until he wants to deal with pain, he'll continue to be a shitty catcher. Watch how he bails on every pitch remotely on the inner half. How he won't block the plate. How he whines and holds up the game every time a foul ball hits him.
You have to sacrifice your body to play the position. You know that. Santana knows it and doesn't want to do it.
Better off working on him at 1B so he's possibly useful there.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:46 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:motherscratcher wrote:You guys are probab,y right. He has been brutal at times behind the plate. He ultimately might end up at 1st or DH.
sorry couldnt get it any bigger
Dude is 25. I am absolutely floored that, before the end of his first full season, you are ready to make hi a DH. Ridiculous.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:48 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:motherscratcher wrote:You guys are probab,y right. He has been brutal at times behind the plate. He ultimately might end up at 1st or DH.
sorry couldnt get it any bigger
Dude is 25. I am absolutely floored that, before the end of his first full season, you are ready to make hi a DH. Ridiculous.
Its not that I want too, I'm fine with them trying next year to make him a 1st baseman since outside of the temporarily resurgent Beau Mills, we have nobody at the position. I was just more stressing the fact that I IMO I think he eventually ends up at DH.
The only defensive tool I have seen is his arm, and he doesn't know how to use it. I have seen him play terrible defense, display a terrible attitude, and in some instances act like a giant pussy. Could this stuff get fixes? Yes. My gut just tells me it doesn't. The kid just seems un-coachable. I pray to God its a maturity thing and he gets over it.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:54 pm
statmasta wrote:Really? All you see is his arm? The man is an athlete. If all you see is his arm, the problem is you, not him.
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:56 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:motherscratcher wrote:You guys are probab,y right. He has been brutal at times behind the plate. He ultimately might end up at 1st or DH.
sorry couldnt get it any bigger
Dude is 25. I am absolutely floored that, before the end of his first full season, you are ready to make hi a DH. Ridiculous.
Its not that I want too, I'm fine with them trying next year to make him a 1st baseman since outside of the temporarily resurgent Beau Mills, we have nobody at the position. I was just more stressing the fact that I IMO I think he eventually ends up at DH.
The only defensive tool I have seen is his arm, and he doesn't know how to use it. I have seen him play terrible defense, display a terrible attitude, and in some instances act like a giant pussy. Could this stuff get fixes? Yes. My gut just tells me it doesn't. The kid just seems un-coachable. I pray to God its a maturity thing and he gets over it.
by skatingtripods » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:57 pm
statmasta wrote:Really? All you see is his arm? The man is an athlete. If all you see is his arm, the problem is you, not him.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 10:59 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:statmasta wrote:Really? All you see is his arm? The man is an athlete. If all you see is his arm, the problem is you, not him.
Are you related to him or something?
I see a guy who is so athletic he has yet to find a position he can play...well...consistently.
He was athletic enough to play third....but he wasn't very good so they moved him. He was athletic enough to play catcher, where he has been average at best, so they have half moved him to first, where "athletically" he can play but not play very well.
He is young and all that can change, so can he get better? Yes, the ability is there...buried beneath some extremely hard-headedness. ( yes i made up a word )
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:02 pm
skatingtripods wrote:statmasta wrote:Really? All you see is his arm? The man is an athlete. If all you see is his arm, the problem is you, not him.
Enlighten us to what you do see. Because it's obviously not the same game we all watch nightly.
by Dnthateonthepronk » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:03 pm
statmasta wrote:Dnthateonthepronk wrote:statmasta wrote:Really? All you see is his arm? The man is an athlete. If all you see is his arm, the problem is you, not him.
Are you related to him or something?
I see a guy who is so athletic he has yet to find a position he can play...well...consistently.
He was athletic enough to play third....but he wasn't very good so they moved him. He was athletic enough to play catcher, where he has been average at best, so they have half moved him to first, where "athletically" he can play but not play very well.
He is young and all that can change, so can he get better? Yes, the ability is there...buried beneath some extremely hard-headedness. ( yes i made up a word )
"average at best" relative to who?
Have you seen the other starting catchers in this league? Saltalamacchia, Russell Martin, John Jaso, Alex Avila, AJ Pierzynski, Yorvit Torrealaba.....
They're not that good. Santana is average to above average defensively. Stop using Lou Marson as the measuring stick. He's on another level, he's elite. But we don't need Santana to be elite.
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:04 pm
by motherscratcher » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:08 pm
peeker643 wrote:The bottom line is he's NOT an average or above average catcher right now. And he's often not well received in the dugout or clubhouse. We've been through this, I've said it a dozen times even before Asdrubal nearly pinned him by the throat to the dugout wall two weeks ago because of his laziness.
If it's a question of maturity he's got a chance to be a fine catcher made more valuable because of a really good bat that's still developing (scary as that may be).
If it's a lack of motivation or laziness he's fucked behind the plate and it doesn't matter what tools he does or doesn't have.
Time will tell.
by motherscratcher » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:12 pm
by motherscratcher » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:13 pm
peeker643 wrote:There's already a thread for this. Let's get back to all agreeing LaPorta is a toad.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:14 pm
peeker643 wrote:The bottom line is he's NOT an average or above average catcher right now. And he's often not well received in the dugout or clubhouse. We've been through this, I've said it a dozen times even before Asdrubal nearly pinned him by the throat to the dugout wall two weeks ago because of his laziness.
If it's a question of maturity he's got a chance to be a fine catcher made more valuable because of a really good bat that's still developing (scary as that may be).
If it's a lack of motivation or laziness he's fucked behind the plate and it doesn't matter what tools he does or doesn't have.
Time will tell.
by skatingtripods » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:23 pm
statmasta wrote:Now I'd like you to enlighten us on what makes him soft. According to you he can't deal with pain, even though according to a writer who actually knows Santana a little bit, that's completely false.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:28 pm
motherscratcher wrote:One more thing, if Santana is the 35th best defensive catcher, that means there is a better cat her for every team in MLB right now. So I'm not sure why that's supposed to be impressive or somehow make him above average.
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:30 pm
statmasta wrote:peeker643 wrote:The bottom line is he's NOT an average or above average catcher right now. And he's often not well received in the dugout or clubhouse. We've been through this, I've said it a dozen times even before Asdrubal nearly pinned him by the throat to the dugout wall two weeks ago because of his laziness.
If it's a question of maturity he's got a chance to be a fine catcher made more valuable because of a really good bat that's still developing (scary as that may be).
If it's a lack of motivation or laziness he's fucked behind the plate and it doesn't matter what tools he does or doesn't have.
Time will tell.
I completely disagree with that. That's kind of like when somebody says so-and-so player is top 5 in the league or all-time or whatever. Well, yeah, making a relative statement like that is easy when you're not actually bringing up the player's peers.
The other catchers in this league really aren't that good. I'd say the only great defensive catchers are Wieters and Marson, and then there's a notable dropoff to the 2nd tier, and I have no problem putting Santana in that tier with guys like Russell Martin, Brayan Pena, and Drew Butera.
I think where a lot of this talk of him not being any good comes from is expectations. We all heard about what a talent he is, so whenever he does something good, well he's supposed to do that. But whenever he makes a mistake it's magnified. The disappointment that I and others as fans feel outweight the positive emotions from good plays. But I think when we objectively look at him and his peers in the AL, he's not bad at all. We get frustrated with Santana, but I guarantee other fans are frustrated with their catchers as well.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:32 pm
skatingtripods wrote:statmasta wrote:Now I'd like you to enlighten us on what makes him soft. According to you he can't deal with pain, even though according to a writer who actually knows Santana a little bit, that's completely false.
Have you seen him block the plate all season long?
How many times have you seen him sacrifice his body to block a ball in the dirt?
The ONE time I saw him use his body was when he ran over the opposing catcher.
Name another guy on the team who ducks and bends away from every pitch in off the plate by a fraction of an inch. He's been rung up on borderline inside pitches because he's giving the illusion that they're farther away from him and therefore must be on the inside corner.
He looks pissed off every time a ball hits him on a tip while Lou Marson smiles and asks the ump for a ball. He doesn't delay the game by wandering around looking like someone just murdered his dog. I haven't seen an opposing catcher pout like Santana when hit by a ball.
Stand in there and be a man. Block the plate like you're supposed to. Get down and sacrifice your body to block pitches in the dirt.
Seen him go hard in to the 2B to break up a double play this year? I can't remember a time.
Who is this writer?
Like McPeek said, there's already a Santana thread. But the fact that they sent LaPorta down and are letting Marson catch every day isn't just coincidence. It's because Lou Marson's a far superior catcher. Today. Tomorrow. And in 10 years.
Santana's future is not at that position.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:34 pm
peeker643 wrote:statmasta wrote:peeker643 wrote:The bottom line is he's NOT an average or above average catcher right now. And he's often not well received in the dugout or clubhouse. We've been through this, I've said it a dozen times even before Asdrubal nearly pinned him by the throat to the dugout wall two weeks ago because of his laziness.
If it's a question of maturity he's got a chance to be a fine catcher made more valuable because of a really good bat that's still developing (scary as that may be).
If it's a lack of motivation or laziness he's fucked behind the plate and it doesn't matter what tools he does or doesn't have.
Time will tell.
I completely disagree with that. That's kind of like when somebody says so-and-so player is top 5 in the league or all-time or whatever. Well, yeah, making a relative statement like that is easy when you're not actually bringing up the player's peers.
The other catchers in this league really aren't that good. I'd say the only great defensive catchers are Wieters and Marson, and then there's a notable dropoff to the 2nd tier, and I have no problem putting Santana in that tier with guys like Russell Martin, Brayan Pena, and Drew Butera.
I think where a lot of this talk of him not being any good comes from is expectations. We all heard about what a talent he is, so whenever he does something good, well he's supposed to do that. But whenever he makes a mistake it's magnified. The disappointment that I and others as fans feel outweight the positive emotions from good plays. But I think when we objectively look at him and his peers in the AL, he's not bad at all. We get frustrated with Santana, but I guarantee other fans are frustrated with their catchers as well.
Sigh- Right after I said let's move this to the other Santana thread.![]()
Guys like Brian Schneider and Yadier Molina are better catchers/receivers/game callers etc behind the dish. Gerald Laird and Henry Blanco as well. Mauer was but he's nearly useless in the spot now. Rod Barajas is highly thought of defensively as is David Ross. There was a metric out there that took into consideration defensive stats and number of runs saved vs. allowed from the spot a year or two ago.
There are plenty Stat. If I find the article I'll link it.
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:37 pm
statmasta wrote:motherscratcher wrote:One more thing, if Santana is the 35th best defensive catcher, that means there is a better cat her for every team in MLB right now. So I'm not sure why that's supposed to be impressive or somehow make him above average.
Most of those catchers above him are either backups (Marson, Shoppach, Hanigan, Butera, Blanco, Pena, Napoli, R. Rivera, Varitek, Powell, Pudge, Ross, Bard, Schneider, Laird, Hayes) or riding the train between Triple-A and the majors (Gimenez, Teagarden, McKenry, M. Rivera, G Molina, Sardinha, Tatum).
So those guys make up 23 of the 34 guys ahead of Santana. There are only 11 starters, according to that analysis, that are better than Santana (Wieters, Ramos, Hernandez, Ruiz, Hundley, Posey, Y Molina, Soto, Barajas, Montero, Buck).
That makes Santana an above average defensive starting catcher.
by statmasta » Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:38 pm
motherscratcher wrote:And Statmasta, we are in agreement that he should remains catcher, but if you think he's been above average behind the dish this year you've been watching the wrong games.
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
